Advanced life support and mechanical ventilation

Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation-A novel and effective ventilation strategy during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND

The effects of different ventilation strategies during CPR on patient outcomes and lung physiology are still poorly understood. This study compares positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) to passive oxygenation (CPAP) and a novel ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) regimen in an experimental ventricular fibrillation animal model.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

ANIMALS

30 male German landrace pigs (16-20 weeks).

METHODS

Ventricular fibrillation was induced in anesthetized and instrumented pigs and the animals were randomized into three groups. Mechanical CPR was initiated and ventilation was either provided by means of standard IPPV (RR: 10/min, Vt: 8-9 ml/kg, FiO2: 1,0, PEEP: 5 mbar), CPAP (O2-Flow: 10 l/min, PEEP: 5 mbar) or ULTVV (RR: 50/min, Vt: 2-3 ml/kg, FiO2: 1,0, PEEP: 5 mbar). Guideline-based advanced life support was applied for a maximum of 4 cycles and animals achieving ROSC were monitored for 6 h before terminating the experiment. Ventilation/perfusion ratios were performed via multiple inert gas elimination, blood gas analyses were taken hourly and extended cardiovascular measurements were collected constantly. Brain and lung tissue samples were taken and analysed for proinflammatory cytokine expression.

RESULTS

ULTVV provided sufficient oxygenation and ventilation during CPR while demanding significantly lower respiratory and intrathoracic pressures. V/Q mismatch was significantly decreased and lung injury was mitigated in surviving animals compared to IPPV and CPAP. Additionally, cerebral cytokine expression was dramatically reduced.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-low-volume ventilation during CPR in a porcine model is feasible and may provide lung-protective benefits as well as neurological outcome improvement due to lower inflammation. Our results warrant further studies and might eventually lead to new therapeutic options in the resuscitation setting.

A new physiological model for studying the effect of chest compression and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The Thiel cadaver

BACKGROUND

Studying ventilation and intrathoracic pressure (ITP) induced by chest compressions (CC) during Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation is challenging and important aspects such as airway closure have been mostly ignored. We hypothesized that Thiel Embalmed Cadavers could constitute an appropriate model.

METHODS

We assessed respiratory mechanics and ITP during CC in 11 cadavers, and we compared it to measurements obtained in 9 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and to predicted values from a bench model. An oesophageal catheter was inserted to assess chest wall compliance, and ITP variation (ΔITP). Airway pressure variation (ΔPaw) at airway opening and ΔITP generated by CC were measured at decremental positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to test its impact on flow and ΔPaw. The patient's data were derived from flow and airway pressure captured via the ventilator during resuscitation.

RESULTS

Resistance and Compliance of the respiratory system were comparable to those of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (C_RS^TEC 42 ± 12 vs C_RS^PAT 37.3 ± 10.9 mL/cmH₂O and Res^TEC 17.5 ± 7.5 vs Res^PAT 20.2 ± 5.3 cmH₂O/L/sec), and remained stable over time. During CC, ΔITP varied from 32 ± 12 cmH₂O to 69 ± 14 cmH₂O with manual and automatic CC respectively. Transmission of ΔITP at the airway opening was significantly affected by PEEP, suggesting dynamic small airway closure at low lung volumes. This phenomenon was similarly observed in patients.

CONCLUSION

Respiratory mechanics and dynamic pressures during CC of cadavers behave as predicted by a theoretical model and similarly to patients. The Thiel model is a suitable to assess ITP variations induced by ventilation during CC.

Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model

Background

Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pig model.

Methods

In 12 pigs (general anaesthesia/intubation) ventricular fibrillation was induced and continuous chest compressions were started after 3min. Pigs were mechanically ventilated in a cross-over setting with 5 ventilation periods of 4min each: Ventilation modes were during the first and last period IPPV (100% O₂, tidalvolumes = 7ml/kgKG, respiratoryrate = 10/min), during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th period CCSV (100% O₂), a pressure-controlled and with each chest compression synchronized breathing pattern with three different presets in randomized order. Presets: CCSV_A: P_insp = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 205ms; CCSV_B: P_insp = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms; CCSV_C: P_insp = 45mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms. Blood gas samples were drawn for each period, mean arterial (MAP) and centralvenous (CVP) blood pressures were continuously recorded. Results as median (25%/75%percentiles).

Results

Ventilation with each CCSV mode resulted in higher PaO₂ than IPPV: PaO₂: IPPV_first: 19.6(13.9/36.2)kPa, IPPV_last: 22.7(5.4/36.9)kPa (p = 0.77 vs IPPV_first), CCSV_A: 48.9(29.0/58.2)kPa (p = 0.028 vs IPPV_first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV_last), CCSV_B: 54.0 (43.8/64.1) (p = 0.001 vs IPPV_first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV_last), CCSV_C: 46.0 (20.2/58.4) (p = 0.006 vs IPPV_first, p = 0.0001 vs IPPV_last). Both the MAP and the difference MAP-CVP did not decrease during twelve minutes CPR with all three presets of CCSV and were higher than the pressures of the last IPPV period.

