A strategy utilizing ambulatory monitoring and home and clinic blood pressure measurements to optimize the safety evaluation of noncardiovascular drugs with potential for hemodynamic effects: a report from the SYNERGY trial

Single-arm study of testosterone gel replacement therapy and ambulatory blood pressure outcomes in men with hypogonadism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Studies examining ambulatory blood pressure (BP) response to testosterone replacement therapy are needed owing to inconsistent prior findings across formulations. This study assessed testosterone gel 1.62% and 24-h ambulatory BP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-arm non-inferiority trial (NCT04274894) conducted at 36 US sites enrolled 246 men with hypogonadism (mean age, 57.6 years; mean office systolic/diastolic BP [SBP/DBP], 129.8/79.5 mm Hg) who were treated for 16 weeks with once-daily testosterone gel treatment (starting dose, 40.5 mg/day; min, max dose, 20.25, 81.0 mg/day) to achieve testosterone concentration of 350-750 ng/dL. Main outcome measures included mean change in 24-h average SBP (primary endpoint) and DBP from baseline to week 16. The non-inferiority threshold was a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit <3.0 mm Hg for 24-h average SBP.

RESULTS

Increase in mean ± SD serum testosterone concentration to a physiologic level (baseline, 244.4 ± 93.9 ng/dL; week 16, 502.5 ± 394.4 ng/dL) was associated with a 1.9-mm Hg mean change in 24-h average SBP observed in the primary analysis (baseline, 123.5 mm Hg; week 16, 125.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.63-3.13 mm Hg; n = 169). As the upper CI limit modestly exceeded the non-inferiority margin (3 mm Hg), study drug effect on SBP could not be ruled out. Non-inferiority was observed in subgroups without hypertension or diabetes (95% CI, upper limit <3.0 mm Hg) and was not observed in those with hypertension or diabetes. Daytime SBP and DBP changes were larger compared with nighttime. No clear cardiovascular adverse events or new safety signals were identified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

While the effect of testosterone gel 1.62% on 24-h average SBP could not be ruled out based on the study's non-inferiority margin, the clinical relevance of the small-magnitude mean increase of 1.9 mm Hg is anticipated to be minimal considering the results of the TRAVERSE study of testosterone gel 1.62% and major adverse cardiac events.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04274894 (registered February 17, 2020).

Mirabegron Versus Placebo and Other Therapeutic Modalities in the Treatment of Patients with Overactive Bladder Syndrome-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) increases with age. Mirabegron and other drugs are used for the management of patients with OAB. To evaluate mirabegron versus other treatments for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).

METHODS

This randomised controlled trial (RCT)-based systematic review (CRD42020200394) was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement, with standards reported in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

We included 28 RCTs (n = 27 481 adults), comparing the following: mirabegron 25 mg versus placebo (n = 8798; six RCTs): significant changes in urgency urinary incontinence (mean difference [MD] -0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.56 to -0.26), total incontinence (MD -0.47, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.30), and nocturia (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.02), and mirabegron 50 mg versus placebo (n = 14 933; 12 RCTs): significant changes in urgency urinary incontinence (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.31), urgency (MD -0.49, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.33), total incontinence (MD -0.44, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.33), favouring mirabegron 25/50 mg; mirabegron 50 mg versus tolterodine 4 mg (n = 8008; five RCTs): significant changes in micturition (MD -0.16, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.02) and overall adverse events (AEs; odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86), favouring mirabegron 50 mg; mirabegron 50 mg versus solifenacin 5 mg (n = 8911; four RCTs): significant changes in voided volume/micturition in millilitres (MD -7.77, 95% CI -12.93 to -2.61), favouring mirabegron 50 mg; and mirabegron 50 mg versus oxybutynin 73.5 mg (n = 302; one RCT): significant changes in overall AEs (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.16), favouring mirabegron 50 mg.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Mirabegron is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Coadministration with anticholinergics provides an advantageous additive effect without a higher occurrence of side effects.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Mirabegron is effective, safe, and well tolerated for treating overactive bladder. When used in conjunction with anticholinergic medications, it provides extra benefits without causing more side effects.

