Monotherapy with enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Objective  This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the clinical comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and aspirin in patients with an unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library using both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Reduction in recurrent deep venous thrombosis (r-DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Other secondary end points were also included. We performed a fixed, random effects, and hierarchical models Bayesian NMA for each outcome. Results  We identified 18 RCTs and seven observational studies. Random models showed sulodexide is the best treatment compared with DOACs, VKA, and aspirin at reducing the risk of CRNMB, for preventing death from any cause, and VTE/PE/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke with 0.47, 0.81, and 0.65 probabilities, respectively. In the random model sulodexide was the best treatment for reducing the risk of MB with a 0.50 probability and hierarchical model that confirmed favorable results. Random and hierarchical models showed sulodexide and DOACs to be the best treatments for reducing PE risk. Sulodexide was more effective than aspirin for reducing r-DVT with 0.12 and less of 0.0001 probabilities, respectively. Conclusion  Sulodexide is more effective for reducing MB and CRNMB, for preventing deaths from any cause, and from VTE/PE/MI/stroke, than other treatments, for both random and hierarchical models. Sulodexide showed to be more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of r-DVT and PE. Sulodexide's reduction in bleeding while protecting from recurrent DVT risk makes this therapeutic option an important alternative for extended anticoagulation treatment.

Influence of sex on risk of bleeding in anticoagulated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of bleeding on anticoagulation varies between patients. It is uncertain whether sex influences this risk.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the risk of major bleeding differs between men and women receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism(VTE).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, and relevant conference proceedings, until February 2013. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies of patients on therapeutic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or VTE. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The relative risk of bleeding in men compared to women was pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies including 94 293 patients were eligible; 78 044 patients (83%) had atrial fibrillation; 16 156 patients (17%) had VTE; 37 250 patients were women (40%); and there were 4147 major bleeds. The relative risk of major bleeding for men vs. women was 1.02(95% CI 0.95–1.10; P = 0.27 for heterogeniety). The relative risk was 1.02 (95% CI 0.95–1.09) in patients with atrial fibrillation and 0.80 (95% CI 0.65–0.98) in patients with VTE (P = 0.03 for subgroup effect). Type of anticoagulant,intensity of anticoagulation, and whether patients began or were already established on anticoagulants at enrollment did not influence the relative risk of major bleeding in men compared to women.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of major bleeding on anticoagulation appears to be the same in men and women, particularly if patients have atrial fibrillation. This finding is less certain for patients with VTE, in whom the risk of bleeding may be marginally lower in men compared to in women.

Comparison of tinzaparin and acenocoumarol for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: a multicentre, randomized study

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and healthcare resource utilization of long-term treatment with tinzaparin in symptomatic patients with acute pulmonary embolism as compared to standard therapy. In this open-label trial, 102 patients with objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism were randomized to receive, after initial treatment with tinzaparin, either tinzaparin (175 IU/kg/day) or international normalized ratio-adjusted acenocoumarol for 6 months. Clinical endpoints were assessed during the 6 months of treatment. A pharmacoeconomic analysis was carried out to evaluate the cost of the long-term treatment with tinzaparin in comparison with the standard one. In an intention-to-treat analysis, one of 52 patients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism in the tinzaparin group compared with none of the 50 patients in the acenocoumarol group. One patient in each group had a major haemorrhagic complication. Six patients in the acenocoumarol group had minor bleeding compared with none in the tinzaparin group (P = 0.027). Median hospital length of stay was shorter in the tinzaparin group compared to the acenocoumarol group (7 versus 9 days; P = 0.014). When all the direct and indirect cost components were combined for the entire population, we found a slight, nonstatistically significant (mean difference €345; 95% CI 1382-2071; P = 0.69) reduction in total cost with tinzaparin. Symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism treatment with full therapeutic doses of tinzaparin for 6 months is a feasible alternative to conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists.

Early Discharge of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: Implications Regarding Therapy

The purpose of this investigation is to show trends in the duration of hospitalization of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The number of patients discharged from short-stay non-Federal hospitals throughout the United States with a primary diagnostic code for PE or DVT from 1979 through 2005 was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. By 2005, 13% of patients with PE were discharged in 1 to 2 days, 30% in 3 to 4 days, 26% in 5 to 6 days, and 31% in ≥7 days. Regarding DVT, by 2005, 26% of patients with DVT were discharged in 1 to 2 days, 34% were discharged in 3 to 4 days, 20% were discharged in 5 to 6 days, and 19% were discharged in ≥7 days. The data indicate that large proportions of patients with a primary diagnosis of PE and of DVT are being discharged before adequate heparin can be administered and before warfarin can become antithrombotic. Others have reported an increased mortality among patients with PE discharged in ≤4 days. If patients are to be discharged before adequate heparin can be administered, outpatient treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for at least 5 days and until the international normalized ratio (INR) is ≥2.0 for 24 hours is recommended or extended outpatient treatment with LMWH may be considered.