Smokers as a high-risk group: data from a screening population

Why is colorectal cancer increasing in younger age groups in the United States?

Introduction: While colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have decreased for older adults, the rates are increasing in adults younger than 50 years of age in the United States as well as globally. In response to strong epidemiologic evidence as well as sophisticated models, the American Cancer Society (ACS) has recommended screening adults for CRC starting at age 45. Understanding the factors associated with the rise of incidence in adults younger than age 50 may help to identify those adults who may be at greatest risk.Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of the recent literature and discuss possible explanations for the increase in CRC in young adults including obesity and other recognized CRC risk factors, delay in diagnosis of symptomatic patients (<50 years of age), and review perspectives on the current and future status of the field.Expert opinion: Currently there are little data regarding risk factors for CRC in average risk young adults who are asymptomatic. With potential endorsement of screening at 45 years of age by US Preventive Services Task Force, more data regarding clinical and molecular risk factors associated with CRC in young adults will be available.

Colonoscopy Outcomes in Average-Risk Screening Equivalent Young Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

INTRODUCTION

Data are needed to further inform the American Cancer Society recommendation to begin colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at age 45. We used the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry to compare the prevalence of advanced neoplasia (AN) in an "average-risk screening equivalent" group aged 45-49 years with patients aged 50-54 years and older receiving screening colonoscopy.

METHODS

Colonoscopies in adults older than 50 years of age usually have diagnostic indications of varying clinical significance. We combined patients older than 50 years with diagnostic indications (abdominal pain and constipation) expected to yield AN prevalence similar to screening low AN risk and those with a screening indication to form an "average-risk screening equivalent" group. We excluded high-risk indications (e.g., bleeding and anemia), surveillance examinations, and patients with a first-degree family history of CRC, incomplete examinations, and poor bowel preparation. We calculated prevalence/adjusted risks for AN (≥1 cm, villous, high-grade dysplasia, and CRC) and clinically significant serrated polyps (large [≥1 cm] hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated polyp, traditional serrated adenomas, and proximal hyperplastic polyp ≥ 5 mm).

RESULTS

In our sample (n = 40,812), AN prevalence was as follows: <40 years (1.1%), 40-44 years (3.0%), 45-49 years (3.7%), 50-54 years (3.6%), 55-59 years (5.1%), and 60+ years (6.7%) (P < 0.0001 across all groups). The prevalence of both AN and clinically significant serrated polyp was similar in the 45-49 and 50-54 years' age groups. Furthermore, the prevalence of AN increased significantly in the 40-44 group as compared to that in the <40 years group. Adjusted analyses confirmed these results. The diagnostic indications considered to have low risk were not predictive of AN.

DISCUSSION

New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data, demonstrating an increase in AN risk starting at age 40 and a similar prevalence for individuals aged 45-49 and those ages 50-54, provide clinically useful evidence for optimization of prevention and the age to start screening. However, this is a complex issue involving additional considerations that will need to be addressed.

Increased risk of metachronous large serrated polyps in individuals with 5- to 9-mm proximal hyperplastic polyps: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Because data on metachronous risk for patients with index proximal 5- to 9-mm hyperplastic polyps (HPs) are limited, the clinical significance of these polyps is unclear. Conversely, published data suggest that sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and large (≥1 cm) HPs are high-risk lesions requiring close surveillance. We used data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) to examine the risk of metachronous large SPs and advanced neoplasias (ANs) in patients with 5- to 9-mm proximal HPs.

METHODS

We included adults with at least 1 polyp resected at index colonoscopy and a surveillance examination 12 months or more after index. Outcomes were risk for metachronous large (≥1 cm) SPs and ANs (≥1 cm, villous elements, high-grade dysplasia, or colorectal cancer [CRC]). Individuals were hierarchically stratified by the most significant index SP. The risks for adults with proximal 5- to 9-mm HPs at index examination were compared with individuals with index findings of large (≥1 cm) HPs or any SSPs or TSAs, nonsignificant HPs (<1 cm in rectosigmoid or <5 mm anywhere in colon), high-risk adenomas (AAs or ≥3 adenomas, no SPs), and low-risk adenomas (no SPs). We present absolute and adjusted risks of metachronous polyps from a regression model that included age, sex, body mass index, smoking, previous polyp history, family history of CRC, year of diagnosis, endoscopist SP detection rates, and months to surveillance examination.

