The blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity in healthy participants are not determined by sex or cardiorespiratory fitness

What do we know about the role of menopause in cardiovascular autonomic regulation in hypertensive women?

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the systemic arterial hypertension effects on cardiovascular autonomic modulation and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in women with or without preserved ovarian function.

METHODS

A total of 120 women were allocated into two groups: middle-aged premenopausal women (42 ± 3 y old; n = 60) and postmenopausal women (57 ± 4 y old; n = 60). Each group was also divided into two smaller groups (n = 30): normotensive and hypertensive. We evaluated hemodynamic and anthropometric parameters, cardiorespiratory fitness, BRS, heart rate variability (HRV), and blood pressure variability. The effects of hypertension and menopause were assessed using a two-way analysis of variance. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the Student-Newman-Keuls test.

RESULTS

Comparing premenopausal groups, women with systemic arterial hypertension showed lower BRS (9.1 ± 4.4 vs 13.4 ± 4.2 ms/mm Hg, P < 0.001 ) and HRV total variance (1,451 ± 955 vs 2,483 ± 1,959 ms 2 , P = 0.005) values than normotensive; however, the vagal predominance still remained. On the other hand, both postmenopausal groups showed an expressive reduction in BRS (8.3 ± 4.2 vs 11.3 ± 4.8 ms/mm Hg, P < 0.001) and HRV characterized by sympathetic modulation predominance (low-frequency oscillations; 56% ± 17 vs 44% ± 17, P < 0.001), in addition to a significant increase in blood pressure variability variance (28.4 ± 14.9 vs 22.4 ± 12.5 mm Hg 2 , P = 0.015) compared with premenopausal groups. Comparing both postmenopausal groups, the hypertensive group had significantly lower values ​​of HRV total variance (635 ± 449 vs 2,053 ± 1,720 ms 2 , P < 0.001) and BRS (5.3 ± 2.8 vs 11.3 ± 3.2 ms/mm Hg) than the normotensive.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive middle-aged premenopausal women present HRV autonomic modulation impairment, but they still maintain a vagal predominance. After menopause, even normotensive women show sympathetic autonomic predominance, which may also be associated with aging. Furthermore, postmenopausal women with hypertension present even worse cardiac autonomic modulation.

Neuro-Cardio-Autonomic Modulations in Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a degenerative X-linked muscle disease. Death frequently results from complications in cardiopulmonary systems. Preclinical/early diagnosis of cardiac autonomic abnormalities may aid initiate cardioprotective therapy and enhance prognosis.

METHODS

A cross sectional, prospective study of 38 DMD boys compared with 37 age-matched healthy controls was conducted. Lead II electrocardiography and beat-to-beat blood pressure were recorded to assess heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure variability (BPV), and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) in a standardized environment. Data were analysed and correlated with disease severity and genotype.

RESULTS

In the DMD group, the median age at assessment was 8 years [IQR 7-9 years], the median age at disease onset was 3 years [IQR, 2-6 years], and the mean duration of illness was 4 years [IQR, 2.5-5]. DNA sequencing showed deletions in 34/38 (89.5 %) and duplications in 4/38 (10.5%) patients. The median heart rate in DMD children was significantly higher [101.19 (Range, 94.71-108.49)] /min compared to controls [81 (Range, 76.2-92.76)] /min (p < 0.05). All the assessed HRV and BPV parameters were significantly impaired in DMD cases except for the coefficient of variance of systolic blood pressure. Further, BRS parameters were also significantly reduced in DMD, excluding alpha-LF. A positive correlation was found between alpha HF with age at onset and duration of illness.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a distinct early impairment of neuro-cardio-autonomic regulation in DMD. Simple yet effective non-invasive techniques such as HRV, BPV, and BRS may help identify cardiac dysfunction in a pre-clinical state, paving the way for early cardio-protective therapies and limiting disease progression in DMD patients.