Mirabegron 50 mg once daily, long-term treatment maximizes benefit in middle-aged and older people with overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled, multicenter, and multinational trials

The prevalence and severity of overactive bladder increase with age, and mirabegron is an approved treatment for this condition. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with placebo for overactive bladder treatment. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library (30 October 2023) for relevant articles (source: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, CINAHL). We included randomized controlled trials involving adults with overactive bladder syndrome that compared mirabegron with placebo treatment. Data were analyzed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Review Manager (computer program) Version 5.4]. Nine parallel-group trials (10 articles) were included. The evaluation included a total of 8,527 adults, including 6,445 women and 2,082 men, of whom 5,726 were White, 2,462 were Asian, and 161 were Black. The mean age of the participants ranged from 53.4 to 60.3 years. This evaluation involved three specifications of mirabegron: 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg. In all trials, patients were enrolled in a 12-week double-blind treatment period, and the dose was once daily. The review of trials found that on average, people taking mirabegron had about 13 ml more volume voided per micturition, five fewer micturitions, and four fewer incontinence episodes every week, with moderate improvements in quality of life. About one in five people taking the drug reported TRAEs. Mirabegron treatment is well tolerated, with the risk of adverse events similar to that of a placebo. For best results, a dose of 50 mg once daily is recommended for long-term use. It is unclear whether any benefits are sustained after treatment discontinuation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO (CRD42023430737).

Clinical pharmacology of β-3 adrenergic receptor agonists for cardiovascular diseases

INTRODUCTION

Few agonists of the third isotype of beta-adrenergic receptors, the β3-adrenoreceptor, are currently used clinically, and new agonists are under development for the treatment of overactive bladder disease. As the receptor is expressed in human cardiac and vascular tissues, it is important to understand their beneficial (or adverse) effect(s) on these targets.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss the most recent results of clinical trials testing the benefit and safety of β3-adrenoreceptor activation on cardiovascular outcomes in light of current knowledge on the receptor biology, genetic polymorphisms, and agonist pharmacology.

EXPERT OPINION

While evidence from small clinical trials is limited so far, the β3-agonist, mirabegron seems to be safe in patients at high cardiovascular risk but produces benefits on selected cardiovascular outcomes only at higher than standard doses. Activation of cardiovascular β3-adrenoreceptors deserves to be tested with more potent agonists, such as vibegron.

Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults

BACKGROUND

Around 16% of adults have symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB; urgency with frequency and/or urge incontinence), with prevalence increasing with age. Anticholinergic drugs are commonly used to treat this condition. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of anticholinergic drugs compared with placebo or no treatment for treating overactive bladder syndrome in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 14 January 2020), and the reference lists of relevant articles. We updated this search on 3 May 2022, but these results have not yet been fully incorporated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised trials in adults with overactive bladder syndrome that compared an anticholinergic drug alone with placebo treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data from the included studies, including an assessment of the risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using the GRADE approach. We processed data as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 104 studies, 71 of which were new or updated for this version of the review. Although 12 studies did not report the number of participants, there were 47,106 people in the remainder of the included studies. The majority of the studies had insufficient information to allow judgement of risk of bias and we judged them to be unclear for all domains. Nine anticholinergic drugs were included in these studies: darifenacin; fesoterodine; imidafenacin; oxybutynin; propantheline; propiverine; solifenacin; tolterodine and trospium. No studies were found that compared anticholinergic drugs to no treatment. At the end of the treatment period, anticholinergics may slightly increase condition-specific quality of life (mean difference (MD) 4.41 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.28 lower to 3.54 lower (scale range -100 to 0); 12 studies, 6804 participants; low-certainty evidence). Anticholinergics are probably better than placebo in terms of patient perception of cure or improvement (risk ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.66; 9 studies, 8457 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and the mean number of urgency episodes per 24-hour period (MD 0.85 lower, 95% CI 1.03 lower to 0.67 lower; 23 studies, 16,875 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, anticholinergics may result in an increase in dry mouth adverse events (RR 3.50, 95% CI 3.26 to 3.75; 66 studies, 38,368 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in an increased risk of urinary retention (RR 3.52, 95% CI 2.04 to 6.08; 17 studies, 7862 participants; low-certainty evidence). Taking anticholinergics may be more likely to lead to participants withdrawing from the studies due to adverse events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.56; 61 studies, 36,943 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, taking anticholinergics probably reduces the mean number of micturitions per 24-hour period compared to placebo (MD 0.85 lower, 95% CI 0.98 lower to 0.73 lower; 30 studies, 19,395 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The use of anticholinergic drugs by people with overactive bladder syndrome results in important but modest improvements in symptoms compared with placebo treatment. In addition, recent studies suggest that this is generally associated with only modest improvement in quality of life. Adverse effects were higher with all anticholinergics compared with placebo. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were also higher for all anticholinergics except tolterodine. It is not known whether any benefits of anticholinergics are sustained during long-term treatment or after treatment stops.

Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Overactive bladder (OAB) negatively affects work productivity and quality of life in sufferers. Its overall impact is likely to increase as a result of increasing prevalence in an ageing population. The pathophysiology of OAB is not completely understood but the β3-adrenoceptor, which is highly expressed in the urinary bladder, is thought to be important for mediating human detrusor relaxation during the storage phase. Clinical trial results have demonstrated that mirabegron, a selective β3-adrenoceptor agonist offers substantial clinical efficacy and good adherence rates over 12 months. Furthermore, due to its different mechanism of action, it is likely to offer a favourable tolerability profile when compared with antimuscarinic agents, resulting in improved persistence over long-term treatment. Finally, from a health economic perspective, despite its higher drug acquisition cost, mirabegron has been found to be cost-effective, owing to the greater increase in quality-adjusted-life-years gained, when compared to antimuscarinic medications. The PubMed database was searched for English language articles published between 1 January 2005 to 31 January 2022, on the subject of mirabegron. Search terms included "mirabegron", "overactive bladder", "β3-adrenoceptor agonist", "urinary incontinence". This review summarises the evidence for mirabegron as a treatment option for the management of OAB.

Impact of Mirabegron Administration on the Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Patients with Overactive Bladder

Background and Objectives: To determine changes in the blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) before and after the administration of mirabegron in real-world clinical practice for patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in patients newly diagnosed with OAB. Before and 12 weeks after mirabegron treatment, we evaluated the effects on BP and PR. An overall examination was conducted, and the patients were divided into two groups according to their age: a young group (<65 years old) and an old group (≥65 years old). Results: A total of 263 patients were enrolled in this study. In the overall and intragroup comparisons, the systolic BP (SBP) did not change significantly after mirabegron administration. However, an increase in SBP of ≥10 mmHg was observed in 53 (20.2%), 4 (7.4%), and 49 (23.4%) in the entire group, young group, and old group, respectively (p = 0.009). Regarding diastolic BP, a significant decrease after the treatment was detected in entire (71.2 ± 11.4 versus 69.8 ± 10.7 mmHg; p = 0.041) and old patients (71.5 ± 10.6 versus 69.5 ± 10.2 mmHg; p = 0.012). There was no significant change in PR in our study population. Further examination using a propensity match score revealed that age was the risk factor for the increase in SBP after mirabegron administration. Conclusions: Mirabegron does not have any adverse effects on BP and PR. However, since some patients in this study had elevated SBP after administration, we suggest regular BP monitoring during mirabegron treatment.