Conclusions

All patterns of CCSV lead to a higher PaO₂ and avoid an arterial blood pressure drop during resuscitation compared to IPPV in this pig model of cardiac arrest.

Ventilation/perfusion ratios measured by multiple inert gas elimination during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) the ventilation/perfusion distribution (VA /Q) within the lung is difficult to assess. This experimental study examines the capability of multiple inert gas elimination (MIGET) to determine VA /Q under CPR conditions in a pig model.

METHODS

Twenty-one anaesthetised pigs were randomised to three fractions of inspired oxygen (1.0, 0.7 or 0.21). VA/ Q by micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry-derived MIGET was determined at baseline and during CPR following induction of ventricular fibrillation. Haemodynamics, blood gases, ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography and return of spontaneous circulation were assessed. Intergroup differences were analysed by non-parametric testing.

RESULTS

MIGET measurements were feasible in all animals with an excellent correlation of measured and predicted arterial oxygen partial pressure (R(2)  = 0.96, n = 21 for baseline; R(2)  = 0.82, n = 21 for CPR). CPR induces a significant shift from normal VA /Q ratios to the high VA /Q range. Electrical impedance tomography indicates a dorsal to ventral shift of the ventilation distribution. Diverging pulmonary shunt fractions induced by the three inspired oxygen levels considerably increased during CPR and were traceable by MIGET, while 100% oxygen most negatively influenced the VA /Q. Return of spontaneous circulation were achieved in 52% of the animals.

CONCLUSIONS

VA /Q assessment by MIGET is feasible during CPR and provides a novel tool for experimental purposes. Changes in VA /Q caused by different oxygen fractions are traceable during CPR. Beyond pulmonary perfusion deficits, these data imply an influence of the inspired oxygen level on VA /Q. Higher oxygen levels significantly increase shunt fractions and impair the normal VA /Q ratio.

Mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, bilevel ventilation, or chest compression synchronized ventilation in a pig model

OBJECTIVE

Mechanical ventilation with an automated ventilator is recommended during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a secured airway. We investigated the influence of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, bilevel ventilation, and the novel ventilator mode chest compression synchronized ventilation, a pressure-controlled ventilation triggered by each chest compression, on gas exchange, hemodynamics, and return of spontaneous circulation in a pig model.

DESIGN

Animal study.

SETTING

University laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-four three-month-old female domestic pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

The study was performed on pigs under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Arterial and central venous catheters were inserted and IV rocuronium (1 mg/kg) was injected. After 3 minutes of cardiac arrest (ventricular fibrillation at t = 0 min), animals were randomized into intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (control group), bilevel, or chest compression synchronized ventilation group. Following 10 minute uninterrupted chest compressions and mechanical ventilation, advanced life support was performed (100% O2, up to six defibrillations, vasopressors).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood gas samples were drawn at 0, 4 and 13 minutes. At 13 minutes, hemodynamics was analyzed beat-to-beat in the end-inspiratory and end-expiratory cycle comparing the IPPV with the bilevel group and the CCSV group. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in five of eight (intermittent positive-pressure ventilation), six of eight (bilevel), and four of seven (chest compression synchronized ventilation) pigs. The results of arterial blood gas analyses at t = 4 minutes and t = 13 minutes (torr) were as follows: PaO2 intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, 143 (76/256) and 262 (81/340); bilevel, 261 (109/386) (p = 0.195 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 236 (86/364) (p = 0.878 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation); and chest compression synchronized ventilation, 598 (471/650) (p < 0.001 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 634 (115/693) (p = 0.054 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation); PaCO2 intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, 40 (38/43) and 45 (36/52); bilevel, 39 (35/41) (p = 0.574 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 46 (42/49) (p = 0.798); and chest compression synchronized ventilation, 28 (27/32) (p = 0.001 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 26 (18/29) (p = 0.004); mixed venous pH intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, 7.34 (7.31/7.35) and 7.26 (7.25/7.31); bilevel, 7.35 (7.29/7.37) (p = 0.645 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 7.27 (7.17/7.31) (p = 0.645 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation); and chest compression synchronized ventilation, 7.34 (7.33/7.39) (p = 0.189 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 7.35 (7.34/7.36) (p = 0.006 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation). Mean end-inspiratory and end-expiratory arterial pressures at t = 13 minutes (mm Hg) were as follows: intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, 28.0 (25.0/29.6) and 27.9 (24.4/30.0); bilevel, 29.1 (25.6/37.1) (p = 0.574 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 28.7 (24.2/36.5) (p = 0.721 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation); and chest compression synchronized ventilation, 32.7 (30.4/33.4) (p = 0.021 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation) and 27.0 (24.5/27.7) (p = 0.779 vs intermittent positive-pressure ventilation).

CONCLUSIONS

Both intermittent positive-pressure ventilation and bilevel provided similar oxygenation and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest compression synchronized ventilation elicited the highest mean arterial pressure, best oxygenation, and a normal mixed venous pH during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.