Reducing Artifacts in Intracochlear Pressure Measurements to Study Sound Transmission by Bone Conduction Stimulation in Humans

The impact of round window reinforcement on middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation

The round window (RW) membrane plays an important role in normal inner ear mechanics. Occlusion or reinforcement of the RW has been described in the context of congenital anomalies or after cochlear implantation and is applied as a surgical treatment for hyperacusis. Multiple lumped and finite element models predict a low-frequency hearing loss with air conduction of up to 20 dB after RW reinforcement and limited to no effect on hearing with bone conduction stimulation. Experimental verification of these results, however, remains limited. Here, we present an experimental study measuring the impact of RW reinforcement on the middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation. In a within-specimen repeated measures design with human cadaveric specimens (n = 6), we compared the intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST) before and after RW reinforcement with soft tissue, cartilage, and bone cement. The differential pressure (PDIFF) across the basilar membrane - known to be closely related to the hearing sensation - was calculated as the complex difference between PSV and PST. With air conduction stimulation, both PSV and PSTincreased on average up to 22 dB at frequencies below 1500 Hz with larger effect sizes for PST compared to PSV. The PDIFF, in contrast, decreased up to 11 dB at frequencies between 700 and 800 Hz after reinforcement with bone cement. With bone conduction, the average within-specimen effects were less than 5 dB for either PSV, PST, or PDIFF. The inter-specimen variability with bone conduction, however, was considerably larger than with air conduction. This experimental study shows that RW reinforcement impacts air conduction stimulation at low frequencies. Bone conduction stimulation seems to be largely unaffected. From a clinical point of view, these results support the hypothesis that delayed loss of air conduction hearing after cochlear implantation could be partially explained by the impact of RW reinforcement.

Intracochlear pressure and temporal bone motion interaction under bone conduction stimulation

BACKGROUND

Under bone conduction (BC) stimulation, the otic capsule, and surrounding temporal bone, undergoes a complex 3-dimentional (3D) motion that depends on the frequency, location and coupling of the stimulation. The correlation between the resultant intracochlear pressure difference across the cochlear partition and the 3D motion of the otic capsule is not yet known and is to be investigated.

METHODS

Experiments were conducted in 3 fresh frozen cadaver heads, individually on each temporal bone, resulting in a total of 6 samples. The skull bone was stimulated, via the actuator of a BC hearing aid (BCHA), in the frequency range of 0.1-20 kHz. Stimulation was applied at the ipsilateral mastoid and the classical BAHA location via a conventional transcutaneous (5-N steel headband) and percutaneous coupling, sequentially. Three-dimensional motions were measured across the lateral and medial (intracranial) surfaces of the skull, the ipsilateral temporal bone, the skull base, as well as the promontory and stapes. Each measurement consisted of 130-200 measurement points (∼5-10 mm pitch) across the measured skull surface. Additionally, intracochlear pressure in the scala tympani and scala vestibuli was measured via a custom-made intracochlear acoustic receiver.

RESULTS

While there were limited differences in the magnitude of the motion across the skull base, there were major differences in the deformation of different sections of the skull. Specifically, the bone near the otic capsule remained primarily rigid across all test frequency (above 10 kHz), in contrast to the skull base, which deformed above 1-2 kHz. Above 1 kHz, the ratio, between the differential intracochlear pressure and the promontory motion, was relatively independent of coupling and stimulation location. Similarly, the stimulation direction appears to have no influence on the cochlear response, above 1 kHz.

CONCLUSIONS

The area around the otic capsule appears rigid up to significantly higher frequencies than the rest of the skull surface, resulting in primarily inertial loading of the cochlear fluid. Further work should be focused at the investigation of the solid-fluid interaction between the bony walls of the otic capsule and the cochlear contents.

Estimating vibration artifacts in preclinical experimental assessment of actuator efficiency in bone-conduction hearing devices

OBJECTIVES

Test feasibility of a means to distinguish artifact from relevant signal in an experimental method for pre-clinical assessment of bone conduction (BC) stimulation efficiency based on measurement of intracochlear pressure (ICP).

METHODS

Experiments were performed on fresh-frozen human temporal bones and cadaver heads. In a first step, fiber optic pressure sensors inserted into the cochlea through cochleostomies were intentionally vibrated to generate relative motion versus the stationary specimen, and the resulting ICP artifact recorded, before and after attaching the sensor fiber to the bone with glue. In a second step, BC stimulation was applied in the conventional location for a commercial bone anchored implant, as well as two alternative locations closer to the otic capsule. Again, ICP was recorded and compared with an estimated artifact, calculated from the previous measurements with intentional vibration of the fiber.

