A Systematic Review of Preexisting Sepsis and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Impact of surface coating and systemic anticoagulants on hemostasis and inflammation in a human whole blood model

BACKGROUND

Surface compatibility with blood is critical both for scientific investigations on hemostasis and clinical applications. Regarding in vitro and ex vivo investigations, minimal alteration in physiological hemostasis is of particular importance to draw reliable conclusions on the human coagulation system. At the same time, artificial coagulation activation must be avoided, which is relevant for the patient, for example to prevent stent graft occlusion. The aim was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of antithrombotic and antifouling surface coatings in the context of their suitability for ex vivo incubation and the study of coagulation properties.

METHODS

We investigated the impact of different protocols for surface coating of synthetic material and different anticoagulants on hemostasis and platelet activation in ex vivo human whole blood. Blood samples from healthy donors were incubated in coated microtubes on a rotating wheel at 37°C. Two protocols for surface coating were analyzed for hemostatic parameters and metabolic status, a heparin-based coating (CHC, Corline Heparin Conjugate) without further anticoagulation and a passivating coating (MPC, 2-methacryloyloxethyl phosphorylcholine) with added anticoagulants (enoxaparin, ENOX; or fondaparinux, FPX). Employing the MPC-based coating, the anticoagulants enoxaparin and fondaparinux were compared regarding their differential effects on plasmatic coagulation by thrombelastometry and on platelet activation by flowcytometry and platelet function assays.

RESULTS

Using the CHC coating, significant coagulation cascade activation was observed, whereas parameters remained mostly unchanged with MPC-based protocols. Extended incubation caused significantly elevated levels of the soluble membrane attack complex. Neither ENOX nor FPX caused a relevant impairment of platelet function or activation capacity and thrombelastometric parameters remained unchanged with both protocols. For translational purposes, we additionally modeled endotoxemia with the MPC-based protocols by incubating with lipopolysaccharide plus/minus thrombin. While coagulation parameters remained unchanged, elevated Interleukin 8 and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 demonstrated preserved immune cell responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPC-based protocols demonstrated better hemocompatibility compared to CHC, and ENOX and FPX proved useful for additional anticoagulation. Furthermore, this simple-to-use whole blood model may be useful for experimental analyses of the early coagulatory and immunological response without decalcification.

Sepsis, Septic Shock, and Differences in Cardiovascular Event Occurrence

Introduction: Mortality estimates from sepsis and septic shock ranged from 18% to 35% and 40% to 60%, respectively, prior to 2014. Sepsis patients who experience subsequent cardiovascular events have increased mortality; however, data are limited among septic shock patients. This study reports in-hospital mortality, incident cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular procedures among sepsis patients with and without subsequent septic shock. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis with and without a secondary diagnosis of septic shock were identified from the 2016 and 2017 National Readmissions Database. These patients were then evaluated for the occurrence of cardiovascular events and procedures. Results: A total of 2,127,137 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 66 years. Twenty percent of patients (n = 420,135) developed subsequent septic shock. In-hospital mortality among patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis was 5.3%, and it was 31.2% for those with subsequent septic shock. Notable cardiovascular events occurring among sepsis patients with and without subsequent septic shock, respectively, included: acute kidney injury (65.1% vs. 32.8%, P < .0001), acute systolic heart failure (9.8% vs. 5.1%, P < .0001), NSTEMI (8.8% vs. 3.2%, P < .0001), and ischemic stroke (2.3% vs. 0.9%, P < .0001). Similarly, the most common cardiovascular procedures between the two groups were: percutaneous coronary intervention (0.37% vs. 0.20%, P < .0001), intra-aortic balloon pump (0.19% vs. 0.02%, P < .0001), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.18% vs. 0.01%, P < .0001). Conclusions: Sepsis with subsequent septic shock is associated with an increased frequency of in-hospital cardiovascular events and procedures.