Does norepinephrine infusion dose influence the femoral-to-radial mean arterial blood pressure gradient in patients with sepsis and septic shock?

Arterial site selection for measurement of mean arterial pressure in septic shock patients on high-dose norepinephrine

Background

The guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign suggest using invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement in septic shock patients, without specifying for a preferred arterial site for accuracy in relation to the severity of septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the mean arterial pressure (MAP) gradient between the femoral and radial artery sites in septic shock patients.

Method

This prospective study was carried out at a 20-bed ICU in a university hospital. Simultaneous MAP measurements at femoral and radial arterial sites were obtained in septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine (≥0.1 μg/kg/min), with a pre-planned subgroup analysis for those receiving a high dose of norepinephrine (≥0.3 μg/kg/min).

Results

The median norepinephrine dose across all 80 patients studied, including 59 patients on a high dose, was 0.4 (0.28-0.7) μg/kg/min. Overall, simultaneous measurement of MAP (mmHg) at the femoral and radial arterial sites produced mean (95% CI) MAP values of 81 (79-83) and 78 (76-80), respectively, with a mean difference of 3.3 (2.67-3.93), p < 0.001. In Bland-Altman analysis of MAP measurements, the detected effect sizes were 1.14 and 1.04 for the overall and high-dose cohorts, respectively, which indicates a significant difference between the measurements taken at each of the two arterial sites. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated a weak but statistically significant correlation between MAP gradient and norepinephrine dose among patients receiving a high dose of norepinephrine (r = 0.289; p = 0.026; 95% CI 0.036-0.508).

Conclusion

In septic shock patients, MAP readings were higher at the femoral site than at the radial site, particularly in those receiving a high dose of norepinephrine.

Clinical trial registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03475667].

Agreements between mean arterial pressure from radial and femoral artery measurements in refractory shock patients

Radial and femoral artery catheterization is the most common procedure for monitoring patients with shock. However, a disagreement in mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two sites has been reported. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the MAP from the radial artery (MAP_radial) with that of the femoral artery (MAP_femoral) in patients with refractory shock. A prospective study was conducted in the medical intensive care unit. The radial and femoral were simultaneously measured MAP in the patients every hour, for 24 h. In total, 706 paired data points were obtained from 32 patients. MAP_radial strongly correlated with MAP_femoral (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). However, overall MAP_radial was significantly lower than MAP_femoral 7.6 mmHg. The bias between MAP_radial and MAP_femoral was − 7.6 mmHg (95% limits of agreement (LOA), − 24.1 to 8.9). In the subgroup of patients with MAP_radial < 65 mmHg, MAP_radial moderately correlated with MAP_femoral (r = 0.63) and the bias was increased to − 13.0 mmHg (95% LOA, − 28.8 to 2.9). There were 414 (58.6%) measurements in which the MAP gradient between the two sites was > 5 mmHg. In conclusion, the radial artery significantly underestimated MAP compared with the femoral artery in patients with refractory shock.