Liberal Right Ventricular Assist Device Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Right Ventricular Failure after Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Central Venopulmonary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Background and Standardized Nomenclature

This review highlights advancements in extracorporeal life support (ECLS), emphasizing the critical role of standardized terminology, particularly for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating right ventricular and respiratory failure. Advocating for the adoption of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Maastricht Treaty for ECLS Nomenclature guidelines, it aims to resolve communication barriers in the ECMO field. Focusing on venopulmonary (VP) ECMO utilizing central pulmonary artery (PA) access, this review details surgical approaches and introduces a terminology guide to support effective knowledge exchange and advancements in patient care.

Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has significantly increased in the last years, trying to offer a therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation, in light also to the significant heart donor shortage compared to the growing advanced heart failure population. Despite technological improvements in the devices, LVAD-related mortality is still fairly high, with right heart failure being one of the predominant predictors. Therefore, many efforts have been made toward a thorough right ventricular (RV) evaluation prior to LVAD implant, considering clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic parameters. However, there is high heterogeneity regarding both which predictor is the strongest as well as the relative cut-off values, and a consensus has not been reached yet, increasing the risk of facing patients in which the distinction between good or poor RV function cannot be surely reached. In parallel, due to technological development and availability of mechanical circulatory support of the RV, LVADs are being considered even in patients with suboptimal RV function. The aim of our review is to analyze the current evidence regarding the role of RV function prior to LVAD and its evaluation, pointing out the extreme variability in parameters that are currently assessed and future prospective regarding new diagnostic tools. Finally, we attempt to gather the available information on the therapeutic strategies to use in the peri-operative phase, in order to reduce the incidence of RV failure, especially in patients in which the preoperative evaluation highlighted some conflicting results with regard to ventricular function.

The Roles of Venopulmonary Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

Concise definitive review of the use of venopulmonary arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-PA ECMO) support in patients with cardiopulmonary failure.

DATA SOURCES

Original investigations identified through a PubMed search with search terms "percutaneous right ventricular assist device," "oxy-RVAD," "V-PA ECMO," and "veno-pulmonary arterial ECMO" were reviewed and evaluated for relevance.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that included more than three patients supported with V-PA ECMO were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Clinically relevant data from included studies, including patient-important outcomes, were summarized and discussed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified four groups of patients where V-PA ECMO has been studied: acute respiratory distress syndrome, right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device placement, bridge to lung transplantation, and pulmonary embolism. Most identified works are small, single center, and retrospective in nature, precluding definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of V-PA ECMO. There have been no clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of V-PA ECMO for any indication.

CONCLUSIONS

V-PA ECMO is a promising form of extracorporeal support for patients with right ventricular dysfunction. Future work should focus on identifying the optimal timing and populations for the use of V-PA ECMO.

Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly common across the heart failure population. Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a feared complication that can occur in the early post-operative phase or during the outpatient follow-up. Multiple tools are available to the clinician to carefully estimate the individual risk of developing RVF after LVAD implantation. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of available tools for RVF prognostication, including patient-specific and right ventricle (RV)-specific echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, to provide guidance in patient selection during LVAD candidacy. We also offer a multidisciplinary approach to the management of early RVF, including indications and management of right ventricular assist devices in this setting to provide tools that help managing the failing RV.

Ventricular and Atrial Pressure—Volume Loops: Analysis of the Effects Induced by Right Centrifugal Pump Assistance

The main indications for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support are right heart failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or early graft failure following heart transplantation. We sought to study the effects induced by different RVAD connections when right ventricular elastance (EesRIGHT) was modified using numerical simulations based on atrial and ventricular pressure–volume analysis. We considered the effects induced by continuous-flow RVAD support on left/right ventricular/atrial loops when EesRIGHT changed from 0.3 to 0.8 mmHg/mL during in-series or parallel pump connection. Pump rotational speed was also addressed. Parallel RVAD support at 4000 rpm with EesRIGHT = 0.3 mmHg/mL generated percentage changes up to 60% for left ventricular pressure–volume area and external work; up to 20% for left ventricular ESV and up to 25% for left ventricular EDV; up to 50% change in left atrial pressure-volume area (PVLAL-A) and only a 3% change in right atrial pressure–volume area (PVLAR-A). Percentage variation was lower when EesRIGHT = 0.8 mmHg/mL. Early recognition of right ventricular failure followed by aggressive treatment is desirable, so as to achieve a more favourable outcome. RVAD support remains an option for advanced right ventricular failure, although the onset of major adverse events may preclude its use.

