1
|
Horvat N, de Oliveira AI, Clemente de Oliveira B, Araujo-Filho JAB, El Homsi M, Elsakka A, Bajwa R, Martins GLP, Elsayes KM, Menezes MR. Local-Regional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics 2022; 42:1670-1689. [PMID: 36190854 PMCID: PMC9539394 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The treatment planning for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies predominantly on tumor burden, clinical performance, and liver function test results. Curative treatments such as resection, liver transplantation, and ablative therapies of small lesions should be considered for all patients with HCC. However, many patients are ineligible for these treatments owing to advanced disease stage and comorbidities. Despite efforts to increase screening, early-stage HCC remains difficult to diagnose, which decreases the possibility of curative therapies. In this context, local-regional treatment of HCC is accepted as a form of curative therapy in selected patients with early-stage disease, as a therapeutic option in patients who are not eligible to undergo curative therapies, as a downstaging approach to decrease tumor size toward meeting the criteria for liver transplantation, and as a bridging therapy to avoid tumor growth while the patient is on the waiting list for liver transplantation. The authors review the indications, types, mechanism of action, and possible complications of local-regional treatment, as well as the expected postprocedural imaging features of HCC. Furthermore, they discuss the role of imaging in pre- and postprocedural settings, provide guidance on how to assess treatment response, and review the current limitations of imaging assessment. Finally, the authors summarize the potential future directions with imaging tools that may add value to contemporary practice at response assessment and imaging biomarkers for patient selection, treatment response, and prognosis. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brunna Clemente de Oliveira
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Jose A. B. Araujo-Filho
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Maria El Homsi
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Ahmed Elsakka
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Raazi Bajwa
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Guilherme L. P. Martins
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Khaled M. Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Marcos R. Menezes
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kerdsirichairat T, Shin EJ. Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:191-204. [PMID: 35634485 PMCID: PMC9048490 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i4.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been a growing interest in developing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions for pancreatic cancer, some of which have become standard of care. There are two main factors that drive these advancements to facilitate treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer, ranging from direct locoregional therapy to palliation of symptoms related to inoperable pancreatic cancer. Firstly, an upper EUS has the capability to access the entire pancreas–lesions in the pancreatic head and uncinate process can be accessed from the duodenum, and lesions in the pancreatic body and tail can be accessed from the stomach. Secondly, there has been a robust development of devices that allow through-the-needle interventions, such as placement of fiducial markers, brachytherapy, intratumoral injection, gastroenterostomy creation, and ablation. While these techniques are rapidly emerging, data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial for some procedures are awaited prior to their adoption in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Microwave Ablation (MWA) versus Laser-Induced Thermotherapy (LITT). Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030564. [PMID: 35328117 PMCID: PMC8947664 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) as a local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC,) with regard to therapy response, survival rates, and complication rates as measurable outcomes. This retrospective study included 250 patients (52 females and 198 males; mean age: 66 ± 10 years) with 435 tumors that were treated by MWA and 53 patients (12 females and 41 males; mean age: 67.5 ± 8 years) with 75 tumors that were treated by LITT. Tumor response was evaluated using CEMRI (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging). Overall, 445 MWA sessions and 76 LITT sessions were performed. The rate of local tumor progression (LTP) and the rate of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) were 6% (15/250) and 46% (115/250) in the MWA-group and 3.8% (2/53) and 64.2% (34/53) in the LITT-group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates calculated from the date of diagnosis were 94.3%, 65.4%, and 49.1% in the MWA-group and 96.2%, 54.7%, and 30.2% in the LITT-group, respectively (p-value: 0.002). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 45.9%, 30.6%, and 24.8% in the MWA-group and 54.7%, 30.2%, and 17% in the LITT-group, respectively (p-value: 0.719). Initial complete ablation rate was 97.7% (425/435) in the MWA-group and 98.7% (74/75) in the LITT-group (p-value > 0.99). The overall complication rate was 2.9% (13/445) in the MWA-group and 7.9% (6/76) in the LITT-group (p-value: 0.045). Based on the results, MWA and LITT thermal ablation techniques are well-tolerated, effective, and safe for the local treatment of HCC. However, MWA is recommended over LITT for the treatment of HCC, since the patients in the MWA-group had higher survival rates.
