1
|
Micuda A, Li H, Rask-Andersen H, Ladak HM, Agrawal SK. Morphologic Analysis of the Scala Tympani Using Synchrotron: Implications for Cochlear Implantation. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:2889-2897. [PMID: 38189807 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To use synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI) to visualize and measure the morphology of the entire cochlear scala tympani (ST) and assess cochlear implant (CI) electrode trajectories. METHODS SR-PCI images were used to obtain geometric measurements of the cochlear scalar diameter and area at 5-degree increments in 35 unimplanted and three implanted fixed human cadaveric cochleae. RESULTS The cross-sectional diameter and area of the cochlea were found to decrease from the base to the apex. This study represents a wide variability in cochlear morphology and suggests that even in the smallest cochlea, the ST can accommodate a 0.4 mm diameter electrode up to 720°. Additionally, all lateral wall array trajectories were within the anatomically accommodating insertion zone. CONCLUSION This is the first study to use SR-PCI to visualize and quantify the entire ST morphology, from the round window to the apical tip, and assess the post-operative trajectory of electrodes. These high-resolution anatomical measurements can be used to inform the angular insertion depth that can be accommodated in CI patients, accounting for anatomical variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A. Laryngoscope, 134:2889-2897, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Micuda
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helge Rask-Andersen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hanif M Ladak
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sumit K Agrawal
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang L, Schmidt FH, Oberhoffner T, Ehrt K, Cantré D, Großmann W, Schraven SP, Mlynski R. Transimpedance Matrix Can Be Used to Estimate Electrode Positions Intraoperatively and to Monitor Their Positional Changes Postoperatively in Cochlear Implant Patients. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e289-e296. [PMID: 38346796 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Accurate positioning of the electrode array during cochlear implant (CI) surgery is crucial for achieving optimal hearing outcomes. Traditionally, postoperative radiological imaging has been used to assess electrode position. Transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements have also emerged as a promising method for assessing electrode position. This involves utilizing electric field imaging to create an electric distance matrix by analyzing voltage variations among adjacent electrodes. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using intraoperative TIM measurements to estimate electrode position and monitor postoperative changes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING University Medical center, tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Patients undergoing CI (CI622) surgery between January 2019 and June 2022. INTERVENTION CI electrode positions and maximal angular insertion depths (maxAID) were determined using X-ray imaging according to Stenvers' projection. The mean gradient phase (MGP) was extracted from the TIM, and a correlation between the MGP and maxAID was examined. A model was then built to estimate the maxAID using the MGP, and changes in electrode location over time were assessed using this model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Twenty-four patients were included in this study. A positive correlation between the maxAID and the MGP ( R = 0.7, p = 0.0001) was found. The established model was able to predict the maxAID with an accuracy of 27.7 ± 4.4°. Comparing intraoperative and postoperative TIM measurements, a decrease of 24.1° ± 10.7° in maxAID over time was observed. CONCLUSION TIM measurements are useful for estimating the insertion depth of the electrode and monitoring changes in the electrode's position over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lichun Zhang
- Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner,"
| | | | - Tobias Oberhoffner
- Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner,"
| | - Karsten Ehrt
- Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner,"
| | - Daniel Cantré
- Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Wilma Großmann
- Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner,"
| | | | - Robert Mlynski
- Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner,"
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Concheri S, Brotto D, Ariano M, Daloiso A, Di Pasquale Fiasca VM, Sorrentino F, Coppadoro B, Trevisi P, Zanoletti E, Franchella S. Intraoperative Measurement of Insertion Speed in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Preliminary Experience with Cochlear SmartNav. Audiol Res 2024; 14:227-238. [PMID: 38525682 PMCID: PMC10961689 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14020021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to present the real-time estimated values of cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion speed (IS) during intraoperative sessions using the Cochlear Nucleus SmartNav System to assess whether this measure affected CI outcomes and to determine whether real-time feedback assists expert surgeons in achieving slow insertion. METHODS The IS was measured in 52 consecutive patients (65 implanted ears) using the CI632 electrode. The IS values were analyzed in relation to procedure repetition over time, NRT ratio, and CI audiological outcomes. RESULTS The average IS was 0.64 mm/s (SD = 0.24); minimum and maximum values were 0.23 and 1.24 mm/s, respectively. The IS significantly decreased with each array insertion by the operator (p = 0.006), and the mean decreased by 24% between the first and last third of procedures; however, this reduction fell within the error range of SmartNav for IS (+/-0.48 mm/s). No correlation was found between IS and the NRT ratio (p = 0.51), pure-tone audiometry (PTA) at CI activation (p = 0.506), and PTA (p = 0.94) or word recognition score (p = 0.231) at last evaluation. CONCLUSIONS The estimated IS reported by SmartNav did not result in a clinically significant reduction in insertion speed or an improvement in CI hearing outcomes. Real-time feedback of IS could potentially be used for training, but its effectiveness requires confirmation through additional studies and more accurate tools. Implementation of IS assessment in clinical practice will enable comparisons between measurement techniques and between manual and robot-assisted insertions. This will help define the optimal IS range to achieve better cochlear implant (CI) outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Concheri
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Brotto
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Marzia Ariano
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Daloiso
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | | | - Flavia Sorrentino
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Beatrice Coppadoro
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Patrizia Trevisi
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Zanoletti
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Franchella