Strategies for Mechanical Right Ventricular Support during Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

BACKGROUND

Refractory right ventricular failure at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation requires treatment with supplemental mechanical circulatory support. However, the optimal strategy for support remains unknown.

METHODS

All patients undergoing first time durable left ventricular assist device implantation with a contemporary device were selected from the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2019). Patients requiring right ventricular assist device (RVAD) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified by RVAD or VA-ECMO and by timing of placement (intraoperative vs. postoperative).

RESULTS

18,423 left ventricular assist device implants were identified, of which 940 (5.1%) required RVAD (n=750) or VA-ECMO (n=190) support. Patients receiving an RVAD more frequently had preoperative inotrope requirement (76% vs. 62%, p<0.01) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (20% vs. 13%, p<0.01). RVAD patients experienced lower rates of postoperative renal failure (40% vs. 51%, p=0.02) and limb ischemia (4% vs. 13%, p<0.01), as well as significantly less operative mortality (41% vs. 54%, p<0.01). After risk-adjustment with propensity score analysis, support with VA-ECMO was associated with a higher risk of mortality (Risk Ratio 1.46 [1.21-1.77], p<0.01) compared to patients receiving an RVAD. Importantly, institution of right ventricular support postoperatively was associated with higher mortality (1.43, p<0.01) compared to intraoperative initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe right ventricular failure in the setting of durable left ventricular assist device implantation may benefit from the use of RVAD over VA-ECMO. Regardless of the type of support, initiation at the index operation was associated with improved outcomes.

Short-term single-centre experience with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to analyse clinical characteristics, survival and adverse events of patients with advanced heart failure supported using the Abbott HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 42 consecutive HeartMate 3 recipients implanted in our centre between 1 November 2015 and 31 October 2019.

RESULTS

Our series comprised 39 males, aged 56.7 ± 11.8 years. Eleven (26%) patients had preimplant INTERMACS clinical profiles of 1 or 2. The mean duration support was 14.0 ± 10.6 months (range 0.69-44 months). During follow-up, 4 (10%) patients died while on support, 13 (35%) patients received a heart transplant and 25 patients are still ongoing. Actuarial survival after LVAD implantation was 88.4 ± 5.5% and 84.4 ± 6.6% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There were no cases of pump thrombosis or technical malfunction. Seven (17%) patients required post-implant temporary right ventricular support. Adverse events included bleeding requiring surgery in 13 (31%) patients, gastrointestinal bleeding in 6 (14%) patients, LVAD-specific infections in 19 (45%) patients and non-disabling ischaemic stroke in 5 (12%) patients. The incidence of ischaemic stroke was significantly higher in patients where the outflow graft was anastomosed to the descending aorta as compared to those where it was anastomosed to the ascending aorta (P < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We have observed satisfactory survival rates using the HeartMate 3 LVAD for long-term mechanical circulatory support. The absence of technical failure, pump thrombosis, haemolysis or need for pump exchange during our 4-year experience confirms its technical reliability and improved haemocompatibility, but bleeding complications and infections remain a concern.

Preoperative Right Heart Dysfunction and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of morbidity among patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The aim of this study was to identify if pre-LVAD right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with risk of GIB after LVAD implantation. Of 398 patients implanted with LVADs between July 2008 and July 2016, 130 (33%) developed GIB at a median of 2.6 months following LVAD implantation. Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were found in 42 (34%) GIB patients. Patients with GIB were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. On pre-LVAD echocardiography, GIB patients had increased RV diastolic dimension (4.7 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.02), a higher rate of greater than mild tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation (73 [60%] vs. 120 [47%], p = 0.006), and underwent TV repair more often (38 [30%] vs. 43 [16%], p = 0.0006) during LVAD implantation. After multivariable adjustment, preoperative greater than mild RV enlargement (hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% CI 1.12-5.03; p = 0.03), TV regurgitation (HR 1.83, CI 1.02-3.44; p = 0.01), and TV repair (HR 3.76, confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.44; p = 0.01) remained associated with risk of GIB. This finding was driven by the AVM-GIB subgroup. Preoperative RV enlargement and TV regurgitation are associated with post-LVAD AVM-related GIB.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on Post-cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education and training.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management, and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education, and training.

Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a review of the literature

Right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a major complication which may significantly impair patient outcome. The genesis of RVF is, however, multifactorial, and the mechanisms underlying such a condition have not been fully elucidated, making its prevention challenging and the course not always predictable. Although preoperative risks factors can be associated with RV impairment, the physiologic changes after the LV support, can still hamper the function of the RV. Current medical treatment options are limited and sometimes, patients with a severe post-LVAD RVF may be unresponsive to pharmacological therapy and require more aggressive treatment, such as temporary RV support. We retrieved 11 publications which we assessed and divided in groups based on the RV support [extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), right ventricular assist device (RVAD), TandemHeart with ProtekDuo cannula]. The current review comprehensively summarizes the main studies of the literature with particular attention to the RV physiology and its changes after the LVAD implantation, the predictors and prognostic score as well as the different modalities of temporary mechanical cardio-circulatory support, and its effects on patient prognosis for RVF in such a setting. In addition, it provides a decision making of the pre-, intra and post-operative management in high- and moderate- risk patients.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education and training.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education and training.

A Dual-Lumen Percutaneous Cannula for Managing Refractory Right Ventricular Failure

A right ventricular assist device (RVAD) using a dual-lumen percutaneous cannula inserted through the right internal jugular vein (IJV) might improve weaning in patients with refractory right ventricular (RV) failure. However, the reported experience with this cannula is limited. We reviewed the records of all patients receiving RVAD support with this new dual-lumen cannula at our institution between April 2017 and February 2019. We recorded data on weaning, mortality, and device-specific complications. We compared outcomes among three subgroups based on the indications for RVAD support (postcardiotomy, cardiogenic shock, and primary respiratory failure) and against similar results in the literature. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the 40 patients (29 men) was 53 (15.5) years. Indications for implantation were postcardiotomy support in 18 patients, cardiogenic shock in 12, and respiratory failure in 10. In all, 17 (94%) patients in the postcardiotomy group were weaned from RVAD support, five (42%) in the cardiogenic shock group, and seven (70%) in the respiratory failure group, overall higher than those reported in the literature (49% to 59%) for surgically placed RVADs. Whereas published in-hospital mortality rates range from 42% to 50% for surgically placed RVADs and from 41% to 50% for RVADs with percutaneous cannulas implanted through the right IJV, mortality was 11%, 58%, and 40% in our subgroups, respectively. There were no major device-related complications. This percutaneous dual-lumen cannula appears to be safe and effective for managing refractory RV failure, with improved weaning and mortality profile, and with limited device-specific adverse events.

Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in combination with a left ventricular assist device

Introduction: Right heart failure (RHF) in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) carries a poor prognosis although the treatment strategy including mechanical circulatory support for the failing right ventricle (RV) has not been well established. Areas covered: In this review, we describe an overview of RHF post-LVAD implant including natural history, prevalence, pathophysiology, outcomes, and challenges to predict RHF post-LVAD implant. Then, we focus on right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) and their clinical outcomes. Recently developed percutaneous RVADs are the major advance in this field. Finally, we discuss future perspectives to overcome limitations of the current treatment options. Expert opinion: In the absence of dedicated RVAD system RHF post-LVAD implant may have been undertreated. Now that dedicated percutaneous RVADs have emerged, surgeons are encouraged to use these new devices to improve outcomes of LVAD therapy. As experience accumulates, we should be able to establish the best possible strategy to treat early RHF post-LVAD implant. Late RHF is another form of RHF post-LVAD implant and has been underappreciated. Further research is mandatory to clarify the mechanism and risk factors. There are still unmet needs for a dedicated implantable RVAD for a subset of patients who need long-term RV support.