A case series describing the use of argatroban in patients on extracorporeal circulation

Association of Argatroban Dose With Coagulation Laboratory Test in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Activated Clotting Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

BACKGROUND

Only some studies have directly compared and analyzed the roles of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) in coagulation monitoring during argatroban administration.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the correlation of argatroban dose with ACT and aPTT values and to identify the optimal coagulation test for argatroban dose adjustment.

METHODS

We evaluated 55 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) who received argatroban for more than 72 hours. The correlation between argatroban dose and aPTT and ACT values was evaluated. To compare argatroban dose and bleeding events according to liver dysfunction, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin.

RESULTS

Among the 55 patients, a total of 459 doses and coagulation tests were evaluated. The aPTT and ACT values showed a weak correlation with argatroban dose, with the Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.261 (P < 0.001) and 0.194 (P = 0.001), respectively. The agreement between the target 150 to 180 seconds for ACT and 55 to 75 seconds for aPTT was observed in 140 patients (46.1%). Twenty-four patients (43.6%) had liver dysfunction when they started argatroban. The median argatroban dose was lower in the liver dysfunction group than in the control group (0.094 mcg/kg/min vs 0.169 mcg/kg/min, P = 0.020). Difference was not observed between the 2 groups in the amount of red blood cell (0.47 vs 0.43 pack, P = 0.909) and platelet (0.60 vs 0.08 pack, P = 0.079) transfusion per day.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

A weak correlation was observed between argatroban dose and the aPTT and ACT values. However, the agreement between aPTT and ACT was only 46.1% regarding the scope of target range. Further research is necessary to determine how to assess the optimal argatroban dose for patients administered argatroban while undergoing ECMO at the intensive care unit.

Argatroban Anticoagulation for Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Heparin is the widely used anti-coagulation strategy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and acquired anti-thrombin (AT) deficiency preclude the use of heparin requiring utilization of an alternative anticoagulant agent. Direct thrombin inhibitors are being proposed as potential alternatives with argatroban as one of the main agents. We aimed to review the evidence with regard to safety and efficacy of argatroban as a potential definitive alternative to heparin in the adult patient population undergoing ECMO support.

METHODS

A web-based systematic literature search was performed in Medline (PubMed) and Embase from inception until June 18, 2020.

RESULTS

The search identified 13 publications relevant to the target (4 cohort studies and 9 case series). Case reports and case series with less than 3 cases were not included in the qualitative synthesis. The aggregate number of argatroban treated patients on ECMO was n = 307. In the majority of studies argatroban was used as a continuous infusion without loading dose. Starting doses on ECMO varied between 0.05 and 2 μg/kg/min and were titrated to achieve the chosen therapeutic target range. The activated partial thormboplastin time (aPTT) was the anticoagulation parameter used for monitoring purposes in most studies, whereas some utilized the activated clotting time (ACT). Optimal therapeutic targets varied between 43-70 and 60-100 seconds for aPTT and between 150-210 and 180-230 seconds for ACT. Bleeding and thromboembolic complication rates were comparable to patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH).

CONCLUSIONS

Argatroban infusion rates and anticoagulation target ranges showed substantial variations. The rational for divergent dosing and monitoring approaches are discussed in this paper. Argatroban appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in patients requiring ECMO. To definitively establish its safety, efficacy and ideal dosing strategy, larger prospective studies on well-defined patient populations are warranted.

Anticoagulation strategies in extracorporeal circulatory devices in adult populations

Extracorporeal circulatory devices such as hemodialysis and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be lifesaving; however, they are also prone to pathologic events including device failure, venous and arterial thrombosis, hemorrhage, and an accelerated risk for atherosclerotic disease due to interactions between blood components and device surfaces of varying biocompatibility. While extracorporeal devices may be used acutely for limited periods of time (eg, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, therapeutic apheresis), some patients require chronic use of these technologies (eg, intermittent hemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices). Given the substantial thrombotic risks associated with extracorporeal devices, multiple antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies-including unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, citrate, direct thrombin inhibitors, and direct oral anticoagulants, have been used to mitigate the thrombotic milieu within the patient and device. In the following manuscript, we outline the current data on anticoagulation strategies for commonly used extracorporeal circulatory devices, highlighting the potential benefits and complications involved with each.

Anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support patients with critical cardiorespiratory illness is increasing. Systemic anticoagulation is an essential element in the care of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. While unfractionated heparin is the most commonly used agent, unfractionated heparin is associated with several unique complications that can be catastrophic in critically ill patients, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and acquired antithrombin deficiency. These complications can result in thrombotic events and subtherapeutic anticoagulation. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are emerging as alternative anticoagulants in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Increasing evidence supports DTIs use as safe and effective in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients with and without heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. This review outlines the pharmacology, dosing strategies and available protocols, monitoring parameters, and special use considerations for all available DTIs in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. The advantages and disadvantages of DTIs in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation relative to unfractionated heparin will be described.

Use of bivalirudin as a primary anticoagulant in a child during Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device support

We describe our experience of bivalirudin use, a newer direct thrombin inhibitor, in an infant who was supported with Berlin Heart EXCOR VAD (Berlin VAD) as bridge to transplant for 122 days without complications and without need for pump exchange. An 11-month-old girl with dilated cardiomyopathy with acute heart failure was awaiting cardiac transplant. Lack of improvement despite maximizing medical therapy and anticipating a prolonged waitlist time, she was supported with Berlin LVAD as a bridge to transplant. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin was started and titrated with a goal partial thromboplastin time of 60-90 seconds. Therapeutic anticoagulation was achieved with bivalirudin for 50% of the days (61/122 days) on a dose of 2.1 mg/kg/hour and in a narrow dose range of 1.9 to 2.3 mg/kg/hour for 80% of the days (98/122 days). Antiplatelet regimen was started initially with aspirin and clopidogrel added later. She was supported for 122 days on a single pump without any evidence of thrombus or need for pump change. Berlin VAD explant and orthotopic heart transplant with biatrial anastomosis were performed uneventfully. Explanted Berlin VAD had no evidence of clot/fibrin or thrombus formation. The child was discharged to home uneventfully 15 days after cardiac transplant.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal life support: incidence, management and outcomes

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe antibody-mediated reaction leading to transient prothrombosis. However, its incidence in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is not well described. The aim of this systematic review was to report the incidence of HIT in patients on ECLS, as well as compare the characteristics and outcomes of HIT in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO).

Methods

An electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature examining outcomes of patients with HIT on ECLS. All identified articles were systematically assessed using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analysis as well as univariate analysis was performed.

Results

Of 309 patients from six retrospective studies undergoing ECLS, 83% were suspected, and 17% were confirmed to have HIT. Due to the sparsity of relevant retrospective data regarding patients with confirmed HIT on ECLS, patient-based data was subsequently collected on 28 patients from case reports and case series. Out of these 28 patients, 53.6% and 46.4% of them underwent VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO, respectively. Patients on VA-ECMO had a lower median platelet count nadir (VA-ECMO: 26.0 vs. VV-ECMO: 45.0 per µL, P=0.012) and were more likely to experience arterial thromboembolism (VA-ECMO: 53.3% vs. VV-ECMO: 0.0%, P=0.007), though there was a trend towards decreased likelihood of experiencing ECLS circuit oxygenator thromboembolism (VA-ECMO: 0.0% vs. VV-ECMO: 30.8%, P=0.075) and thromboembolism necessitating ECLS device or circuit exchange (VA-ECMO: 13.3% vs. VV-ECMO 53.8%, P=0.060). Kaplan-Meier survival plots including time from ECLS initiation reveal no significant differences in survival in patients supported on VA-ECMO as compared to VV-ECMO (P=0.300).

Conclusions

Patients who develop HIT on VA-ECMO are more likely to experience more severe thrombocytopenia and arterial thromboembolism than those on VV-ECMO. Further research in this area and development of standardized protocols for the monitoring, diagnosis and management of HIT in patients on ECLS support are warranted.

Clinical complications during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxigenation in post-cardiotomy and non post-cardiotomy shock: still the achille's heel

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is life-saving for potentially reversible heart failure and respiratory injuries not responsive to conventional therapies. Technological innovations have produced over the years significant improvements in ECMO devices (pump, cannula design and oxygenator) and have allowed a better risk/benefit profile. Alongside with recognized advantages in the treatment of very sick patients, ECMO remains an invasive procedure for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and it is associated with complications that strongly influence the prognosis. Current review was designed to provide a comprehensive outline on ECMO complications, analyzing risk factors and strategies of management, focusing on adult population undergoing veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) therapy.

