Comparing Hearing Outcomes in Irradiated and Conservatively Managed Vestibular Schwannoma

Reduced Cochlear MRI Signal and Hearing Outcomes in Conservatively Managed Vestibular Schwannoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if hypointense cochlear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) signal correlates with hearing outcomes in conservatively managed vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of 657 cases from 1992 to 2020.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

A retrospective review was performed to identify conservatively managed VS patients with appropriate baseline MRI, audiology, and at least 12-month audiological follow-up. Patients were excluded if they progressed to surgery or radiotherapy in less than 12 months, bilateral tumors, or surgery on the contralateral ear.

INTERVENTION

Conservatively managed patients with CISS imaging studies and audiology testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure change in pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS). Secondary outcome measures tumor size, presence of lateral fluid cap, or cystic changes.

RESULTS

A total of 92 individuals (47% male, 58 ± 11.6 yr) met the inclusion criteria, with 36 (39%) of patients demonstrating abnormal cochlear CISS signal. At baseline, abnormal cochlear CISS signal was associated with higher intracanalicular (IC) length (7.9 versus 6.6 mm, p = 0.0177) and lower WRS (55.7 versus 78.8 dBHL, p = 0.0054). During follow-up, individuals with abnormal cochlear CISS signal had significantly higher PTA (62.4 versus 46.4 dBHL, p = 0.0010). After adjusting for baseline covariates, abnormal cochlear CISS signal was consistently associated with a greater increase in PTA of 8.3 dBHL (95% confidence interval, 2.9-13.7; p = 0.0032) from baseline when compared with the normal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal cochlear signal on MRI CISS sequences is associated with poorer hearing outcomes in conservatively managed VS patients.

Comparative analysis of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery and watchful waiting in the management of newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors posing significant management challenges. This study aims to compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and watchful waiting (WW) in the management of newly diagnosed VS, integrating findings from both retrospective and the pioneering V-REX prospective trial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies directly comparing SRS with WW for newly diagnosed VS were included. Primary outcomes focused on hearing preservation assessed through the AAO-HNS or Gardner-Robertson hearing classification scales and tumor progression, with secondary outcomes focusing on neurological symptoms, and the need for further treatment. Thirteen studies encompassing 1,635 patients (WW: 891; SRS: 744) were included.While no significant difference was found in serviceable hearing loss at last follow-up (RR = 1.51, [95%CI: 0.98, 2.32], p = 0.06), significant differences favoring WW were observed in pure tone audiometry (PTA) (MD = -13.51 [95%CI: -22.66, -4.37], p = 0.004) and word recognition score (WRS) (MD = 20.48 [95%CI: 9.72, 31.25], p = 0.0002). Analysis of tumor progression indicated no overall significant difference in risk between SRS and WW (RR = 0.40, [95%CI 0.07, 2.40], p = 0.32), but subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk with SRS in certain contexts. The need for further treatments favored SRS (RR = 0.24, [95%CI: 0.07, 0.74], p = 0.007). No significant differences were found in tinnitus and imbalance between the two groups. This comprehensive analysis suggests no marked difference in functional hearing preservation between SRS and WW in managing VS. However, untreated tumors commonly necessitate additional interventions. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment decisions and underscore the importance of continued monitoring. The study advocates for further prospective trials to refine management strategies for VS.

Temporal lobe injury with middle fossa approach to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review

There are several surgical approaches for vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. However, management has gradually shifted from microsurgical resection, toward surveillance and radiosurgery. One of the arguments against microsurgery via the middle fossa approach (MFA) is the risk of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe retraction injury or sequela from a MFA via a systematic review of the existing literature. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting temporal lobe injury or sequela during MFA for VS were identified. Data was aggregated and subsequently analyzed to evaluate the incidence of temporal lobe injury. 22 studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1522 patients that underwent VS resection via MFA. The overall rate of temporal lobe sequelae from this approach was 0.7%. The rate of CSF leak was 5.9%. The rate of wound infection was 0.6%. Meningitis occurred in 1.6% of patients. With the MFA, 92% of patients had good facial outcomes, and 54.9% had hearing preservation. Our series and literature review support that temporal lobe retraction injury or sequelae is an infrequent complication from an MFA for intracanalicular VS resection.

