Long-term cardiovascular risk of white-coat hypertension with normal night-time blood pressure values

Relationship of the White Coat Effect with Endpoints and Several Prognostic Indicators in Hypertensive Patients Treated with Regular Antihypertensive Therapy

Aim of the study was to evaluate in a prospective cohort study the relationship between the severity of the white coat effect (WHE) in patients with hypertension, who treated with regular antihypertensive therapy, and the composite endpoint, several prognostic indicators, in a routine clinical practice.

Material and Methods. We analyzed the data of a prospective cohort study, which included 125 patients with hypertension who received regular antihypertensive therapy. The study consisted of three visits (baseline, 6 and 12 months) and an outcome data collection period (30.1±7.6 months of follow-up after the third visit). This study included three visits every 3 months: 1 visit – screening, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) session, Echo; 2 – assessment of the patient’s status and the therapy effectiveness; 3- assessment of the patient’s status, ABPM session, Echo (the total number of ABPM was 239, Echo - 240). The primary composite endpoint included death for any reason angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, development of chronic heart failure, arterial revascularization, frequent ventricular extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation, secondary - deterioration of the cardiovascular diseases course and tertiary endpoint – deterioration of the arterial hypertension, concomitant diseases course.

Results. The study involved 125 patients: 28 men (22%), 97 women (78%), mean age was 62.6±0.8 years, duration of hypertension 11.6±0.8 years, height 163.6±0.7 cm, body weight 83.1±1.4 kg. The baseline mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) was 125.1±9.8 and diastolic (DBP) – 76.1±7.0 mm Hg, age was 62.8±9.0 years, the WCE level for SBP was 16.5±1.4, for DBP 10.9±0.7 mm Hg. We identified a positive correlation between tertiary composite endpoint data and WCE: for systolic WCE (SWCE) (F = 4.7, p<0.031). We found correlations between WCE and Echo parameters: 1) SWCE level had with LVMI (r = 0.16. p<0.017); 2) diastolic WCE (DWCE) had negative relationship with LV contractility parameters.

Conclusions. Thus, only systolic WCE level had correlation with composite endpoint data and LVMI. DWCE level had negative associations with echocardiography LV contractility parameters.

Evaluation of 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure in a Diverse Urban Population

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown benefits of 30-minute office blood pressure (OBP-30) but did not report on race and gender. The purpose of this study was to determine if similar effects are seen in a diverse urban population.

METHODS

Patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (age 18-89) were invited to participate. Blood pressure was measured using standard procedure (SOBP). Patients were left alone in an exam room connected to an automated office blood pressure monitor which obtained BP readings every 5 minutes for 30 minutes. The last 5 measurements were averaged for the OBP-30 measurement. Primary outcomes were BPs measured using SOBP and OBP-30. Multivariate logit methods were used to estimate the average probability of having a BP measured <140/90 mm Hg (BPM <140/90) for the 2 measurement methods. Differences were computed across methods, in total and by sex and race, all other factors held constant.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of having a BPM <140/90 was 47.1% using SOBP and 66.7% using OBP-30 (P < 0.01). Using SOBP, females had a 26.2 PP lower probability of having a BPM <140/90 (P < 0.001) than males. Relative to white patients, Black patients had a 43.9 PP lower (P < 0.001) and other races a 38.5 PP lower (P < 0.001) probability of having a BPM <140/90 using SOBP. Using OBP-30, these differences narrowed and became statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

OBP-30 may increase the probability of BPM meeting goals, especially in females and patients who are Black, indigenous, or persons of color.