Use of argatroban for extracorporeal life support in patients with nonheparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Analysis of 10 consecutive patients

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is currently the standard anticoagulant used in extracorporeal life support (ECLS). However, severe thrombocytopenia occurs frequently during ECLS use and it may be difficult to determine whether this represents heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or not. In this case, UFH cannot be continued. Because a confirmatory laboratory test requires time, argatroban is empirically used if HIT is suspected. However, many patients are not found to have HIT. In non-HIT patients, the effectiveness and safety of argatroban are unclear. Thus, we investigated whether argatroban was safe and useful in patients who were suspected of having HIT and were started on argatroban, but were ultimately found to have non-HIT.We retrospectively reviewed all patients on ECLS who received the anticoagulant argatroban as an alternative to UFH between January 2014 and July 2015. The pretest clinical score (4Ts) was calculated, and a score greater than 4 was considered an indication for argatroban. The target-activated clotting time or activated partial thromboplastin time was 1.5 times the patient's upper normal value. Of 191 patients on ECLS during the study period, 10 (5.2%) were treated with argatroban infusion.No patients were found to have antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies. The average maintenance dose of argatroban was 0.1 μg/kg/min. Platelet counts increased significantly following argatroban administration (P = .02). There were no anticoagulation-related complications such as bleeding or thrombosis.Our results suggest that argatroban is a safe alternative to UFH for patients with non-HIT on ECLS. Argatroban may have a more significant platelet-preserving effect than UFH, regardless of whether HIT is present.

Thromboprophylaxis in Extracorporeal Circuits: Current Pharmacological Strategies and Future Directions

The development of extracorporeal devices for organ support has been a part of medical history and progression since the late 1900s. These types of technology are primarily used and developed in the field of critical care medicine. Unfractionated heparin, discovered in 1916, has really been the only consistent form of thromboprophylaxis for attenuating or even preventing the blood-biomaterial reaction that occurs when such technologies are initiated. The advent of regional anticoagulation for procedures such as continuous renal replacement therapy and plasmapheresis have certainly removed the risks of systemic heparinization and heparin effect, but the challenges of the blood-biomaterial reaction and downstream effects remain. In addition, regional anticoagulation cannot realistically be applied in a system such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation because of the high blood flow rates needed to support the patient. More recently, advances in the technology itself have resulted in smaller, more compact extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems that can-at certain times and in certain patients-run without any form of anticoagulation. However, the majority of patients on ECLS systems require some type of systemic anticoagulation; therefore, the risks of bleeding and thrombosis persist, the most devastating of which is intracranial hemorrhage. We provide a concise overview of the primary and alternate agents and monitoring used for thromboprophylaxis during use of ECLS. In addition, we explore the potential for further biomaterial and technologic developments and what they could provide when applied in the clinical arena.

Platelet Count Trends and Prevalence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Cohort of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and to study platelet count trends potentially suggestive of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a population of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A total of 926-bed teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients who survived longer than 48 hours from extracorporeal membrane oxygenator initiation between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively on all extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing results and platelet count variables were obtained from the electronic medical record. We used our institutional algorithm to interpret the results of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing. Ninety-six extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients met the algorithm criteria for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosis and seven of those had documented thromboembolic event while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia related thrombosis, 8.3 and 7.3, respectively). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive patients were younger; all underwent venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; spent more hours on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; had significantly higher heparin-induced thrombocytopenia enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays optical density; had a higher prevalence of thromboembolic events and reached platelet count nadir later. There was no difference in mortality between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive and negative patients. Comparison of platelet count trends revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the predefined study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-related thrombosis among extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients at our institution is relatively high. Using platelet count trends to guide decision to test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not an optimal strategy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients. Without a validated pretest probability clinical score, serosurveillance in a defined high-risk group of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator patients may be needed.

Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology

Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) indications and usage has strikingly progressed over the last 20 years; it has become essential tool in the care of adults and children with severe cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional management. In this article we will provide a review of ECMO development, clinical indications, patients' management, options and cannulations techniques, complications, outcomes, and the appropriate strategy of organ management while on ECMO.