Vestibular Schwannoma International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS Study

PURPOSE

The present study assesses the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus observation for Koos grade 1 and 2 vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumors affecting hearing and neurological function.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multicenter study analyzed data from Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients managed with SRS (SRS group) or observation (observation group). Propensity score matching balanced patient demographics, tumor volume, and audiometry. Outcomes measured were tumor control, serviceable hearing preservation, and neurological outcomes.

RESULTS

In 125 matched patients in each group with a 36-month median follow-up (P = .49), SRS yielded superior 5- and 10-year tumor control rates (99% CI, 97.1%-100%, and 91.9% CI, 79.4%-100%) versus observation (45.8% CI, 36.8%-57.2%, and 22% CI, 13.2%-36.7%; P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at 5 and 9 years were comparable (SRS 60.4% CI, 49.9%-73%, vs observation 51.4% CI, 41.3%-63.9%, and SRS 27% CI, 14.5%-50.5%, vs observation 30% CI, 17.2%-52.2%; P = .53). SRS were associated with lower odds of tinnitus (OR = 0.39, P = .01), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.11, P = .004), and any cranial nerve palsy (OR = 0.36, P = .003), with no change in cranial nerves 5 or 7 (P > .05). Composite endpoints of tumor progression and/or any of the previous outcomes showed significant lower odds associated with SRS compared with observation alone (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS management in matched cohorts of Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients demonstrated superior tumor control, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly lower odds of experiencing neurological deficits. These findings delineate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of this patient population.

Reported Hearing Outcome Measures Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Scoping Review

Background  Evidence on hearing outcome measures when assessing hearing preservation following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for adults with vestibular schwannoma (VS) has not previously been collated in a structured review. Objective  The objective of the present study was to perform a scoping review of the evidence regarding the choice of hearing outcomes and other methodological characteristics following SRS for adults with VS. Methods  The protocol was registered in the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension guidelines for scoping reviews. A systematic search of five online databases revealed 1,591 studies, 247 of which met the inclusion criteria. Results  The majority of studies ( n  = 213, 86%) were retrospective cohort or case series with the remainder ( n  = 34, 14%) prospective cohort. Pure-tone audiometry and speech intelligibility were included in 222 (90%) and 158 (64%) studies, respectively, often summarized within a classification scheme and lacking procedural details. Fifty-nine (24%) studies included self-report measures. The median duration of follow-up, when reported, was 43 months (interquartile range: 29, 4-150). Conclusion  Evidence on hearing disability after SRS for VS is based on low-quality studies which are inherently susceptible to bias. This review has highlighted an urgent need for a randomized controlled trial assessing hearing outcomes in patients with VS managed with radiosurgery or radiological observation. Similarly, consensus and coproduction of a core outcome set to determine relevant hearing and communication outcome domains is required. This will ensure that patient priorities, including communication abilities in the presence of background noise and reduced participation restrictions, are addressed.

Management of Central and Peripheral Nervous System Tumors in Patients with Neurofibromatosis

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis represent a diverse group of genetic tumor predisposition syndromes with a shared feature of tumors affecting the peripheral nerve sheaths. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many advancements have been made in understanding the biologic underpinnings of these conditions, and in 2016 the first drug was approved by the FDA to treat pediatric symptomatic unresectable plexiform neurofibromas. RECENT FINDINGS: Mek inhibitors have provided a much-needed therapeutic avenue for NF1 patients with unresectable plexiform neurofibromas (PN), both for reduction of tumor bulk and for improvement in symptoms. Selumetinib is the first FDA approved drug for PN, but is only approved for children. Some research suggests that alternative Mek inhibitors and other mixed tyrosine kinase inhibitors may have better efficacy in adults. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab can prolong hearing and delay the need for surgery in NF2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. This article provides an update regarding considerations and approaches when treating the tumors associated with the neurofibromatoses (NF), including risk and prognosis metrics, clinical trial results, surgical techniques, and radiation therapy recommendations.

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Vestibular Schwannoma ‒ evaluation and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on vestibular schwannoma were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Diagnosis - audiologic, electrophysiologic tests, and imaging; (2) Treatment - wait and scan protocols, surgery, radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in VS treatment has become more challenging. MRI can diagnose increasingly smaller tumors, which has disastrous consequences for the patients and their families. It is important to develop an individualized approach for each case, which highly depends on the experience of each surgical team.

