On the Intracochlear Location of Straight Electrode Arrays After Cochlear Implantation: How Lateral Are Lateral Wall Electrodes?

Correlation of Scalar Cochlear Volume and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing

OBJECTIVE

Preservation of residual hearing is one of the main goals in cochlear implantation. There are many factors that can influence hearing preservation after cochlear implantation. The purpose of the present study was to develop an algorithm for validated preoperative cochlear volume analysis and to elucidate the role of cochlear volume in preservation of residual hearing preservation after atraumatic cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 166 cochlear implant recipients were analyzed. All patients were implanted with either a MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria) FLEXSOFT (n = 3), FLEX28 (n = 72), FLEX26 (n = 1), FLEX24 (n = 41), FLEX20 (n = 38), or FLEX16 (n = 11, custom made device) electrode array through a round window approach. Main outcome measures: Cochlear volume as assessed after manual segmentation of cochlear cross-sections in cone beam computed tomography, and preservation of residual hearing 6 months after implantation were analyzed. The association between residual hearing preservation and cochlear volume was then assessed statistically.

RESULTS

Rapid and valid cochlear volume analysis was possible using the individual cross-sections and a newly developed and validated algorithm. Cochlear volume had the tendency to be larger in patients with hearing preservation than in those with hearing loss. Significant correlations with hearing preservation could be observed for the basal width and length of the basal turn.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation may depend on cochlear volume but appears to be influenced more strongly by other cochlear dimensions.

On the interdependence of insertion forces, insertion speed, and lubrication: Aspects to consider when testing cochlear implant electrodes

OBJECTIVES

During the insertion of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays, forces occur which may cause trauma and poorer hearing outcomes. Unfortunately, research groups investigating factors influencing insertion forces come to contradicting results, especially regarding insertion speed. This study was conducted to investigate the origin of these contradicting results and to determine how different testing conditions influence experimental findings.

METHODS

Repeated, automated insertions with three different FLEX28 CI electrode arrays (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) were performed into a newly developed, anatomically correct and 3D-printed mean scala tympani phantom. The testing protocol for each electrode included variations in insertion speed (v = 0.1-2.0 mm/s) and lubrication (90%, 50%, and 10% liquid soap), resulting in 51 insertions per electrode array and a total of 153 insertions.

RESULTS

The test setup and protocol allowed for repeatable insertions with only minimal change in the morphology of the insertion force profiles per testing condition. Strong but varying dependencies of the maximal insertion forces and work were found regarding both lubrication and speed: work-speed dependency is constant for the 10% lubricant, negative for the 50% lubricant and positive for the 90% lubricant.

CONCLUSION

Our results can explain part of the contradicting results found within previous studies by translating interrelations known from lubricated rubber friction to the field of CI electrode array insertion. We show that the main driver behind measured bulk forces are most likely the generated friction forces, which are strongly dependent on insertion speed and lubrication. The employed test setup allows for conducting repeatable and comparable insertion studies, which can be recapitulated by other centers due to the detailed explanation of the test setup as well as the developed and freely available insertion phantom. This study hence represents another important step toward standardizing CI array insertion testing.

Intracochlear Recording of Electrocochleography During and After Cochlear Implant Insertion Dependent on the Location in the Cochlea

To preserve residual hearing during cochlear implant (CI) surgery it is desirable to use intraoperative monitoring of inner ear function (cochlear monitoring). A promising method is electrocochleography (ECochG). Within this project the relations between intracochlear ECochG recordings, position of the recording contact in the cochlea with respect to anatomy and frequency and preservation of residual hearing were investigated. The aim was to better understand the changes in ECochG signals and whether these are due to the electrode position in the cochlea or to trauma generated during insertion. During and after insertion of hearing preservation electrodes, intraoperative ECochG recordings were performed using the CI electrode (MED-EL). During insertion, the recordings were performed at discrete insertion steps on electrode contact 1. After insertion as well as postoperatively the recordings were performed at different electrode contacts. The electrode location in the cochlea during insertion was estimated by mathematical models using preoperative clinical imaging, the postoperative location was measured using postoperative clinical imaging. The recordings were analyzed from six adult CI recipients. In the four patients with good residual hearing in the low frequencies the signal amplitude rose with largest amplitudes being recorded closest to the generators of the stimulation frequency, while in both cases with severe pantonal hearing losses the amplitude initially rose and then dropped. This might be due to various reasons as discussed in the following. Our results indicate that this approach can provide valuable information for the interpretation of intracochlearly recorded ECochG signals.

A Multicenter Comparison of 1-yr Functional Outcomes and Programming Differences Between the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in hearing outcomes or stimulation levels between Advanced Bionics straight and precurved arrays.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review across three implant centers.

SETTING

Tertiary centers for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen pediatric and 205 adult cochlear implants (CIs) were reviewed. All patients were implanted under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2009 guidelines with a HiRes Ultra SlimJ or Mid-Scala electrode array.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation after implantation, as well as CI-only listening scores for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were compared 1 year after implantation. Stimulation levels for threshold and comfort levels were also compared 1 year after implantation.

