Tubomanometry Measurement Success Rate in Clinical Practice

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Diagnostic Pathway-What Is the Current State of the Art and How Relevant Is Chronic Nasal Disease?

Background: Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) presents a complex diagnostic challenge in otolaryngology, compounded by its multifaceted nature and overlapping symptoms with chronic nasal disease. This article examines the intricacies of ETD diagnosis, emphasising the necessity for a consensus on diagnostic procedures. Methods: A review of the literature was performed through the OVID research tool in the Pubmed/Medline databases to identify relevant articles that discuss eustachian tube dysfunction diagnostics as well as its correlation with chronic nasal disease. Results: The literature review harvested 201 articles, and only 51 of them were included in the full text review. A consensus statement was identified on eustachian tube dysfunction, function and diagnostics. It appears that there is significant variability in the diagnostic tools used to identify eustachian tube dysfunction. The main diagnostic approaches used are tympanometry, tubomanometry and sonotubometry, combined with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure ETDQ-7 questionnaire to support the diagnosis of the condition. Nasal pathology is mostly absent from the retrieved studies, while ear pathology is more commonly mentioned in the current literature. Conclusions: There is no gold standard diagnostic tool to determine the presence of eustachian tube dysfunction. Further discussion, large multicentre studies and focused research are required to achieve a consensus on a diagnostic approach. The authors suggest a diagnostic pathway that combines subjective and objective diagnostic tools to determine the presence of eustachian tube dysfunction. This pathway is simple and can be used in district ENT departments, highlighting the nasal pathology relevance to ETD.

Concordance Analysis of the Pressure Chamber and Tubomanometer According to Estève for the Determination of Eustachian Tube Opening Pressure

INTRODUCTION

For the diagnosis of Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD), clinical procedures such as tympanometry, micro-otoscopy, and maneuvers according to Toynbee and Valsalva only allow an indirect assessment for the moment. With a prevalence of up to 5%, the selection of patients with ETD and its subtypes is clinically relevant. Dynamic methods of Eustachian tube function assessment include a hypo/hyperbaric pressure chamber and Estève's tubomanometer (TMM). One method of assessing ETD is the evaluation of Eustachian tube opening pressure (ETOP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a concordance analysis between pressure chamber and TMM to determine ETOP. For this purpose, we analyzed the measurements of both methods from 28 healthy subjects using Bland-Altman plots, regression according to Passing-Bablok and Lin's concordance correlations coefficient. The maximum tolerated clinical deviation of measured values was set at 10%.

RESULTS

A maximum of 53 measurements of ETOP between pressure chamber and TMM were compared. Mean ETOP for TMM was 28.7 hPa, passive opening was 32 hPa, Toynbee maneuver was 28.4 hPa, and Valsalva maneuver was 54.6 hPa. Concordance analysis revealed following results: passive opening versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 3.3 hPa, limits of agreement ±31.8 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.67 x + 9.36; Lin's rccc = 0.18. Toynbee versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 0.7 hPa, limits of agreement ±35.8 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.47x + 14.03; Lin's rccc = 0.14. Valsalva versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 24.2 hPa, limits of agreement ±117.5 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.17x + 25.12; Lin's rccc = 0.18.

CONCLUSION

Estève's tubomanometer and pressure chamber measurements of ETOP are not concordant. The two methods cannot be interchanged without reservation.

Assessing the usefulness of tubomanometry as a diagnostic tool in Eustachian tube dysfunction

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of tubomanometry (TMM) in diagnosing obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) before balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted, involving 25 patients with sinonasal pathology, 75 patients with middle ear disease, and 25 healthy subjects, totaling 250 ears. All participants underwent comprehensive physical examinations, including TMM, nasal videoendoscopy, otoendoscopy, Valsalva maneuver (VM), tympanometry, and audiometry. Additionally, various scales such as ETDQ-7 and ETS-7 were employed. Tympanometry served as the gold standard for assessing OETD, and comparisons were made among the measures across the three groups.

RESULTS

Among the 125 participants, 44.8% (n = 56) were female, and 55.2% (n = 69) were male, with ages ranging from 19 to 93 years (M = 48.5; SD = 15.6). In our study, VM demonstrated high sensitivity (86.3%) when tympanometry was considered the gold standard. Conversely, TMM, ETDQ-7, and ETS-7 exhibited high specificity, with ETDQ-7 showing the highest specificity (87.4%). Regarding TMM, all R values in patients within the middle ear disease group were pathological (R > 1).