Cardiovascular safety of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A post hoc analysis from the Japanese MILAI II study

Objective

This analysis was conducted to investigate the cardiovascular (CV) safety outcomes from the MILAI II study. MILAI II was conducted to evaluate the long‐term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add‐on therapy to mirabegron over 52 weeks in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.

Methods

MILAI II consisted of a 2‐week screening period (patients received mirabegron 50 mg once daily) plus a 52‐week treatment period (patients were randomized to receive a combination of mirabegron 50 mg/d plus solifenacin 5 mg/d, propiverine 20 mg/d, imidafenacin 0.2 mg/d, or tolterodine 4 mg/d). CV safety was assessed using treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and 12‐lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). Vital signs and ECG data were evaluated for each patient using worst post‐baseline values reported.

Results

Of 647 patients, 570 (88.1%) were female with a mean age of 65 years. CV history at baseline and CV‐related concomitant medication use throughout the study were balanced between groups. The incidences of overall and drug‐related CV TEAEs were ≤8.1% and ≤6.2%, respectively, for all groups. The most common TEAEs were ECG T wave amplitude decreased, ECG QT prolonged, and ventricular extrasystoles. Overall, 36 TEAEs of interest related to the CV system that were possibly/probably related to treatment were reported with similar incidences for each group. For the worst post‐baseline vital signs and ECGs, no relationships were noted in terms of either timing or treatment group.

Conclusion

A favorable CV safety profile was observed following long‐term combination treatment with mirabegron and an antimuscarinic in patients with OAB symptoms.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Mirabegron and Solifenacin in Combination Compared with Monotherapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomised, Multicentre Phase 3 Study (SYNERGY II)

BACKGROUND

The long-term potential of solifenacin and mirabegron combination treatment for patients with overactive bladder (OAB) has not been previously assessed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of solifenacin succinate 5mg plus mirabegron 50mg tablets (combination treatment) versus solifenacin or mirabegron monotherapy in patients with OAB over 12 mo.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial (SYNERGY II) of patients with "wet" OAB symptoms (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 mo. The study was conducted from March 2014 to September 2016; with 1829 patients randomised. The full analysis set was comprised of 1794 patients.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary objective was safety, measured as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was measured as the change from baseline to the end of treatment in the mean number of incontinence episodes/24h and micturitions/24h.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median age was 60 yr (range 19-86 yr) and 1434 patients (80%) were female. Overall, 856 patients (47%) experienced ≥1 TEAE. TEAE frequency was slightly higher in the combination group (596 patients, 49%; mirabegron 126 patients, 41%; solifenacin 134 patients, 44%). Serious TEAEs were reported by 67 patients (3.7%); one was considered possibly treatment-related (mirabegron group, atrial fibrillation). Dry mouth was the most common TEAE (combination 74 patients, 6.1%; solifenacin 18 patients, 5.9%; mirabegron 12 patients, 3.9%). Combination therapy was statistically superior to mirabegron and solifenacin for the number of incontinence episodes (vs mirabegron: adjusted mean difference [AMD] -0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.7 to -0.2, p<0.001; vs solifenacin: AMD -0.1, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.1, p=0.002) and micturitions (vs mirabegron: AMD -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.2, p<0.001; vs solifenacin: AMD -0.4, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.1, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Mirabegron and solifenacin combination treatment for OAB symptoms was well tolerated over 12 mo and led to efficacy improvements over each monotherapy. This innovative combination is a treatment option that could become widely used in the clinic.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study looked at the safety and efficacy of a combination of solifenacin succinate 5mg plus mirabegron 50mg tablets over 12 mo in patients with the overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms of increased urination frequency, heightened urgency to urinate, and unintentional passing of urine. We compared this treatment with solifenacin succinate 5mg or mirabegron 50mg alone, and found that the combination treatment was well tolerated by patients and led to greater improvements in symptoms. This novel combination could be an improved treatment option in the clinical setting for patients with OAB. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02045862.