Long-Term Risk of Progression to Sustained Hypertension in White-Coat Hypertension with Normal Night-Time Blood Pressure Values

Background

The long-term prognosis and transition towards sustained ambulatory hypertension (SHT) of white-coat hypertension (WCHT) remain uncertain particularly in those with both normal nighttime and daytime blood pressure (BP) values. Different classification criteria and the use of antihypertensive drugs may contribute to conflicting results. Patients and Methods. We prospectively evaluated for a 7.1 year transition to SHT in 899 nondiabetic subjects free from cardiovascular (CV) events: normotensive (NT) (n = 344; 52, 9% female; ageing 48 ± 14 years); untreated WCHT (UnWCHT n = 399; 50, 1% female; ageing 51 ± 14 years); and treated WCHT with antihypertensive drugs after baseline (TxWCHT n = 156; 54, 4% female; ageing 51 ± 15 years). All underwent 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (24 h-ABPM) at baseline, at 30 to 60 months, and at 70 to 120 months thereafter. WCHT was at baseline (with no treatment) as office BP ≥ 140/or 90 mm·Hg, daytime BP < 135/85 mm·Hg, and nighttime BP < 120/70 mm·Hg. Development of SHT was considered if daytime BP ≥ 135/or 85 mm Hg and/or nighttime BP ≥ 120/or 70 mm·Hg.

Results

Baseline metabolic parameters did not differ among groups. At 30–60 months and at the end of follow-up, development of SHT occurred, respectively, in NT (3.8% (n = 13) and 9.6% (n = 33)) and in UnWCHT (10.1% (n = 40) and 16.5% (n = 66)) (p < 0.009). The mean annual increase of average 24 h-systolic BP was 0.48 + 0.93 in NT and 0.73 + 1.06 in UnWCHT, whereas annual SBP in office increased in NT by 1.2 + 0.95 but decreased in UnWCHT by 1.36 + 1.35 mm Hg (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Untreated WCHT patients exhibit a faster and a higher risk of developing SHT compared to NT with TxWCHT assuming an intermediate position between them.

[Antihypertensives always evenings-absolutely not or sensible?]

The Spanish Hygia study has led to considerable irritation due to the general recommendation to prescribe antihypertensives preferably to be taken in the evening, especially since the lay press as well as medical media made enthusiastic comments. The discussion about the optimal time to take antihypertensive drugs shows once again how dangerous the uncritical handling of study data can be. No possible risks were pointed out. The Hygia study compared 19,084 patients with morning and evening intake of antihypertensive drugs under the control of a 48‑h blood pressure measurement (!). There was a significantly better reduction in blood pressure and the rate of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events with evening intake. The data are scientifically valuable; however, the conclusions are incomprehensible based on the data, contradict many other studies and are dangerous for certain patient groups. There are also methodological shortcomings. Therefore, a general evening intake is not justified and nonsensical due to the diverse, individually very different pathophysiological findings of the nocturnal blood pressure behavior. Basically, the outpatient 24‑h blood pressure measurement (ABPM) enables a better assessment of the individual cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks and prevents an incorrect assessment of the blood pressure and thus unnecessary or sufficient treatment. Instead of a general recommendation, the ABPM offers the option of an individually tailored treatment. Taking antihypertensive drugs in the evening should always be preceded by an ABDM in the case of prognostically unfavorable nocturnal hypertension in order to avoid the risk of nocturnal ischemic risks due to excessive drops in blood pressure.

Effects of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension on coronary artery stenosis and cardiac arrhythmia

This study aimed to investigate whether hypertension phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCHT), diagnosed with the addition of nighttime blood pressure (BP) criteria, are related to coronary artery stenosis (CAS) and cardiac arrhythmia. In this cross-sectional observational study, 844 participants who did not use antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet drugs were selected. The subjects were divided into normotensive (NT), WCHT, masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) groups based on the results of clinic BP measurement and ambulatory BP monitoring. Coronary angiography and ambulatory electrocardiography were performed to determine the participants' CAS and cardiac arrhythmia status. Coronary angiography revealed 556 patients with CAS and 288 participants with normal coronary arteries. The chi-squared test showed that the incidence of CAS was higher in the MHT and SHT groups than in the NT group, while no significant change was found in the WCHT group (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.119). The logarithm of the Gensini score was used to compare the degree of CAS between the groups. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the degree of CAS was higher in the WCHT, MHT, and SHT groups than in the NT group (P < 0.05). The incidences of frequent atrial premature beats, atrial tachycardia, and ventricular cardiac arrhythmia were significantly higher in the WCHT and SHT groups than in the NT group, while only ventricular cardiac arrhythmia changes were observed in the MHT group. This study found that hypertension phenotypes such as WCHT were closely associated with CAS and cardiac arrhythmia.