RESULTS

A total of 8560 NHCR participants were included (44.8% women; average age, 59.0 years; standard deviation, 9.1). Similar to those with large HPs or any SSPs/TSAs at index examination (odds ratio, 7.63; 95% confidence interval, 4.78-12.20), individuals with proximal 5- to 9-mm HPs had an elevated risk for metachronous large SPs (odds ratio, 4.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.54-8.94) as compared with adults with low-risk conventional adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

NHCR data suggest that similar to adults with large HPs or any SSPs or TSAs at index examination, individuals with index 5- to 9-mm HPs proximal to the sigmoid are at an increased risk for metachronous large SPs. These novel data suggest that close surveillance intervals may be appropriate for patients with 5- to 9-mm proximal HPs.

Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Serrated Pathway

Serrated polyps are classified into hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, and traditional serrated adenomas. Although all serrated polyps share characteristic colonic crypts serrations, distinguishing hyperplastic polyps from sessile serrated adenomas/polyps is challenging. Traditional serrated adenomas are cytologically dysplastic lesions; sessile serrated adenomas/polyps develop cytologic dysplasia as they progress to colorectal cancer. A flat and pale appearance of serrated polyps may make detection difficult. Endoscopic mucosal resection has higher rates of complete resection. Close surveillance is recommended for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyp with dysplasia, hyperplastic polyps ≥10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas.

Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent increases in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in adults younger than 50 years of age have led to more colonoscopies in this age group. As a result, there may be an increasing number of adults <50 years old with polyps detected. There is concern that younger adults may require closer follow-up. Our goal was to use data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) to examine the risk for metachronous advanced adenomas (AAs) and large (>1 cm) serrated polyps in younger versus older adults who return for a follow-up colonoscopy.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of NHCR participants with at least 1 polyp on index examination and a follow-up colonoscopy at least 1 year after the index examination. Outcomes were the risks for metachronous AAs (adenomas ≥1 cm, with villous elements or high-grade dysplasia, or CRC) and large (≥1 cm) serrated polyps. We present absolute risk and adjusted risks from a logistic regression model stratified by age at index colonoscopy (<40, 40-49, 50-59, and 60+ [reference]). Covariates included index findings, endoscopist adenoma detection rates, sex, smoking, body mass index, follow-up time (months), bowel preparation quality, and family history of CRC.

RESULTS

In our sample of 12,380 adults, absolute risk for metachronous AA was lower for younger patients than for patients aged ≥60. After adjusting for covariates, when comparing with the 60+ group (reference), the lowest risk was observed in those younger than 40 years (odds ratio, .19; 95% confidence interval, .05-.80). Of note, similar risks were observed in the 40 to 49 age group (odds ratio, .61; 95% confidence interval, .41-.92) and 50 to 59 age group (odds ratio, .71; 95% confidence interval, .58-.86). The risk for large metachronous serrated polyps was not associated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger adults aged <40 with index adenomas had a lower risk for metachronous AAs than those aged ≥60. The 40- to 49-year age group was found to have metachronous risk similar to the 50- to 59-year age group, with both less than the ≥60 age group. These data suggest that current surveillance interval guidelines for patients aged ≥50 years may appropriately be used with younger adults.

Control and dysregulation of redox signalling in the gastrointestinal tract

Redox signalling in the gastrointestinal mucosa is held in an intricate balance. Potent microbicidal mechanisms can be used by infiltrating immune cells, such as neutrophils, to protect compromised mucosae from microbial infection through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Unchecked, collateral damage to the surrounding tissue from neutrophil-derived reactive oxygen species can be detrimental; thus, maintenance and restitution of a breached intestinal mucosal barrier are paramount to host survival. Redox reactions and redox signalling have been studied for decades with a primary focus on contributions to disease processes. Within the past decade, an upsurge of exciting findings have implicated subtoxic levels of oxidative stress in processes such as maintenance of mucosal homeostasis, the control of protective inflammation and even regulation of tissue wound healing. Resident gut microbial communities have been shown to trigger redox signalling within the mucosa, which expresses similar but distinct enzymes to phagocytes. At the fulcrum of this delicate balance is the colonic mucosal epithelium, and emerging evidence suggests that precise control of redox signalling by these barrier-forming cells may dictate the outcome of an inflammatory event. This Review will address both the spectrum and intensity of redox activity pertaining to host-immune and host-microbiota crosstalk during homeostasis and disease processes in the gastrointestinal tract.

