Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: time to be more specific?

CT-based body composition analysis and pulmonary fat attenuation volume as biomarkers to predict overall survival in patients with non-specific interstitial pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is an interstitial lung disease that can result in end-stage fibrosis. We investigated the influence of body composition and pulmonary fat attenuation volume (CTpfav) on overall survival (OS) in NSIP patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 71 NSIP patients with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 21.5), 39 females (55%), who had a computed tomography from August 2009 to February 2018, were included, of whom 38 (54%) died during follow-up. Body composition analysis was performed using an open-source nnU-Net-based framework. Features were combined into: Sarcopenia (muscle/bone); Fat (total adipose tissue/bone); Myosteatosis (inter-/intra-muscular adipose tissue/total adipose tissue); Mediastinal (mediastinal adipose tissue/bone); and Pulmonary fat index (CTpfav/lung volume). Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with a higher (> median) Sarcopenia and lower (< median) Mediastinal Fat index had a significantly better survival probability (2-year survival rate: 83% versus 71% for high versus low Sarcopenia index, p = 0.023; 83% versus 72% for low versus high Mediastinal fat index, p = 0.006). In univariate analysis, individuals with a higher Pulmonary fat index exhibited significantly worse survival probability (2-year survival rate: 61% versus 94% for high versus low, p = 0.003). Additionally, it was an independent risk predictor for death (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.48, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Fully automated body composition analysis offers interesting perspectives in patients with NSIP. Pulmonary fat index was an independent predictor of OS.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The Pulmonary fat index is an independent predictor of OS in patients with NSIP and demonstrates the potential of fully automated, deep-learning-driven body composition analysis as a biomarker for prognosis estimation.

KEY POINTS

This is the first study assessing the potential of CT-based body composition analysis in patients with non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). A single-center analysis of 71 patients with board-certified diagnosis of NSIP is presented Indices related to muscle, mediastinal fat, and pulmonary fat attenuation volume were significantly associated with survival at univariate analysis. CT pulmonary fat attenuation volume, normalized by lung volume, resulted as an independent predictor for death.

Demystifying idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: time for more etiology-focused nomenclature in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

A major focus of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has centered on disorders termed idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) which include, among others, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease.

AREAS COVERED

We review the radiologic and histologic patterns for the nine disorders classified by multidisciplinary approach as IIP, and describe the remarkable amount of published epidemiologic, translational, and molecular studies demonstrating their associations with numerous yet definitive environmental exposures, occupational exposures, pulmonary diseases, systemic diseases, medication toxicities, and genetic variants.

EXPERT OPINION

In the 21st century, these disorders termed IIPs are rarely idiopathic, but rather are well-described radiologic and histologic patterns of lung injury that are associated with a wide array of diverse etiologies. Accordingly, the idiopathic nomenclature is misleading and confusing, and may also promote a lack of inquisitiveness, suggesting the end rather than the beginning of a thorough diagnostic process to identify ILD etiology and initiate patient-centered management. A shift toward more etiology-focused nomenclature will be beneficial to all, including patients hoping for better life quality and disease outcome, general medicine and pulmonary physicians furthering their ILD knowledge, and expert ILD clinicians and researchers who are advancing the ILD field.

Diagnostic approach of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases of unknown origin

Interstitial lung diseases encompass a broad range of numerous individual conditions, some of them characterized histologically by fibrosis, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia, interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases, and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. The diagnostic approach relies mainly on the clinical evaluation, especially assessment of the patient's demographics, history, smoking habits, occupational or domestic exposures, use of drugs, and on interpretation of high-quality HRCT of the chest. Imaging is key to the initial diagnostic approach, and often can confirm a definite diagnosis, particularly a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis when showing a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in the appropriate context. In other cases, chest HRCT may orientate toward an alternative diagnosis and appropriate investigations to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Autoimmune serology helps diagnosing connective disease. Indications for bronchoalveolar lavage and for lung biopsy progressively become more restrictive, with better considerations for their discriminate value, of the potential risk associated with the procedure, and of the anticipated impact on management. Innovative techniques and genetics are beginning to contribute to diagnosing interstitial lung disease and to be implemented routinely in the clinic. Multidisciplinary discussion, enabling interaction between pulmonologists, chest radiologists, pathologists and often other healthcare providers, allows integration of all information available. It increases the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction, proposes a first-choice diagnosis, may suggest additional investigations, and often informs the management. The concept of working diagnosis, which can be revised upon additional information being made available especially longitudinal disease behaviour, helps dealing with diagnostic uncertainty inherent to interstitial lung diseases and facilitates management decisions. Above all, the clinical approach and how thoroughly the patient's history and possible exposures are assessed determine the possibility of an accurate diagnosis.