RESULTS

Intentional vibration of the sensor fiber creates relative motion between fiber and bone, as intended, and causes an ICP signal. The stimulus does not create substantial promontory vibration, indicating that the measured ICP is all artifact, i.e. would not occur if the sensor were not in place. Fixating the sensor fiber to the bone with glue reduces the ICP artifact by at least 20 dB. BC stimulation also creates relative motion between sensor fiber and bone, as expected, from which an estimated ICP artifact level can be calculated. The ICP signal measured during BC stimulation is well above the estimated artifact, at least in some specimens and at some frequencies, indicating "real" cochlear stimulation, which would result in an auditory percept in a live subject. Stimulation at the alternative locations closer to the otic capsule appear to result in higher ICP (no statistical analysis performed), indicating a trend towards more efficient stimulation than at the conventional location.

CONCLUSIONS

Intentional vibration of the fiber optic sensor for measurement of ICP can be used to derive an estimate of the artifact to be expected when measuring ICP during BC stimulation, and to characterize the effectiveness of glues or other means of reducing the artifact caused by relative motion of fiber and bone.

Intracochlear pressure as an objective measure for perceived loudness with bone conduction implants

BACKGROUND

The generally accepted method to assess the functionality of novel bone conduction implants in a preclinical stage is to experimentally measure the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory. Yet, bone conduction of sound is a complex propagation phenomenon, depending on both frequency and amplitude, involving different conduction pathways.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to validate the use of intracochlear sound pressure (ICP) as an objective indicator for perceived loudness for bone conduction stimulation. It is investigated whether a correlation exists between intracochlear sound pressure measurements in cadaveric temporal bones and clinically obtained results using the outcome of a loudness balancing experiment.

METHODS

Ten normal hearing subjects were asked to balance the perceived loudness between air conducted (AC) sound and bone conducted (BC) sound by changing the AC stimulus. Mean balanced thresholds were calculated and used as stimulation levels in a cadaver trial (N = 4) where intracochlear sound pressure was measured during AC and BC stimulation to assess the correlation with the measured clinical data. The intracochlear pressure was measured at the relatively low stimulation amplitude of 80 dBHL using a lock-in amplification technique.

RESULTS

Applying AC and BC stimulation at equal perceived loudness on cadaveric heads yield a similar differential intracochlear pressure, with differences between AC and BC falling within the range of variability of normal hearing test subjects.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the perceived loudness at 80 dB HL for both AC and BC validates intracochlear pressure as an objective indicator of the cochlear drive. The measurement setup is more time-intensive than measuring the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory, yet it provides direct information on the level of the cochlear scalae.

The Impact of Location and Device Coupling on the Performance of the Osia System Actuator

Active transcutaneous bone conduction (BC) devices offer the benefit of improved power output compared to passive transcutaneous devices and remove the risk of skin infections that are more common in traditional percutaneous BC devices. Despite these advantages, more research is needed on implant location, device coupling, and their influence on device performance. This study is aimed at quantifying the extent to which certain parameters affect device output when using the Osia® system actuator. Parameters under study are (1) implant location, (2) comparison with the actuator of a state-of-the-art BC device, (3) bone undergrowth simulation, and (4) skull fixation. Five human cadaveric heads were implanted with the actuator at three different implant locations: (1) recommended, (2) posterior Osia® positions, and (3) standard Baha® position. At each location, the cochlear promontory velocity and the intracochlear pressure difference were measured. A percutaneous bone conduction actuator was used as a reference for the obtained measurements. Stimulation levels corresponded to a hearing level of 60 dB HL for frequencies between 250 and 6000 Hz. In addition, bone cement was used as a simulation for reactive bone growth. Results obtained in four heads indicate an improved power transmission of the transcutaneous actuator when implanted at the recommended position compared to the actuator of the percutaneous device on its respective recommended location when stimulating at an identical force level. A correlation was found between the promontory vibration and the actuator position, indicating that the same level of stimulation leads to higher promontory vibrations when the device is implanted closer to the ear canal. This is mainly reflected at frequencies higher than 1 kHz, where an increase was observed in both measurement modalities. At lower frequencies (<1 kHz), the power transmission is less influenced by the implant position and differences between the acquired responses are limited. In addition, when no rigid coupling to the skull is provided, power transfer losses of up to 30 dB can be expected.

Output performance of the novel active transcutaneous bone conduction implant Sentio at different stimulation sites

OBJECTIVES

The output performance of a novel semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device was compared to an established percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system device using cadaver heads. The influence of actuator position, tissue growth below the actuator and mounting it on the surface or in a flattened bone bed on the performance of the implanted actuator was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The percutaneous and the new transcutaneous device were sequentially implanted at two sites in five human cadaver heads: 55 mm superior-posterior to the ear canal opening (position A) and, closer to the cochlea, about 20 mm inferior-posterior to the ear canal opening behind the pinna on the mastoid (position B). The ipsi- and contralateral cochlear promontory (CP) velocity magnitude responses to percutaneous and transcutaneous stimulation were measured using laser Doppler vibrometry. In addition, the CP vibration of the transcutaneous device placed directly on the skull bone surface was compared with the placement in a flattened bone bed at a depth of about 3 mm. Finally, the influence of placing a thin silicone interposition layer under the implanted transducer was also explored.

