A high-resolution view of achalasia

High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motility in Patients with Achalasia

The motility of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is still poorly understood. It is also unclear if the motility of this area may be compromised in patients with achalasia. This study aims to evaluate the motility of the pharynx, UES, and proximal esophagus in patients with esophageal achalasia. Sixty patients with achalasia underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) (52 % females, mean age 54 years). Esophageal dilatation was classified according to the radiologic diameter in Type I (<4 cm): 6 %; Type II (4-7 cm): 36 %; Type III (7-10 cm): 34 %; and Type IV (>10 cm): 24 %. HRM classified 43 % of the patients as Chicago Type I and 57 % as Type II. Manometric parameters were compared to normal values obtained from a previous study in volunteers. The motility of the velopharynx showed short, premature, and hypertonic contraction. The epiglottis also showed hypertonic contraction. The UES had increased residual pressure. Chicago classification Type II patients had higher UES residual pressure (p = 0.03). The degree of esophageal dilatation did not correlate with manometric parameters. Achalasia may affect the motility of the pharyngo-upper esophageal area. The changes observed may represent functional alterations to prevent aspiration, especially in patients with Chicago classification Type II achalasia.

Clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic features of three subtypes of achalasia, classified using high-resolution manometry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

High-resolution manometry (HRM) has improved the accuracy of manometry in detecting achalasia and determining its subtypes. However, the correlation of achalasia subtypes with clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic findings has not been assessed. We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical, endoscopic, and fluoroscopy findings associated with three subtypes of achalasia using HRM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective clinical data, HRM, endoscopy, and radiologic findings were obtained from the medical records of untreated achalasia patients.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2013, 374 patients underwent HRM. Fifty-two patients (14%) were diagnosed with achalasia, but only 32 (8.5%) of these patients had not received treatment and were therefore included in this study. The endoscopy results were normal in 28% of the patients, and a barium swallow was inconclusive in 31% of the achalasia patients. Ten patients (31%) were classified as having type I achalasia, 17 (53%) were classified as type II, and 5 (16%) were classified as type III. Among the three subtypes, type I patients were on average the youngest and had the longest history of dysphagia, mildest chest pain, most significant weight loss, and most dilated esophagus with residual food. Chest pain was most common in type III patients, and frequently had normal fluoroscopic and endoscopic results.

CONCLUSION

The clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings were not significantly different between patients with type I and type II untreated achalasia. Type III patients had the most severe symptoms and were the most difficult to diagnose based on varied clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings.

Evaluation of Esophageal Motor Function With High-resolution Manometry

For several decades esophageal manometry has been the test of choice to evaluate disorders of esophageal motor function. The recent introduction of high-resolution manometry for the study of esophageal motor function simplified performance of esophageal manometry, and revealed previously unidentified patterns of normal and abnormal esophageal motor function. Presentation of pressure data as color contour plots or esophageal pressure topography led to the development of new tools for analyzing and classifying esophageal motor patterns. The current standard and still developing approach to do this is the Chicago classification. While this methodical approach is improving our diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders, it currently does not address all motor abnormalities. We will explore the Chicago classification and disorders that it does not address.

On the origin of rhythmic contractile activity of the esophagus in early achalasia, a clinical case study

A patient with early achalasia presented spontaneous strong rhythmic non-propulsive contractions at ~7/min, independent of swallows. Our aim was to evaluate characteristics of the rhythmic contractions, provide data on the structure of pacemaker cells in the esophagus and discuss a potential role for interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in the origin of rhythmicity. We hypothesize that intramuscular ICC (ICC-IM) are the primary pacemaker cells. The frequency but not the amplitude of the rhythmic contractions was inhibited by the phosphodiesterase inhibitor drotaverine consistent with cAMP inhibiting pacemaker currents in ICC-IM. The frequency increased by wet swallows but not dry swallows, consistent with stretch causing increase in slow wave frequency in ICC-IM. New studies on archival material showed that ICC-IM were present throughout the human esophageal musculature and were not diminished in early achalasia. Although ICC-IM exhibited a low density, they were connected to PDGFRα-positive fibroblast-like cells with whom they formed a dense gap junction coupled network. Nitrergic innervation of ICC was strongly diminished in early achalasia because of the loss of nitrergic nerves. It therefore appears possibly that ICC-IM function as pacemaker cells in the esophagus and that the network of ICC and PDGFRα-positive cells allows for coupling and propagation of the pacemaker activity. Loss of nitrergic innervation to ICC in achalasia may render them more excitable such that its pacemaker activity is more easily expressed. Loss of propagation in achalasia may be due to loss of contraction-induced aboral nitrergic inhibition.

The Chicago classification for achalasia in a French multicentric cohort

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is divided into 3 subtypes using the Chicago classification for high-resolution manometry. Aim of this study was to apply this classification to a multicentric French cohort of achalasia and to compare clinical and manometric characteristics between the 3 subtypes.

