Role of Esophageal Motility, Acid Reflux, and of Acid Suppression in Nonobstructive Dysphagia

Laparoscopic fundoplication improves esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a high-volume single-center controlled study in the era of high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH impedance

BACKGROUND

Most existing literature studies reported that laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis. However, the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could affect esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This study analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) fundoplication or laparoscopic Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD at our department between 2010 and 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), barium swallow, endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour pH impedance (multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring [MII-pH]) before and after surgery. HRM was reviewed by 2 experts, following the criteria of the Chicago Classification (version 4.0). LF failure was objectively defined in case of abnormal postoperative MII-pH according to the Lyon 2.0 criteria with/without an abnormal GerdQ.

RESULTS

During the study period, 124 patients with GERD (89 males and 35 females) were recruited. Of note, 58 patients underwent LN fundoplication, and 66 patients underwent LT fundoplication. All procedures were completed laparoscopically, and the 90-day postoperative mortality was nil. At the postoperative MII-pH, good outcome was recorded in 103 patients, and failure was recorded in 21 patients. There was a significant association between a successful LF and the normalization of esophageal motility (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed that LF is an effective treatment in patients with GERD, regardless of esophageal motility status. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of motility abnormalities in patients with GERD.

CORRELATION BETWEEN SYMPTOMS AND REFLUX IN PATIENTS WITH GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE

BACKGROUND

Esophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are the same in functional heartburn, non-erosive disease, and erosive disease. Their patient-perceived intensity may be related to gastroesophageal reflux intensity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the symptoms in GERD patients are related to the intensity of gastroesophageal acid reflux.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, 68 patients with heartburn (18 with functional heartburn, 28 with non-erosive reflux disease, and 22 with erosive reflux disease) had their symptoms evaluated by the Velanovich score (which mainly focuses on heartburn) and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (which focuses on dysphagia). They were submitted to esophageal endoscopy and then, on another day, they answered the Velanovich and EAT-10 questionnaires and underwent manometry and 24-hour pHmetry (measured 5 cm proximal to the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter).

RESULTS

The Velanovich score was higher in patients with non-erosive and erosive diseases than in those with functional heartburn. The mean EAT-10 score did not differ between functional heartburn, erosive, and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Considering the threshold of ≥5 to define dysphagia, 4 (22%) patients with functional heartburn, 12 (43%) with non-erosive disease, and 9 (41%) with erosive disease had dysphagia (P=0.18). There was: a) a moderate correlation between the Velanovich and DeMeester score and between Velanovich score and the percentage of acid exposure time (AET); b) a weak correlation between EAT-10 and DeMeester score and between EAT-10 and acid exposure time.

CONCLUSION

There is a moderate positive correlation between heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux measurement. Dysphagia has a weak positive correlation with reflux measurement.

Dysphagia: clinical evaluation and management

Dysphagia is a common problem affecting all ages. It is increasing in frequency particularly among the younger population due to the rising incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis, a condition which often leads to acute presentation to hospital for the first time with food bolus obstruction requiring endoscopic removal. Careful history taking remains the first and most important step in evaluating dysphagia, and it is especially important to distinguish an oropharyngeal versus oesophageal origin, which helps to guide further investigation and therapy. The three main investigations for dysphagia remain endoscopy, barium study and manometry, with endoscopy also offering therapeutic potential. Management is largely determined by the eventual diagnosis, often in a multi-disciplinary setting.

Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years.

RESULTS

In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale.

CONCLUSION

In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.