Extended Retro/Infralabyrinthine Approach to Cerebellopontine Angle and Internal Auditory Canal, a Radio-Anatomic Study

Novel Multiportal Approach to the Internal Auditory Canal for Hearing-Preserving Surgery: Feasibility Assessment in Dissections

OBJECTIVE

State-of-the-art, minimally invasive endoscopic transcanal surgery of the internal auditory canal (IAC) sacrifices the cochlea with complete hearing loss. With a combination of the transcanal infracochlear and transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approaches, we aim to preserve hearing and enable minimally invasive surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. In this study, we investigate the anatomical indications and the feasibility of both approaches in dissections, in human whole head specimens.

METHODS

We operated whole head anatomical specimens with a four-handed technique, using the retrolabyrinthine approach as the main surgical corridor and the infracochlear approach for endoscopic visualization. We tested 4 different powered surgical systems. We collected intraoperative data on the size of the access windows, the surgical freedom, and the exposed area of the IAC. Finally, we evaluated the outcome in postoperative computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Six out of 14 sides were anatomically suitable and qualified for the surgery based on preoperative computed tomography. In all attempted sides, the IAC could be reached and opened, leaving the ossicular chain and the labyrinth intact. 51%-75% of the length and 22%-40% of the circumference of the IAC could be exposed. All tested instruments were beneficial at different stages of the surgery. The four-handed technique enabled good maneuverability of the instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined multiportal approach to the IAC is feasible with a good surgical exposure and full anatomical preservation of hearing. State-of-the-art surgical instruments in specimens with suitable anatomy are sufficient to perform this approach.

Hearing-Preserving Approaches to the Internal Auditory Canal: Feasibility Assessment from the Perspective of an Endoscope

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approaches to the internal auditory canal sacrifice the cochlea. Two hearing-preserving approaches, the exclusively endoscopic transcanal infracochlear approach and the endoscope-assisted transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach, have been controversially discussed in the literature. In this study, we examine the feasibility of these 2 approaches by means of three-dimensional surface models, a population-based analysis of the available surgical space, and dissections in human whole-head specimens.

METHODS

We reconstructed three-dimensional surface models based on clinical high-resolution computed tomography scans of 53 adult temporal bones. For both approaches, we measured the maximal extensions and the area of the surgical access windows located between landmarks on the surrounding anatomic structures. We then identified the limiting extensions and derived the cumulative distribution to describe the available surgical space. Dissections were performed to validate the corridors and landmark selection.

RESULTS

The limiting extension for the infrachochlear approach is 7.0 ± 2.7 mm from the round window to the dome of the jugular bulb. The limiting extension for the retrolabyrinthine approach is 6.4 ± 1.5 mm from the dura of the posterior fossa to the facial nerve. The cumulative distribution shows that 80% of the cohort have access window extensions ≥3 mm for both approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in a high percentage of the measured cohort, the access windows are sufficiently large for endoscopic approaches to the internal auditory canal. With appropriate instrumentation, these hearing-preserving minimally invasive approaches may evolve into alternatives to surgical treatment.

Anatomic Assessment of the Limits of an Endoscopically Assisted Retrolabyrinthine Approach to the Internal Auditory Canal

Objective  Data regarding the surgical advantages and anatomic constraints of a hearing-preserving endoscopic-assisted retrolabyrinthine approach to the IAC are scarce. This study aimed to define the minimum amount of retrosigmoid dural exposure necessary for endoscopic exposure of the IAC and the surgical freedom of motion afforded by this approach. Methods  Presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approaches were performed on fresh cadaveric heads. The IAC was exposed under endoscopic guidance. The retrosigmoid posterior fossa dura was decompressed until the fundus of the IAC was exposed. Surgical freedom of motion at the fundus was calculated after both retrolabyrinthine and translabyrinthine approaches. Results  The IAC was entirely exposed in nine specimens with a median length of 12 mm (range: 10-13 mm). Complete IAC exposure could be achieved with 1 cm of retrosigmoid dural exposure in eight of nine mastoids. For the retrolabyrinthine approach, the median anterior-posterior surgical freedom was 13 degrees (range: 6-23 degrees) compared with 46 degrees (range: 36-53 degrees) for the translabyrinthine approach ( p  = 0.014). For the retrolabyrinthine approach, the median superior-inferior surgical freedom was 40 degrees (range 33-46 degrees) compared with 47 degrees (range: 42-51 degrees) for the translabyrinthine approach ( p  = 0.022). Conclusion  Using endoscopic assistance, the retrolabyrinthine approach can expose the entire IAC. We recommend at least 1.5 cm of retrosigmoid posterior fossa dura exposure for this approach. Although this strategy provides significantly less instrument freedom of motion in both the horizontal and vertical axes than the translabyrinthine approach, it may be appropriate for carefully selected patients with intact hearing and small-to-medium sized tumors involving the IAC.