Collapse
|
4
|
Biondetti P, Saggiante L, Ierardi AM, Iavarone M, Sangiovanni A, Pesapane F, Fumarola EM, Lampertico P, Carrafiello G. Interventional Radiology Image-Guided Locoregional Therapies (LRTs) and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of HCC. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5797. [PMID: 34830949 PMCID: PMC8616392 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided locoregional therapies (LRTs) are a crucial asset in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has proven to be characterized by an impaired antitumor immune status. LRTs not only directly destroy tumor cells but also have an immunomodulating role, altering the tumor microenvironment with potential systemic effects. Nevertheless, the immune activation against HCC induced by LRTs is not strong enough on its own to generate a systemic significant antitumor response, and it is incapable of preventing tumor recurrence. Currently, there is great interest in the possibility of combining LRTs with immunotherapy for HCC, as this combination may result in a mutually beneficial and synergistic relationship. On the one hand, immunotherapy could amplify and prolong the antitumoral immune response of LRTs, reducing recurrence cases and improving outcome. On the other hand, LTRs counteract the typical immunosuppressive HCC microenvironment and status and could therefore enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Here, after reviewing the current therapeutic options for HCC, we focus on LRTs, describing for each of them the technique and data on its effect on the immune system. Then, we describe the current status of immunotherapy and finally report the recently published and ongoing clinical studies testing this combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Biondetti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Saggiante
- Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Enrico Maria Fumarola
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Preliminary Evaluation of Thulium Doped Fiber Laser in Pig Model of Liver Surgery. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:3275284. [PMID: 30410925 PMCID: PMC6205105 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3275284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Partial liver resection is a treatment of choice for liver tumors; the range of parenchyma excision varies from a small part of the tissue surrounding the neoplasm up to 70% of the organ. One of the major concerns during liver resection is blood loss. Thulium lasers which are characterized by the length of emission wave corresponding to a peak absorption of water create a new possibility of cutting tissues efficiently with minimal thermal damage and concurrently providing a good hemostasis control. The aim of our study was to evaluate an impact of liver transection with thulium doped fiber laser on an intraoperative bleeding and histopathological changes during postoperative period in swine model. Ten animals were subjected to open surgery partial liver resection and an incision of liver tissue with an all-fiber, diode-pumped, and continuous-wave Tm3+-doped fiber laser emitting 37.4 W of output power at ~1.94 μm wavelength. The macroscopic and histopathological evaluation was performed intraoperatively as well as 7 and 14 days after surgery. Macroscopically almost no bleeding was observed during surgery and no signs of bleeding were stated after 7 and 14 days. Histopathological analysis of the transection margin revealed a thermal damage area ranging in depth from 620.23 ± 23.82 μm on the day of surgery to 1817.70 ± 211.98 μm after 7 days. In the samples taken intraoperatively and after 7 days a superficial zone of carbonization was visibly separated from the deeper changes. After 14 days one 765.35 μm deep zone characterized by a granulation was present. In conclusion, thulium doped fiber laser is efficacious in cutting with a narrow zone of thermal injury and provides a good hemostasis during liver transection, thus being a potential tool for oncotic liver surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kis B, El-Haddad G, Sheth RA, Parikh NS, Ganguli S, Shyn PB, Choi J, Brown KT. Liver-Directed Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Control 2018; 24:1073274817729244. [PMID: 28975829 PMCID: PMC5937250 DOI: 10.1177/1073274817729244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) are primary liver cancers where all or most of the tumor burden is usually confined to the liver. Therefore, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease with minimal systemic side effects. The English medical literature and clinical trials were reviewed to provide a synopsis on the available liver-directed percutaneous therapies for HCC and IHC. Locoregional liver-directed therapies provide survival benefit for patients with HCC and IHC compared to best medical treatment and have lower comorbid risks compared to surgical resection. These treatment options should be considered, especially in patients with unresectable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bela Kis
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rahul A Sheth
- 2 Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nainesh S Parikh
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- 3 Center for Image Guided Cancer Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul B Shyn
- 4 Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Junsung Choi
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Karen T Brown
- 5 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sartori S, Mauri G, Tombesi P, Di Vece F, Bianchi L, Pacella CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation is safe and effective in the treatment of small renal tumors in patients at increased bleeding risk. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 35:19-25. [PMID: 29749271 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1468038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of laser ablation (LA) in patients with small renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and increased risk of bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2013 to 2017, nine patients (six males, three females, aged 68.5 ± 12.2 years) at high risk of bleeding underwent ultrasonography-guided LA for an RCC. Patients were considered at increased risk of bleeding because of impairment of coagulation parameters, concomitant antiplatelet therapy, or at-risk location of the tumor (one, five, and three patients, respectively). RCC diameter ranged from 11 to 23 mm. According to tumor size, two or three laser fibers were introduced through 21-gauge needles and 1800 J per fiber were delivered in 6 min with a fixed power of 5 W. Major and minor complications, technical success, and primary and secondary technical effectiveness and tumor recurrence were recorded. RESULTS Just one Grade 1 complication was observed: a small asymptomatic hematoma that spontaneously resolved. Technical success was 100%, 1 month technical efficacy was 88.9% (8/9 patients). One patient with residual tumor was successfully retreated 1 month later, and secondary efficacy rate was 100%. No local tumor recurrence occurred during a median follow-up of 26 months (range 11-49 months). CONCLUSIONS LA is safe and effective in the treatment of small RCC and might represent a valid option in patients with increased risk of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Sartori
- a Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anna Hospital , Ferrara , Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- b Department of Interventional Radiology , European Institute of Oncology , Milan , Italy
| | - Paola Tombesi
- a Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anna Hospital , Ferrara , Italy
| | - Francesca Di Vece
- a Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anna Hospital , Ferrara , Italy
| | - Lara Bianchi
- a Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine , St. Anna Hospital , Ferrara , Italy
| | - Claudio Maurizio Pacella
- c Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology , Regina Apostolorum Hospital , Albano Laziale, Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sartori S, Di Vece F, Ermili F, Tombesi P. Laser ablation of liver tumors: An ancillary technique, or an alternative to radiofrequency and microwave? World J Radiol 2017; 9:91-96. [PMID: 28396723 PMCID: PMC5368631 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is currently the most popular and used ablation modality for the treatment of non surgical patients with primary and secondary liver tumors, but in the last years microwave ablation (MWA) is being technically improved and widely rediscovered for clinical use. Laser thermal ablation (LTA) is by far less investigated and used than RFA and MWA, but the available data on its effectiveness and safety are quite good and comparable to those of RFA and MWA. All the three hyperthermia-based ablative techniques, when performed by skilled operators, can successfully treat all liver tumors eligible for thermal ablation, and to date in most centers of interventional oncology or interventional radiology the choice of the technique usually depends on the physician’s preference and experience, or technical availability. However, RFA, MWA, and LTA have peculiar advantages and limitations that can make each of them more suitable than the other ones to treat patients and tumors with different characteristics. When all the three thermal ablation techniques are available, the choice among RFA, MWA, and LTA should be guided by their advantages and disadvantages, number, size, and location of the liver nodules, and cost-saving considerations, in order to give patients the best treatment option.
