Electrocochleographic Responses Before and After Short-Term Suprathreshold Electrical Stimulation in Human Cochlear Implant Recipients

Steady-state auditory motion based potentials evoked by intermittent periodic virtual sound source and the effect of auditory noise on EEG enhancement

Hearing is one of the most important human perception forms, and humans can capture the movement of sound in complex environments. On the basis of this phenomenon, this study explored the possibility of eliciting a steady-state brain response in an intermittent periodic motion sound source. In this study, a novel discrete continuous and orderly change of sound source positions stimulation paradigm was designed based on virtual sound using head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). And then the auditory motion stimulation paradigms with different noise levels were designed by changing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The characteristics of brain response and the effects of different noises on brain response were studied by analyzing electroencephalogram (EEG) signals evoked by the proposed stimulation. Experimental results showed that the proposed paradigm could elicit a novel steady-state auditory evoked potential (AEP), i.e., steady-state motion auditory evoked potential (SSMAEP). And moderate noise could enhance SSMAEP amplitude and corresponding brain connectivity. This study enriches the types of AEPs and provides insights into the mechanism of brain processing of motion sound sources and the impact of noise on brain processing.

Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

Different patterns of electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array have been described. However, the implications of these patterns remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to correlate different peri- and postoperative electrocochleographic patterns with four-point impedance measurements and preservation of residual hearing.

DESIGN

Thirty-nine subjects with residual low-frequency hearing which were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array could prospectively be included. Intracochlear electrocochleographic recordings and four-point impedance measurements along the 22 electrodes of the array (EL, most apical EL22) were conducted immediately after complete insertion and 3 months after surgery. Hearing preservation was assessed after 3 months.

RESULTS

In perioperative electrocochleographic recordings, 22 subjects (56%) showed the largest amplitude around the tip of the electrode array (apical-peak, AP, EL20 or EL22), whereas 17 subjects (44%) exhibited a maximum amplitude in more basal regions (mid-peak, MP, EL18 or lower). At 3 months, in six subjects with an AP pattern perioperatively, the location of the largest electrocochleographic response had shifted basally (apical-to-mid-peak, AP-MP). Latency was analyzed along the electrode array when this could be discerned. This was the case in 68 peri- and postoperative recordings (87% of all recordings, n = 78). The latency increased with increasing insertion depth in AP recordings (n = 38, median of EL with maximum latency shift = EL21). In MP recordings (n = 30), the maximum latency shift was detectable more basally (median EL12, p < 0.001). Four-point impedance measurements were available at both time points in 90% (n = 35) of all subjects. At the 3-month time point, recordings revealed lower impedances in the AP group (n = 15, mean = 222 Ω, SD = 63) than in the MP (n = 14, mean = 295 Ω, SD= 7 6) and AP-MP groups (n = 6, mean = 234 Ω, SD = 129; AP versus MP p = 0.026, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.023, MP versus AP-MP p > 0.999). The amplitudes of perioperative AP recordings showed a correlation with preoperative hearing thresholds (r2=0.351, p = 0.004). No such correlation was detectable in MP recordings (r2 = 0.033, p = 0.484). Audiograms were available at both time points in 97% (n = 38) of all subjects. The mean postoperative hearing loss in the AP group was 13 dB (n = 16, SD = 9). A significantly larger hearing loss was detectable in the MP and AP-MP groups with 28 (n = 17, SD = 10) and 35 dB (n = 6, SD = 13), respectively (AP versus MP p = 0.002, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.002, MP versus AP-MP p = 0.926).

CONCLUSION

MP and AP-MP response patterns of the electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after cochlear implantation are correlated with higher four-point impedances and poorer postoperative hearing compared to AP response patterns. The higher impedances suggest that MP and AP-MP patterns are associated with increased intracochlear fibrosis.

