Cochlear implantation and congenital deafness: perceptive and lexical results in 2 genetically pediatric identified population

Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis

Objective

This study aims to assess the potential efficacy of cochlear implantation as a treatment for patients with Waardenburg syndrome (WS) and to guide clinical work by comparing the effect of auditory and speech recovery after cochlear implantation in patients with WS and non-WS.

Methods

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were sources for retrieving literature on cochlear implantation in WS, and clinical data meeting the inclusion criteria were meta-analyzed using RevMan5.41.

Results

A total of nine articles were included in this study, including 132 patients with WS and 815 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that there are no significant differences in the scores for categories of audit performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) between the WS group and the control group.

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation demonstrates comparable auditory and speech recovery outcomes for WS patients and non-WS patients.

Cochlear implantation in Waardenburg syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is a genetic condition associated with moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this review is to characterize cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in patients with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of WS.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

All reports describing defined sets of patients with WS who underwent CI and subsequent evaluation of clinical outcomes were included. To harmonize outcome data between studies that used different measures, a binary variable Favored CI was developed to capture success of procedures (1 = favored, 0 = unfavored) based on original authors' description, commentary, discussion, and conclusions. Expert reviewers independently reviewed and selected articles, extracted data and scored Favored CI values. Synthetic and analytic meta-analyses were implemented using standard analytic techniques.

RESULTS

Twenty articles meeting inclusion criteria provided data on 192 WS patients and 210 CIs. The mean age at CI was 3.8 years (95% confidence interval [95%CI]; 3.1-4.5 years), and the mean duration of follow up was 5.2 years (95% CI; 3.4-7.0 years). Surgical complications were rare (11/210 implants, 5.2%) where gusher was the most common complication. CIs yielded favorable hearing outcomes in 90% (95% CI; 84-94%) of cases, and appear successful for those with temporal bone anomalies (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative synthesis of the study data demonstrates that in the majority of patients with WS, CI yield favorable hearing outcomes and low rates of surgical complications. CI has shown to provide clinical benefits in patients with WS.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Additional Disabilities: A Systematic Review

This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities was systematically explored through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from January 2012 to July 2023. Our two-stage search strategy selected a total of 61 articles concerning CI implantation in children with several forms of additional disabilities: autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, motor disorders, developmental delay, genetic syndromes, and intellectual disability. Overall, many children with additional disabilities benefit from CIs by acquiring greater environmental sound awareness. This, in turn, improves non-verbal communication and adaptive skills, with greater possibilities to relate to others and to be connected with the environment. Instead, despite some improvement, expressive language tends to develop more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to children affected by hearing loss only. Further studies are needed to better appreciate the specificities of each single disability and to personalize interventions, not restricting the analysis to auditory and language skills, but rather applying or developing cross-culturally validated instruments able to reliably assess the developmental trajectory and the quality of life of DHH children with additional disabilities before and after CI.

Outcomes of Cochlear implantation in early-deafened patients with Waardenburg syndrome: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Objective

This systematic review aims to establish the expected hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with profound congenital deafness secondary to Waardenburg syndrome (WS).

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on language or year of publication.

Results

Searches identified 186 abstracts and full texts. Of these, 16 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 179 patients and at least 194 implants. Hearing outcomes of those receiving cochlear implantation were generally good. Five studies included genetic analysis of one or more of the participants. A total of 11 peri/post-operative complications were reported. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, mainly comprising noncontrolled case series with small cohort size. All studies were OCEBM grade III-IV.

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation in congenitally deafened children with Waardenburg Syndrome is a well-established intervention as a method of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the uncommon nature of the condition, there is a lack of large-scale high-quality studies examining the use of cochlear implantation in this patient group. However, overall outcomes following implantation are positive with the majority of patients demonstrating improved audiometry, speech perception and speech intelligibility supporting its use in appropriately selected cases.

