Lengthening Temporalis Myoplasty Versus Hypoglossal-Facial Nerve Coaptation in the Surgical Rehabilitation of Facial Palsy: Evaluation by Medical and Nonmedical Juries and Patient-Assessed Quality of Life

Quality of life after surgical treatments for facial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Facial palsy profoundly affects patients' quality of life (QoL). We evaluated the effect of various surgical procedures on QoL using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide evidence-based recommendations for improved care.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for studies on QoL in patients with facial palsy who had undergone reconstructive surgery with preoperative and postoperative data from validated PROMs. After conducting the quality assessment, data were subtracted from the articles. Meta-analyses of subgroups were performed when study outcomes where compatible.

RESULTS

Incorporating 24 studies (522 patients), our systematic review revealed consistent and significant QoL improvements following diverse reconstructive surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed the positive effects of different reconstructive surgical procedures on QoL of patients with facial palsy. These results support clinicians to better inform patients about their potential outcomes, optimizing informed and shared decision-making and ultimately improving overall QoL in patients with facial palsy.

Hypoglossal Nerve Transfer for Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypoglossal-facial nerve (12-7) anastomosis can restore symmetry and voluntary movement on the face in patients with facial nerve paralysis. Traditional 12-7 transfer includes direct end-to-end nerve anastomosis, sacrificing the entire hypoglossal nerve. Contemporary, end-to-side anastomosis, or split anastomosis techniques limit tongue morbidity by preserving some hypoglossal nerve. Direct outcome comparisons between these techniques are limited. Objective: To compare reported outcomes of facial movement, tongue, speech, and swallow outcomes among the different types of hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis schemes. Evidence Review: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, a comprehensive strategy was designed to search PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database from inception to January 2021, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, reporting guideline yielding 383 results. Any participant who underwent 12-7 transfer using any of the three techniques, with or without an interposition graft, and had documented preoperative and postoperative evaluation of facial nerve function with a validated instrument such as House-Brackmann (HB), was considered for inclusion. Secondary outcomes of synkinesis, tongue atrophy, and speech or swallowing dysfunction were also compared. Forty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing data from 961 total patients who underwent 12-7 transfer. Results: The proportion of good HB outcomes (HB I-III) did not differ by anastomosis type: End-to-side and end-to-end anastomosis (73% vs. 59%, p = 0.07), split and end-to-end anastomosis (62% vs. 59%, p = 0.88), and end-to-side anastomosis and split anastomosis (73% vs. 62%, p = 0.46). There was no difference in reported synkinesis rates between the anastomosis types. However, end-to-side anastomosis (z = 6.55, p < 0.01) and split anastomosis (z = 3.58, p < 0.01) developed less tongue atrophy than end-to-end anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis had less speech/swallowing dysfunction than end-to-end anastomosis (z = 3.21, p < 0.01). Conclusion: End-to-side and split anastomoses result in similar HB facial nerve outcomes as the traditional end-to-end 12-7 anastomosis. End-to-side anastomosis has decreased complications of tongue atrophy and speech/swallow dysfunction compared to end-to-end anastomosis. In addition, split anastomosis has decreased rates of tongue atrophy compared to end-to-end anastomosis.

Hypoglossal and Masseteric Nerve Transfer for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hypoglossal and masseteric nerve transfer are currently the most popular cranial nerve transfer techniques for patients with facial paralysis. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional outcomes and adverse effects of these procedures. Methods: A review of online databases was performed to include studies with four or more patients undergoing hypoglossal or masseter nerve transfer without muscle transfer or other cranial nerve transposition. Facial nerve outcomes, time to reinnervation, and adverse events were pooled and studied. Results: A total of 71 studies were included: 15 studies included 220 masseteric-facial transfers, and 60 studies included 1312 hypoglossal-facial transfers. Oral commissure symmetry at rest was better for hypoglossal transfer (2.22 ± 1.6 mm vs. 3.62 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.047). The composite Sunnybrook Facial Nerve Grading Scale was better for masseteric transfer (47.7 ± 7.4 vs. 33.0 ± 6.4, p < 0.001). Time to first movement (in months) was significantly faster in masseteric transfer (4.6 ± 2.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). Adverse effects were rare (<5%) for both procedures. Conclusions: Both nerve transfer techniques are effective for facial reanimation, and the surgeon should consider the nuanced differences in selecting the correct procedure for each patient.

Current thoughts and developments in facial nerve reanimation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present the most current literature regarding the management of acute and chronic facial paralysis. This review will focus primarily on smile reanimation in the setting of acute and chronic facial paralysis. The management of the flaccid and the hypertonic face will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments include advances in neural repair with fibrin glue and the use of cadaveric nerve grafts as interposition grafts. Advances in nerve substitutes have been shown to limit donor-site morbidity and provide similar outcomes to autografts. Techniques for muscle transfer continue to evolve to improve smile outcomes.

SUMMARY

The goal of facial reanimation surgery is to restore meaningful facial movement. The goal should be to have quality-driven clinical practice guidelines to better facilitate patient care. This process must be initiated by facial reanimation surgeons deciding to use consistent outcome measures to report their results. Currently, it is impossible to make a direct comparison between different surgical techniques because of inconsistent methods of evaluation. Despite the lack of consistent quantitative evaluation, there have been many exciting advances in the field.