1
|
Gu Y, Liu M, Wang A, He D, Sun H, Cui X, Tian W, Zhang Y, Jin C, Wang H. Analysis of Factors Influencing Hospitalization Expenses of Patients with Gastric Cancer in Shanghai, 2014-2021: Based on Grey Relational Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 44:101029. [PMID: 39094426 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study analyzed the basic condition and the influencing factors of hospitalization costs of patients with gastric cancer in Shanghai from 2014 to 2021, so as to provide a scientific reference for promoting the reform of the medical and healthcare system. METHODS The study data were obtained from the electronic medical record system of Shanghai Hospital. The grey relational analysis was applied to analyze the correlation strength of various expenses with hospitalization costs. The structural equation modeling was constructed to analyze the influences of factors on the hospitalization expenses, as well as the relationship between each factor. RESULTS A total of 23 335 study subjects were included. The results of grey relational analysis showed that the total cost of drugs had the strongest correlation with hospitalization expenses, followed by material expenses and surgery cost, whereas those of others were lower. The results of the structural equation modeling showed that age had the greatest influence on hospitalization expenses with a path coefficient of 0.618. Other influencing factors included surgery history, length of stay, hospital level, gender, and medical insurance. CONCLUSIONS The total cost of drugs had the strongest correlation with hospitalization expenses. Factors such as gender, age, and hospital level all affect the hospitalization expenses. In the future, it is necessary to take further measures to control the cost of drugs and constantly optimize the structure of hospitalization costs. Meanwhile, the reform of the medical and healthcare system should be deepened to reasonably regulate the medical behaviors and reduce the financial burden of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yichun Gu
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengying Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Anhui Xinhua University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Anqi Wang
- School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Da He
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Sun
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Cui
- Shanghai Health Statistics Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqi Tian
- Shanghai Health Statistics Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yulin Zhang
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chunlin Jin
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Haiyin Wang
- Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng X, Ding S, Wu M, Sun C, Wu Y, Wang S, Du Y, Yang L, Xue L, Wang B, Wang C, Cui W, Xie Y. Dynamic monitoring revealed a slightly prolonged waiting time for total gastrectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic without increasing the short-term complications. Front Oncol 2022; 12:944602. [PMID: 36119493 PMCID: PMC9471957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.944602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to determine the pattern of delay and its effect on the short-term outcomes of total gastrectomy before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Overlaid line graphs were used to visualize the dynamic changes in the severity of the pandemic, number of gastric cancer patients, and waiting time for a total gastrectomy. We observed a slightly longer waiting time during the pandemic (median: 28.00 days, interquartile range: 22.00–34.75) than before the pandemic (median: 25.00 days, interquartile range: 18.00–34.00; p = 0.0071). Moreover, we study the effect of delayed surgery (waiting time > 30 days) on short-term outcomes using postoperative complications, extreme value of laboratory results, and postoperative stay. In patients who had longer waiting times, we did not observe worse short-term complication rates (grade II–IV: 15% vs. 19%, p = 0.27; grade III–IV: 7.3% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.51, the short waiting group vs. the prolonged waiting group) or a higher risk of a longer POD (univariable: OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80–1.49, p = 0.59; multivariable: OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.78–1.55, p = 0.59). Patients in the short waiting group, rather than in the delayed surgery group, had an increased risk of bleeding in analyses of laboratory results (plasma prothrombin activity, hemoglobin, and hematocrit). A slightly prolonged preoperative waiting time during COVID-19 pandemic might not influence the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent total gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohao Zheng
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shikang Ding
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yun Cheng Center Hospital, Yuncheng, China
| | - Chunyang Sun
- Department of General Surgery, The Central Hospital of Jia Mu Si City, Jiamusi, China
| | - Yunzi Wu
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shenghui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yongxing Du
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liyan Xue
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bingzhi Wang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chengfeng Wang
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Chengfeng Wang, ; Wei Cui, ; Yibin Xie,
| | - Wei Cui
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Chengfeng Wang, ; Wei Cui, ; Yibin Xie,
| | - Yibin Xie
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Langfang, China
- *Correspondence: Chengfeng Wang, ; Wei Cui, ; Yibin Xie,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah S, Hubscher E, Pelletier C, Jacob R, Vinals L, Yadlapati R. Helicobacter pylori infection treatment in the United States: clinical consequences and costs of eradication treatment failure. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:341-357. [PMID: 35315732 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2056015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is causal in benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend Hp eradication in patients with active infection. Unfortunately, treatment failure is common, exposing patients to complications associated with persistent Hp infection and consequences of repeated treatment, including promotion of antibiotic resistance. In the United States (US), data regarding eradication rates with available therapies are limited. Moreover, the clinical and economic burden of eradication treatment failure have not been thoroughly described. AREAS COVERED We aimed to characterize Hp eradication rates and the clinical consequences and associated costs of persistent Hp infection among US adults. We conducted focused literature reviews using initial searches in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid followed by manual searches to identify relevant publications. EXPERT OPINION Hp eradication rates were suboptimal, with most studies reporting rates ≤80% with clarithromycin-based triple therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy. There was direct evidence supporting numerous benefits of successful Hp eradication, including decreased risk of recurrent or complicated peptic disease and non-cardia gastric cancer. Cost benefits of eradication were related to mitigation of conditions associated with persistent Hp infection, (e.g. complicated peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer) which altogether exceed US$5.3 billion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailja Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Corey Pelletier
- HEOR, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rinu Jacob
- Medical Affairs, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey, USA
| | - Lydia Vinals
- Real-World Advanced Analytics, Cytel, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohammadpour S, Niknam N, Javan-Noughabi J, Yousefi M, Ebrahimipour H, Haghighi H, Kasraei F, Kargar M, Sharifi T. The Factors Associated With Direct Medical Costs in Patients With Gastric Cancer: Quantile Regression Approach Compared With Gamma Regression. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 21:127-132. [PMID: 31783308 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluating the costs of illness can provide evidence to improve performance at all levels of health organizations. This study aimed to identify the relationship between the costs of diagnosing and treating patients with gastric cancer and their explanatory variables, using quantile and gamma regressions and comparing the results of the two models. METHODS This was a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytic study carried out in 2016. In total, 449 patients with gastric cancer were selected at a hospital affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Direct costs and other variables were collected from medical documents. Data were analyzed using the STATA 12 software, using quantile and gamma regression analysis, and the results were compared. RESULTS The highest average cost per patient was related to hospitalization costs in both metastatic (20 911 034 Iranian Rials) and nonmetastatic patients (20 738 062 Iranian Rials). The lowest average cost was related to biopsy services in nonmetastatic patients. The results of the study also showed that quantile regression is an appropriate substitute for gamma regression and, in some cases, can provide more information for the analysis of disease costs. Based on the results of the quantile regression, being a male and having a shorter stay had a positive effect on cost and the age of the patient had a significantly negative effect. CONCLUSIONS Examining the cost of a common illness, such as gastric cancer, is an important economic tool for policy makers and decision makers. It provides evidence-based decision making about resource allocation that they can use for future planning and cost control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Mohammadpour
- Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Information, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Noureddin Niknam
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Medical Information, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Javad Javan-Noughabi
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehdi Yousefi
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hosein Ebrahimipour
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hajar Haghighi
- Health Policy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Kasraei
- School of Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mehdi Kargar
- Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Tahere Sharifi
- Department of Health Care Management, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|