Objective Vestibular Test Battery and Patient Reported Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients

Vestibular Hypofunction Screening in Older Cochlear Implant Candidates

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular loss is associated with increasing age and hearing loss. Cochlear implantation (CI) may be performed in these patients; however, CI can induce vestibular hypofunction (VH) postoperatively. If CI is performed in the "better balancing ear," patients may experience vestibulopathy from new bilateral VH. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rates of VH in older CI candidates, thereby helping to identify patients at increased risk for bilateral VH after CI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from 2019 to 2022 of patients age 60 to 80 years old who underwent videonystagmography (VNG).

SETTING

Tertiary care neurotology practice.

METHODS

VNG, including spontaneous nystagmus, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric stimulation, and rotary chair, was reviewed and stratified by CI candidacy. Patients with prior CI or known vestibular diagnosis were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were CI candidates and 184 patients were controls. cVEMP demonstrated a significantly greater rate of unilateral VH in CI candidates (P = .018). Caloric stimulation demonstrated an elevated rate of bilateral VH and presbyvestibulopathy in CI candidates (P = .057 and P = .036, respectively). Rotary chair demonstrated a significantly higher rate of bilateral VH and incomplete vestibular compensation based on reduced gain and gain asymmetry, respectively, in CI candidates (P < .001 and P = .043, respectively). Mean bithermal slow phase velocity sum and rotary chair gain were significantly lower in the CI candidate group (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). Preoperative identification of VH determined the side of implantation in 4 patients (15%).

CONCLUSION

VH and incomplete vestibular compensation are common and more frequently seen in CI candidates compared to age-matched controls. Vestibular screening can play a role in surgical counseling and planning, and should be considered in older patients undergoing CI.

Does Location of Intralabyrinthine Vestibular Schwannoma Determine Objective and Subjective Vestibular Function?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The incidence of intralabyrinthine schwannomas is increasing, and a growing attention is given to the detrimental effects on hearing function. On the contrary, the vestibular profile of intralabyrinthine vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is still not well understood. We aimed to investigate and report the observed relationships between the intralabyrinthine location of the schwannomas and objective and subjective vestibular profile of the patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 20 consecutive individuals with sporadic intralabyrinthine schwannomas and grouped according to the intralabyrinthine location of the schwannomas. Vestibular testing consisted of the video head impulse test of all three semicircular canals, the caloric test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and the dizziness handicap inventory. A nonparametric unpaired t test was performed to compare groups, and Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data.

RESULTS

The median video head impulse test gains (lateral, anterior, posterior) were 0.40, 0.50, and 0.75 for intravestibular schwannomas and 0.93, 1.52, and 0.91 for intracochlear schwannomas ( p = 0.0001, p = 0.009, p = 0.33), respectively. Caloric unilateral weakness had a median of 100% for intravestibular schwannomas and 14% for intracochlear schwannomas ( p = 0.0001). The mean dizziness handicap inventory was 21 for intravestibular schwannomas and 1 for cochlear schwannomas ( p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials according to intralabyrinthine location.

CONCLUSION

By both objective and subjective measures, intralabyrinthine schwannomas with an intravestibular component has significantly worse vestibular function than schwannomas with purely cochlear involvement.

Vestibular function and hearing preservation in children following a minimally invasive cochlear implantation

