Consequences of Mastoidectomy on Bone Conducted Sound Based on Simulations in a Whole Human Head

Improved Bone Conduction Hearing After Middle Ear Surgery: Investigation of the Improvement Mechanism

OBJECTIVES

When performing middle ear operations, such as ossiculoplasty or stapes surgery, patients and surgeons expect an improvement in air conduction (AC) hearing, but generally not in bone conduction (BC). However, BC improvement has often been observed after surgery, and the present study investigated this phenomenon.

METHODS

We reviewed the preoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes of 583 patients who underwent middle ear surgery. BC improvement was defined as a BC threshold decrease of >15 dB at two or more frequencies. Subjects in group A underwent staged ossiculoplasty after canal wall up mastoidectomy (CWUM), group B underwent staged ossiculoplasty after canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWDM), group C underwent ossiculoplasty only (thus, they had no prior history of CWUM or CWDM), and group D received stapes surgery. We created a hypothetical circuit model to explain this phenomenon.

RESULTS

BC improvement was detected in 12.8% of group A, 9.1% of group B, and 8.5% of group C. The improvement was more pronounced in group D (27.0%). A larger gain in AC hearing was weakly correlated with greater BC improvement (Pearson's r=0.395 in group A, P<0.001; r=0.375 in group B, P<0.001; r=0.296 in group C, P<0.001; r=0.422 in group D, P=0.009). Notably, patients with otosclerosis even experienced postoperative BC improvements as large as 10.0 dB, from a mean value of 30.3 dB (standard error [SE], 3.2) preoperatively to 20.3 dB (SE, 3.2) postoperatively, at 1,000 Hz, as well as an improvement of 9.2 dB at 2,000 Hz, from 37.8 dB (SE, 2.6) to 28.6 dB (SE, 3.1).

CONCLUSION

BC improvement may be explained by a hypothetical circuit model applying the third window theory. Surgeons should keep in mind the possibility of BC improvement when making a management plan.

Hearing Through Bone Conduction Headsets

Bone conduction (BC) stimulation has mainly been used for clinical hearing assessment and hearing aids where stimulation is applied at the mastoid behind the ear. Recently, BC has become popular for communication headsets where the stimulation position often is close to the anterior part of the ear canal opening. The BC sound transmission for this stimulation position is here investigated in 21 participants by ear canal sound pressure measurements and hearing threshold assessment as well as simulations in the LiUHead. The results indicated that a stimulation position close to the ear canal opening improves the sensitivity for BC sound by around 20 dB but by up to 40 dB at some frequencies. The transcranial transmission ranges typically between -40 and -25 dB. This decreased transcranial transmission facilitates saliency of binaural cues and implies that BC headsets are suitable for virtual and augmented reality applications. The findings suggest that with BC stimulation close to the ear canal opening, the sound pressure in the ear canal dominates the perception of BC sound. With this stimulation, the ear canal pathway was estimated to be around 25 dB greater than other contributors, like skull bone vibrations, for hearing BC sound in a healthy ear. This increased contribution from the ear canal sound pressure to BC hearing means that a position close to the ear canal is not appropriate for clinical use since, in such case, a conductive hearing loss affects BC and air conduction thresholds by a similar amount.

Postmastoidectomy Hyperacusis Syndrome: Clinical Features and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

We report a novel postmastoidectomy hyperacusis syndrome (PMHS) in patients who have had cortical mastoidectomies and experience hyperacusis to stimuli involving touch of the pinna and periauricular area. This report aims to describe the clinical characteristics of patients predisposed to this disabling complication after mastoid surgery and describes surgical treatment with mastoid cortex resurfacing with hydroxyapatite bone cement.

PATIENTS

Three patients who have undergone intact canal wall mastoidectomies for nonchronic middle ear-related pathologies all reported a similar constellation of postoperative symptoms. None of the patients had any ossicular chain or middle ear abnormalities, and none had preoperative conductive hearing loss. All patients reported disabling hyperacusis related to light touch stimuli in the periauricular area. On examination, all three patients demonstrated synchronous movement of the tympanic membrane when the postauricular area was palpated.

INTERVENTIONS

After a period of observation, none of the patients noted any improvement to their symptoms. Resurfacing of the mastoid cortex with hydroxyapatite bone cement was performed in all patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of touch-induced hyperacusis and audiometry was assessed postoperatively. Patients were also examined for synchronous movement of the tympanic membrane with palpation of the postauricular area.

RESULTS

All patients experienced complete resolution of touch-induced hyperacusis postoperatively. Pure-tone audiometric hearing thresholds remained unchanged after mastoid cortex resurfacing, and there was no longer tympanic membrane movement with palpation of the postauricular area.

CONCLUSIONS

PMHS can occur in patients after cortical mastoidectomy when there is no history of ossicular chain or history of chronic middle ear disease or middle ear abnormalities. PMHS can cause significant distress to patients and remain underrecognized unless synchronous tympanic membrane movement is specifically examined for. Treatment via mastoid cortex surfacing with hydroxyapatite bone cement is safe and effective.

Intracochlear pressure as an objective measure for perceived loudness with bone conduction implants

BACKGROUND

The generally accepted method to assess the functionality of novel bone conduction implants in a preclinical stage is to experimentally measure the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory. Yet, bone conduction of sound is a complex propagation phenomenon, depending on both frequency and amplitude, involving different conduction pathways.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to validate the use of intracochlear sound pressure (ICP) as an objective indicator for perceived loudness for bone conduction stimulation. It is investigated whether a correlation exists between intracochlear sound pressure measurements in cadaveric temporal bones and clinically obtained results using the outcome of a loudness balancing experiment.

