Prospective Analysis of an Evidence-Based Symptom Set in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial and Other Non-Superior Semicircular Canal Third Window Dehiscence on High-Resolution Temporal Bone CT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The radiologic prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in the asymptomatic population has been widely studied, but less is known about the rates of other forms of third window dehiscence. Per the existing literature, the radiologic prevalence of cochlear-facial nerve dehiscence, for example, exceeds that seen in histologic studies, suggesting that conventional CT is unreliable for cochlear-facial dehiscence. These studies relied on nonisometric CT acquisitions, however, and underused multiplanar reformatting techniques, leading to false-positive findings. Our purpose was to determine the rate of cochlear-facial dehiscence and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences on optimized CT in asymptomatic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four-channel temporal bone CT scans from 602 patients in emergency departments were assessed for cochlear-facial and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences by using high-resolution, multiplanar oblique reformats. Confidence intervals for dehiscence prevalence were calculated using the Newcombe 95% interval confidence method.

RESULTS

Of 602 patients, 500 were asymptomatic, while 102 had an imaging indication consistent with possible third window syndrome (symptomatic). Eight asymptomatic patients (1.6%) had cochlear-facial dehiscence, while 43 (8.4%) had jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence or jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence in asymptomatic patients compared with symptomatic patients. Cochlear-carotid canal, cochlear-internal auditory canal, and cochlear-petrosal sinus dehiscences were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-four-channel CT with multioblique reformatting is sensitive and specific for identifying cochlear-facial dehiscence, with rates similar to those in postmortem series. Jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence is a common incidental finding and is unlikely to produce third window physiology. Other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences are rare in asymptomatic patients.

Vestibular Migraine Confounds Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of vestibular migraine (VM) in a cohort of patients with radiologic confirmation of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) and to compare management of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) in patients with and without comorbid VM.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a SCD database.

SETTING

University-based tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-one patients identified with SCD from 2009 to 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coincidence of VM and SCD, and resolution of symptoms.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients with SCD met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. VM was diagnosed in 36 (39.6%) patients. Of those receiving medical therapy for VM alone, five (45.5%) reported symptom resolution, five (45.5%) reported partial improvement, one (9.1%) had no change, and none worsened. Fifteen patients (41.7%) were treated with both surgery (for SCD) and medical therapy (for VM). Seven (46.7%) reported symptom resolution, seven (46.7%) reported partial improvement, and one (6.7%) worsened. There was no statistically significant difference in symptom resolution between SCD + VM patients who were treated medically compared with those treated with medical therapy and surgery (p = 0.951). There was no significant difference in symptom resolution after surgery between SCD + VM and SCD-only cohorts (p = 0.286).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study describing the incidence of VM in a cohort of patients with SCDS. The symptoms of VM confound those of SCDS and unrecognized or undertreated VM may contribute to surgical failure in SCDS. Therefore, we recommend a high index of suspicion for VM in patients with SCDS and a trial of medical therapy in the setting of suspected VM.