Association between FCGR2A rs1801274 and MUC5B rs35705950 variations and pneumonia susceptibility

Background

Herein, we collected currently published data to comprehensively evaluate the impact of the FCGR2A (Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIa) rs1801274 and MUC5B (mucin 5B, oligomeric mucus/gel-forming) rs35705950 variations on susceptibility to pneumonia diseases.

Methods

We retrieved case-control studies from three online databases and applied the statistical approach of meta-analysis for a series of pooling analyses.

Results

A total of fourteen case-control studies were included for FCGR2A rs1801274; while thirty-one case-control studies were included for MUC5B rs35705950. No significant difference between pneumonia cases and controls for FCGR2A rs1801274 was found. However, MUC5B rs35705950 was significantly associated with pneumonia susceptibility in the whole population under the genetic models of allelic T vs. G [OR (odds ratio) =3.78], carrier T vs. G (OR = 3.31), TT vs. GG (OR = 13.66), GT vs. GG (OR = 4.78), GT + TT vs. GG (OR = 5.05), and TT vs. GG + GT (OR = 6.47) (all P < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.006; false discovery rate-adjusted P < 0.0010). Furthermore, we observed a similar positive result for subgroup analyses of “Caucasian”, “Asian”, “population-based control”, and “idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis”.

Conclusions

MUC5B rs35705950, but not FCGR2A rs1801274, increases susceptibility to clinical pneumonia, especially to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, in both the Caucasian and Asian populations.

Impact of an interstitial lung disease service in the diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

The current gold standard for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) involves an ILD clinic evaluation, followed by discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). However, there is a paucity of data on the impact of ILD MDMs on the diagnosis and management of ILDs in Southeast Asia. We studied the clinical impact of the ILD service on the diagnosis and management of ILDs at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Singapore.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective review was done on 97 consecutive patients referred for evaluation to the ILD service from March 2016 to August 2017.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 67 ± 11 years. Gender distribution was almost equal (52% male), with a majority of never-smokers (63%). Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 1.81 ± 0.66 L (66% ± 20% predicted). The three commonest referral diagnoses were ILD of uncertain classification (n = 38, 39%), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) (n = 24, 25%) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 16, 17%). Following evaluation by the ILD service, there was a change of diagnosis in 60 (62%) patients and a change of management in 71 (73%) patients. The majority of consensus MDM diagnoses were IPF (n = 35, 36%), CTD-ILD (n = 30, 30%) and others (n = 15, 15%). There was a significant prognostic separation between the IPF and non-IPF diagnoses made following evaluation by the ILD service.

