LVAD Pulsatility Assesses Cardiac Contractility: In Vitro Model Utilizing the Total Artificial Heart and Mock Circulation

Evaluating Indices for Non-invasive Myocardial Recovery Assessment in LVAD-Supported Heart Failure Patients

Accurate assessment of myocardial recovery (MR) under left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is essential for clinicians to manage heart failure patients. However, current techniques for assessing MR are time-consuming, invasive, and infrequent. Measuring MR using indices derived from LVAD operating data instead provides a potential real-time alternative. Several of these indices for assessing the MR of LVAD-supported heart failure patients were collated from the literature and subject to a comprehensive comparative analysis. The objective of this analysis was to determine the most accurate index for assessing systolic cardiac function under LVAD-support, characterized by maximal end-systolic elastance (Emax), while remaining insensitive to preload & afterload. The indices were compared in computational simulation, utilizing an LVAD + cardiovascular system model to sweep through a large array of Emax and resistance conditions. Results demonstrated the index that correlated best with Emax, showing the highest accuracy, was the ratio between maximum flow acceleration and flow pulsatility (average R2 =0.9790). The same index also exhibited the lowest % variation (sensitivity) to preload & afterload (1.32% & 13.53% respectively). However, opportunities for improvement remain among current recovery assessment indices, with this study providing a baseline of performance for potential future indices to improve upon.Clinical relevance- This study presents a potential real-time measure of native cardiac function in LVAD-supported heart failure patients to support patient management and further recovery.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.