Combined effects of angiotensin receptor blocker use and physical training in hypertensive men

PURPOSE

Pharmacological (angiotensin II receptor type 1 receptor blocker use) and non-pharmacological treatment (physical aerobic exercise) are important strategies to reduces blood pressure and control arterial hypertension; however, only few clinical studies have evaluated their combined effects on autonomic cardiovascular control. Therefore, we investigated the effect of a combination intervention that involved losartan administration and physical aerobic training on autonomic cardiovascular control.

METHODS

Thirty-two men (aged 40 to 60 years) were assigned into two groups: normotensive group, without any pharmacological treatment (NG, N = 16), or hypertensive group, with losartan administration (HG, N = 16). They underwent a physical aerobic training for 16 weeks, thrice a week. Hemodynamic parameters, heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure variability, and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) were measured before and after training.

RESULTS

Before training, both the groups showed similar values of hemodynamic parameters. However, the HG showed decreased BRS and HRV, characterized by reduction in sympathetic (p = .02) and vagal (p < .001) modulation. After training, the NG exhibited decreased heart rate (HR) at rest (p < .001), whereas the HG showed decreased HR at rest (p < .001) and blood pressure (BP) (p = .001). The HG showed decreased sympathetic modulation (p = .02) and increased BRS (p < .001) and vagal modulation (p < .001), but HRV (p < .001) and BRS gain (p < .001) remained significantly lower when compared to the NG.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical aerobic training was essential to improve the BRS and HRV cardiac autonomic modulation in the HG. However, it was not sufficient to normalize the analyzed autonomic parameters.

Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is strongly recommended for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treatment. However, recent studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would promote great benefits for cardiac autonomic control. Therefore, we investigated whether the benefits of HIIT related to cardiovascular autonomic control were greater than those of MICT in women with PCOS.

METHODS

Women with PCOS were randomly allocated through a blind draw into three groups: control, MICT, and HIIT. The control group did not undergo exercise, whereas those in the MICT and HIIT groups underwent 16 weeks of aerobic physical training. All groups were evaluated before and after the 16 weeks of intervention in the following aspects: quantification of serum lipids, testosterone, fasting insulin and blood glucose; physical fitness through cardiopulmonary testing; analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) by linear (time domain and frequency domain) and non-linear (symbolic analysis) methods, analysis of blood pressure variability (BPV) and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS).

RESULTS

The final analysis, each group comprised 25 individuals. All groups had similar baseline parameters. After 16 weeks, intragroup comparison showed that the MICT and HIIT groups had a reduction in baseline heart rate (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively) and testosterone levels P < 0.037; P < 0.012, respectively) associated with an increase in VO2_peak (MICT, P < 0.001; HIIT, P < 0.001). The MICT (P < 0.36) and HIIT (P < 0.17) groups also showed an increase in cardiac vagal modulation, however only observed in the non-linear analysis. The intergroup comparison showed no differences between the MICT and HIIT groups in any of the hormonal, metabolic and autonomic parameters evaluated, including testosterone, peak oxygen uptake (VO2_peak), HRV, BPV and BRS.

CONCLUSION

HIIT and MICT showed similar results for the different parameters evaluated. This suggests that both training protocols can be recommended for the treatment of PCOS. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-78qtwy).

Heart Rate Variability and Cardiovascular Fitness: What We Know so Far

Fluctuation analysis in intervals between heartbeats provides important indices related to autonomic modulation of heart rate variability (HRV). These indices are considered predictors of morbidity and mortality as they are frequently altered in patients with chronic degenerative diseases, especially in those with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Similarly, a reduction in HRV is common with aging. In all cases, cardiovascular fitness is often reduced to below the predicted values. In turn, increases in cardiovascular fitness through regular physical exercise, especially aerobic exercise, represent an important therapeutic tool capable of promoting positive adjustments in cardiac autonomic modulation. These adjustments are characterized by reduced sympathetic modulatory influence and/or increased vagal modulatory influence on the heart, increasing the HRV. Therefore, several methodological tools have been used to assess the degree of impairment of autonomic modulation and the therapeutic effects of physical exercise. In contrast, establishment of strict protocols in experimental design is a main challenge in establishing HRV analysis as a robust parameter for evaluating cardiovascular homeostasis. Thus, this review aimed to contribute to the understanding of autonomic modulation of HRV and its relationship with cardiovascular fitness, highlighting the advances made thus far, the applicability of analysis tools, and the confounding factors observed frequently.