RESULTS

The percutaneous device provided about an 11 dB higher average CP vibration level than the transcutaneous device at frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz. The ipsilateral CP vibration responses with stimulations at position B were on average 13 dB higher compared to stimulation at position A. The placement of the transcutaneous transducer at position B provided similar or higher average vibration magnitudes than the percutaneous transducer at position A. The 3 mm deep flattened bone bed had no significant effects on the output performance. Placing a thin silicone layer under the transcutaneous transducer had no significant influence on the output of the transcutaneous device.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results using the CP vibration responses show that at frequencies above 500 Hz the new transcutaneous device at position B provides similar output levels as the percutaneous device at position A. The results also indicated that neither a bone bed for the placement of the transcutaneous transducer nor a simulated tissue growth between the actuator and the bone affect the output performance of the device.

A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Making use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostics on patients with implanted medical devices requires caution due to mutual interactions between the device and the electromagnetic fields used by the scanner that can cause a number of adverse events. The presented study offers a novel test method to quantify the risk of unintended output of acoustically stimulating hearing implants. The design and operating principle of an all-optical, MRI safe vibrometer is outlined, followed by an experimental verification of a prototype. Results obtained in an MRI environment indicate that the system can detect peak displacements down to 8 pm for audible frequencies. Feasibility testing was performed with an active middle ear implant that was exposed to several pulse sequences in a 1.5 Tesla MRI environment. Magnetic field induced actuator vibrations, measured during scanning, turned out to be equivalent to estimated sound pressure levels between 25 and 85 dB SPL, depending on the signal frequency. These sound pressure levels are situated well below ambient sound pressure levels generated by the MRI scanning process. The presented case study therefore indicates a limited risk of audible unintended output for the examined hearing implant during MRI.

Development of a finite element model of a human head including auditory periphery for understanding of bone-conducted hearing

A three-dimensional finite-element (FE) model of a human head including the auditory periphery was developed to obtain a better understanding of bone-conducted (BC) hearing. The model was validated by comparison of cochlear and head responses in both air-conducted (AC) and BC hearing with experimental data. Specifically, the FE model provided the cochlear responses such as basilar membrane velocity and intracochlear pressure corresponding to BC stimulations applied to the mastoid or the conventional bone-anchored-hearing-aid (BAHA) positions. This is a strength of the model because it is difficult to obtain the cochlear responses from experiments corresponding to the BC stimulation applied at a specific position on the head surface. In addition, there have been few studies based on an FE model that can calculate the head and cochlear responses simultaneously from a BC stimulation. Moreover, in this study, the intracochlear sound pressure at multi-positions along the BM length was calculated and used to clarify the effect of stimulating force direction on the cochlear and promontory velocities in BC hearing. Also, the relationship between BC and AC stimulation and the basilar membrane velocity in the FE model was used to calculate the stimulation level at hearing thresholds which has been investigated only by psychoacoustical methods.

Transcranial attenuation in bone conduction stimulation

In bone conduction (BC) stimulation, the sound travels from the site of stimulation to the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlea. A frequency dependent reduction in BC hearing sensitivity occurs when sound travels to the contralateral cochlea as compared to the ipsilateral cochlea. This effect is called transcranial attenuation (TA) that is affected by several factors. Experimental and clinical studies describe TA and the factors that have an effect on it. These factors include stimulus location, coupling of a bone conduction hearing aid to the underlying tissue, and the properties of the head (such as geometry of the head, thickness of the skin and/or skull, changes due to aging, iatrogenic changes such as bone removal in mastoidectomy, and occlusion of the external auditory canal). While TA has an effect of the patient's benefit of BCHAs, there seems to be a discrepancy between experimental measurements and clinical relevance. The effects are small and the interindividual variability, in comparison, is rather large. However, a better understanding of these factors may help to determine the site of attachment, the coupling mode, and possibly the fitting of a BCHA, depending on its indication.

Dependence of skull surface wave propagation on stimulation sites and direction under bone conduction

In order to better understand bone conduction sound propagation across the skull, three-dimensional (3D) wave propagation on the skull surface was studied, along with its dependence on stimulation direction and location of a bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) actuator. Experiments were conducted on five Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimens. Stimulation, in the 0.1-10 kHz range, was sequentially applied at the forehead and mastoid via electromagnetic actuators from commercial BCHAs, supported by a 5-N steel band. The head response was quantified by sequentially measuring the 3D motion of ∼200 points (∼15-20 mm pitch) across the ipsilateral, top, and contralateral skull surface via a 3D laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) system, guided by a robotic positioner. Low-frequency stimulation (<1 kHz) resulted in a spatially complex rigid-body-like motion of the skull that depended on both the stimulation condition and head support. The predominant motion direction was only 5-10 dB higher than other components below 1 kHz, with no predominance at higher frequencies. Sound propagation direction across the parietal plates did not coincide with stimulation location, potentially due to the head base and forehead remaining rigid-like at higher frequencies and acting as a large source for the deformation patterns across the parietal sections.