[Evaluation of hearing and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in children with Waardenburg syndrome]

Objective:By comparing the hearing and speech rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation （CI） in children with Waardenburg syndrome （WS） and children with common deafness genes （SLC26A4, GJB2） in the Chinese population, and the hearing and speech rehabilitation effects of bilateral CI and unilateral CI in children with WS, to provide a reference for clinical CIin children with WS. Methods:Follow up and return visit 72 pedestrian cochlear implant children with severe and above sensorineural hearing loss and clear gene mutation type diagnosed by Kunming Children's Hospital from 2017 to 2019, including 24 cases in the WS group, 24 cases in the control group （SLC26A4 deafness group and GJB2 deafness group）. All enrolled children were evaluated for auditory and speech ability 12 months after startup. Results:The hearing aid threshold, the correct recognition rate of speech recognition ability evaluation, IT-MAIS / MAIS score rate, CAP score, SIR score, there was no significant difference（P>0.05）. The correct recognition rates of IT-MAIS / MAIS score, SIR score, natural environment sound recognition, vowel recognition, tone recognition, monosyllabic word recognition, disyllabic word recognition and short sentence recognition in children with WS bilateral CI were significantly higher than those in children with WS unilateral CI （P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in CAP score, initial recognition and correct recognition rate of trisyllabic words between children with WS bilateral CI and children with WS unilateral CI （P>0.05）. Conclusion:Common deafness genes in children with WS and Chinese population （SLC26A4, GJB2） the effect of cochlear implantation on hearing and speech rehabilitation of sick children is equivalent. For children with severe and above sensorineural hearing loss associated with this syndrome, CI can be used clinically to improve their hearing and speech ability. WS bilateral CI has advantages in some hearing and speech abilities compared with unilateral CI, so those whomeet the conditions should be encouraged bilateral implantation.

The Hearing Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Waardenburg Syndrome

Objectives. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of cochlear implantation for sensorineural hearing loss in patients with Waardenburg syndrome. Method. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent cochlear implantation at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinical classification, genetic mutation, clinical course, preoperative hearing threshold, high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone, and postoperative hearing outcome were assessed. Result. Five children with Waardenburg syndrome underwent cochlear implantation. The average age at implantation was 2 years 11 months (ranging from 1 year 9 months to 6 years 3 months). Four patients had congenital profound hearing loss and one patient had progressive hearing loss. Two patients had an inner ear malformation of cochlear incomplete partition type 2. No surgical complication or difficulty was seen in any patient. All patients showed good hearing outcome postoperatively. Conclusion. Cochlear implantation could be a good treatment option for Waardenburg syndrome.

Paediatric Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Waardenburg Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the benefit of cochlear implantation in young deaf children with Waardenburg syndrome (WS) compared to a reference group of young deaf children without additional disabilities.

METHOD

A retrospective study was conducted on children with WS who underwent cochlear implantation at the age of 2 years or younger. The post-operative results for speech perception (phonetically balanced standard Dutch consonant-vocal-consonant word lists) and language comprehension (the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, RDLS), expressed as a language quotient (LQ), were compared between the WS group and the reference group by using multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 children were diagnosed with WS, and 6 of them had additional disabilities. The WS children were implanted at a mean age of 1.6 years and the 48 children of the reference group at a mean age of 1.3 years. The WS children had a mean phoneme score of 80% and a mean LQ of 0.74 at 3 years post-implantation, and these results were comparable to those of the reference group. Only the factor additional disabilities had a significant negative influence on auditory perception and language comprehension.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with WS performed similarly to the reference group in the present study, and these outcomes are in line with the previous literature. Although good counselling about additional disabilities concomitant to the syndrome is relevant, cochlear implantation is a good rehabilitation method for children with WS.

Is deafness etiology important for prediction of functional outcomes in pediatric cochlear implantation?

CONCLUSIONS

Implanted children with GJB2 mutations tended to achieve better functional outcomes than the two control groups, although clear-cut significance was not always achieved. Hearing loss etiology may be considered as one of the important predictors, but complex influence of other factors on postoperative performance should be included in cautious individual counseling.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to detect possible associations between hearing loss etiology and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes in prelingually deaf children, with a particular focus on hereditary deafness caused by connexin mutations.

METHODS

Eighty-one of 92 prelingually deaf implanted children, tested for DFNB1 mutations, were divided into 3 etiology groups and underwent audiological evaluation in tone audiometry, speech audiometry, monosyllabic words, and categories of auditory performance (CAP), conducted 1, 3, and 5 years after implantation.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for tone audiometry were obtained, particularly after the first and third year post implantation, between 'connexin' and 'known' etiology groups. In speech audiometry, the monosyllabic word test, and CAP, the connexin group of children scored significantly better than the two control groups only after 3 and 5 years. Although the rate of excellent performers was higher in the connexin group, poor results were achieved in all groups in similar proportion.