Transimpedance Matrix Measurements Reliably Detect Electrode Tip Fold-over in Cochlear Implantation

International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery

OBJECTIVES

A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements.

DESIGN

A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement.

CONCLUSIONS

A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.

A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices

BACKGROUND

Extrusion of electrodes outside the cochlea and tip fold overs may lead to suboptimal outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Intraoperative measures such as Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements may enable clinicians to identify electrode malposition and direct surgeons to correctly place the electrode array during surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the current literature on the effectiveness of TIM measurements in identifying extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs.

METHODS

A scoping review of studies on TIM-based measurements were carried out using the Databases-Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Eleven full texts articles met the inclusion criteria. Only human studies pertaining to TIM as a tool used in CI were included in the review. Further, patient characteristics, electrode design, and TIM measurement outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

TIM measurements were available for 550 implanted ears with the subjects age ranged between 9 months to 89 years. Abnormal TIM measurements were reported for 6.55% (36). Tip fold over was detected in 3.64% (20) of the cases, extracochlear electrodes in 1.45% (8), and 1.45% (8) were reported as buckling. Slim-modiolar electrode array designs were more common (54.71%) than pre-curved (23.34%) or lateral wall (21.95%) electrode array. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was reported for five ears (0.89%), with normal cochlear anatomy for all other patients.

CONCLUSION

TIM measurement is a promising tool for the intraoperative detection of electrode malposition. TIM measurement has a potential to replace intraoperative imaging in future. Though, TIM measurement is in its early stages of clinical utility, intuitive normative data sets coupled with standardised criteria for detection of abnormal electrode positioning would enhance its sensitivity.

Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array

OBJECTIVES

The influence of cochlear morphology and electrode array design on scalar position and dislocation rates is of great interest in CI surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate scalar position and specific points of dislocation in relation to cochlear morphology in patients implanted with a new slim perimodiolar electrode array.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were implanted using the slim modiolar electrode array (= SMA) (= 532/632 electrode array of Cochlear™). Postoperative imaging was performed via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the scans were analyzed regarding cochlear morphology (distances A and B and cochlear height), scalar location of the electrode array, basal insertion depth and apical insertion angle. Furthermore, electrode array design and surgical protocols were evaluated.

RESULTS

81 ears implanted with the SMA were retrospectively included. We evaluated 3 electrode array tip fold over intraoperatively via X-ray imaging and performed revision during the same surgery. The CBCT scans showed 76 initial scala tympani (ST) insertions without dislocation. Two ears showed a dislocated array, one at 77° and the other at 163°. Three arrays were inserted into scala vestibuli (SV) via cochleostomy. These patients showed no signs of obliteration. Cochlear morphology showed no influence on angular insertion depth and scalar position.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMA showed a very low rate of scalar dislocations due to its slim electrode array design (2.7%). We could find a learning curve regarding the handling and the risk of dislocation and tip fold over with this electrode array. The rate of intraoperative tip fold over detection via X-ray imaging was 3.7%. Therefore, we highly recommend X-ray imaging and transimpedance matrix measurements within the surgery protocol. Scala vestibuli insertions happened in patients with cochleostomy only. We could identify two specific points of dislocation depending on electrode array design.

Detection of Tip Fold-Over of the Slim Modiolar Electrode Using Intraoperative Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the importance of mobile cone-beam computed tomography in detecting tip fold-over of a slim modiolar electrode within the cochlea during surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

METHODS

From January 2020 to June 2022, 33 ears of 30 patients with normal cochlear morphology underwent cochlear implantation with slim modiolar electrodes and intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Furthermore, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images.

RESULTS

The tip fold-over of the electrodes was detected using mobile cone-beam computed tomography in 3 out of 33 ears (9.1%). We could not identify the tip fold-over by scouting plain X-ray images in 2 out of 3 cases before taking the cone-beam computed tomography images. Electrode removal and reinsertion were performed before wound closure and the successful reinsertion was confirmed by mobile cone-beam computed tomography. The folded electrode tips were located at 238.8°, 152°, and 185.8°.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography is useful in detecting the tip fold-over of the slim modiolar electrodes during surgery. Therefore, it was possible to reinsert the electrodes in all cases before closing the wound, eliminating the need for revision surgeries. Moreover, the analysis of mobile cone-beam computed tomography images may help to elucidate the mechanisms of electrode tip fold-over.