CONCLUSION

The ILD service allowed for more precise subtyping of various ILDs. This is particularly useful for IPF patients, who can benefit from antifibrotic therapies.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacies of Serological Markers KL-6, SP-A, SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 in Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of serological markers Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein-A (SP-A), SP-D, chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), and chemokine 13 (CXCL13) in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with IIP aged 18–80 years from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled in this retrospective case-control study. Data on the general patient characteristics, laboratory test results, chest high-resolution CT, and pulmonary function test results were collected. The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was based on the international practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of IPF, a collaborative effort published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Association (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. The diagnostic criteria of non-IPF (N-IPF) followed the consensus classification of the IIPs, which was jointly issued by the ATS and ERS in 2002. The diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was based on the official research statement on IPAF, which was jointly issued by the ATS and ERS in 2015. Serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 were measured. The differences in the expression of these biomarkers and their correlation with the severity of the disease were analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, cutoff value, and area under the curve (AUC) value for each of the indices were determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b><i>Findings:</i></b> Between September 2015 and October 2017, 69 patients with IIP. Of these patients, 19 had IPF, 23 had N-IPF, and 27 had IPAF. We also enrolled 20 age- and gender-matched patients with pneumonia and 15 uninfected individuals as normal control. The serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, ­SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 were significantly higher in patients with IIP than in patients with pneumonia and the normal controls. The detection of these markers was found to have better diagnostic efficacy in patients with IIP than in those with pneumonia. Of these markers above, KL-6 had the highest diagnostic value (AUC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99). Based on a logistics regression analysis, the combination of KL-6, CCL2, and CXCL13 had an improved diagnostic efficacy for IIP. In patients with IIP, the serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, CCL2, and CXCL13 all showed a significant negative correlation with the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO; <i>r</i> = –0.36, –0.37, –0.36, –0.30, respectively; all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Although their expression levels along with that of SP-D were elevated in patients with IPF, N-IPF, and IPAF, it was difficult to distinguish between these 3 conditions by detecting the 5 serum biomarkers together. Our findings indicate that the serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 are notably elevated in patients with IIP and show significant correlation with the severity of interstitial lung lesions. Additionally, we further explore the diagnostic efficacy of 5 biomarkers in different types of IIP. It is the first time that the level of serum marker CXCL13 of N-IPF and IPAF patients was higher than IPF patients, which further enriched the study on serum markers for IIPs. Between September 2015 and October 2017, 69 patients with IIP. Of these patients, 19 had IPF, 23 had N-IPF, and 27 had IPAF. We also enrolled 20 age- and gender-matched patients with pneumonia and 15 uninfected individuals as normal control. The serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 were significantly higher in patients with IIP than in patients with pneumonia and the normal controls. Of these markers above, KL-6 had the highest diagnostic value (AUC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99). Based on a logistics regression analysis, the combination of KL-6, CCL2, and CXCL13 had an improved diagnostic efficacy for IIP. In patients with IIP, the serum levels of KL-6, SP-A, CCL2, and CXCL13 all showed a significant negative correlation with the DLCO (<i>r</i> = –0.36, –0.37, –0.36, –0.30, respectively; all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Our findings indicate that the serum levels of KL-6, ­SP-A, SP-D, CCL2, and CXCL13 are notably elevated in patients with IIP and show significant correlation with the severity of interstitial lung lesions. Additionally, we further explore the diagnostic efficacy of 5 biomarkers in different types of IIP. It is the first time that the level of serum marker CXCL13 of N-IPF and IPAF patients was higher than IPF patients, which further enrich the study on serum markers in IIPs. <b><i>Interpretation:</i></b> Although the combined detection of KL-6, CCL3, and CXCL13 significantly improves the diagnosis of IIP, detection of all the 5 markers together is unable to distinguish between IPF, N-IPF, and IPAF.

Expanded acceptance of acute exacerbation of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, including 7 additional cases with detailed clinical pathologic correlation

Acute exacerbation is uncommonly diagnosed in patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and its pathologic features have received relatively little attention compared to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We retrospectively studied 14 consecutive cases of histopathologically proven NSIP by surgical lung biopsy. The diagnosis of acute exacerbation was confirmed clinically. We analyzed whether four reported pathologic features, including organizing pneumonia lesion, alveolar hemorrhage, many fibroblastic foci, and focal hyaline membranes were present and suggestive of acute exacerbation of NSIP or not. Acute exacerbation in patients with NSIP was diagnosed in 8 cases, while the remaining 6 cases were diagnosed as clinically stable. Seven cases of organizing pneumonia lesion, 7 of alveolar hemorrhage, 6 of many fibroblastic foci, and 3 of focal hyaline membranes were identified as the main pathologic components in patients with acute exacerbation. Organizing pneumonia lesion and many fibroblastic foci were identified in 2 and 3 stable cases, respectively. Having more than two components was significantly associated with acute exacerbation. Evaluation of lung biopsies with NSIP for organizing pneumonia lesions, alveolar hemorrhage, many fibroblastic foci, and focal hyaline membranes may be useful to predict the possibility of acute exacerbation.

Classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias using anti-myxovirus resistance-protein 1 autoantibody

Chronic fibrosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) can be divided into two main types: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a steroid-resistant and progressive disease with a median survival of 2-3 years, and idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (INSIP), a steroid-sensitive and non-progressive autoimmune disease. Although the clinical courses of these two diseases differ, they may be difficult to distinguish at diagnosis. We performed a comprehensive analysis of serum autoantibodies from patients definitively diagnosed with IPF, INSIP, autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, and sarcoidosis. We identified disease-specific autoantibodies and enriched KEGG pathways unique to each disease, and demonstrated that IPF and INSIP are serologically distinct. Furthermore, we discovered a new INSIP-specific autoantibody, anti-myxovirus resistance-1 (MX1) autoantibody. Patients positive for anti-MX1 autoantibody constituted 17.5% of all cases of chronic fibrosing IIPs. Notably, patients rarely simultaneously carried the anti-MX1 autoantibody and the anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetase autoantibody, which is common in chronic fibrosing IIPs. Because MX1 is one of the most important interferon-inducible anti-viral genes, we have not only identified a new diagnostic autoantibody of INSIP but also obtained new insight into the pathology of INSIP, which may be associated with viral infection and autoimmunity.