Leveraging the microbiome in the treatment of sepsis: potential pitfalls and new perspectives

Nutritional and metabolic modulation of inflammation in critically ill patients: a narrative review of rationale, evidence and grey areas

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is the hallmark of critical illness and triggers the neuro-endocrine stress response and an oxidative stress. Acute inflammation is initially essential for patient's survival. However, ongoing or exaggerated inflammation, due to persistent organ dysfunction, immune dysfunction or poor inflammation resolution, is associated to subsequent hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism that severely impact short and long-term functional status, autonomy, as well as health-related costs. Modulation of inflammation is thus tempting, with the goal to improve the short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients.

FINDINGS

Inflammation can be modulated by nutritional strategies (including the timing of enteral nutrition initiation, the provision of some specific macronutrients or micronutrients, the use of probiotics) and metabolic treatments. The most interesting strategies seem to be n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin D, antioxidant micronutrients and propranolol, given their safety, their accessibility for clinical use, and their benefits in clinical studies in the specific context of critical care. However, the optimal doses, timing and route of administration are still unknown for most of them. Furthermore, their use in the recovery phase is not well studied and defined.

CONCLUSION

The rationale to use strategies of inflammation modulation is obvious, based on critical illness pathophysiology and based on the increasingly described effects of some nutritional and pharmacological strategies. Regretfully, there isn't always substantial proof from clinical research regarding the positive impacts directly brought about by inflammation modulation. Some arguments come from studies performed in severe burn patients, but such results should be transposed to non-burn patients with caution. Further studies are needed to explore how the modulation of inflammation can improve the long-term outcomes after a critical illness.

Gut microbiota and sepsis and sepsis-related death: a Mendelian randomization investigation

Background

It is unclear what the causal relationship is between the gut microbiota and sepsis. Therefore, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to determine whether a causal link exists between the two.

Methods

This study used publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data of gut microbiota, sepsis, sepsis (critical care), and sepsis (28-day death in critical care) to perform a two-sample MR analysis. To ensure the robustness of the results, we also conducted a sensitivity analysis.

Results

For sepsis susceptibility, inverse variance weighted (IVW) estimates revealed that Victivallales (OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.78-0.94, p = 0.0017) was protective against sepsis, while Lentisphaerae (OR = 0.89, 95% CI, 0.80-0.99), Gammaproteobacteria (OR = 1.37, 95% CI, 1.08-1.73), Clostridiaceae1 (OR = 1.21, 95% CI, 1.04-1.40), RuminococcaceaeUCG011 (OR = 1.10, 95% CI, 1.01-1.20), Dialister (OR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.74-0.97), and Coprococcus2 (OR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.69-0.94) presented a suggestive association with the development of sepsis (all p < 0.05). For sepsis (critical care), IVW estimates indicated that Lentisphaerae (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.93), Victivallales (OR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.50-0.91), Anaerostipes (OR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76), LachnospiraceaeUCG004 (OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.34-0.77), and Coprococcus1 (OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.44-0.99) showed a suggestive negative correlation with sepsis (critical care) (all p < 0.05). For sepsis (28-day death in critical care), IVW estimates suggested that four bacterial taxa had a normally significant negative correlation with the risk of sepsis-related death, including Victivallales (OR = 0.54, 95% CI, 0.30-0.95), Coprococcus2 (OR = 0.34, 95% CI, 0.14-0.83), Ruminiclostridium6 (OR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.22-0.83), and Coprococcus1 (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.21-0.97), while two bacterial taxa were normally significantly positively linked to the risk of sepsis-related death, namely, Mollicutes (OR = 2.03, 95% CI, 1.01-4.08) and Bacteroidales (OR = 2.65, 95% CI, 1.18-5.96) (all p < 0.05). The robustness of the above correlations was verified by additional sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

This MR research found that several gut microbiota taxa were causally linked to the risk of sepsis, sepsis in critical care, and sepsis-related 28-day mortality in critical care.