Collapse
|
9
|
Slotta JE, Kollmar O, Ellenrieder V, Ghadimi BM, Homayounfar K. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Surgeon's view on latest findings and future perspectives. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:1168-1183. [PMID: 26019733 PMCID: PMC4438492 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i9.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Revised: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver-derived malignancy with a high fatality rate. Risk factors for the development of HCC have been identified and are clearly described. However, due to the lack of tumor-specific symptoms, HCC are diagnosed at progressed tumor stages in most patients, and thus curative therapeutic options are limited. The focus of this review is on surgical therapeutic options which can be offered to patients with HCC with special regard to recent findings, not exclusively focused on surgical therapy, but also to other treatment modalities. Further, potential promising future perspectives for the treatment of HCC are discussed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Costanzo GGD, Francica G, Pacella CM. Laser ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and future perspectives. World J Hepatol 2014; 6:704-715. [PMID: 25349642 PMCID: PMC4209416 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i10.704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Revised: 06/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last two decades, various local thermal ablative techniques for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been developed. According to internationally endorsed guidelines, percutaneous thermal ablation is the mainstay of treatment in patients with small HCC who are not candidates for surgical resection or transplantation. Laser ablation (LA) represents one of currently available loco-ablative techniques. In this article, the general principles, technique, image guidance, and patient selection are reported. Primary effectiveness, long-term outcome, and complications are also discussed. A review of published data suggests that LA is equivalent to the more popular and widespread radiofrequency ablation in both local tumor control and long-term outcome in the percutaneous treatment of early HCC. In addition, the LA technique using multiple thin laser fibres allows improved ablative effectiveness in HCCs greater than 3 cm. Reference centres should be equipped with all the available techniques so as to be able to use the best and the most suitable procedure for each type of lesion for each patient.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vallo S, Eichler K, Kelly K, Schulz B, Bartsch G, Haferkamp A, Vogl TJ, Zangos S. MR-guided laser-induced thermotherapy in ex vivo porcine kidney: comparison of four different imaging sequences. Lasers Surg Med 2014; 46:558-62. [PMID: 24902949 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical value of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for a real-time thermo-monitoring during laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) in kidneys. METHODS Twenty-eight ex vivo pig kidneys were treated with laser ablation under MR guidance in a high-field MR scanner (Magnetom Espree or Avanto Fit, Siemens, Germany). For the thermal ablation of the kidney, a neodymium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser was used in combination with a special protective catheter (length 43 cm, 4 French) which is sealed at the distal end. First, ablation was performed for 7, 10, and 13 minutes using FLASH sequences for investigation of time-dependent growth of lesion size. In the second step, we evaluated the optimal imaging sequence during a 7 minutes ablation of the kidney and after cooling using four different MR sequences (Haste, FLASH, radial VIBE, and Caipirinha DIXON). RESULTS Macroscopic lesion volume increased from 3,784 ± 1,525 mm(3) to 7,683 ± 5,756 mm(3) after the ablation from 7 to 13 minutes and MR volume ranged from 2,107 ± 1,674 mm(3) to 2,934 ± 1,549 mm(3) after the ablation from 7 to 13 minutes. During ablation, FLASH (132 ± 34%) and radial VIBE (120 ± 43%) sequences displayed lesion volumes most efficiently with a trend to overestimation. The Caipirinha DIXON (323 ± 24%) sequence overestimated the volumes significantly during real-time monitoring. The volumes measured by MRI with FLASH (61 ± 30%), Haste (67 ± 28%), or radial VIBE (48 ± 14%) sequences after cooling of the kidney after ablation were always underestimated. The Caipirinha DIXON (142 ± 2%) sequence still overestimated the lesion volume after cooling of the kidney. CONCLUSION LITT is a feasible ablation modality in kidney tissue. Moreover, macroscopic and MR lesion volume increases time-dependently. For online monitoring, radial VIBE and FLASH sequences seem to be most efficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Vallo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|