Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Temporary Right Ventricular Assist Device Support for Acute Right Ventricular Failure During Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review

Acute right-sided heart failure (RHF) is a complex clinical syndrome, with a wide range of clinical presentations, associated with increased mortality and morbidity, but about which there is a scarcity of evidence-based literature. A temporary right-ventricular assist device (t-RVAD) is a potential treatment option for selected patients with severe right-ventricular dysfunction as a bridge-to-recovery or as a permanent solution. We sought to conduct a systematic review to determine the safety and efficacy of t-RVAD implantation. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, from which data were extracted. Successful t-RVAD weaning ranged between 23% and 100%. Moreover, 30-day survival post-temporary RAVD implantation ranged from 46% to 100%. Bleeding, acute kidney injury, stroke, and device malfunction were the most commonly reported complications. Notwithstanding this, t-RVAD is a lifesaving option for patients with severe RHF, but the evidence stems from small non-randomized heterogeneous studies utilizing a variety of devices. Both the etiology of RHF and time of intervention might play a major role in determining the t-RVAD outcome. Standardized endpoints definitions, design and methodology for t-RVAD trials is needed. Furthermore, efforts should continue in improving the technology as well as improving the timely provision of a t-RVAD.

Strategies for Mechanical Right Ventricular Support during Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

BACKGROUND

Refractory right ventricular failure at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation requires treatment with supplemental mechanical circulatory support. However, the optimal strategy for support remains unknown.

METHODS

All patients undergoing first time durable left ventricular assist device implantation with a contemporary device were selected from the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2019). Patients requiring right ventricular assist device (RVAD) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified by RVAD or VA-ECMO and by timing of placement (intraoperative vs. postoperative).

RESULTS

18,423 left ventricular assist device implants were identified, of which 940 (5.1%) required RVAD (n=750) or VA-ECMO (n=190) support. Patients receiving an RVAD more frequently had preoperative inotrope requirement (76% vs. 62%, p<0.01) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (20% vs. 13%, p<0.01). RVAD patients experienced lower rates of postoperative renal failure (40% vs. 51%, p=0.02) and limb ischemia (4% vs. 13%, p<0.01), as well as significantly less operative mortality (41% vs. 54%, p<0.01). After risk-adjustment with propensity score analysis, support with VA-ECMO was associated with a higher risk of mortality (Risk Ratio 1.46 [1.21-1.77], p<0.01) compared to patients receiving an RVAD. Importantly, institution of right ventricular support postoperatively was associated with higher mortality (1.43, p<0.01) compared to intraoperative initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe right ventricular failure in the setting of durable left ventricular assist device implantation may benefit from the use of RVAD over VA-ECMO. Regardless of the type of support, initiation at the index operation was associated with improved outcomes.

Percutaneous venopulmonary artery extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for right heart failure after left ventricular assist device insertion

OBJECTIVES

Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Mechanical support options include right ventricular assist devices, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and venopulmonary artery ECMO, the latter often involving central cannulation. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of a truly percutaneous venopulmonary artery (pVPA) ECMO strategy, with the potential advantage of bedside removal once weaned.

METHODS

Data from a single tertiary centre were reviewed retrospectively from January 2014 to January 2019. During this time, 54 patients underwent LVAD insertion, with 19 requiring mechanical support for right ventricular failure. Among them, 10 patients received pVPA ECMO. Implantation of the pVPA ECMO was performed under transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance, with an inflow cannula placed in the right atrium via the right femoral vein and an outflow cannula placed in the left pulmonary artery (PA) via the right internal jugular vein.

RESULTS

Cannula insertion was 100% successful with no need for repositioning. Eight patients (80%) were able to be successfully weaned (at the bedside); 6 were discharged from the hospital and there were no cases of early sepsis, mediastinitis or thromboembolism. At follow-up, 5 patients had received transplants (50%), with 1 on LVAD support as destination therapy (10%). Survival was 60 ± 15% and 50 ± 16% at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

pVPA ECMO is 100% technically feasible and is an efficient method for temporary right ventricular support after LVAD insertion with the advantage of simple bedside removal and avoidance of a PA graft remnant in the chest cavity.