Smoking and Other Risk Factors in Individuals With Synchronous Conventional High-Risk Adenomas and Clinically Significant Serrated Polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Serrated polyps (SPs) and conventional high-risk adenomas (HRAs) derive from two distinct biological pathways but can also occur synchronously. Adults with synchronous SPs and adenomas have been shown to be a high-risk group and may have a unique risk factor profile that differs from adults with conventional HRAs alone. We used the population-based New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry (NHCR) to examine the risk profile of individuals with synchronous conventional HRAs and SPs.

METHODS

Our study population included 20,281 first time screening colonoscopies from asymptomatic NHCR participants 40 years or older between 2004-15. Exams were categorized by findings: (1) normal, (2) HRA only (adenomas ≥ 1 cm, villous, high grade dysplasia, multiple adenomas ( > 2) and adenocarcinoma), (3) clinically significant SP (CSSP) only (any hyperplastic polyp ≥ 1 cm, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps or traditional serrated adenomas), and (4) synchronous HRA + CSSP. Risk factors examined included exposure of interest, smoking (never, past, and current/pack years), as well as age, sex, alcohol, education, and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). Multivariable unconditional logistic regression tested the relation of risk factors with having synchronous HRA + CSSP versus having a normal exam or HRA alone.

RESULTS

Among NHCR participants with 18,354 screening colonoscopies (with complete smoking, sex, bowel preparation data, and adequate preparation) there were 16,495 normal; 1309 HRA alone; 461 CSSP alone, and 89 synchronous HRA + CSSP. Current smoking was associated with an almost threefold increased risk for HRA or CSSP, and an eightfold risk for synchronous HRA + CSSP (aOR = 8.66; 95% CI: 4.73-15.86) compared to normal exams. Adults with synchronous HRA + CSSP were threefold more likely to be current smokers than those with HRA alone (aOR = 3.27; 95% CI:1.74-6.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that current smokers may be at a higher risk for synchronous CSSP + HRA even when compared to having HRA alone.

Factors Associated With Classification of Hyperplastic Polyps as Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps on Morphologic Review

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing sessile serrated adenomas/polyp (SSA/P), a subset of serrated polyps, from hyperplastic polyps (HPs) remains a challenge and has surveillance implications. Our goal was to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with serrated polyps originally read as HPs being reassessed as SSA/Ps versus confirmed as HPs.

METHODS

Data were collected from consecutive patients with a right-sided HP and a corresponding comparison group with conventional adenomas between 1993 and 2003. Two experienced gastrointestinal pathologists, blinded to polyp and clinical factors, reinterpreted the HPs using current SSA/P classification criteria. These HPs were classified as SSA/P when diagnostic histologic feature(s) were present in at least 3 crypts. Analyses, conducted on a per polyp basis, examined the factors associated with risk of individual HPs being reassessed as SSA/Ps as opposed to being confirmed as HPs.

RESULTS

Of the 702 HPs (355 adults), 188 (26.8%) were reclassified as SSA/Ps. Predictors of HPs being reinterpreted as SSA/Ps included: size ≥5 mm [odds ratio (OR), 2.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-3.26], proximal location (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.69-4.74), synchronous adenomas with advanced pathology (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.22-5.55) and ≥1 synchronous HPs (other than HP being reassessed) reclassified as SSA/Ps (OR, 11.76; 95% CI, 6.75-20.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Because HP versus SSP is not very reproducible the predictors of SSA/P that we identified, including size, location, and synchronous lesions, can offer some additional help to endoscopists when determining surveillance intervals in patients with serrated polyps. In addition, observed association between SSA/P with advanced conventional neoplasia (but not low-grade adenomas) suggests 2 distinct groups of patient predisposition, one with both advanced conventional and important serrated precursors (SSA/P) and the other largely restricted to nonadvanced conventional adenomas and HPs only. Whether the association reported here has to do with SSA/P diagnosis per se or generally larger size of SSA/P remains to be determined in future studies.