METHODS

Ten normal hearing subjects were asked to balance the perceived loudness between air conducted (AC) sound and bone conducted (BC) sound by changing the AC stimulus. Mean balanced thresholds were calculated and used as stimulation levels in a cadaver trial (N = 4) where intracochlear sound pressure was measured during AC and BC stimulation to assess the correlation with the measured clinical data. The intracochlear pressure was measured at the relatively low stimulation amplitude of 80 dBHL using a lock-in amplification technique.

RESULTS

Applying AC and BC stimulation at equal perceived loudness on cadaveric heads yield a similar differential intracochlear pressure, with differences between AC and BC falling within the range of variability of normal hearing test subjects.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the perceived loudness at 80 dB HL for both AC and BC validates intracochlear pressure as an objective indicator of the cochlear drive. The measurement setup is more time-intensive than measuring the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory, yet it provides direct information on the level of the cochlear scalae.

The outer ear pathway during hearing by bone conduction

There have been conflicting reports in the literature about the importance of the induced ear canal sound pressure for the perception of bone-conducted (BC) sound. Here we investigated this by comparing the ear canal sound pressure at threshold for air-conducted (AC) and BC stimulation. Twenty-one adults with subjectively normal hearing function participated. They were tested for their hearing thresholds in the frequency range 250 Hz to 12.5 kHz with AC and BC stimulation and the ear canal sound pressure within 5 mm of the eardrum was obtained with probe tube microphones. Contralateral masking used with BC stimulation shifted the hearing threshold by 5 to 10 dB due to central masking effects. When the ear canal sound pressures at threshold were investigated, the results indicate that the ear canal component for hearing BC sound is around 10 dB below other contributors at frequencies below 2 kHz and similar to other important contributors at frequencies between 2 and 4 kHz. At frequencies above 4 kHz, the contribution from the ear canal sound pressure on BC hearing declines and was around 40 dB below other contributors at 12.5 kHz. The contribution of the ear canal sound pressure in the mid-frequency region is facilitated by the ear canal resonance occurring in this frequency area. The results were similar irrespective of stimulation position. The study also revealed problems estimating the force out of BC transducers caused by a shift in resonance frequency when the artificial mastoid impedance deviates from the impedance of human mastoids. The current study indicates that model predictions have underestimated the contribution from the ear canal sound pressure on BC hearing by around 10 dB.

Review of Whole Head Experimental Cochlear Promontory Vibration with Bone Conduction Stimulation and Investigation of Experimental Setup Effects

Bone conduction sound transmission in humans has been extensively studied using cochlear promontory vibrations. These studies use vibration data collected from measurements in live humans, whole cadavers, and severed cadaver heads, with stimulation applied either at an implant in the skull bone or directly on the skin. Experimental protocols, methods, and preparation of cadavers or cadaver heads vary among the studies, and it is currently unknown to what extent the aforementioned variables affect the outcome of those studies. The current study has two aims. The first aim is to review and compare available experimental data and assess the effects of the experimental protocol and methods. The second aim is to investigate similarities and differences found between the experimental studies based on simulations in a finite element model, the LiUHead. With implant stimulation, the average cochlear promontory vibration levels were within 10 dB, independent of the experimental setup and preparations of the cadavers or cadaver heads. With on-skin stimulation, the results were consistent between cadaver heads and living humans. Partial or complete replacement of the brain with air does not affect the cochlear promontory vibration, whereas replacing the brain with liquid reduces the vibration level by up to 5 dB. An intact head–neck connection affects the vibration of the head at frequencies below 300–400 Hz with a significant vibration reduction at frequencies below 200 Hz. Removing all soft tissue, brain tissue, and intracranial fluid from the head increases the overall cochlear promontory vibration level by around 5 dB.

Development of a finite element model of a human head including auditory periphery for understanding of bone-conducted hearing

A three-dimensional finite-element (FE) model of a human head including the auditory periphery was developed to obtain a better understanding of bone-conducted (BC) hearing. The model was validated by comparison of cochlear and head responses in both air-conducted (AC) and BC hearing with experimental data. Specifically, the FE model provided the cochlear responses such as basilar membrane velocity and intracochlear pressure corresponding to BC stimulations applied to the mastoid or the conventional bone-anchored-hearing-aid (BAHA) positions. This is a strength of the model because it is difficult to obtain the cochlear responses from experiments corresponding to the BC stimulation applied at a specific position on the head surface. In addition, there have been few studies based on an FE model that can calculate the head and cochlear responses simultaneously from a BC stimulation. Moreover, in this study, the intracochlear sound pressure at multi-positions along the BM length was calculated and used to clarify the effect of stimulating force direction on the cochlear and promontory velocities in BC hearing. Also, the relationship between BC and AC stimulation and the basilar membrane velocity in the FE model was used to calculate the stimulation level at hearing thresholds which has been investigated only by psychoacoustical methods.

Transcranial attenuation in bone conduction stimulation

In bone conduction (BC) stimulation, the sound travels from the site of stimulation to the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlea. A frequency dependent reduction in BC hearing sensitivity occurs when sound travels to the contralateral cochlea as compared to the ipsilateral cochlea. This effect is called transcranial attenuation (TA) that is affected by several factors. Experimental and clinical studies describe TA and the factors that have an effect on it. These factors include stimulus location, coupling of a bone conduction hearing aid to the underlying tissue, and the properties of the head (such as geometry of the head, thickness of the skin and/or skull, changes due to aging, iatrogenic changes such as bone removal in mastoidectomy, and occlusion of the external auditory canal). While TA has an effect of the patient's benefit of BCHAs, there seems to be a discrepancy between experimental measurements and clinical relevance. The effects are small and the interindividual variability, in comparison, is rather large. However, a better understanding of these factors may help to determine the site of attachment, the coupling mode, and possibly the fitting of a BCHA, depending on its indication.