Study of heart rate recovery and cardiovascular autonomic modulation in healthy participants after submaximal exercise

Heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure variability (BPV), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) provide important information on cardiovascular autonomic control. However, little is known about the reorganization of HRV, BPV, and BRS after aerobic exercise. While there is a positive relationship between heart rate (HR) recovery rate and cardiorespiratory fitness, it is unclear whether there is a relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and reorganization of cardiovascular autonomic modulation during recovery. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether cardiorespiratory fitness influences the cardiovascular autonomic modulation recovery, after a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Sixty men were assigned into groups according to their cardiorespiratory fitness: low cardiorespiratory fitness (LCF = VO2: 22–38 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹), moderate (MCF = VO2: 38–48 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹), and high (HCF = VO2 > 48 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). HRV (linear and non-linear analysis) and BPV (spectral analysis), and BRS (sequence method) were performed before and after a cardiopulmonary exercise test. The groups with higher cardiorespiratory fitness had lower baseline HR values and HR recovery time after the cardiopulmonary exercise test. On comparing rest and recovery periods, the spectral analysis of HRV showed a decrease in low-frequency (LF) oscillations in absolute units and high frequency (HF) in absolute and normalized units. It also showed increases in LF oscillations of blood pressure. Nonlinear analysis showed a reduction in approximate entropy (ApEn) and in Poincare Plot parameters (SD1 and SD2), accompanied by increases in detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) parameters α1 and α2. However, we did not find differences in cardiovascular autonomic modulation parameters and BRS in relation to cardiorespiratory fitness neither before nor after the cardiopulmonary test. We concluded that cardiorespiratory fitness does not affect cardiovascular autonomic modulations after cardiopulmonary exercise test, unlike HR recovery.

Important differences between hypertensive middle-aged women and men in cardiovascular autonomic control-a critical appraisal

Background

Normotensive premenopausal women show a vagal predominance of cardiac autonomic modulation, whereas age-matched men show a predominance of sympathetic modulation. However, some women develop systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) even with preserved ovarian function. Our hypothesis is that these women may have cardiovascular autonomic parameters similar to those of hypertensive men, even when subjected to pharmacological treatment. We aimed to investigate cardiovascular autonomic control and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in hypertensive premenopausal women and age-matched men.

Methods

One hundred volunteers between 18 and 45 years of age were assigned to two groups (50 participants each): a hypertensive group including patients with a history of SAH for at least 6 months (25 men and 25 women), who were under treatment with monotherapy (losartan, 25–50 mg/kg); and a normotensive group (25 men and 25 women). Anthropometric, hemodynamic, metabolic, and autonomic cardiovascular assessments were performed focusing on BRS, autonomic modulation of heart rate variability (HRV), and blood pressure variability (BPV).

Results

On HRV analysis, women showed higher values of high-frequency (HF) oscillations in absolute and normalized units, lower values ​of low-frequency (LF) in normalized units, and lower LF/HF ratio, as compared with men. When the normotensive and hypertensive groups were compared, hypertensive groups showed lower values ​of total variance and of LF and HF bands in absolute units. On BRS, hypertensive groups showed lower values than the normotensive group.

Conclusion

Regardless of blood pressure control through pharmacological treatment, hypertensive patients continued to have reduced HRV compared to normotensive, and hypertensive men had more autonomic impairment than hypertensive premenopausal women.