Lateral Thoracotomy for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Literature

The use of lateral thoracotomy (LT) for implanting left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is worldwide increasing, although the available evidence for its positive effects compared with conventional sternotomy (CS) is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzes the outcomes of LT compared with CS in patients undergoing implantation of a centrifugal continuous-flow LVAD. Four databases and 1,053 publications were screened until December 2019. Articles including patients undergoing implantation of a centrifugal continuous-flow LVAD through LT were included. A meta-analysis to compare LT and CS was performed to summarize evidences from studies including both LT and CS patients extracted from the same population. Primary outcome measure was in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Eight studies reporting on 730 patients undergoing LVAD implantation through LT (n = 242) or CS (n = 488) were included in the meta-analysis. Left thoracotomy showed lower in-hospital/30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.520, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.99, p = 0.050), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (mean difference [MD]: 3.29, CI: 1.76-4.82, p < 0.001), lower incidence of severe right heart failure (OR: 0.41; CI: 0.19-0.87, p = 0.020) and postoperative right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation (OR: 0.27, CI: 0.10-0.76, p = 0.010), fewer perioperative transfusions (MD: 0.75, CI: 0.36-1.14, p < 0.001), and lower incidence of renal failure (OR: 0.45, CI: 0.20-1.01, p = 0.050) and device-related infections (OR: 0.45, CI: 0.20-1.01, p = 0.050), respectively. This meta-analysis demonstrates that implantation of a centrifugal continuous-flow LVAD system via LT benefits from higher short-term survival, less right heart failure, lower postoperative RVAD need, shorter ICU stay, less transfusions, lower risk of device-related infections and kidney failure. Prospective studies are needed for further proof.

Temporary right ventricular circulatory support following right ventricular infarction: results of a groin-free approach

Aims

Acute right heart failure (RHF) is a severe complication of right ventricular infarction. The management of acute RHF poses a number of challenges, such as providing haemodynamic support. Temporary circulatory support (TCS) may be required upon failing medical therapy. The ProtekDuo® dual lumen cannula provides a minimally invasive option for (TCS) through a groin‐free internal jugular vein approach. We present the largest patient series to date using the ProtekDuo® cannula as temporary right ventricular assist device (t‐RVAD) in RHF after acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results

From July 2016 to November 2019, 10 patients underwent t‐RVAD implantation for RHF following acute MI. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography were performed in all patients to assess cardiac function, with a particular focus on RV function. Cumulative 30‐day survival was 60%. Mean TAPSE was 6.4 ± 3.1 mm, mean fractional area change was 12.1 ± 4.2%, and mean right ventricular end diastolic area was 19.8 ± 2.7 cm². Mean implantation time was 32.8 ± 8.3 min. Mean interval after first cardiac intervention was 4.6 ± 5.8 days. Mean t‐RVAD time was 10.0 ± 7.4 days with a significant reduction in central venous pressure 19.3 ± 2.7 vs. 8.2 ± 2.6 mmHg, P < 0.001 and a significant increase in central venous saturation 52.8 ± 15.6 vs. 80.0 ± 6.0%, P < 0.001. Mean intensive care unit stay was 18.6 ± 12.2 days. Four patients were weaned from TCS. Two patients were bridged to a long‐term paracorporeal RVAD. There were no t‐RVAD associated complications. Causes of death (n = 4) were multiorgan failure, electromechanical dissociation, and haemorrhagic stroke. Mean follow‐up time was 96.0 ± 107.6 days. No independent predictors of mortality were identified in univariate analysis.

Conclusions

We show that groin‐free, percutaneous implantation of the ProtekDuo® cannula is a feasible and safe tool for TCS in acute RHF post‐MI. This approach provides the advantages of percutaneous implantation including complete mobilization and non‐surgical bedside explantation, as well as the option for adding an oxygenator to the t‐RVAD circuit.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Concomitant Dor Procedure: a Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with concomitant Dor plasty is only reported anecdotally. We herein aimed to describe our experience with LVAD and concomitant Dor procedures and describe long-term outcomes of this special subset of heart failure patients.

METHODS

Between January/2010 and December/2018, 144 patients received LVAD therapy at our institution. Of those, five patients (80% male, 60.4±7.2 years) presented with an apical aneurysm and received concomitant Dor plasty. Apical aneurysms presented diameter between 75 and 98 mm, with one impending rupture.

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in all patients. No unplanned right ventricular assist device implantation occurred. Furthermore, no acute 30-day mortality was seen. In follow-up, one patient was lost due to intentional disconnection of the driveline. One patient underwent heart transplantation on postoperative day 630. The remaining three patients are still on device with sufficient flow; pump thromboses were successfully managed by lysis therapy in one patient.