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song B, Oh S, Kim D, Cho YS, Moon IJ. Changes in Revision Cochlear Implantation and Device Failure Profiles. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 17:37-45. [PMID: 38228133 PMCID: PMC10933811 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As cochlear implantation (CI) experiences rapid innovations and its indications expand, the characteristics of revision CI (RCI) are evolving. This study investigated changes in the RCI profile and explored their clinical implications. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of all CIs performed at a tertiary medical institution between October 2001 and January 2023. The rates of and reasons for RCI were evaluated in relation to the manufacturer and device model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to examine cumulative and device survival curves. Cumulative and device survival rates were additionally analyzed based on age group, period of primary CI, and manufacturer. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between RCI and the device manufacturer. RESULTS Among 1,430 CIs, 73 (5.1%) required RCI. The predominant reason for RCI was device failure (40 of 73 RCIs [54.8%]), with an overall device failure rate of 2.8%. This was followed by flap-associated problems and migration (nine of 73 RCIs each [12.3%]). Flap retention issues emerged as a new cause in three cases (two involving the CI 632 and one involving the SYNCHRONY 2 implant), and six instances of electrode tip fold-over arose (four for the CI 600 series and two for the CI 500 series). The overall 10-year cumulative and device survival rates were 93.4% and 95.8%, respectively. After excluding models with recall issues, significant differences in cumulative (P =0.010) and device (P =0.001) survival rates were observed across manufacturers. CONCLUSION While the overall CI survival rate is stable, device failure persists as the predominant reason for RCI. Moreover, the types of complications leading to revision (including issues with flap retention and electrode tip fold-over) have shifted, particularly for newer implant models. Given the clinical importance of device failure and subsequent reoperation, clinicians should remain informed about and responsive to these trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bokhyun Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Subi Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doyun Kim
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Sang Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Joon Moon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Böttcher-Rebmann G, Schell V, Zuniga MG, Salcher R, Lenarz T, Rau TS. Preclinical evaluation of a tool for insertion force measurements in cochlear implant surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2023; 18:2117-2124. [PMID: 37310560 PMCID: PMC10589184 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-023-02975-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trauma that may be inflicted to the inner ear (cochlea) during the insertion of an electrode array (EA) in cochlear implant (CI) surgery can significantly decrease the hearing outcome of patients with residual hearing. Interaction forces between the EA and the cochlea are a promising indicator for the likelihood of intracochlear trauma. However, insertion forces have only been measured in laboratory setups. We recently developed a tool to measure the insertion force during CI surgery. Here, we present the first ex vivo evaluation of our tool with a focus on usability in the standard surgical workflow. METHODS Two CI surgeons inserted commercially available EAs into three temporal bone specimens. The insertion force and the orientation of the tool were recorded together with camera footage. The surgeons answered a questionnaire after each insertion to evaluate the surgical workflow with respect to CI surgery. RESULTS The EA insertion using our tool was rated successful in all 18 trials. The surgical workflow was evaluated to be equivalent to standard CI surgery. Minor handling challenges can be overcome through surgeon training. The peak insertion forces were 62.4 mN ± 26.7 mN on average. Peak forces significantly correlated to the final electrode insertion depth, supporting the assumption that the measured forces mainly correspond to intracochlear events and not extracochlear friction. Gravity-induced forces of up to 28.8 mN were removed from the signal, illustrating the importance of the compensation of such forces in manual surgery. CONCLUSION The results show that the tool is ready for intraoperative use. In vivo insertion force data will improve the interpretability of experimental results in laboratory settings. The implementation of live insertion force feedback to surgeons could further improve residual hearing preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Böttcher-Rebmann
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Viktor Schell
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - M Geraldine Zuniga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rolf Salcher
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas S Rau
- Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li J, Kang S, Du H, Wang S, Wang D, Liu M, Yang S. Analysis of Cochlear Parameters in Paediatric Inner Ears with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Patent Cochlea. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101666. [PMID: 36294805 PMCID: PMC9605104 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Is cochlear implant (CI) electrode selection for cochleae with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) the same as that for patent cochleae with a normal inner ear structure? Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images of 247 ears were assessed retrospectively. The A-value, B-value, and H-value were measured with OTOPLAN, and Bell curves were created to show the distribution. All ears with EVA were re-evaluated using a 3D slicer to confirm whether incomplete partition type II (IP II) existed. The Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to determine a statistically significant difference. After adjustment with the Bonferroni correction method, a p-value ≤ 0.006 was considered significant. In total, 157 ears with patent cochlea and 90 ears with EVA were assessed. Seventy (82%) of the EVA ears had an IP II malformation, and 14 (19%) of these were not detected by CT scan but were later seen through the 3D reconstruction. A significant difference was found for the A value and B value between the patent cochleae and EVA-only and between the patent cochleae and EVA with IP II. Most EVA cases had an IP II malformation. The basal turn of the cochlea may be smaller in EVA cases than in the patent cochleae. Electrode selection should be adjusted accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianan Li
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Shuoshuo Kang
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Haiqiao Du
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Shuwei Wang
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Dandan Wang
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Mengyu Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Correspondence: (M.L.); (S.Y.)