Adenoma Detection Rates for Screening Colonoscopies in Smokers and Obese Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

GOAL

To examine screening adenoma detection rates (ADR) and serrated detection rates (SDR) among smokers and obese adults in the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

BACKGROUND

ADR, a quality measure for screening colonoscopies, is associated with protection from interval colorectal cancer. Currently, only sex-specific ADR benchmarks are reported. However, obesity and smoking ≥20 pack-years are strong predictors for colorectal neoplasia, as highlighted by the 2009 American College of Gastroenterology CRC Screening Guidelines. Data comparing ADR in smokers and obese adults to those without these risks are limited.

STUDY

We calculated ADR, SDR, and 95% confidence intervals for screening colonoscopies in participants ≥50 years. Sex-specific and sex-age-specific rates were compared by smoking exposure (never vs. <20 vs. ≥20 pack-years) and body mass index (<30 vs. ≥30).

RESULTS

A total of 21,539 screening colonoscopies were performed by 77 endoscopists at 20 facilities (April 2009 to September 2013). The difference in ADR between nonsmokers and smokers with ≥20 pack-years was 8.8% (P<0.0001) and between obesity groups 5.0% (P<0.0001). Significant sex-specific and sex-age-specific increases in ADR and SDR were found among smokers and obese participants.

CONCLUSIONS

ADR and SDR for smokers and obese adults were significantly higher than their counterparts without those risks. Endoscopists should consider the prevalence of these risks within their screening population when comparing their rates to established benchmarks. Calculating sex-specific or sex-age-specific ADR and SDR based on smoking and obesity may provide optimal protection for populations with a particularly high prevalence of smokers and obese adults.

Prevalence and characteristics of colorectal polyps in symptomatic and asymptomatic Iranian patients undergoing colonoscopy from 2009-2013

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in males and the second in females in Iran. Males are more likely to develop CRC than women and age is considered as a main risk factor for colorectal cancer. Prevalence of colorectal cancer has been increasing in Asian countries.

AIM

The object of this study was to determine the clinical and pathology characteristics of colorectal polyps in Iranian patients and to investigate the variation between our populations with other populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 167 patients with colorectal polyps were included in our study. All underwent colonoscopy during 2009-2013 and specimens were taken through polypectomy and transferred to pathology. All data in patient files including pathology reports were collected and analyzed by SPSS 16 software. A two-tailed test was used and a P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean age of participants was 57±15. Some 84 were females (50.3%) and 83 males (49.7%). Total of 225 polyps were detected which 119 (52.9%) were in males and 106 (47.1%) were in females. Solitary polyps were observed in 124 patients (74%), 26 (15.6%) had two polyps and 17 (10.1%) with more than two polyps (three to five). Rectosigmoid was the site of most of the polyps (63.1%), followed by 19.6% in the descending colon, 7.6% in the transverse, 5.8% in the ascending, and 3.1% in the cecum, data being missing in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Recto sigmoid was site of most of the polyps. The most prevalent type of lesion was adenomatous polyps detected in 78 (34.7%). Mixed hyperplastic adenomatous type observed in 70 (31.1%). This high prevalence of adenomatous polyps in Iranian patients implies the urgent need for screening plans to prevent further healthcare problems with colorectal cancer in the Iranian population.

Development and validation of a clinical score for predicting risk of adenoma at screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Currently, no clinical tools use demographic and risk factor information to predict the risk of finding an adenoma in individuals undergoing colon cancer screening. Such a tool would be valuable for identifying those who would most benefit from screening colonoscopy.

METHODS

We used baseline data from men and women who underwent screening colonoscopy from the randomized, multicenter National Colonoscopy Study (NCS) to develop and validate an adenoma risk model. The study, conducted at three sites in the United States (Minneapolis, MN; Seattle, WA; and Shreveport, LA) asked all participants to complete baseline questionnaires on clinical risk factors and family history. Model parameters estimated from logistic regression yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) used to assess prediction.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-one subjects were included in the development model, and 1,334 in the validation of the risk score. Variables in the prediction of adenoma risk for colonoscopy screening were age (likelihood ratio test for overall contribution to model, P < 0.001), male sex (P < 0.001), body mass index (P < 0.001), family history of at least one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (P = 0.036), and smoking history (P < 0.001). The adjusted AUROCC of 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.74] for the derivation cohort was not statistically significantly different from that in the validation cohort. The adjusted AUROCC for the entire cohort was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.67).

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a simple well-calibrated risk score.

IMPACT

This tool may be useful for estimating risk of adenomas in screening eligible men and women.