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of minimally invasive cochlear implantation (CI) on the vestibular function (VF) and residual hearing (RH) as well as their relationship in pediatric recipients before and after surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-four pediatric patients with preoperative low frequency residual hearing (LFRH) (250 or 500 Hz ≤ 80 dB HL) who underwent minimally invasive CI were enrolled. Pure-tone thresholds, the cervical/ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP/oVEMP), and video head impulse test (vHIT) were all evaluated in the 24 pediatric patients with preoperative normal VF before and at 1 and 12 months after surgery. The relationship between changes in hearing and VF was analyzed preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on VF preservation and hearing preservation (HP) at both 1 and 12 months post-CI (p > 0.05). At 1 month post-CI, the correlations of the variations in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains of horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) and the shift in 250 Hz threshold were negatively correlated (r = - 0.41, p = 0.04 and r = - 0.43, p = 0.04, respectively). At 12 months post-CI, the shift in 250 Hz threshold negatively correlated to the variations in VOR gain of superior semicircular canal (SSC) (r = - 0.43, p = 0.04); the HP positively correlated to the variation in oVEMP-amplitude ratio (AR) (r = 0.41, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that there were partial correlations between VF preservation and HP both in the short- and long-terms after atraumatic CI surgery, especially with the 250 Hz threshold. Regarding the variation of PSC function, the correlation with hearing status was variable with time after atraumatic CI surgery. Minimally invasive techniques for HP are successful and effective for the preservation of VF in pediatric patients both in the short- and long-terms.

Balancing Act: A Comprehensive Review of Vestibular Evaluation in Cochlear Implants

Cochlear implantation, a transformative intervention for individuals with profound hearing loss, has evolved significantly over the years. However, its impact on the vestibular system, responsible for balance and spatial orientation, remains a subject of ongoing research and clinical consideration. This narrative review highlights key aspects of vestibular evaluation in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Preoperative vestibular assessment is crucial to establish baseline vestibular function and identify any pre-existing balance issues. Various tests, including caloric, rotational chair, vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, and video head impulse tests, play a vital role in evaluating vestibular function. The goal is to assess the risk of vestibular disturbances arising from the surgery, guide surgical planning, and detect pre-existing alterations that could be totally or partially compensated. While some patients experience minimal vestibular disruptions, others may encounter transient or persistent balance issues following cochlear implant surgery. Postoperative vestibular testing allows for the early detection of such disturbances, enabling timely interventions like vestibular rehabilitation and evaluating changes produced due to surgical complications or changes in the patient's prior conditions. Challenges in vestibular evaluation include individual variability in patient responses, the proximity of the cochlea to the vestibular system, and the need to tailor testing protocols to individual needs. Further research is essential to refine testing protocols, minimize vestibular disturbances, and improve outcomes for cochlear implant candidates. A multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, audiologists, and physical therapists is integral to comprehensive patient care in this context. In conclusion, vestibular evaluation in patients undergoing cochlear implantation is critical for optimizing surgical planning, managing postoperative issues, and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals embarking on the journey of restored hearing.

Characteristics of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in children with vestibular malformation and severe sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

With the increasing clinical focus on the safety of bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) and the potential risk of bilateral vestibular dysfunction, evaluating vestibular end-organ function in patients with vestibular malformations with accompanying abnormalities has been strongly recommended.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) values among children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with vestibular malformation and assess the effectiveness of VEMP testing for inner ear malformations (IEM) diagnosis.

METHODS

This study included 96 children (192 ears), including those with vestibular malformations (48 ears), large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) (50 ears), and SNHL without IEM (94 ears; control group). All groups underwent ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP and cVEMP, respectively) testing. The response rates, VEMP parameters, and wave characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

The cVEMP response rates were 37.5 %, 64 %, and 58.51 % and the oVEMP response rates were 42.86 %, 78.95 %, and 77.27 % in the vestibular malformation, LVAS, and control groups, respectively, and significantly differed between groups (cVEMP: X2 = 18.228, P<0.001) (oVEMP: X2 = 7.528, P = 0.023). Significant inter-group differences were observed for the cVEMP and oVEMP latency and amplitude (P < 0.05). The LVAS group's waveform exhibited a prolonged latency and increased amplitude compared with that of the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SNHL were highly susceptible to otolith dysfunction, regardless of comorbid vestibular malformation presence. Measuring VEMPs is an effective and rapid evaluation technique for vestibular function and could provide a basis for vestibular rehabilitation training.

Vestibular dysfunction in pediatric patients with cochlear implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Vestibular dysfunction may delay the achievement of balance and perception milestones in pediatric patients after cochlear implantation (CIM).