Long-term tumor growth and hearing after conservative management of vestibular schwannomas

BACKGROUND

There has been no report of a detailed long-term study of hearing at defined frequencies.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate long-term vestibular shwannoma (VS) growth and long-term changes in hearing thresholds at defined frequencies.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved the medical records of 67 VS patients. Cases that were followed up for more than 5 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Tumor growth was observed in 15 cases (22.4%) and 6 cases underwent gamma knife treatment (9.0%). The longest case of tumor growth and gamma knife treatment was observed 11 years after the initial diagnosis. Hearing thresholds at 500-2000 Hz was significantly different between the no growth and growth group (p < .05). Particularly at 1000 Hz, there was a significant difference between the two groups from an early time-point.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Even a 10-year or longer follow-up of VS may show an increase in tumor growth. Moreover, hearing thresholds, particularly at 1000 kHz, may predict tumor growth when following-up VS patients.

Factors Influencing Personalized Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review

Management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a complex process aimed at identifying a clinical indication for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (sRT) or microsurgical resection or wait and scan (WS). The aim of the review was to clarify which patient and tumor parameters may lead to different therapeutic choices, with a view to a personalized VS approach. A systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis criteria was conducted between February and March 2022. The authors defined six parameters that seemed to influence decision-making in VS management: 1-incidental VS; 2-tumor size; 3-tumor regrowth after sRT; 4-subtotal resection; 5-patients' age; 6-symptoms. The initial search yielded 3532 articles, and finally, 812 articles were included. Through a qualitative synthesis of the included studies, management strategies were evaluated and discussed. An individualized proposal of procedures is preferable as compared to a single gold-standard approach in VS decision-making. The most significant factors that need to be considered when dealing with a VS diagnosis are age, tumor size and hearing preservation issues.

Hearing Preservation After Intervention in Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the durability of audiological outcomes after radiation and surgery in the management of vestibular schwannoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and serviceable hearing at the time of intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

Gamma Knife, middle cranial fossa, or retrosigmoid approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores.

RESULTS

Postintervention serviceable hearing (class A/B) was preserved in 70.4% (n = 130; mean follow-up, 3.31 yr; range, 0-15.25 yr). Of the 49 patients treated with radiation, 19 (39.6%) had serviceable hearing at last follow-up, compared with 38 (46.9% of 81) who underwent retrosigmoid (n = 36 [44.4%]) and middle cranial fossa (n = 45 [55.6%]) approaches (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-2.82; p = 0.47). A matched analysis by age, tumor volume, and preintervention hearing (n = 38) also found no difference in hearing preservation (HP) likelihood between surgery and radiation (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.24-35.91; p = 0.59). After initial HP, 4 (9.5%) surgical versus 10 (37.0%) radiated patients subsequently lost residual serviceable (A/B) hearing (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; p = 0.01) at a mean 3.74 ± 3.58 and 4.73 ± 3.83 years after surgery and radiation, respectively. Overall, 5- and 10-year HP rates (A/B) after initially successful HP surgery were 84.4 and 63.0%, respectively. However, survival estimates declined to 48.9% at 5 years and 32.7% at 10 years when patients with immediate postoperative serviceable hearing loss were also included, which were comparable to radiation-HP rates at 5 and 10 years of 28.0 and 14.2%, respectively ( p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

After vestibular schwannoma intervention, overall HP was similar between radiated and surgical cohorts. However, when successful, surgical approaches offered more durable hearing outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Endoscopic-Assisted Keyhole Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Small Vestibular Schwannomas

The classical middle cranial fossa approach (MCFA) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal often requires a large incision and craniotomy, excessive temporal lobe manipulation, and a longer recovery. We describe a keyhole MCFA (KMCFA) with endoscopic assistance that allows for adequate access with minimal temporal lobe manipulation, resulting in a fast recovery and an invisible scar. Eight sides of four cadaveric heads were dissected through the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA to access the internal auditory canal (IAC). Furthermore, five patients with intracanalicular VS underwent tumor removal with the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA. During the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA with fine instruments, a 3-cm supra-auricular incision and a 2-cm diameter keyhole craniotomy achieved exposure of the entire length of the IAC in all cadaveric dissections without unintended violation of the cochlea, semicircular canal, and facial nerve. The gross tumor was totally removed in five patients with no major postoperative complications. The surgical time was reduced, the hearing outcomes were similar to those of the classical MCFA, and the scar was invisible 1 month after the surgery. The endoscopic-assisted KMCFA permits intracanalicular VS removal in a safe, efficient, and cosmetic way. For small intracanalicular VSs, this approach can replace the classical MCFA when indicated.