| | - Shiming Yang
- Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing 100853, China
- State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100853, China
- Correspondence: (M.L.); (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matsumoto N, Akagi-Tsuchihashi N, Noda T, Komune N, Nakagawa T. Orientation of the Cochlea From a Surgeon's Perspective. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY OPEN 2022; 2:e017. [PMID: 38516627 PMCID: PMC10950153 DOI: 10.1097/ono.0000000000000017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Background One of the mechanisms that cause tip fold-over is a misalignment between the electrode array's coiling direction and the cochlea's curving direction. Objectives We reviewed surgical videos and computed tomography (CT) datasets of the patients who underwent cochlear implantation procedures from January 2010 to December 2021, paying particular attention to the cochlea's orientation in the surgeon's microscopic view. Methods CT dataset and video recordings were analyzed to measure the "slope angle," which is the angle between the cochlea's coiling plane and the horizontal plane. Results There were 220 cases that met the criteria and completed the analysis. The mean slope angle was 12.1° ± 9.5°, with a minimum of -9.4° and maximum of 44.6°. However, each surgeon had a favored slope angle range. Conclusion Understanding the slope angle and making an effort to reduce the chance of misalignment during electrode insertion may help prevent tip fold-over of slim perimodiolar electrode arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nozomu Matsumoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Nana Akagi-Tsuchihashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Teppei Noda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Noritaka Komune
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Nakagawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu C, Debs S, Singh R, Kastetter S, Pierre-Louis A, Coelho DH. The case for intra-operative X-ray in cochlear implantation: Four illustrative cases and literature review. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:332-338. [PMID: 36005270 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2112546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate the utility of routine intraoperative plain film imaging in optimizing outcomes in cochlear implantation. INTRODUCTION Evolving surgical techniques, programming, and electrode arrays have all improved performance outcomes in cochlear implantation. Yet despite decreasing complication rates, electrode misplacement remains a common occurrence. Utilization of intraoperative confirmational tools (radiologic, electrophysiologic) remains unstandardized despite the acknowledged importance of proper electrode positioning. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use and benefits of intraoperative X-ray (IOXR) in four cases, particularly in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing. METHODS Four cases performed by an experienced CI surgeon are discussed where electrode malposition was only detected through X-ray. Literature review was performed on the use of intraoperative imaging, focusing on plain film radiography. RESULTS Case 1-3 describe examples of resistance-free electrode insertion in patients with normal pre-operative imaging. Intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) were normal. However, IOXR ultimately revealed tip fold-over prompting array repositioning. Case 4 describes an elective replacement of a soft-failing device. Resistance was encountered during array insertion, with IOXR demonstrating incomplete insertion compared with prior imaging. Positioning was revised to achieve pre-revision insertion depth, demonstrating the utility of prior IOXR in revision cases. Literature review of IOXR is discussed. CONCLUSION Appropriate placement of the electrode is paramount to successful CI outcomes. These cases illustrate IOXR as a safe, effective method to ensure optimal placement even in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing, supporting its routine use even by the most seasoned surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Debs
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Rhea Singh
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sean Kastetter
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Akilah Pierre-Louis
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Daniel H Coelho
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4-6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6-30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2-1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1-1.3%), 11% (9.2-13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5-3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|