CONCLUSION

TMM has exhibited notable specificity as a diagnostic tool compared to tympanogram and VM. Nonetheless, the combination of TMM and ETDQ-7 has enabled us to conduct a diagnostic assessment with high sensitivity and specificity for chronic OETD diagnosis.

A Nomogram Diagnostic Model for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Patients with Tympanic Membrane Perforation

OBJECTIVES

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a common disease associated with chronic otitis media. A standard diagnostic tool for ETD in patients with tympanic membrane perforation is still lacking. We developed and validated a new diagnostic model for ETD in patients with tympanic membrane perforation.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in patients who had tympanic membrane perforation from February to August 2023. We collected clinical characteristics and examination results including otoscopy, nasal endoscopy, tubomanometry, and 5-item Eustachian Tube Score (ETS-5). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent diagnostic factors. Based on this, the nomogram model was constructed. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), the C-index, the calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 40 participants were enrolled in the study. ETS-5 score and Eustachian tube opening mucosa inflammation in the nasopharynx were significant predictors in identifying ETD. Based on the above independent predictors, a diagnostic nomogram was successfully established. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic model were 80.0% and 90.0%, respectively. The AUC and the C-index of the diagnostic model were both 0.901, which suggested that the model had a good discrimination power. The calibration curve indicated a good calibration degree of the model. DCA showed that the proposed model was useful for clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model is effective and reliable in identifying ETD in patients with tympanic membrane perforation.

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: retrospective multicentre cohort study of 248 patients

OBJECTIVE

To present the results after balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) grouped up into: baro-challenge, chronic serous otitis media and adhaesive otitis media.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on patients who underwent BET surgery. As outcome measures, otoscopy, tympanometry, Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) and ability to perform the Valsalva manoeuvre were recorded at baseline and at 3, 12 and 24 months after BET. A p value of 0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference for all statistical tests.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen ears (248 patients) were included with a 3-month follow-up, 272 ears had a 12-month follow-up, and 171 ears had 24-month follow-up. Globally, a statistical significance improvement in all groups in all outcome measures was found. According to BET indication, in the baro-challenge group, there was no improvement in otoscopy, but ETDQ-7, Valsalva manoeuvre and tympanogram improved significantly. In the chronic serous otitis media group, otoscopy, ETDQ-7 and Valsalva manoeuvre were significantly improved in all the three timelines, including the avoidance of a new transtympanic tube after the BET in over 80% of cases. In the adhaesive otitis media group, Valsalva manoeuvre improved significantly, ETDQ-7 decreased and tympanogram improved but not significantly. Few mild complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

BET is an effective method for the treatment of OETD in all etiologic groups. The greatest benefit was observed in patients with baro-challenge. A long-term follow-up is recommended since the benefit seems to increase over time.

Tubomanometry correlations with patient characteristics and other diagnostic tests of Eustachian tube dysfunction: a cohort study of 432 ears

Objectives

Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best protocol for diagnosing Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). We aimed to evaluate how patient characteristics affect tubomanometry (TMM) results. If an association between patient characteristics and TMM results exists, this should be considered in TMM interpretation. We also wanted to study if TMM correlates with other diagnostic tools of ETD.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients with TMM results available from November 2011 to October 2020 at a tertiary referral center, including 432 ears from 219 patients. An association between diagnostic tests and patient characteristics was assessed using regression models. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyze correlations between diagnostic tests.

Results

None of the studied patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, smoking, sinonasal disease) was associated with TMM results except for pollen allergy (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.15–2.63, P = 0.009). TMM results correlated with Valsalva maneuver performance (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.31) and otomicroscopic signs of inadequate middle ear ventilation (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.28). The Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score did not correlate with any diagnostic method.

Conclusions

TMM results are unaffected by patient characteristics other than pollen allergy. Thus, TMM may be used in ETD diagnostics in a wide variety of patients with straightforward interpretation. TMM correlates with other diagnostic tests studied but not with ETDQ-7. ETDQ-7 does not seem to correlate with other diagnostic tests and appears nonspecific in ETD diagnostics.