CONCLUSION

LVAD implantation with concomitant Dor procedure is feasible, safe, and occasionally performed in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Major advantages are prevention of thromboembolism and facilitation of LVAD placement by improving pump stability and warranting midventricular, coaxial alignment of the inflow cannula. In long-term follow-up, no adverse event associated with Dor plasty was observed.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

Results of concomitant groin-free percutaneous temporary RVAD support using a centrifugal pump with a double-lumen jugular venous cannula in LVAD patients

Background

Modern left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have evolved to become standard of care in severe heart failure (HF) patients. Right HF (RHF) is a major complication responsible for early mortality. Several techniques for temporary right ventricular assist device (t-RVAD) have been described before, baring relevant disadvantages such as limited mobilization or the need for re-thoracotomy. We describe the results of an alternative technique for t-RVAD using the Tandem Heart™ with ProtekDuo™ cannula.

Methods

An institutional retrospective single centre outcome analysis was performed including all permanent LVAD recipients with concomitant groin-free t-RVAD support.

Results

Between October 2015 and September 2017, 11 patients (10 male, 90.9%) were included. Preoperative NYHA class was 3.8±0.75 and INTERMACS class 3.5±1.5. Four (36.4%) patients were already on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at time of implantation with 4 (36.4%) patients already on inotropic support. All LVAD implantations were performed on-pump and 3 cases (27.3%) were re-do cases. Mean t-RVAD duration was 16.8±9.5 days. Ten patients (90.9%) could be weaned from temporary RVAD support, 1 patient deceased on support. Mean ICU stay was 23.8±16.5 days, while 30-day survival was 72.7%. Follow-up was complete with 214.7±283 days. Three patients (27.3%) died following multi-organ failure (MOF), 1 patient (9.1%) following intracranial bleed 12 days after t-RVAD explantation. No severe t-RVAD associated complications were observed.

Conclusions

Our technique allows for safe groin-free t-RVAD providing all advantages of percutaneous implantation including complete mobilization and bedside explantation without any need for operation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation

OBJECTIVES

Right ventricular (RV) failure complicating left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with increased mortality. Despite a lack of supporting evidence, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is increasingly being used as an alternative to traditional temporary RV support. We report our institutional experience with ECMO-facilitated RV support after left ventricular assist device implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the concept of temporary ECMO support for perioperative RV failure in 32 consecutive left ventricular assist device (mean age 52 ± 14 years; male 84.4%; ischaemic cardiomyopathy 40.6%; INTERMACS Level I 71.8%; INTERMACS Level II 6.3%; INTERMACS Level III 12.5%; INTERMACS Level IV-VII 9.4%; HeartWare ventricular assist device 75%; HeartMate II: 25%) from May 2009 to April 2014. The study end points were RV recovery during ECMO support, mortality and causes of death.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (90.6%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO support after RV recovery. Three (9.4%) patients expired during ECMO support. ECMO support improved RV function and haemodynamic parameters (central venous pressure 13 mmHg vs 10 mmHg, P < 0.01; mean pulmonary artery pressure 28 mmHg vs 21 mmHg, P < 0.01; cardiac output 5.1 l/min vs 5.9 l/min, P = 0.09) over a median period of 3 (range 1-15) days. Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were 18.8% and 25%, respectively. One-year survival was 75%, causes of death were multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (50%), sepsis (25%), haemorrhagic stroke (12.5%) and ischaemic stroke (12.5%). Causes of death during ECMO support were ischaemic stroke, sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary ECMO-facilitated RV support is associated with good long-term outcomes and high rates of RV recovery.

Temporary assist device support for the right ventricle: pre-implant and post-implant challenges

Severe right ventricular (RV) failure is more likely reversible than similar magnitudes of left ventricular (LV) failure and, because reversal of both adaptive remodeling and impaired contractility require most often only short periods of support, the use of temporary RV assist devices (t-RVADs) can be a life-saving therapy option for many patients. Although increased experience with t-RVADs and progresses made in the development of safer devices with lower risk for complications has improved both recovery rate of RV function and patient survival, the mortality of t-RVAD recipients can still be high but it depends mainly on the primary cause of RV failure (RVF), the severity of end-organ dysfunction, and the timing of RVAD implantation, and much less on adverse events and complications related to RVAD implantation, support, or removal. Reduced survival of RVAD recipients should therefore not discourage appropriate application of RVADs because their underuse further reduces the chances for RV recovery and patient survival. The article reviews and discusses the challenges related to the pre-implant and post-implant decision-making processes aiming to get best possible therapeutic results. Special attention is focused on pre-implant RV assessment and prediction of RV improvement during mechanical unloading, patient selection for t-RVAD therapy, assessment of unloading-promoted RV recovery, and prediction of its stability after RVAD removal. Particular consideration is also given to prediction of RVF after LVAD implantation which is usually hampered by the complex interactions between the different risk factors related indirectly or directly to the RV potential for reverse remodeling and functional recovery.