Clinically Silent Brain Injury and Perioperative Neurological Events in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Brain Autopsy Study

Cerebral Microvascular Injury in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device: a Neuropathological Study

Strokes are common among patients with left ventricular devices (LVAD). We hypothesize that there is ongoing cerebral microvascular injury with LVAD support and aim to describe this among LVAD-implanted patients through post-mortem neuropathologic evaluation. We identified and reviewed medical records of LVAD patients who underwent brain autopsy between January 2006 and December 2019 at a tertiary center. Cerebral injury was defined as both gross and microscopic injuries within the intracranial space including cerebral infarct (CI), hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and cerebral microvascular injury. Cerebral microvascular injury was defined as microscopic brain intraparenchymal or perivascular hemorrhage, perivascular hemosiderin deposition, and perivascular inflammation. Twenty-one patients (median age = 57 years, 67% male) had autopsy after LVAD support (median LVAD support = 51 days). The median time from death to autopsy was 19 h. All 21 patients had cerebral injuries and 19 (90%) patients had cerebral microvascular injuries. Fourteen patients (78%) harbored more than one type of cerebral injury. On gross examination, 8 patients (38%) had CI, and 6 patients (29%) had ICH. On microscopic exam, 12 patients (57%) had microscopic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, 3 patients (14%) had perivascular hemorrhage, 11 patients (43%) had perivascular hemosiderin deposition, 5 patients (24%) had meningeal hemorrhage, 13 patients had chronic perivascular inflammation (62%), and 2 patients had diffuse HIBI (10%). Among patients with LVAD, there is a high prevalence of subclinical microvascular injuries and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), which may provide some insights to the cause of frequent cerebral injury in LVAD population.

Neurocritical Care of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in otherwise refractory cardiopulmonary failure but are associated with significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. This review aims to characterize MCS-associated brain injury and discuss the neurocritical care of this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found no practice guidelines or specific management strategies for the neurocritical care of patients with MCS devices. Acute brain injury was commonly observed in short-term and durable MCS devices. There is emerging evidence that a standardized neurological monitoring and management algorithm for MCS device-associated brain injury is feasible and potentially improves neurological outcomes. While MCS devices are associated with significant neurologic morbidity and mortality, there is scant evidence regarding optimal neuromonitoring and neurocritical care. With the increase in use of MCS devices for both short-term and durable applications, improved outcomes will depend on early identification and intervention of neurologic complications and further research into their pathophysiology.