Do recent epidemiologic observations impact who and how we should screen for CRC?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended to begin at age 50 for those patients with no significant family history of CRC. However, even within this group of average-risk patients, there is data to suggest that there may be variation in CRC risk. These observations suggest that perhaps CRC screening should be tailored to target those patients at higher risk for earlier or more invasive screening as compared to those individuals at lower risk. The strategy of how to identify those higher-risk patients may not be straightforward. One method might be to use single risk factors such as smoking or elevated BMI as has been suggested in the recent American College of Gastroenterology CRC screening guidelines. Another paradigm involves the use of models which incorporate several risk factors to stratify patients by risk. This article will highlight recent large studies that examine recognized CRC risk factors as well as review recently developed CRC risk models. There will also be a discussion of the application of these factors and models in an effort to make CRC screening more efficient.

Pathogenesis and management of serrated polyps: current status and future directions

Hyperplastic or serrated polyps were once believed to have little to no clinical significance. A subset of these polyps are now considered to be precursors to colorectal cancers (CRC) in the serrated pathway that may account for at least 15% of all tumors. The serrated pathway is distinct from the two other CRC pathways and involves an epigenetic hypermethylation mechanism of CpG islands within promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes. This process results in the formation of CpG island methylator phenotype tumors. Serrated polyps are divided into hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). The SSA/P and the TSA have the potential for dysplasia and subsequent malignant transformation. The SSA/Ps are more common and are more likely to be flat than TSAs. Their flat morphology may make them difficult to detect and thus explain the variation in detection rates among endoscopists. Challenges for endoscopists also include the difficulty in pathological interpretation as well surveillance of these lesions. Furthermore, serrated polyps may be inadequately resected by endoscopists. Thus, it is not surprising that the serrated pathway has been linked with interval cancers. This review will provide the physician or clinician with the knowledge to manage patients with serrated polyps.

Oxidative stress: an essential factor in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal mucosal diseases

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated as by-products of normal cellular metabolic activities. Superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase are the enzymes involved in protecting cells from the damaging effects of ROS. ROS are produced in response to ultraviolet radiation, cigarette smoking, alcohol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ischemia-reperfusion injury, chronic infections, and inflammatory disorders. Disruption of normal cellular homeostasis by redox signaling may result in cardiovascular, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. ROS are produced within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but their roles in pathophysiology and disease pathogenesis have not been well studied. Despite the protective barrier provided by the mucosa, ingested materials and microbial pathogens can induce oxidative injury and GI inflammatory responses involving the epithelium and immune/inflammatory cells. The pathogenesis of various GI diseases including peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal cancers, and inflammatory bowel disease is in part due to oxidative stress. Unraveling the signaling events initiated at the cellular level by oxidative free radicals as well as the physiological responses to such stress is important to better understand disease pathogenesis and to develop new therapies to manage a variety of conditions for which current therapies are not always sufficient.

Chromocolonoscopy

Chromocolonoscopy is the process of endoscopically examining the colon mucosa after it has been stained with dye. The goal is to allow the endoscopist to identify subtle features in the mucosa, such as morphologically flat polyps or crypt patterns. Studies examining the efficacy of chromocolonoscopy to identify adenomas missed by conventional colonoscopy have shown that although chromocolonoscopy increases polyp yield, most additional lesions are small in size. Staining can also help in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps. Perhaps the most useful aspect of chromocolonoscopy is increasing the yield for dysplasia in patients undergoing colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease surveillance.

Editorial: Body mass index and colorectal adenomas

The recent American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening highlight obese individuals as a high-risk group for colorectal cancer (CRC). In this issue, Okabayashi and colleagues present data from a well-designed and executed meta-analysis demonstrating an increased adenoma risk for a modest increase in body mass index (BMI). Specifically, overweight (BMI≥25) subjects have an increased risk for colorectal adenomas (odds ratio=1.24 (95% confidence interval=1.16-1.33)) as compared with non-overweight subjects. The paper's many strengths include the careful selection of the best studies. These data highlight the importance of screening in obese patients.

Aberrant crypt foci as predictors of colorectal neoplasia on repeat colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk for colorectal neoplasia detected on repeat colonoscopy in relation to aberrant crypt foci (ACF) frequency reported during the previous baseline examination.