RESULTS

Hearing preservation was significantly better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala electrode array. Bamford-Kowal-Bench outcomes were not significantly different between the two arrays in any listening condition. Stimulation levels were not different between arrays but did vary across electrode contacts. At least one electrode was deactivated in 33% of implants but was more common for the SlimJ device.

CONCLUSION

Modern straight and precurved arrays from Advanced Bionics did not differ in hearing performance or current requirements. Although hearing preservation was possible with both devices, the SlimJ array would still be the preferred electrode in cases where hearing preservation was a priority. Unfortunately, the SlimJ device was also prone to poor sound perception on basal electrodes. Further investigation is needed to determine if deactivated electrodes are associated with electrode position/migration, and if programming changes are needed to optimize the use of these high-frequency channels.

Accuracy of radiological prediction of electrode position with otological planning software and implications of high-resolution imaging

OBJECTIVES

In cochlear implantation, preoperative prediction of electrode position has recently gained increasing attention. Currently, planning is usually done by multislice CT (MSCT). However, flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) and its secondary reconstructions (fpVCTSECO) allow for more precise visualization of the cochlea. Combined with a newly developed otological planning software, the position of every single contact can be effectively predicted. In this study it was investigated how accurately radiological prediction forecasts the postoperative electrode localization and whether higher image resolution is advantageous.

METHODS

Utilizing otological planning software (OTOPLAN®) and different clinical imaging modalities (MSCT, fpVCT and fpVCTSECO) the electrode localization [angular insertion depth (AID)] and respective contact frequencies were predicted preoperatively and examined postoperatively. Furthermore, inter-electrode-distance (IED) and inter-electrode-frequency difference (IEFD) were evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

Measurements revealed a preoperative overestimation of AID. Corresponding frequencies were also miscalculated. Determination of IED and IEFD revealed discrepancies at the transition from the basal to the middle turn and round window to the basal turn. All predictions and discrepancies were lowest when using fpVCTSECO.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative electrode position can be predicted quite accurately using otological planning software. However, because of several potential misjudgments, high-resolution imaging, such as offered by fpVCTSECO, should be used pre- and postoperatively.

Virtual cochlear implantation for personalized rehabilitation of profound hearing loss

In cochlear implantation, current preoperative planning procedures allow for estimating how far a specific implant will reach into the inner ear of the patient, which is important to optimize hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes. Here we report on the development of a methodology that goes beyond current planning approaches: the proposed model does not only estimate specific outcome parameters but allows for entire, three-dimensional virtual implantations of patient-specific cochlear anatomies with different types of electrode arrays. The model was trained based on imaging datasets of 186 human cochleae, which contained 171 clinical computer tomographies (CTs) of actual cochlear implant patients as well as 15 high-resolution micro-CTs of cadaver cochleae to also reconstruct the refined intracochlear structures not visible in clinical imaging. The model was validated on an independent dataset of 141 preoperative and postoperative clinical CTs of cochlear implant recipients and outperformed all currently available planning approaches, not only in terms of accuracy but also regarding the amount of information that is available prior to the actual implantation.

Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation

Cochlear variability is of key importance for the clinical use of cochlear implants, the most successful neuroprosthetic device that is surgically placed into the cochlear scala tympani. Despite extensive literature on human cochlear variability, few information is available on the variability of the modiolar wall. In the present study, we analyzed 108 corrosion casts, 95 clinical cone beam computer tomographies (CTs) and 15 µCTs of human cochleae and observed modiolar variability of similar and larger extent than the lateral wall variability. Lateral wall measures correlated with modiolar wall measures significantly. ~ 49% of the variability had a common cause. Based on these data we developed a model of the modiolar wall variations and related the model to the design of cochlear implants aimed for perimodiolar locations. The data demonstrate that both the insertion limits relevant for lateral wall damage (approximate range of 4–9 mm) as well as the dimensions required for optimal perimodiolar placement of the electrode (the point of release from the straightener; approximate range of 2–5mm) are highly interindividually variable. The data demonstrate that tip fold-overs of preformed implants likely result from the morphology of the modiolus (with radius changing from base to apex), and that optimal cochlear implantation of perimodiolar arrays cannot be guaranteed without an individualized surgical technique.

On the Accuracy of Clinical Insertion Angle Predictions With a Surgical Planning Platform for Cochlear Implantation

HYPOTHESIS

Various studies over the last few decades have shown that the cochlea is not a uniform structure, but that its size and shape may vary quite substantially in between subjects. The surgical planning platform enables the user to quickly approximate the size of a cochlea within clinical imaging data by measuring the basal cochlear diameters A and B. It also allows for contact specific insertion angle predictions for MED-EL cochlear implant electrode arrays based on this individual anatomy approximation. The proposed, retrospective study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of these predictions.

