Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy: State of the Art

Peroral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication (POEM-F) for achalasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its long-term sequelae remain a concern following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM with fundoplication (POEM-F) is simultaneous fundoplication via pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM-F in mitigating post-POEM GER.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive electronic database search from January 2008 through June 2024 for studies evaluating outcomes of POEM-F performed for managing post-POEM GER. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Q statistics.

Results

We included seven studies comprising 127 patients. Pooled technical success for POEM was 96.90%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.40-98.90. Pooled technical success of fundoplication was 92.30%; 95% CI 85.20-96.10. Clinical success in treating achalasia was 96.40%; 95% CI 90.70-98.60. Rate of wrap integrity on follow-up was 84.00%; 95% CI 66.00-93.40. Composite clinical success of POEM-F in mitigating post-POEM GER was 86.20%; 95% CI 73.80-93.20. Mean total procedure duration and fundoplication time was 115.74 minutes; 95% CI 103.53-126.96 and 55.28 minutes; 95% CI 47.35-63.20, respectively. The overall pooled major adverse events (AE) rate was 3.60%; 95% CI 1.40-9.40.

Conclusions

POEM-F is an effective procedure with an acceptable AE rate in expert hands. It appears to offer clinical benefit in mitigating post-POEM GER. However, further standardization for evaluating clinically significant post-POEM GER and long-term benefit of POEM-F is warranted.

Active narcotic use and post-peroral endoscopic myotomy outcomes in esophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat esophageal motility disorders. Opioid use has been demonstrated to adversely affect esophageal dysmotility and is associated with an increased prevalence of esophageal motility disorders. Our aim was to investigate the effect of narcotic use on success rates in patients undergoing POEM.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing POEM between February 2017 and September 2021. Primary outcomes were post-POEM Eckardt score (ES), distensibility index, and length of procedure. Secondary outcomes included technical success, myotomy length, length of stay, adverse events, reintervention rates, and postprocedure GERD.

RESULTS

During the study period, 90 patients underwent POEM for treatment of esophageal dysmotility disorders. Age, sex, race, indications for POEM, and body mass index were not significant between those with or without narcotic use. There were no differences in procedure time, preprocedure ESs, or length of stay. Postprocedure ESs were higher in the group with active narcotic use compared to the group with no prior history (2.73 vs 1.2, P = .004). Distensibility indexes measured with EndoFLIP (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) were not different in patients using narcotics compared with opioid-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Active narcotic use negatively affects symptom improvement after POEM for the treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Managing Jackhammer Esophagus: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare hypercontractile motility disorder often associated with dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. In patients with clinically relevant symptoms, treatment options aim to decrease esophageal contractions. Medical, endoscopic and surgical therapies have limited long-term efficacy. The advent of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has evolved as a minimally invasive treatment option. Yet data regarding JE is scare. As such we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of JE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single center retrospective study of consecutive adult patients undergoing POEM for JE from April 2018 to September 2021. All procedures were conducted by a single endoscopist. Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as Eckardt score (ES) ≤3 following the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients (mean age 58, 7 females) underwent POEM with a mean duration of symptoms of 42.6 months. Preprocedure mean ES was 8.92. Nine patients were treatment naive. Pre-POEM endoluminal functional luminal imaging probe (n=10) demonstrated a distensibility index of 0.34. The average length of follow-up after POEM was 15.8 months.There was a 92.3% (12/13) clinical success rate, with a mean post-POEM ES of 1.53. One patient's ES improved from 12 to 1 after POEM; however, 2.5 years later she developed recurrent symptoms (ES 10). Only 1 patient had endoscopic evidence of Los Angeles grade A esophagitis. One year after POEM, 5 patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, but only 2 required acid suppression therapy.

CONCLUSION

POEM is an effective treatment modality with long-term efficacy. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a rare benign esophageal motor disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The treatment of achalasia is not curative, but rather is aimed at reducing LES pressure. In patients who have failed noninvasive therapy, surgery should be considered. Myotomy with partial fundoplication has been considered the first-line treatment for non-advanced achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a technique that employs the principles of submucosal endoscopy to perform the equivalent of a surgical myotomy, has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for the management of this condition.

AIM

To compare POEM and laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication (LM-PF) regarding their efficacy and outcomes for the treatment of achalasia.

METHODS

Forty treatment-naive adult patients who had been diagnosed with achalasia based on clinical and manometric criteria (dysphagia score ≥ II and Eckardt score > 3) were randomized to undergo either LM-PF or POEM. The outcome measures were anesthesia time, procedure time, symptom improvement, reflux esophagitis (as determined with the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire), barium column height at 1 and 5 min (on a barium esophagogram), pressure at the LES, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the LM-PF and POEM groups regarding symptom improvement at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up (P = 0.192, P = 0.242, and P = 0.242, respectively). However, the rates of reflux esophagitis at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up were significantly higher in the POEM group (P = 0.014, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). There were also no statistical differences regarding the manometry values, the occurrence of AEs, or LOS. Anesthesia time and procedure time were significantly shorter in the POEM group than in the LM-PF group (185.00 ± 56.89 and 95.70 ± 30.47 min vs 296.75 ± 56.13 and 218.75 ± 50.88 min, respectively; P = 0.001 for both). In the POEM group, there were improvements in all domains of the QoL questionnaire, whereas there were improvements in only three domains in the LM-PF group.

CONCLUSION

POEM and LM-PF appear to be equally effective in controlling the symptoms of achalasia, shortening LOS, and minimizing AEs. Nevertheless, POEM has the advantage of improving all domains of QoL, and shortening anesthesia and procedure times but with a significantly higher rate of gastroesophageal reflux.