Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: Past, Present, and Future

Characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ex-situ lung perfusion

BACKGROUND

Ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) can be used to assess and rehabilitate donor lungs, potentially expanding the donor pool. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ESLP in the United States.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry of primary adult lung transplant recipients from February 28, 2018, to June 30, 2021, was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and 1-year survival of ESLP vs no ESLP lung transplants.

RESULTS

Of 8204 lung transplants, 426 (5.2%) were performed with ESLP. ESLP donors were older, more donation after circulatory death (DCD), and had lower PaO2:FiO2 (P:F) ratios. Recipients had lower lung allocation scores. ESLP lungs traveled further, had longer preservation times, and were more likely double lung transplants. Reintubation rates, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, and hospital length of stay were greater in the ESLP group. On multivariable analysis, ESLP was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival. However, further analysis showed that DCD lungs managed on ESLP had worse 1-year survival compared to DCD lungs preserved with standard cold storage or with donation after brain death donor lungs.

CONCLUSIONS

ESLP is used in a small percentage of lung transplants in the US and is not independently associated with 1-year survival. ESLP combined with DCD lungs, however, is associated with worse 1-year survival and warrants further investigation.

Decreasing blood wastage during ex vivo lung perfusion recovery through utilization of thermal control technology

BACKGROUND

The Organ Care System (OCS) is a revolutionary ex vivo organ perfusion technology that can potentially expand the organ retrieval range. The OCS Lung device uses packed red blood cells (pRBC) with a proprietary solution. We report the ability to reduce blood waste during this procedure by using a thermal packaging solution in conjunction with the OCS platform.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all OCS Lung recoveries performed by our recovery team, using pRBCfrom May 2019 to January 2021. Initially, units were stored using passive refrigeration with the Performance cooler at a temperature range of 1-6°C for 4 h. Subsequently, thermal control technology with the ProMed cooler was utilized to maintain the same temperature range for 72 h.

RESULTS

Twenty-three recoveries were initiated with 63 pRBC. The Performance cooler was used for 8, while the ProMed cooler for 13. 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler was used within the validated time range, while 25.0% were used beyond the validated time range based on clinical judgment. In addition, 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler were returned to the institution after canceled recoveries with an estimated loss of $1800; the ProMed cooler had no wastage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that using an advanced thermal packaging solution facilitates proper storage of pRBC and represents an advancement for extended donor lung preservation. The elimination of blood wastage in this initial study portends ongoing benefits for the limited blood supply and reduced cost.

Is there life on the airway tree? A pilot study of bronchial cell vitality and tissue morphology in the ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) era of lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a relevant procedure to increase the lung donor pool but could potentially increase the airway tree ischemic injury risk.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the direct effect of EVLP on the airway tree by evaluating bronchial cell vitality and tissue signs of injury on a series of 117 bronchial rings collected from 40 conventional and 19 EVLP-treated lung grafts. Bronchial rings and related scraped bronchial epithelial cells were collected before the EVLP procedure and surgical anastomosis.

RESULTS

The preimplantation interval was significantly increased in the EVLP graft group (p < 0.01). Conventional grafts presented cell viability percentages of 47.07 ± 23.41 and 49.65 ± 21.25 in the first and second grafts which did not differ significantly from the EVLP group (first graft 50.54 ± 25.83 and second graft 50.22 ± 20.90 cell viability percentage). No significant differences in terms of histopathological features (edema, inflammatory infiltrate, and mucosa ulceration) were observed comparing conventional and EVLP samples. A comparison of bronchial cell viability and histopathology of EVLP samples retrieved at different time intervals revealed no significant differences. Accordingly, major bronchial complications after lung transplant were not observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, we observed that EVLP did not significantly impact bronchial cell vitality and airway tissue preservation nor interfere with bronchial anastomosis healing, further supporting it as a safe and useful procedure.