Methods

A strategic literature search was done following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2022. Studies were included on the otoliths, semicircular canals, and balance function changes in children after CIM. Two reviewers independently assessed the level of evidence, methodological limitations, risk of bias, and characteristics of the cases. Matched pre- and postoperative vestibular functional test data, including ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP and cVEMP), caloric test, video head impulse test (vHIT), and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test 2 (BOT-2), were used to calculate the relative risk of vestibular disorders. Subgroup analyses were performed according to surgical approach, CIM device status, and etiology.

Results

Twenty studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for the meta-analysis. We observed significant vestibular dysfunction in pediatric patients with CIM. The results showed a statistically significant increase in abnormal cVEMP response (RR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.87, 2.58, P < 0.0001), abnormal oVEMP response (RR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.50, 2.94, P < 0.0001), and abnormal caloric test results (RR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20, 2.19, P = 0.0018) after implantation. Statistically significant differences were not found in the vHIT test results of all three semicircular canals before and after the operation (P > 0.05). Regarding static and dynamic balance, we found significantly poorer BOT-2 scores in children with CIM than in the normal group (mean difference = −7.26, 95% CI = −10.82, −3.70, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The results showed that vestibular dysfunction might occur after CIM in pediatric patients. Some children experience difficulties with postural control and balance. Our results suggest that a comprehensive evaluation of vestibular function should be performed before and after CIM.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques in vestibular function preservation in patients with cochlear implants

Background

Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective and successful method of treating individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Coupled with it’s great clinical effectiveness, there is a risk of vestibular damage. With recent advances in surgical approach, modified electrode arrays and other surgical techniques, the potential of hearing preservation (HP) has emerged, in order to preserve the inner ear function. These techniques may also lead to less vestibular damage. However, a systematic study on this at different follow-ups after CI surgery has not been documented before.

Aims

To investigate changes of vestibular function systematically in recipients at short and long follow-ups after a minimally invasive CI surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 72 patients (72 ears) with minimally invasive CI were recruited. All participants selected had bilateral SNHL and pre-operative residual hearing (RH) and underwent unilateral CI. They were treated to comprehensive care. All patients underwent vestibular function tests 5 days prior to CI. During the post-operative period, follow-up tests were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The contemporaneous results of caloric, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), and video head impulse (vHIT) tests were followed together longitudinally.

Results

On the implanted side, the percent fail rate of caloric test was significantly higher than that of vHIT at 1, 3, and 9 months post-operatively (p < 0.05); the percent fail rate of oVEMP was higher than vHIT of superior semicircular canal (SSC), posterior semicircular canal (PSC), or horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) at 1, 3, and 9 months (p < 0.05); at 3 and 9 months, the percent fail rate of cVEMP was higher than that of SSC and PSC (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the percent fail rates among all tests at 6 and 12 months post-CI (p > 0.05). The percent fail rates showed decreased trends in caloric (p = 0.319) and HSC tested by vHIT (p = 0.328) from 1–3 to 6–12 months post-operatively. There was no significant difference in cVEMP between 1–3 and 6–12 months (p = 0.597). No significant differences on percent fail rates of cVEMP and oVEMP between short- and long-terms post-CI were found in the same subjects (p > 0.05). Before surgery, the abnormal cVEMP and oVEMP response rates were both lower in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) than patients with a normal cochlea (p = 0.001, 0.018, respectively).

Conclusion

The short- and long-term impacts on the vestibular function from minimally invasive CI surgery was explored. Most of the vestibular functions can be preserved with no damage discrepancy among the otolith and three semicircular canal functions at 12 months post-CI. Interestingly, a similar pattern of changes in vestibular function was found during the early and the later stages of recovery after surgery.

The effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function in adults: A meta-analysis study

Issue

The findings in literature indicate inconsistency in the complications caused by the implant of electrodes in the cochlea; vestibular alterations and balance disorders are mentioned as the most likely.

Purpose

To evaluate, in literature, through the results of multiple vestibular function tests, the effects of cochlear implant surgery on postural stability in adult patients and to analyze.