METHODS

Oesophageal symptoms were collected in a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia on high-resolution manometry. Manometry data were analyzed with oesophago-gastric junction resting and relaxation pressures, and upper oesophageal sphincter resting pressure. Achalasia was classified according to the Chicago classification.

RESULTS

From 2007 to August 2011, achalasia was diagnosed in 169 patients, 14% classified as type I, 70% as type II and 16% as type III. Type III patients were older than types I and II (62 years vs. 52, p = 0.03). Ninety five percent of patients complained of dysphagia, 16% of chest pain (no difference between the 3 subtypes); 50% of type I patients presented regurgitations compared to 33% of type II and 22% of type III (p = 0.10). Oesophago-gastric junction and upper oesophageal sphincter pressures did not differ between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Type II was the more prevalent subtype of achalasia in this French multicentre cohort. The older age of patients with type III achalasia suggests a different pathophysiology.

Characteristics of achalasia subtypes in untreated Chinese patients: a high-resolution manometry study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the clinical characteristics, manometric results and treatment outcomes of different subtypes of achalasia in untreated Chinese patients using high-resolution esophageal manometry.

METHODS

A total of 75 achalasia patients and 34 healthy controls were enrolled in the study, and three achalasia subtypes were determined based on the Chicago classification. Clinical characteristics, manometric and treatment outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients were classified as type I, 46 as type II and 4 as type III. The mean overall length of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in type III was significantly longer than those in the controls and type I patients (P < 0.05), and abdominal LES length was significantly longer in type III than those in controls, type I and type II patients. All subtypes of achalasia had higher resting and residual LES pressures than those found in healthy controls (P < 0.05). Resting upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure in type III patients was significantly lower than those in healthy controls and type I patients, whereas types I and II patients had higher residual UES pressures compared with healthy controls (P < 0.05). Type II patients had a better response to the treatment than type I and III patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Type II is more common in untreated Chinese achalasia patients, and type II patients had better treatment outcomes than other types of patients. Large-sample multicenter trials are necessary in the future.

Heterogeneity of lower esophageal sphincter function in children with achalasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motor disorder in children. The manometric hallmarks are esophageal body aperistalsis, lack of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, and high LES pressure. However, LES relaxation and function may be heterogeneous, making the diagnosis difficult at times. The aim of the study was to describe LES function in children with achalasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective review of manometric tracings of pediatric patients with achalasia and controls. LES response after each swallow was evaluated. LES parameters were defined as homogeneous (normal or abnormal) if the same response was observed in >75% of swallows. Otherwise, the LES parameters were considered heterogeneous.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with achalasia and 16 control patients were included. All of the controls had normal LES pressure and relaxation in all of the wet swallows. In the achalasia group, some LES relaxation was present in 74% of swallows and 25% of swallows had normal relaxation. Depending on the parameter, a heterogeneous LES (resting pressure, relaxation, residual pressure, and duration of relaxation) was observed in 27.6% to 34.5% of patients with achalasia versus 0% of the controls (P < 0.001). The rest of the patients with achalasia had homogeneous abnormal responses versus homogeneous normal responses in 100% of control patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LES function in pediatric patients with achalasia is heterogeneous. The classic description of a nonrelaxing high-pressure LES in patients with achalasia is rarely found in children. Partial relaxations are common, and normal relaxations may be present.

Effect of bolus volume on proximal esophageal contractions of patients with Chagas' disease and patients with idiopathic achalasia

Chagas' disease and idiopathic achalasia patients have similar impairment of distal esophageal motility. In Chagas' disease, the contractions occurring in the distal esophageal body are similar after wet or dry swallows. Our aim in this investigation was to evaluate the effect of wet swallows and dry swallows on proximal esophageal contractions of patients with Chagas' disease and with idiopathic achalasia. We studied 49 patients with Chagas' disease, 25 patients with idiopathic achalasia, and 33 normal volunteers. We recorded by the manometric method with continuous water perfusion the pharyngeal contractions 1 cm above the upper esophageal sphincter and the proximal esophageal contractions 5 cm from the pharyngeal recording point. Each subject performed in duplicate swallows of 3-mL and 6-mL boluses of water and dry swallows. We measured the time between the onset of pharyngeal contractions and the onset of proximal esophageal contractions (pharyngeal-esophageal time [PET]), and the amplitude, duration, and area under the curve (AUC) of proximal esophageal contractions. Patients with Chagas' disease and with achalasia had longer PET, lower esophageal proximal contraction amplitude, and lower AUC than controls (P≤ 0.02). In Chagas' disease, wet swallows caused shorter PET, higher amplitude, and higher AUC than dry swallows (P≤ 0.03).There was no difference between swallows of 3- or 6-mL boluses. There was no difference between patients with Chagas' disease and with idiopathic achalasia. We conclude that patients with Chagas' disease and with idiopathic achalasia have a delay in the proximal esophageal response and lower amplitude of the proximal esophageal contractions.