Implications of Phase Changes in Extracochlear Electrocochleographic Recordings During Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and implications of phase changes in extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings during cochlear implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Extracochlear ECochG recordings were performed before and after insertion of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode by a recording electrode placed on the promontory. Acoustic stimuli were tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 Hz. The pure tone average (PTA) was determined before and approximately 4 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Extracochlear ECochG recordings in 69 ears of 68 subjects were included. At 250 Hz, the mean phase change was 43° (n = 50, standard deviation (SD) 44°), at 500 Hz 36° (n = 64, SD 36°), at 750 Hz 33° (n = 42, SD 39°), and at 1,000 Hz 22° (n = 54, SD 27°). Overall, in 48 out of 210 ECochG recordings a phase change of ≥45° (23%) was detectable. Ears with an amplitude drop >3 dB and a phase change ≥45° (n = 3) had a complete or near complete loss of residual cochlear function in all cases. A phase change of ≥90° in one recording was not associated with a larger amplitude change of the ECochG signal (1.9 dB vs. -0.9 dB, p = 0.1052, n = 69), but with a significantly larger postoperative hearing loss (17 dB vs. 26 dB, p = 0.0156, n = 69).

CONCLUSIONS

Phase changes occur regularly in extracochlear ECochG recordings during cochlear implantation. Phase changes of ≥90° with or without amplitude changes in the ECochG signal are associated with a larger postoperative hearing loss and could therefore represent an independent marker for cochlear trauma or changes of inner ear mechanics relevant for the postoperative hearing outcome.

Clinical Utility of Intraoperative Electrocochleography (ECochG) During Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) as a predictive tool for preservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review employing a multi-database search strategy (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Cochrane, and Scopus) was conducted from inception to August 1, 2019. English language studies in humans were included.

STUDY SELECTION

All articles were independently reviewed by two authors according to Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies without intraoperative ECochG obtained during cochlear implantation were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Extracted variables included number of patients, ECochG recording technique, success rate of obtaining ECochG potentials, intraoperative changes in ECochG signal, and postoperative hearing preservation outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among 537 eligible articles, 22 met inclusion criteria encompassing 498 unique patients. Ten studies featured extracochlear measurements, eight featured intracochlear measurements, and four featured both. Extracochlear ECochG had an average (SD) recording success rate of 94.9% (12.7%) while intracochlear ECochG had an average (SD) recording success rate of 91.8% (9.8%). One hundred forty five unique patients from six studies had complete intraoperative ECochG data with postoperative behavioral audiometry. After accounting for study-specific definitions of ECochG signal disturbance, worsening changes in intraoperative ECochG signal predicted postoperative hearing loss with limited sensitivity and specificity and notable heterogeneity across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ECochG recordings can be obtained in over 90% of patients, but accuracy in predicting postoperative hearing loss remains limited. Standardization of intraoperative ECochG monitoring technique and data interpretation are necessary to more robustly investigate outcomes and refine technique.

Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Acoustic Hearing: A Systematic Review

(1) Objectives: This study reviews the use of electrocochleography (ECoG) as a tool for assessing the response of the peripheral auditory system and monitoring hearing preservation in the growing population of cochlear implant (CI) users with preserved hearing in the implanted ear. (2) Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL databases up to August 2020 to locate articles related to the ECoG measured during or after the cochlear implant (CI) surgery for monitoring purposes. Non-English articles, animal studies, literature reviews and editorials, case reports, and conference papers were excluded. The quality of studies was evaluated using the National Institute of Health (NIH) "Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies". (3) Results: A total 30 articles were included for the systematic review. A total of 21 articles were intraoperative ECoG studies, while seven articles were postoperative studies. Two studies were conducted ECoG both during and after the surgery. Intraoperative ECoG studies focused on monitoring changes in ECoG response amplitudes during and/or after electrode insertion and predicting the scalar location of the electrode array. Postoperative ECoG studies focused on using the ECoG measurements to estimate behavioral audiometric thresholds and monitor pathophysiological changes related to delayed onset hearing loss postimplant. (4) Conclusions: ECoG is feasible to provide real-time feedback intraoperatively and has a potential clinical value to monitor the status of hearing preservation postoperatively in this CI population with residual acoustic hearing.