Orientation of the Cochlea From a Surgeon's Perspective

Background

One of the mechanisms that cause tip fold-over is a misalignment between the electrode array's coiling direction and the cochlea's curving direction.

Objectives

We reviewed surgical videos and computed tomography (CT) datasets of the patients who underwent cochlear implantation procedures from January 2010 to December 2021, paying particular attention to the cochlea's orientation in the surgeon's microscopic view.

Methods

CT dataset and video recordings were analyzed to measure the "slope angle," which is the angle between the cochlea's coiling plane and the horizontal plane.

Results

There were 220 cases that met the criteria and completed the analysis. The mean slope angle was 12.1° ± 9.5°, with a minimum of -9.4° and maximum of 44.6°. However, each surgeon had a favored slope angle range.

Conclusion

Understanding the slope angle and making an effort to reduce the chance of misalignment during electrode insertion may help prevent tip fold-over of slim perimodiolar electrode arrays.

Assessing the Placement of the Cochlear Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Array by Trans Impedance Matrix Analysis: A Temporal Bone Study

New cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays provide softer insertion dynamics; however, due to their high flexibility, the possibilities of fold-overs or intraoperative displacements must be taken into account. The position of each individual electrode can only be determined by using high-resolution computed tomography or cone-beam CT. The trans-impedance matrix test (TIM) is an electrophysiological method based on electric field imaging that can provide images of electrode position and electrode folding. Objective: In this experimental research, we evaluated the result of TIM as a method of monitoring cochlear insertion for a precurved slim modiolar electrode array in fresh human temporal bones by analyzing the transimpedance matrix patterns and their correlation with electrode position using high-resolution computed tomography. Material and Methods: Sixteen slim modiolar electrode arrays were inserted into eight fresh Human Temporal Bones. Eight electrodes were inserted according to the correct methodology of insertion, and eight were intentionally folded over. After all insertions, a trans-impedance matrix analysis and a Cone Beam CT (CBCT) were performed in each temporal bone. Results: If we correlated the TIM patterns with the radiological electrode position, we observed that better electrode intracochlear positions indicated more “homogeneous” TIM patterns (intracochlear voltage dropped monotonically as the distance between stimulation and recording contact increased, both toward the apex and toward the base). A correlation where fold-over was detected in the TIM results was found in all eight temporal bone radiological findings. Conclusions: Trans-Impedance Matrix patterns were correlated with the radiological CI electrode position. When a tip fold-over appeared, a matrix with a secondary ridge in addition to the primary ridge was observed in all cases. TIM can be an effective method in the control of electrode positioning.

Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today

As biomolecular approaches for hearing restoration in profound sensorineural hearing loss evolve, they will be applied in conjunction with or instead of cochlear implants. An understanding of the current state-of-the-art of this technology, including its advantages, disadvantages, and its potential for delivering and interacting with biomolecular hearing restoration approaches, is helpful for designing modern hearing-restoration strategies. Cochlear implants (CI) have evolved over the last four decades to restore hearing more effectively, in more people, with diverse indications. This evolution has been driven by advances in technology, surgery, and healthcare delivery. Here, we offer a practical treatise on the state of cochlear implantation directed towards developing the next generation of inner ear therapeutics. We aim to capture and distill conversations ongoing in CI research, development, and clinical management. In this review, we discuss successes and physiological constraints of hearing with an implant, common surgical approaches and electrode arrays, new indications and outcome measures for implantation, and barriers to CI utilization. Additionally, we compare cochlear implantation with biomolecular and pharmacological approaches, consider strategies to combine these approaches, and identify unmet medical needs with cochlear implants. The strengths and weaknesses of modern implantation highlighted here can mark opportunities for continued progress or improvement in the design and delivery of the next generation of inner ear therapeutics.