[Argatroban, a new antithrombotic treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia application in cardiac surgery and in intensive care]

OBJECTIVES

Although heparin-induced thrombocytopemia (HIT) is uncommon, its thromboembolic complications are potentially life-threatening. The low-molecular weight heparins are less responsible of HIT than unfractionated heparin (UFH) but this latter is still indicated in some circumstances such as cardiac surgery. Argatroban, a selective thrombin inhibitor, recently available, has been indicated in HIT treatment. This review presents the main pharmacological characteristics, its indications and uses in the context of cardiac surgery and in intensive care medicine.

METHODS

Review of the literature in Medline database over the past 15 years using the following keywords: argatroban, cardiac surgery, circulatory assistance, cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Despite its short-acting pharmacokinetic, argatroban cannot be recommended during cardiopulmonary bypass. On the contrary, argatroban is indicated in many circumstances in postoperative period of various cardiac surgeries (on-pump, off-pump, circulatory assistance). Nevertheless, after cardiac surgery, doses have to be adapted according to coagulation laboratory testing (ACT), particularly in patients presenting acute organ failure (kidney injury, heart failure, liver failure). This compound has no antagonist and is excluded during severe hepatic failure. The continuous intravenous administration is a drawback.

CONCLUSION

Argatroban is a new direct competitive thrombin inhibitor well evaluated as treatment of HIT after cardiac surgery. In HIT management, argatroban is an interesting alternative to lepirudin that is not anymore available and danaparoid because of supply disturbances.

Bivalirudin in pediatric patients maintained on extracorporeal life support

OBJECTIVE

Anticoagulation with heparin is standard of care for patients maintained on extracorporeal life support. Very limited evidence exists for the use of alternative anticoagulants during extracorporeal life support. Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin resistance, and evidence of significant thrombosis while on heparin may be candidates for alternative anticoagulation. The objective of this analysis is to present evidence for the use of bivalirudin during extracorporeal life support in pediatric patients.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

University of California, Davis Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Twelve critically ill, pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twelve patients meeting entry criteria received bivalirudin during the study period. The median patient age was 8 days (range, 1 d to 6 yr). Eight patients were neonates. Eight patients were male. Nine patients were supported with venoarterial extracorporeal life support. Median duration of extracorporeal life support was 226 hours (range, 111-913) and median time on bivalirudin was 92 hours (range, 60-230). Bivalirudin bolus doses were administered to select patients without bleeding complications. The maintenance dose that corresponded with initial target activated partial thromboplastin time ranged from 0.045 to 0.48 mg/kg/hr with a median rate of 0.16 mg/kg/hr. The median dose for days 1, 3, and 5 was 0.135, 0.175, and 0.267 mg/kg/hr, respectively. The correlation (r2) between dose adjustment and activated partial thromboplastin time response was 0.264.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest case series describing the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor in pediatric extracorporeal life support patients. The maintenance dose range reflected considerable inter-patient variability. There was an observed increase in dose requirements with time. Bivalirudin, with close monitoring, is a potential option for pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support who have developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin resistance, or significant thrombosis while on heparin.

The evolution of patient selection criteria and indications for extracorporeal life support in pediatric cardiopulmonary failure: next time, let's not eat the bones

Bill James, baseball statistician and author, tells the story of hungry cavemen sitting about a campfire, waiting for tomatoes to ripen. One has the inspiration to throw an ox on the fire, and the first barbecue ensued and was endured. After eating, the conversation goes something like this. "There were some good parts." "Yeah, but there were some bad parts." And the smart one says, "This time, let's not eat the bones." The evolution of patient selection criteria for the use of extracorporeal support (ECLS) is a bit like those cavemen and their first barbecued ox. Extracorporeal life support technology and application to patient care is the unique result of a long standing history of ambitious attempt, evaluation, debate, collaboration and extension.

Laboratory methods and management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The clinical effects of heparin are meritorious and heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for most clinical needs. However, as with any drug, adverse effects exist. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an important adverse effect of heparin associated with amputation and death due to thrombosis. Although the diagnosis and treatment of HIT can be difficult and complex, it is critical that patients with HIT be identified as soon as possible to initiate early treatment to avoid thrombosis.