Safety and efficacy of caplacizumab in a case of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the postpartum period

Management and follow-up of pregnancy-onset thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: the French experience

ABSTRACT

Pregnancy-onset thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening disease of which diagnosis and management requires experienced multidisciplinary teams. The mechanisms responsible for a deficiency in the disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13 (ADAMTS13) leading to pregnancy-onset TTP may be congenital or acquired, and studying ADAMTS13 conformation could be of interest. The differential diagnosis between TTP and other pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) is often challenging. Our retrospective multicenter study highlights the significance and the challenges associated with pregnancy-onset TTP and childbirth in terms of diagnosis, obstetric management, and follow-up aspects. Among 1174 pregnancy-onset TMA enrolled in the French Registry for TMA from 2000 to 2020, we identified 108 pregnancy-onset TTP: 52 immune-mediated TTP (iTTP, 48.1%), 27 acquired TTP of unidentified mechanism (uTTP, 25%), and 29 congenital TTP (cTTP, 26.9%). Data show that maternal outcome is good (survival rate: 95%) and fetal outcome is linked to the gestational age at the onset of the disease (survival rate: 75.5%). Three distinct entities with different natural histories emerged: pregnancy-onset iTTP appears similar to idiopathic iTTP, with an open ADAMTS13 conformation, and is marked by a relapse risk independent of subsequent pregnancies; pregnancy-onset uTTP appears to have a different pathophysiology with an unexpected open ADAMTS13 conformation and a very low relapse risk independent of subsequent pregnancies; finally, pregnancy-onset cTTP is characterized by the necessity of pregnancy as a systematic and specific trigger and a need for prophylactic plasmatherapy for subsequent pregnancies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00426686, and at the Health Authority and the French Ministry of Health (P051064/PHRC AOM05012).

Should we consider caplacizumab as routine treatment for acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura? An expert perspective on the pros and cons

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening disorder. Caplacizumab has been the latest drug incorporated into the initial treatment of acute episodes, allowing for faster platelet recovery and a decrease in refractoriness, exacerbation, thromboembolic events, and mortality. However, caplacizumab is also associated with a bleeding risk and higher treatment costs, which prevent many centers from using it universally.

AREAS COVERED

Studies that included iTTP and/or caplacizumab to date were selected for this review using PubMed and MEDLINE platforms. We describe outcomes in the pre-caplacizumab era and after it, highlighting the benefits and risks of its use early in frontline, and also pointing out special situations that require careful management.

EXPERT OPINION

It is clear that the availability of caplacizumab has significantly and favorably impacted the management of iTTP patients. Whether this improvement is cost-effective still remains uncertain, and data on long-term sequelae and different healthcare systems will help to clarify this point. In addition, evidence of the bleeding/thrombotic risk of iTTP patients under this drug needs to be better addressed in future studies.