The primary haemostasis is more preserved in thrombocytopenic patients with liver cirrhosis than cancer

Assessment of hemostatic profile in patients with mild to advanced liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis of patients suffering from liver cirrhosis is challenging due to both, pro- and anticoagulatory disorders leading to hemostatic alterations with distinct abnormalities of coagulation. Pathological changes in conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count are common manifestations of decreased liver synthesis of coagulation factors and reduced platelet count in these patients. However, conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count do not reflect in-vivo coagulation status or platelet function. The purpose of this present observational study was therefore to assess the haemostatic profile including plasmatic coagulation using thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry for platelet function in patients suffering from liver cirrhosis.

AIM

To assess the hemostatic profile of cirrhotic patients according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.

METHODS

Our study included both in- and outpatients suffering from liver cirrhosis attending the out- and inpatient care of the department of hepatology. Demographic and biochemical data as well as medical history including cause of liver cirrhosis, end stage kidney failure and medication with anticoagulants were recorded. To assess the hemostatic profile, platelet function was analyzed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using Multiplate^® (ADP-, ASPI- and TRAP-test) and thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM). Data were compared using Mann-Whitney U- or χ²-test. Spearman correlation was performed to analyze the association between MELD Score and results of thrombelastometry and MEA.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients attending the out- and inpatient care suffering from liver cirrhosis were screened. Of these, 50 patients were included and assigned to groups according to MELD score 6 to 11 (n = 25) or ≥ 17 (n = 25). Baseline patient characteristics revealed significant differences for MELD score (8 vs 22, P < 0.0001) and underlying laboratory parameters (international normalized ratio, bilirubine, creatinine) as well as fibrinogen level (275 mg/dL vs 209 mg/dL, P = 0.006) and aPTT (30 s vs 35 s, P = 0.047). MEA showed a moderately impaired platelet function (medians: AUC_ADP = 43U, AUC_ASPI = 71U, AUC_TRAP = 92U) but no significant differences between both groups. Thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM) revealed values within normal range in both groups. No significant correlation was observed between MELD score and results of MEA/thrombelastometry.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate a partially impaired hemostatic profile in liver cirrhosis patients unrelated to MELD score. An individual assessment of a potential coagulopathy should therefore be considered.

Platelet function in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy

A growing interest concerns arterial thromboembolic disease in cancer patients. As platelets may be key players in this process, investigation of platelet aggregation in cancer patients is of importance. We aimed to investigate platelet aggregation in patients with lung cancer prior to surgery and during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy compared with lobectomy performed through a thoracotomy. We included 93 patients (VATS + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), n = 32; VATS no LMWH, n = 31; thoracotomy + LMWH, n = 30). Data obtained from 121 healthy individuals were used for comparison prior to surgery. Platelet aggregation was analysed by impedance aggregometry using adenosine diphosphate 6.5 μM (ADPtest) and collagen 3.2 μg/mL (COLtest) as agonists. Prior to surgery, platelet aggregation was significantly increased in both VATS-patients (ADPtest, p < .0001; COLtest, p = .0002) and patients undergoing thoracotomy (ADPtest, p < .0001; COLtest, p < .0001) compared with healthy individuals. Platelet aggregation did not differ between VATS-patients and thoracotomy patients prior to surgery (p-values >.11). At the first postoperative day, VATS-patients demonstrated significantly higher collagen-induced platelet aggregation than preoperatively (p = .001), but the increase in platelet aggregation did not differ significantly between VATS and thoracotomy patients (p-values ≥.24). At the second postoperative day, platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in thoracotomy patients compared with the preoperative level (ADPtest, p = .002; COLtest, p = .05). In conclusion, platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with primary lung cancer prior to surgery compared with healthy individuals. At the first postoperative day, platelet aggregation was significantly higher than the preoperative level in VATS-patients; however, this increase did not differ between patient groups.