METHODS

From July 2003 until December 2008, patients had a colonoscopy with an ACF study using a magnifying colonoscope. The distal 20 cm section of colon was sprayed with Methylene Blue to ascertain the ACF frequency, the independent variable. Patients were categorized into low and high ACF count using the median as the cut point. Data collected from consenting patients included age, gender, height, weight, ethnicity, smoking history, family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), and personal history of colorectal neoplasia. A follow-up colonoscopy was performed at an interval as dictated by clinical surveillance guidelines. The main outcome was surveillance detected advanced colorectal neoplasia (SDAN) detected on repeat colonoscopy. Logistic Regression was used to calculate risk of SDAN on repeat colonoscopy in relation to baseline ACF count.

RESULTS

74 patients had a baseline ACF exam and a repeat surveillance colonoscopy. The median ACF was six and thus a high ACF count was >6 ACF and a low ACF count was ≤6 ACF. Patients diagnosed with SDAN were more likely to have had a high ACF number at baseline compared to patients without these lesions at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio = 12.27; 95% confidence interval: 2.00-75.25) controlling for age, sex, smoking, history of prior adenoma, family history of colon cancer, obesity, and time interval to surveillance exam. A sub analysis of our results demonstrated that this relationship was observed in 48 patients who were undergoing a surveillance colonoscopy for a previous adenoma and not those receiving surveillance for a family history of neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased number of ACF in the distal colorectum was independently associated with substantial risk for future advanced neoplasia. This relationship was observed in patients undergoing surveillance for previous adenomas. Thus, ACF may serve as potential biomarkers in patients with adenomas to help identify patients who may need additional surveillance.

Smoking and the association of advanced colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic average risk population: analysis of exposure and anatomical location in men and women

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk factors for advanced colorectal adenomas may aid in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially in light of the American College of Gastroenterology's recent guidelines, emphasizing cancer prevention through identification and removal of advanced adenomas. Smoking is an important risk factor for advanced adenomas but there is little data regarding levels of exposure for genders.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to use an existing database to examine the genders separately with respect to exposure level and anatomic location of advanced adenomas. Our database was designed to study smoking in an asymptomatic, screening population. Data included demographics, family history of CRC, smoking exposure (pack-years and years smoked), alcohol, diabetes, medications, exercise and dietary history. We excluded patients with a first degree relative with CRC.

RESULTS

Compared to non-smokers, female smokers had an increased risk for advanced adenomas with an exposure of 10-30 pack-years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-9.01) as well as for ≥30 pack-years (AOR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.08-5.96) while men had an increased risk with smoking ≥30 pack-years (AOR = 3.10; 95% CI, 1.71-5.65). An increased association with smoking was observed for proximal advanced adenomas (AOR = 4.06; 95% CI, 1.62-10.19) and large hyperplastic polyps in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women smokers had an increased risk for advanced adenomas at a lower exposure level and had a greater risk for proximal lesions. These findings may have an impact on CRC screening for women.

Risk factors and diagnosis of flat adenomas of the colon

In addition to histology, size and location, a morphologic description can be ascribed to polyps and adenomas. Traditionally, adenomas have been described as sessile and pedunculated, but it is now accepted that they can also present as flat or even depressed. Although first recognized in 1985, flat adenomas have become more common in Western published literature and in endoscopic reports. The Japanese Research Society Classification describes flat adenomas as lesions with a height that is less than one half of the diameter, while the Paris classification divides polyps into protruding and nonprotruding. The clinical significance of flat adenomas includes their potential malignancy, difficulty in detection and possible role in interval cancers. Serrated polyps represent a subset of polyps that have all the features that make flat lesions clinically important. Due to the relatively recent recognition of these lesions, as well as the technology required to detect them, the prevalence and malignant potential of these lesions in Western patients are still unknown. Finally, the best techniques and equipment for detecting flat polyps are also not established. In this article, we examine the issue of flat polyps and their significance in colorectal cancer screening with regard to prevalence, risk factors and methods for detecting flat polyps.

Nicotine enhances colon cancer cell migration by induction of fibronectin

BACKGROUND

Long-term cigarette smoking increases the risk of colorectal cancer mortality. Tobacco's addictive toxin, nicotine, was reported to increase DNA synthesis of colon cancer cells. Because metastasis is the major cause of cancer death, the influence of nicotine on the migration of colon cancer cells remains to be determined.

