(Even Off-Label) Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Results in Measurable Objective and Subjective Benefit

Are children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss receiving cochlear implants?

INTRODUCTION

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted its first approval for cochlear implants (CI) in children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in 1990. In 2019, the FDA expanded CI indications to include children with unilateral SNHL.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of children with unilateral SNHL in the population of new pediatric CI recipients between 2012 and 2021.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Pediatric database examined patients under 18 years of age with bilateral or unilateral SNHL who underwent CI between 2012 and 2021. Current Procedural Terminology code 69930 identified patients with 'cochlear device implantation, with or without mastoidectomy.' The percentage of children undergoing CI for unilateral versus bilateral SNHL during the study period was calculated and subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

9863 pediatric CI patients were included with a mean age of 5.1 (95 % CI 5.1-5.2) years at the time of implantation. 7.5 % (N = 739) of patients had unilateral SNHL and 92.5 % (N = 9124) had bilateral SNHL. Children with bilateral SNHL undergoing CI were significantly younger (5.0 years versus 6.9 years for those with unilateral SNHL, p < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of children receiving CI for unilateral versus bilateral SNHL (3.3 % in 2012 to 14.3 % in 2021, p < .001) before and after the FDA changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of CIs placed for unilateral SNHL has increased annually even before 2019 when the FDA expanded its CI indications to include children with unilateral SNHL for the first time.

[Cochlear implant and tinnitus]

Cochlear implant (CI) treatment is now established as a successful standard of care for auditory rehabilitation of profoundly deaf or severe hearing loss patients. CI candidates with tinnitus also benefit from improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and tinnitus burden. Current CI indications include bilateral (double-sided) profound hearing loss and deafness (DSD), unilateral (single-sided) deafness (SSD), and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). The new and expanded indications for cochlear implants result in different healthcare situations, which may also be associated with differences in tinnitus burden before and after CI treatment. In this article, we discuss the prevalence of tinnitus in different patient groups and the influence of CI on tinnitus prevalence and severity in these groups. In addition, further therapeutic options for tinnitus suppression based on the CI principle are presented, including the development of an anti-tinnitus implant (proof of concept).

[Prospective comparative analysis of cochlear implant patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss with regard to health-related quality of life, tinnitus distress and psychological comorbidities]

BACKGROUND

Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) are increasingly being treated with cochlear implants (CI) due to the demonstrated improvements in auditory abilities and quality of life. To date, there are few published studies in which these two groups are comparatively studied. The aim of the current study was to examine which factors differ between those two patient groups, especially preoperatively.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of the previously published raw data of 66 prospectively recruited CI patients (21 SSD/45 AHL) was performed. In addition to the hearing outcome, tinnitus distress (tinnitus questionnaire), health-related quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, NCIQ), stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire, PSQ), and psychological comorbidities (General Depression Scale, ADS‑L and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, GAD-7) were assessed in SSD and AHL patients pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, SSD patients showed significantly higher scores in the NCIQ subdomains "elementary" and "advanced sound perception" than the AHL group. Stress (PSQ) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) were significantly higher preoperatively in SSD patients than in AHL patients. After CI, these differences were strongly reduced, with minimal differences being detectable between the groups in the investigated domains postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

SSD and AHL patients differ significantly preoperatively in terms of their subjective hearing assessment and psychosocial parameters. In SSD patients, psychological stress factors may have a stronger impact on the quality of life than in AHL patients. These aspects should be taken into account in the preoperative counseling and postoperative rehabilitation.

Etiology, Severity, Audiogram Type, and Device Usage in Patients with Unilateral Moderate to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Japan

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported on the etiology, severity, or device usage of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (UHL) compared to bilateral hearing loss. Therefore, this study investigated the characteristics of UHL in adults and children.

METHODS

We performed a survey using questionnaires for secondary and tertiary otolaryngology institutions.

RESULTS

We included 15,981 patients (1549 children and 14,432 adults) from 196 institutions with otolaryngology residency programs and 2844 patients (336 children and 2508 adults) from 27 institutions with board members of the Japan Audiology Society. The latter submitted audiological data. Among children, most diagnoses were made at age 0. Approximately half of them had profound hearing loss, and 37 children (2.2%) used hearing devices. Among adults, the number of cases increased with age, but decreased when people reached their 80s and 90s. More than half of them had moderate hearing loss. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss was the most common cause of UHL of all ages; 4.4% of UHL patients used hearing devices, and most of the device users (98.6%) selected a conventional hearing aid.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing aid use is limited in children and adults with UHL in Japan. There could be many candidates with UHL for intervention such as a cochlear implant.