METHODS

Preoperative CBCT scans of N = 91 MED-EL cochlear implant patients with different types of FLEX electrode arrays (flexible, thin, and straight arrays) were evaluated using a planning module. Both the initial version (based on an equation proposed by Escudé et al.) as well as a novel, recently proposed approach (called elliptic-circular approximation) was employed. All predictions were then compared to the actual insertion angles which were derived from postoperative CBCT images of the same patient.

RESULTS

Most prediction deviations of the investigated cases stayed below 45deg for all electrode arrays and both prediction methods. In general, prediction deviations increased from base to apex were found to be larger for longer electrode arrays. Hardly any significant differences between the two prediction methods were observed. However, particularly large deviations were found for the Escudé method and could be substantially deceased with the updated elliptic-circular approximation approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The new platform version with its updated prediction module allows to reliably predict insertion angles even for cochlear anatomies with slightly unusual features and shapes.

Fully Automated Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length From Clinical Temporal Bone Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To present and validate a novel fully automated method to measure cochlear dimensions, including cochlear duct length (CDL).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The computational method combined 1) a deep learning (DL) algorithm to segment the cochlea and otic capsule and 2) geometric analysis to measure anti-modiolar distances from the round window to the apex. The algorithm was trained using 165 manually segmented clinical computed tomography (CT). A Testing group of 159 CTs were then measured for cochlear diameter and width (A- and B-values) and CDL using the automated system and compared against manual measurements. The results were also compared with existing approaches and historical data. In addition, pre- and post-implantation scans from 27 cochlear implant recipients were studied to compare predicted versus actual array insertion depth.

RESULTS

Measurements were successfully obtained in 98.1% of scans. The mean CDL to 900° was 35.52 mm (SD, 2.06; range, [30.91-40.50]), the mean A-value was 8.88 mm (0.47; [7.67-10.49]), and mean B-value was 6.38 mm (0.42; [5.16-7.38]). The R² fit of the automated to manual measurements was 0.87 for A-value, 0.70 for B-value, and 0.71 for CDL. For anti-modiolar arrays, the distance between the imaged and predicted array tip location was 0.57 mm (1.25; [0.13-5.28]).

CONCLUSION

Our method provides a fully automated means of cochlear analysis from clinical CTs. The distribution of CDL, dimensions, and cochlear quadrant lengths is similar to those from historical data. This approach requires no radiographic experience and is free from user-related variation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Uncoiling the Human Cochlea-Physical Scala Tympani Models to Study Pharmacokinetics Inside the Inner Ear

In the field of cochlear implantation, artificial/physical models of the inner ear are often employed to investigate certain phenomena like the forces occurring during implant insertions. Up to now, no such models are available for the analysis of diffusion processes inside the cochlea although drug delivery is playing an increasingly important role in this field. For easy access of the cochlea along its whole profile, e.g., for sequential sampling in an experimental setting, such a model should ideally be longitudinal/uncoiled. Within this study, a set of 15 micro-CT imaging datasets of human cochleae was used to derive an average representation of the scala tympani. The spiral profile of this model was then uncoiled along different trajectories, showing that these trajectories influence both length and volume of the resulting longitudinal model. A volumetric analysis of the average spiral model was conducted to derive volume-to-length interrelations for the different trajectories, which were then used to generate two tubular, longitudinal scala tympani models with volume and length properties matching the original, spiral profile. These models can be downloaded for free and used for reproducible and comparable simulative and experimental investigations of diffusion processes within the inner ear.

Correlation of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function Slope and Anamnestic Parameters in Cochlear Implant Patients-Identification of Predictors for the Neuronal Health Status

Cochlear implants (CI) are the treatment of choice in profoundly deaf patients. Measuring the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) has become an important tool for verifying the function of the spiral ganglion neurons (SGN), which are the target cells of the CI stimulation. ECAP measurement is only possible after electrode insertion. No information about the neuronal health status is available before cochlear implantation. We investigated possible correlations between the ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) slope and anamnestic parameters to identify possible predictors for SGN health status and therefore for CI outcome. The study included patients being implanted with various electrode array lengths. Correlation analysis was performed for the mean AGF slope of the whole array, for separate electrodes as well as for grouped electrodes of the apical, medial, and basal region, with duration of deafness, age at implantation, residual hearing (grouped for electrode length), and etiology. The mean ECAP AGF slopes decreased from apical to basal. They were not correlated to the length of the electrode array or any etiology. For the mean of the full array or when grouped for the apical, middle, and basal part, the ECAP AGF slope was negatively correlated to the duration of hearing loss and the age at implantation. Since a significant negative correlation of the ECAP AGF slope and age at cochlear implantation and duration of deafness was observed, this study supports the statement that early implantation of a CI is recommended for sensorineural hearing loss. Additional factors such as the cochlear coverage and insertion angle influence the ECAP AGF slope and performance of the patient and should be included in future multifactorial analysis to study predictive parameters for the CI outcome.