Is there delayed restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stent?

Profound thrombocytopenia induced by clopidogrel with a prior history of long-term safe administration

Clopidogrel has shown an excellent safety, tolerability and efficacy ever since its marketing. However, here we report a rare case with profound thrombocytopenia following clopidogrel administration previously safely exposed to this same drug. This reminds us that thrombocytopenia might be induced by clopidogrel even with a prior, safe history of long-term administration.

Comparison of changes in early inflammatory markers between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation after coronary intervention identifies patients at increased risk of subsequent cardiac events. Cardiac events, especially in-stent restenosis, are less frequent after use of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, the underlying mechanism for this disparity is not well investigated. We hypothesize that an attenuated inflammatory response after SES implantation may be a contributor.

PURPOSE

In the present study, we sought to determine the early inflammatory response after SES implantation in patients with single-vessel disease compared with PES implantation, and evaluate the relationship between inflammatory response and late clinical outcomes in a randomized design.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with stable angina were randomly enrolled into the two groups, SES or PSE group (n = 16 respectively). Peripheral blood samples were taken before PCI, 24 and 72 h after stenting. The plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 8 months after stenting.

RESULTS

The data showed that there was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics between the two groups. The plasma CRP and IL-6 levels at 24 h after stenting were significant higher in both groups compared with baseline (p < 0.01 respectively). Likewise, the CRP levels at 72 h after stenting were also significant higher compared with baseline in both groups (p < 0.01 respectively). However, the plasma levels of IL-6 at 24 h and CRP at 72 h after stenting were higher in PES group compared with SES group (p < 0.05). At 8 months follow-up, the rates of major adverse cardiac events, target lesion revascularization, in-stent and in-segment restenosis were similar in both groups. However, the late loss in both in-stent and in-segment was significantly higher in the PES group than in SES group (p < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a drug-eluting stent implantation could trigger a systemic inflammatory response as previously demonstrated. However, SES implantation results in a lower inflammatory response compared with PES implantation, which seems to be associated with greater late of in-stent and in-segment loss at 8-month follow-up with PES.

Randomized comparison of early inflammatory response after sirolimus-eluting stent vs bare metal stent implantation in native coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of early inflammatory response after coronary stent implantation has been controversial. Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has been shown to be better outcomes compared with bare metal stent (BMS). We prospectively investigated the early inflammatory response after SES or BMS implantation in patients with single-vessel lesion, and evaluated the relationship between inflammation and late clinical outcomes in a randomized design.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with single-vessel disease were randomized into SES or BMS implantation group (n=24 respectively). Blood samples were taken before stenting, 1 h, 24 h and 8 months afterward. The plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined by ELISA. The clinical and angiographic follow-up were performed at 8 months after stenting.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline characteristics, plasma CRP and IL-6 concentrations between the 2 groups. However, plasma IL-6 concentrations at 1 h after stenting were higher in both groups than in baseline (p<0.01). In addition, the plasma CRP and IL-6 concentrations at 24 h after stenting were significantly higher in both groups compared with baseline (p<0.01 respectively). Likewise, plasma CRP and IL-6 concentrations were significantly higher in BMS group compared with SES group at 24 h after stenting (p<0.05 respectively). At the follow-up (mean 8 months after stenting), the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were higher in BMS group than in SES group (p<0.05 respectively) although the plasma CRP and IL-6 concentrations are similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Single coronary stenting could trigger an early inflammatory response. However, patients undergoing SES implantation has less augmentation of early inflammatory markers after stenting compared to patients treated with BMS, which was positively related the incidence of ISR and TLR at follow-up. This may reflect the potential impact of SES implantation on the early inflammatory response and late clinical outcomes.