Comparison of Cochlear Implant Device Fixation-Well Drilling Versus Subperiosteal Pocket. A Cost Effectiveness, Case-Control Study

Current Issues With Pediatric Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear implants (CIs) have demonstrated a clear functional benefit in children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and thus have gained wide acceptance for treating deafness in the pediatric population. When evaluating young children for cochlear implantation, there are unique considerations beyond the standard issues addressed during surgery in adults. Because of advances in genetic testing, imaging resolution, CI technology, post-implant rehabilitation, and other factors, issues related to CI surgery in children continue to evolve. Such factors have led to changes in candidacy guidelines, vaccine requirements, and lowering of age requirement for surgery. In addition, differences in the anatomy and physiology of infants require special attention to ensure safety when operating on young children. This review summarizes these issues and provides guidance for surgeons treating children with SNHL.

A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation

BACKGROUND

During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.

DISCUSSION

Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021.

Comparison of Cochlear Implantation Complications with Subperiosteal Pocket Technique Versus Well-Drilling Technique in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study

Aims: Cochlear implantation is becoming the standard treatment for rehabilitating patients with sensorineural hearing (SNH) impairment. Various techniques can be used to achieve this goal. In the current study, we compared the subperiosteal technique (SPT) with the development of a subperiosteal pocket without fixation to the well-drilling method (WD) by constructing an incision into the scalp with suture fixation. Materials and methods: Our study weighted the efficiency of children who underwent WD or SPT from 2017 to 2021 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. In this retrospective records review, we compared 63 SPT cases with 104 WD cases during a 5-year period who were followed for 1 month or more. Results: There were 88 females (50.9%) and 79 male (45.7%) with a mean age of 4.49 ± 3.06 years at the time of surgery. The mean WD duration was 2.47 ± 1.05 h, and 2.91 ± 1.05 h for SPT (P = 0.01). Moreover, there was a significant relationship between comorbidities and electrode complications (P = 0.022). There was no significant correlation between the surgical method and intraoperative complications (P = 0.714), electrode array issues (P = 0.88), or serious postoperative complications including device failure and migration skin problems (P = 0.207). Conclusion: Overall, the WD technique was faster. However, both methods can be used safely and effectively, as no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Further long-term studies are required to validate our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03735-z.

Variability in surgical techniques for cochlear implantation: an international survey study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to gain insight into current practices regarding the surgical techniques used for positioning and fixation of internal components of the cochlear implant.

METHODS

A questionnaire focused on surgical techniques used for cochlear implantation was distributed among 441 cochlear implant surgeons. Descriptive statistics were reported.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 59 surgeons working in 13 different countries. The most preferred incision shapes were the S-shape (41%) and the C-shape (36%). The preferred implantation angle for the receiver/stimulator device was either 45° (64%) or 60° (30%), relative to the Frankfurter Horizontal Plane. Most respondents used a drilled bony well with (42%) or without a subperiosteal pocket (31%) to fixate the receiver/stimulator device. All respondents used the facial recess approach. Most used the round window insertion technique to enter the scala tympani (73%). Approximately half of the respondents preferred the lateral wall electrode array, whereas the other half preferred the perimodiolar electrode array. During their career, most (86%) changed their technique towards structure preservation and minimizing trauma.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates variability in the surgical techniques used to position and fixate the internal components of the cochlear implant. Additionally, surgical preference transits towards structure preservation and minimal invasiveness.