Repeated Audiometry After Bacterial Meningitis: Consequences for Future Management

Detecting Hearing Loss Through Targeted Surveillance: Risk Registry and Surveillance Timeframe Recommendations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to inform the revision of a targeted surveillance risk registry by identifying which risk factors predict postnatally identified hearing loss (PNIHL) in children who pass newborn hearing screening and to determine whether hearing surveillance beyond the age of 1 year is warranted.

METHOD

We used retrospective analysis of the audiological outcomes of children born in the state of Queensland, Australia, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, who passed the newborn hearing screen with risk factors.

RESULTS

Approximately one third of children were lost to follow-up and could not be included in the analysis. Risk factors that predicted PNIHL in the analyzed cohort were as follows: syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, perinatal infections, and family history of permanent childhood hearing loss. Severe asphyxia did not predict PNIHL but yielded some cases of significant bilateral hearing loss. Hearing loss in children with a history of prolonged ventilation was mild and/or unilateral in nature (except in cases where the hearing loss was due to an unrelated etiology). There were no cases of PNIHL in children with hyperbilirubinemia or neonatal bacterial meningitis. For the risk factors that predicted PNIHL, nearly all hearing losses were detected by 1 year of age, except for children with family history where one quarter of hearing losses had a later onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The four risk factors recommended for efficient postnatal identification of hearing loss are as follows: syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, perinatal infection, and family history of permanent childhood hearing loss. Hearing surveillance through to 1 year old is sufficient except for children with a family history, where a second phase assessment is indicated. Alternative targeted surveillance protocols and models of care are required to minimize loss to follow-up.

Neonatal bacterial meningitis: hearing screening and audiological monitoring outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study reviewed the outcomes of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and ongoing hearing monitoring in children following recovery from neonatal bacterial meningitis to determine (a) whether screening may be a suitable alternative to diagnostic audiology for detecting permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) and (b) whether infants who pass UNHS should be monitored throughout childhood.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a UNHS database.

STUDY SAMPLE

Data were extracted from the state-wide UNHS database for all children born in Queensland Australia between 1 September 2004 and 30 June 2020 with the risk factor of bacterial meningitis (in isolation or in combination with other risk factors) identified at the time of the UNHS. This cohort included 231 children.

RESULTS

Results showed that all post-meningitic infants diagnosed with PCHL had a refer result on the UNHS or were medically excluded from screening. Additionally, no cases of PCHL were identified through the targeted surveillance program following a pass result on UNHS.

CONCLUSIONS

UNHS may be sufficient to detect PCHL in post-meningitic neonates and routine audiological monitoring may not be required for children who pass the screen.

Protocol for Evaluation and Management of Hearing Loss After Meningitis

Bacterial meningitis is the most common cause of post-natal acquired hearing loss in children. Although cochlear implantation helps in improving the hearing in these patients, the fibrosis and ossification of the cochlear lumen that occurs as a result of bacterial meningitis, limits the chances of successful implantation. In developing countries like India, the reduced awareness, limited resources, and financial constraints warrant judicial use of radiological and audiological tests to increase the rate of successful cochlear implantation. The present paper is a review of the literature and a proposed protocol for follow-up of post-meningitis patients to help clinicians diagnose and hence, intervene early when profound hearing loss occurs. Every patient who has had an episode of bacterial meningitis must be followed up for atleast 2 years for possible hearing loss with frequent audiological and radiological evaluation, as required. Cochlear implantation must be done as early as possible when profound hearing loss is detected.

[Clinical protocol: audiological assessment of infants in Russian Federation. Part II]

This is the second part of the previously published clinical protocol of audiological assessment in infants. The goal of the protocol is unification approaches to audiological diagnosis of the infants. The following sections were included in the second part of the protocol: behavioral testing in infants, testing sequence, duration of the examination and necessity in follow-up, hearing assessment in special cases (premature children, children with congenital infections, after meningitis, with external ear abnormalities, single-sided deafness, with hydrocephalus and shunts, with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, with mild hearing loss and otitis media with effusion), medical report.

Predicting hearing loss from 10 years of universal newborn hearing screening results and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether demographic variables, risk factor presence or absence and universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) results can be used to predict permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) in infants referred from screening.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a UNHS database.

STUDY SAMPLE

Data were extracted from the state-wide UNHS database storing details of the 613,027 infants who were born in Queensland, Australia between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016 and participated in UNHS. This study included the 6735 children who were referred from the UNHS program for diagnostic audiology due to failing the screen in one or both ears or bypassing screening.

RESULTS

Factors with a significant positive association with PCHL that were incorporated into a logistic regression model were: female gender, non-indigenous status, family history of PCHL, craniofacial anomalies and syndromes associated with PCHL, and a bilateral refer result on screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Odds of PCHL vary among infants referred for diagnostic assessment from UNHS programs. When an infant refers on the newborn hearing screen, information about their gender, indigenous status, identified risk factors and specific screening outcome can be used to predict the likelihood of a congenital PCHL diagnosis.