Monitoring respiratory mechanics during assisted ventilation

Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare respiratory system compliance (C rs ) calculation during controlled mechanical ventilation (MV) and, subsequently, during assisted MV.

DESIGN

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

This study was conducted on patients admitted to Neuro-ICU of Niguarda Hospital (tertiary referral hospital).

PATIENTS

We analyzed every patient greater than or equal to 18 years old having a C rs measurement in controlled and in assisted MV within 60 minutes. Plateau pressure (P plat ) was considered reliable if it was deemed visually stable for at least 2 seconds.

INTERVENTIONS

Inspiratory pause was incorporated to detect P plat in controlled and assisted MV. Calculation of C rs and driving pressure were achieved.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were studied. An acceptable agreement was found (Bland-Altman plot bias -3.9, level of agreement upper 21.6, lower -29.6). C rs in assisted MV was 64.1 (52.6-79.3) and in controlled MV it was 61.2 (50-71.2) mL/cm H 2o ( p = 0.006). No statistical difference was found in C rs (assisted vs controlled MV) when peak pressure was lower than P plat nor when peak pressure was higher than P plat .

CONCLUSIONS

A P plat visually stable for at least 2 seconds leads to reliable C rs calculation during assisted MV.

Reliability of plateau pressure during patient-triggered assisted ventilation. Analysis of a multicentre database

PURPOSE

An inspiratory hold during patient-triggered assisted ventilation potentially allows to measure driving pressure and inspiratory effort. However, muscular activity can make this measurement unreliable. We aim to define the criteria for inspiratory holds reliability during patient-triggered breaths.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Flow, airway and esophageal pressure recordings during patient-triggered breaths from a multicentre observational study (BEARDS, NCT03447288) were evaluated by six independent raters, to determine plateau pressure readability. Features of "readable" and "unreadable" holds were compared. Muscle pressure estimate from the hold was validated against other measures of inspiratory effort.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent of the recordings were consistently judged as readable or unreadable by at least four raters. Plateau measurement showed a high consistency among raters. A short time from airway peak to plateau pressure and a stable and longer plateau characterized readable holds. Unreadable plateaus were associated with higher indexes of inspiratory effort. Muscular pressure computed from the hold showed a strong correlation with independent indexes of inspiratory effort.

CONCLUSION

The definition of objective parameters of plateau reliability during assisted-breath provides the clinician with a tool to target a safer assisted-ventilation and to detect the presence of high inspiratory effort.

Flow Index accurately identifies breaths with low or high inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation

Background

Flow Index, a numerical expression of the shape of the inspiratory flow-time waveform recorded during pressure support ventilation, is associated with patient inspiratory effort. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of Flow Index in detecting high or low inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation and to establish cutoff values for the Flow index to identify these conditions. The secondary aim was to compare the performance of Flow index,of breathing pattern parameters and of airway occlusion pressure (P_0.1) in detecting high or low inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.

Methods

Data from 24 subjects was included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 702 breaths. Breaths with high inspiratory effort were defined by a pressure developed by inspiratory muscles (P_musc) greater than 10 cmH₂O while breaths with low inspiratory effort were defined by a P_musc lower than 5 cmH₂O. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of Flow Index and respiratory rate, tidal volume,respiratory rate over tidal volume and P_0.1 were analyzed and compared to identify breaths with low or high inspiratory effort.

Results

P_musc, P_0.1, Pressure Time Product and Flow Index differed between breaths with high, low and intermediate inspiratory effort, while RR, RR/V_T and V_T/kg of IBW did not differ in a statistically significant way. A Flow index higher than 4.5 identified breaths with high inspiratory effort [AUC 0.89 (CI 95% 0.85–0.93)], a Flow Index lower than 2.6 identified breaths with low inspiratory effort [AUC 0.80 (CI 95% 0.76–0.83)].

Conclusions

Flow Index is accurate in detecting high and low spontaneous inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03855-4.

Biosignal-Based Digital Biomarkers for Prediction of Ventilator Weaning Success

We evaluated new features from biosignals comprising diverse physiological response information to predict the outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). We enrolled 89 patients who were candidates for weaning from MV in the intensive care unit and collected continuous biosignal data: electrocardiogram (ECG), respiratory impedance, photoplethysmogram (PPG), arterial blood pressure, and ventilator parameters during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). We compared the collected biosignal data's variability between patients who successfully discontinued MV (n = 67) and patients who did not (n = 22). To evaluate the usefulness of the identified factors for predicting weaning success, we developed a machine learning model and evaluated its performance by bootstrapping. The following markers were different between the weaning success and failure groups: the ratio of standard deviations between the short-term and long-term heart rate variability in a Poincaré plot, sample entropy of ECG and PPG, α values of ECG, and respiratory impedance in the detrended fluctuation analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92). This combination of the biosignal data-based markers obtained during SBTs provides a promising tool to assist clinicians in determining the optimal extubation time.

Flow Index: a novel, non-invasive, continuous, quantitative method to evaluate patient inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation

Background

The evaluation of patient effort is pivotal during pressure support ventilation, but a non-invasive, continuous, quantitative method to assess patient inspiratory effort is still lacking. We hypothesized that the concavity of the inspiratory flow-time waveform could be useful to estimate patient’s inspiratory effort. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the shape of the inspiratory flow, as quantified by a numeric indicator, could be associated with inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.

Methods

Twenty-four patients in pressure support ventilation were enrolled. A mathematical relationship describing the decay pattern of the inspiratory flow profile was developed. The parameter hypothesized to estimate effort was named Flow Index. Esophageal pressure, airway pressure, airflow, and volume waveforms were recorded at three support levels (maximum, minimum and baseline). The association between Flow Index and reference measures of patient effort (pressure time product and pressure generated by respiratory muscles) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models adjusted for tidal volume, respiratory rate and respiratory rate/tidal volume.

Results

Flow Index was different at the three pressure support levels and all group comparisons were statistically significant. In all tested models, Flow Index was independently associated with patient effort (p < 0.001). Flow Index prediction of inspiratory effort agreed with esophageal pressure-based methods.

Conclusions

Flow Index is associated with patient inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation, and may provide potentially useful information for setting inspiratory support and monitoring patient-ventilator interactions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03624-3.