A Novel Study of Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation in a Pressurized Pulsatile Duplicator

Using a Mock Circulatory Loop as a Regulatory Science Tool to Simulate Different Heart Failure Conditions

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device therapy is one of the primary treatment options for end-stage heart failure (HF), whereby a mechanical pump is integrated with the failing heart to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. The ISO 14708-5:2020 standard prescribes generic guidelines for nonclinical device evaluation and system performance testing of MCS devices using a mock circulatory loop (MCL). However, the utility of MCLs in premarket regulatory submissions of MCS devices is ambiguous, and the specific disease states that the device is intended to treat are not usually simulated. Hence, we aim to outline the potential of MCLs as a valuable regulatory science tool for characterizing MCS device systems by adequately representing target clinical-use HF conditions on the bench. Target pathophysiologic hemodynamics of HF conditions (i.e., cardiogenic shock (CS), left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy secondary to hypertension, and coronary artery disease), along with a healthy adult at rest and a healthy adult during exercise are provided as recommended test conditions. The conditions are characterized based on LV, aorta, and left atrium pressures using recommended cardiac hemodynamic indices such as systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, mean cardiac output (CO), cardiac cycle time, and systemic vascular resistance. This study is a first step toward standardizing MCLs to generate well-defined target HF conditions used to evaluate MCS devices.

Simulating Radial Pressure Waveforms with a Mock Circulatory Flow Loop to Characterize Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems

PURPOSE

Mock circulatory loops (MCLs) can reproducibly generate physiologically relevant pressures and flows for cardiovascular device testing. These systems have been extensively used to characterize the performance of therapeutic cardiac devices, but historically MCLs have had limited use for assessing patient monitoring systems. Here, we adapted an MCL to include peripheral components and evaluated its utility for qualitative and quantitative benchtop testing of hemodynamic monitoring devices.

METHODS

An MCL was designed to simulate three physiological hemodynamic states: normovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and hyperdynamic circulation. The system was assessed for stability in pressure and flow values over time, repeatability, waveform morphology, and systemic-peripheral pressure relationships.

RESULTS

For each condition, cardiac output was controlled to the nearest 0.2 L/min, and flow rate and mean arterial pressure remained stable and repeatable over a 60-s period (n = 5, standard deviation of ± 0.1 L/min and ± 0.84 mmHg, respectively). Transfer function analyses showed that the systemic-peripheral relationships could be adequately manipulated. The results from this MCL were comparable to those from other published MCLs and computational simulations. However, resolving current limitations of the system would further improve its utility. Three pulse contour analysis algorithms were applied to the pressure and flow data from the MCL to demonstrate the potential role of MCLs in characterizing hemodynamic monitoring systems.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the development of robust analysis methods in conjunction with modified MCLs can expand device testing applications to hemodynamic monitoring systems. Properly validated MCLs can create a stable and reproducible environment for testing patient monitoring systems over their entire operating ranges prior to clinical use.