Analysis of Hearing Preservation in Middle Cranial Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma

Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.

SETTING

Tertiary academic institution.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic VS.

INTERVENTIONS

MCF.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.

Establishment of Nomogram for Prediction of Hearing Preservation after Retrosigmoid Approach in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a prognostic nomogram for the prediction of hearing preservation (HP) after retrosigmoid approach (RSA) in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) and further assist in clinical decision-making.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 111 patients diagnosed with VS with serviceable hearing from January 2013 to March 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent surgery via RSA, and hearing outcomes were reviewed 2 weeks postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative and postoperative hearing were analyzed and stratified according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis of the primary group, preoperative hearing, tumor size, and tumor origin were significantly related to postoperative HP ( p = 0.029, p = 0.043, and p = 0.018, respectively). Factors derived from the multivariate analysis were all assembled into the nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed good predictive accuracy of the nomogram model in both primary and validation groups with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.802 and 0.797, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Independent predictors of postoperative HP in patients with VS were selected to create the nomogram. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups and assist in clinical decision making.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Retrosigmoid Approach for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: Patient Selection, Technical Pearls, and Hearing Results

The retrosigmoid corridor provides the most broadly applied approach for resection of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. It may be utilized for any size tumor and for patients with intact hearing with the intention of hearing preservation. For larger tumors, the skull base surgeon must weigh the benefits the retrosigmoid approach against those of the translabyrinthine route. For smaller tumors where hearing preservation is a goal, the retrosigmoid approach is contrasted to the middle fossa route. Hearing preservation is most likely for patients with small and medially located intracanalicular tumors with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, and excellent preoperative hearing.

Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma

The middle fossa approach is an excellent technique for removing appropriate vestibular schwannomas in patients with serviceable hearing. Knowledge of the intricate middle fossa anatomy is essential for optimal outcomes. Gross total removal can be achieved with preservation of hearing and facial nerve function, both in the immediate and long-term periods. This article provides an overview of the background and indications for the procedure, a description of the operative protocol, and a summary of the literature on postoperative hearing outcomes.

Hearing Preservation After Intervention in Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the durability of audiological outcomes after radiation and surgery in the management of vestibular schwannoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and serviceable hearing at the time of intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

Gamma Knife, middle cranial fossa, or retrosigmoid approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores.

RESULTS

Postintervention serviceable hearing (class A/B) was preserved in 70.4% (n = 130; mean follow-up, 3.31 yr; range, 0-15.25 yr). Of the 49 patients treated with radiation, 19 (39.6%) had serviceable hearing at last follow-up, compared with 38 (46.9% of 81) who underwent retrosigmoid (n = 36 [44.4%]) and middle cranial fossa (n = 45 [55.6%]) approaches (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-2.82; p = 0.47). A matched analysis by age, tumor volume, and preintervention hearing (n = 38) also found no difference in hearing preservation (HP) likelihood between surgery and radiation (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.24-35.91; p = 0.59). After initial HP, 4 (9.5%) surgical versus 10 (37.0%) radiated patients subsequently lost residual serviceable (A/B) hearing (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; p = 0.01) at a mean 3.74 ± 3.58 and 4.73 ± 3.83 years after surgery and radiation, respectively. Overall, 5- and 10-year HP rates (A/B) after initially successful HP surgery were 84.4 and 63.0%, respectively. However, survival estimates declined to 48.9% at 5 years and 32.7% at 10 years when patients with immediate postoperative serviceable hearing loss were also included, which were comparable to radiation-HP rates at 5 and 10 years of 28.0 and 14.2%, respectively ( p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

After vestibular schwannoma intervention, overall HP was similar between radiated and surgical cohorts. However, when successful, surgical approaches offered more durable hearing outcomes at long-term follow-up.