Hypothesis

From the PICO strategy, where the Population focuses on adults, Intervention is cochlear implant surgery, Comparisons are between implanted patients, and Outcomes are the results of the assessment of cochlear function, the research question was formulated: Are there deficits in vestibular function in adults undergoing cochlear implant placement?

Method

Systematic review based on cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Information sources: Databases between 1980 and 2021, namely, PubMed, Cinahl, Web Of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Search strategy using Mesh terms: “Adult,” “Cochlear Implant,” “Postural Balance,” “Posturography,” “Cochlear Implant,” “Dizziness,” “Vertigo,” “Vestibular Functional Tests,”and “Caloric Tests.” Populational inclusion criteria: studies with adult patients; intervention: cochlear implant placement surgery; comparison: analysis of a vestibular function with vestibular test results and pre- and postoperative symptoms; outcome: studies with at least one of the vestibular function tests, such as computerized vectoelectronystagmography (VENG), vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), caloric test, video head impulse test (VHIT), head impulse test (HIT), videonystagmography, (VNG) and static and dynamic posturography. Exclusion criteria: studies without records of pre- and postoperative data collection and studies with populations under 18 years of age. Screening based on the reading of abstracts and titles was performed independently by two reviewers. In the end, with the intermediation of a third reviewer, manuscripts were included. Risk of bias analysis, performed by two other authors, occurred using the JBI “Critical Appraisal Checklist.”

Results

Of the 757 studies, 38 articles met the inclusion criteria. VEMP was the most commonly used test by the studies (44.7%), followed by the caloric test (36.8%) and vHIT (23.6%). Most studies performed more than one test to assess vestibular function.

Conclusion

Among all vestibular tests investigated, the deleterious effects on vestibular function after cochlear implant surgery were detected with statistical significance (P < 0.05) using VEMP and caloric test. Comparing abnormal and normal results after implant surgery, the vestibular apparatus was evaluated as having abnormal results after cochlear implant surgery only in the VEMP test. The other tests analyzed maintained a percentage mostly considered normal results.

Systematic review registration

identifier: CRD42020198872.

Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Canal and Otolith Function

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) on all five vestibular end-organs and on subjective ratings of post-CI dizziness.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients undergoing unilateral CI were recruited for the study. All participants completed pre- and post-CI three-dimensional video head-impulse tests (3D vHITs) to assess semicircular-canal (SC) function, air- and bone-conducted (AC and BC) cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs) to assess otolith-function and the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) to measure self-perceived disability.

RESULTS

Nineteen percent of patients reported new or worsened dizziness postsurgery. Post-CI abnormalities (new lesions and significant deteriorations) were seen in the AC cVEMP (48%), AC oVEMP (34%), BC cVEMP (10%), and BC oVEMP (7%); and lateral (L) (17%), posterior (P) (10%), and anterior (A) (13%) SC vHITs. CI surgery was more likely to affect the AC cVEMP compared with the other tests (χ2 test, p < 0.05). Fifty percent of patients reported no dizziness pre- and postsurgery. In the implanted ear, normal pre-CI vHIT gain was preserved in lateral semicircular canal (LSC) (69%), anterior semicircular canal (ASC) (74%), and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) (67%), and normal reflex amplitudes were found in AC cVEMP (25%), AC oVEMP (20%), BC cVEMP (59%), and BC oVEMP (74%). Statistically significant decreases were observed in LSC vHIT gain, AC cVEMP amplitude, and AC oVEMP amplitude postsurgery (p < 0.05). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between change in DHI scores and the summed vestibular deficit postsurgery (r(51) = 0.38, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CI can impact tests that assess all five vestibular end-organs and subjective ratings of dizziness. These results support pre and post-surgical vestibular testing and assist preoperative counseling and candidate selection.

[Effects of cochlear implantation on vestibular function]

The literature review is devoted to the effects arising from the effect of a cochlear implant on the vestibular system. Due to the pronounced anatomical proximity and physiological interaction of vestibular receptors with the cochlea, the installation of a cochlear implant and its electrical activity are associated with an effect on the vestibular system. The analysis of the works of foreign and domestic researchers who carried out monitoring of vestibular function in patients after cochlear implantation using modern objective methods was carried out.