METHODS

The influence of nicotine on the migration of colon cancer cells was evaluated using transwell assay. Nicotine receptor-mediated migration was studied by using both inhibitors and small interfering RNA (siRNA). The role of COX-2 signal was studied using pharmacological inhibitors. The expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker and COX-2 signal was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

Nicotine enhanced DLD-1 and SW480 cell migration in a dose-dependent manner. We used inhibitors and siRNA to demonstrate that α7-nAChR mediates nicotine-enhanced colon cancer cell migration and upregulates fibronectin expression, which is involved in nicotine-enhanced migration. Furthermore, COX-2 signal was induced by nicotine treatment and is involved in nicotine-enhanced fibronectin expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicotine, tobacco's additive toxin, enhances colon cancer metastasis through α7-nAChR and fibronectin--a mesenchymal marker for epithelial mesenchymal transition. Furthermore, COX-2 signal was involved in the induction of fibronectin. Therefore, smoking may play role in the progression of colon cancer.

Increased frequency of serrated aberrant crypt foci among smokers

OBJECTIVES

The American College of Gastroenterology has published guidelines recently that suggest that smokers with a history of >20 pack years may need screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) at an earlier age than non-smokers. Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) may represent important precursors for colorectal neoplasms and potential surrogate biomarkers. Clarifying the role of ACF in relation to known CRC risk factors such as smoking may have important implications for screening as well as our understanding of tobacco use and colorectal carcinogenesis. Our goal was to examine whether smoking at least 20 pack years was associated with an increased frequency of ACF.

METHODS

We gathered detailed smoking history, personal and family history of CRC, and other epidemiologic data (age, gender, height, weight, ethnicity, and medication use) from 125 patients undergoing routine screening or surveillance colonoscopy. We used a magnifying colonoscope (Olympus Close Focus Colonoscope XCF-Q160ALE, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and examined the distal 20 cm section of colon after staining with 0.5% methylene blue. ACF were counted and characterized histologically. Hyperplastic ACF were further characterized as either serrated or non-serrated.

RESULTS

Smoking at least 20 pack years was associated with an increased likelihood (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=3.45; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.93-6.18) of having more than the median number of ACF (> or = 15) compared with non-smokers. Similarly, patients with a personal history of advanced neoplasia were more likely (adjusted OR=3.42; 95% CI=1.01-11.67) to have a greater than median number of ACF compared with patients without this diagnosis. Smokers were more likely than non-smokers to have serrated ACF (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking at least 20 pack years seems to be associated with increased number of ACF in the rectum and distal sigmoid, especially those with serrated histology. Our data support ACG guidelines for earlier screening for CRC among smokers and add to our understanding of how colorectal carcinogenesis is related to tobacco use.

Association of smoking and flat adenomas: results from an asymptomatic population screened with a high-definition colonoscope

BACKGROUND

Flat adenomas represent a morphologically distinct class of polyps that may be difficult to detect, and little is known regarding risk factors for these lesions. Identification of risk factors for these lesions may aid in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, because patients at risk for these lesions may require special imaging techniques. Smoking, an important risk factor for CRC, may be associated with molecular changes that increase the risk for flat adenomas.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the association between smoking and flat adenomas.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University hospital endoscopy center.

PATIENTS

We enrolled asymptomatic patients presenting for CRC screening.

INTERVENTIONS

We screened patients with a high-definition (1080i signal) wide-angle (170 degrees field of view) Olympus 180-series colonoscope. We collected demographics, medication use, family history of CRC, diet history, and smoking history.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Polyp morphology, assessed by using the Japanese Research Society Classification (JRSC).

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were enrolled. We observed that smoking was associated with having a flat adenoma of any size (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.53; 95% CI, 1.60-4.00), having only flat adenomas that were > or = 6 mm in diameter (adjusted OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 2.02-7.32), as well as flat advanced adenomas (adjusted OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.08-7.30).

LIMITATIONS

The study design may not account for some confounding variables and provides no information regarding smoking status at the time of initiation of flat adenomas.

CONCLUSION

Smoking was associated with flat adenomas in our population. Our findings may explain the earlier onset of CRC in smokers as well as the advanced stage with which they present, with compared with nonsmokers. Smokers may require screening with high-definition colonoscopes to detect flat adenomas.