Outcomes of patients awaiting lung transplantation after the implementation of donation after brain death at a single Chinese center

Voluntary contribution has become the only source of donor lungs in China since 2015. To elaborate the outcomes of patients awaiting lung transplantation (LTx) after the implementation of donation after brain death, we performed a retrospective study that encompassed 205 patients with end-stage lung disease who registered for LTx at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2021. A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The median waiting time was 1.25 months. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) (103/180, 57.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (56/180, 31.1%) were the most common diseases in our study population. The mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of patients in the died-waiting group was higher than that of the survivors (53.29±21.71 mmHg vs. 42.11±18.58 mmHg, P=0.002). The mortality of patients with ILD (34/103, 33.00%) was nearly twice that of patients with COPD (10/56, 17.86%) while awaiting LTx (P=0.041). In the died-waiting group, patients with ILD had a shorter median waiting time than patients with COPD after being listed (0.865 months vs. 4.720 months, P=0.030). ILD as primary disease and mPAP > 35 mmHg were two significant independent risk factors for waitlist mortality, with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.483 (95% CI 1.311-9.111; P=0.011) and 3.500 (95% CI 1.435-8.536; P=0.006). Hence, LTx is more urgently needed in patients with ILD and pulmonary hypertension.

Current trends in candidate selection, contraindications, and indications for lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an established treatment option that can improve quality of life and prolong survival for select patients diagnosed with end-stage lung disease. Given the gaps in organ donation and failures to make effective use of available organs, careful selection of candidates for lung transplant remains one of the most important considerations of the transplant community. Toward this end, we briefly reviewed recent trends in pretransplant evaluation, candidate selection, organ allocation, and organ preservation techniques. Since the latest consensus statement regarding appropriate selection of lung transplant candidates, many advances in the science and practice of lung transplantation have emerged and influenced our perspective of 'contraindications' to transplant. These advances have made it increasingly possible to pursue lung transplant in patients with risk factors for decreased survival-namely, older recipient age, increased body mass index, previous chest surgery, poorer nutritional status, and presence of chronic infection, cardiovascular disease, or extrapulmonary comorbid conditions. Therefore, we reviewed the updated evidence demonstrating the prognostic impact of these risk factors in lung transplant recipients. Lastly, we reviewed the salient evidence for current trends in disease-specific indications for lung transplantation, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, emphysema due to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and pulmonary arterial hypertension, among other less common end-stage diseases. Overall, lung transplant remains an exciting field with considerable hope for patients as they experience remarkable improvements in quality of life and survival in the modern era.

Noteworthy Literature Published in 2018 for Thoracic Organ Transplantation

Publications of note from 2018 are reviewed for the cardiothoracic transplant anesthesiologist. Strategies to expand the availability of donor organs were highlighted, including improved donor management, accumulating experience with increased-risk donors, ex vivo perfusion techniques, and donation after cardiac death. A number of reports examined posttransplant outcomes, including outcomes other than mortality, with new data-driven risk models. Use of extracorporeal support in cardiothoracic transplantation was a prominent theme. Major changes in adult heart allocation criteria were implemented, aiming to improve objectivity and transparency in the listing process. Frailty and prehabilitation emerged as targets of comprehensive perioperative risk mitigation programs.

Machine perfusion of thoracic organs

This article summarizes recent knowledge and clinical advances in machine perfusion (MP) of thoracic organs. MP of thoracic organs has gained much attention during the last decade. Clinical studies are investigating the role of MP to preserve, resuscitate, and assess heart and lungs prior to transplantation. Currently, MP of the cardiac allograft is essential in all type DCD heart transplantation while MP of the pulmonary allograft is mandatory in uncontrolled DCD lung transplantation. MP of thoracic organs also offers an exciting platform to further investigate downregulation of the innate and adaptive immunity prior to reperfusion of the allograft in recipients. MP provides a promising technology that allows pre-transplant preservation, resuscitation, assessment, repair, and conditioning of cardiac and pulmonary allografts outside the body in a near physiologic state prior to planned transplantation. Results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited to estimate the true clinical value of this new technology in advancing the field of heart and lung transplantation by increasing the total number and the quality of available organs and by further improving recipient early and long-term outcome.