Vestibular Function in Pendred Syndrome: Intact High Frequency VOR and Saccular Hypersensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Although Pendred syndrome involves anatomical abnormalities in the vestibular system and patient-perceived dizziness, the literature on vestibular function is scarce. The objective was to evaluate objective vestibular function in patients with PS using the video head impulse test (VHIT) and the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) test, assessing the high frequency vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and the saccular function, respectively.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects (52 ears) with Pendred Syndrome and severe-to-profound hearing loss (cochlear implant candidacy) were studied retrospectively. Main outcome measures were VHIT VOR gain, refixation saccades, cVEMP stimulus thresholds and amplitudes.

RESULTS

In total, 4 of 52 ears (8%) had pathological VHIT outcomes (2 ears with low VHIT gain and 2 ears with saccades). The mean VHIT gain value was 0.96 (range 0.63-2.02). No patients had complete VOR loss. CVEMP responses were present in 76% of tested ears and absent in 24%. The mean cVEMP amplitude value was 192 μV. Absence of cVEMP response was associated with the presence of VHIT saccades (p = 0.038) and advanced age (rs = -0.34; p < 0.05). cVEMP amplitude was correlated with VHIT gain (rs = 0.46; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite dysmorphic vestibular anatomy and severe loss of hearing, the VHIT VOR function is normal in patients with Pendred Syndrome. However, saccular function appears to be abnormally sensitive, as documented by low cVEMP thresholds and high amplitudes, which agrees with a "third window" effect secondary to the large vestibular aqueduct.

Long-Term Vestibular Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients

Background: Vestibular dysfunction is likely the most common complication to cochlear implantation (CI) and may, in rare cases, result in persistent severe vertigo. Literature on long-term vestibular outcomes is scarce. Objective: This paper aims to evaluate vestibular dysfunction before and after cochlear implantation, the long-term vestibular outcomes, and follows up on previous findings of 35 consecutive adult cochlear implantations evaluated by a battery of vestibular tests. Methods: A prospective observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted on 35 CI recipients implanted between 2018 and 2019; last follow-up was conducted in 2021. At the CI work-up (T0) and two postoperative follow-ups (T1 and T2), 4 and 14 months following implantation, respectively, all patients had their vestibular function evaluated. Evaluation with a vestibular test battery, involving video head impulse test (vHIT), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), caloric irrigation test, and dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), were performed at all evaluations. Results: vHIT testing showed that 3 of 35 ears had abnormal vHIT gain preoperatively, which increased insignificantly to 4 of 35 at the last follow-up (p = 0.651). The mean gain in implanted ears decreased insignificantly from 0.93 to 0.89 (p = 0.164) from T0 to T2. Preoperatively, 3 CI ears had correction saccades, which increased to 11 at T2 (p = 0.017). Mean unilateral weakness increased from 19 to 40% from T0 to T2 (p < 0.005), and the total number of patients with either hypofunctioning or areflexic semicircular canals increased significantly from 7 to 17 (p < 0.005). Twenty-nine percent of CI ears showed cVEMP responses at T0, which decreased to 14% (p = 0.148) at T2. DHI total mean scores increased slightly from 10.9 to 12.8 from T0 to T1 and remained at 13.0 at T2 (p = 0.368). DHI scores worsened in 6 of 27 patients and improved in 4 of 27 subjects from T0 to T2. Conclusion: This study reports significant deterioration in vestibular function 14 months after cochlear implantation, in a wide range of vestibular tests. vHIT, caloric irrigation, and cVEMP all measured an overall worsening of vestibular function at short-term postoperative follow-up. No significant deterioration or improvement was measured at the last postoperative follow-up; thus, vestibular outcomes reached a plateau. Despite vestibular dysfunction, most of the patients report less or unchanged vestibular symptoms.