Critical reappraisal of underlying histological patterns in patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Up-regulation by overexpression of c-MET in fibroblastic foci of usual interstitial pneumonia

Background

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the radiologic and histologic hallmark of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and the commonest histologic pattern of other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (e.g., fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia). Analogous to lung cancer, activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one of the main molecular pathways recently identified by transcriptomic studies in IPF. Fibroblastic foci (FF) are considered the active/trigger component of UIP pattern. The proto-oncogene C-MET is a key gene among molecules promoting EMT against which several inhibitors are currently available or promising in ongoing studies on lung cancer.

Methods

Twenty surgical cases of diffuse fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (fILD) with UIP pattern and FF-rich (17 IPF and 3 patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia, fHP) were retrospectively selected. FF were manually microdissected and analysed for c-MET gene alterations (FISH amplification and gene hot-spot mutations Sanger sequencing) and tested with a c-MET companion diagnostic antibody (clone SP44 metmab) by immunohistochemistry.

Results

FF are characterized by upregulation of c-MET as shown by overexpression of the protein in 80% of cases, while no gene amplification by FISH or mutations were detected. C-MET upregulation of FF was observed either in IPF and fHP, with a tropism for the epithelial cell component only.

Conclusion

Upregulation of c-MET in FF of ILD with UIP pattern further confirms the key role of the proto-oncogene c-MET in its pathogenesis, possibly representing an interesting and easily-detectable molecular target for selective therapy using specific inhibitors in future clinical trials, similar to lung cancer. It is reasonable to speculate that molecular alterations in FF can also be detected in FF by transbronchial cryobiopsy.

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Review and Summary of American College of Chest Physicians Statement

Assessment of lung biopsies for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is one of the most difficult diagnostic problems for surgical pathologists. It is a form of interstitial lung disease resulting from an immune reaction provoked by an inhaled antigen in susceptible individuals. Although this definition sounds simple, in practice, the diagnosis of HP can be challenging. To address these issues, the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) has recently published a guideline for the diagnosis of HP. In this review, we will explore the multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation of HP with a focus on the pathologic features as outlined in the CHEST guidelines. The histologic criteria are divided into 4 diagnostic categories: (1) Typical nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (2) Compatible with nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (3) Indeterminate for nonfibrotic or fibrotic HP; and (4) Alternative Diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that patterns 1 to 3 do not represent discrete histologic entities or pathologic diagnoses. Rather, these categories are meant to serve as a practical guide for organizing a complex set of overlapping histologic patterns into an integrated diagnostic framework for facilitating multidisciplinary discussion. High-resolution computed tomography features are also summarized, emphasizing how the correlation of lung biopsies with computed tomography findings can help to favor the diagnosis, particularly in cases where biopsies are not typical for HP. This review highlights details of the histologic spectrum of HP as well as the utility of different types of biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage. We also emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary discussion and the complex differential diagnosis.

Biopsy in interstitial lung disease: specific diagnosis and the identification of the progressive fibrotic phenotype

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evaluation of progression in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may require a multidimensional approach. This review will cover the role and usefulness of lung biopsy in diagnosis and assessment of the progressive fibrotic phenotype.

RECENT FINDINGS

The identification of specific findings and the balance between inflammation and fibrosis on lung biopsy may help distinguishing different disease entities and may likely determine the effect of treatment and possibly prognosis. The fibrotic morphological patterns potentially associated with a progressive phenotype include usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and other less common fibrotic variants, with histopathological findings of UIP at the time of diagnosis being predictive of worse outcome compared with other patterns. The prognostic significance of lung biopsy findings has been assessed after both surgical lung biopsy (SLB) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC), the latter becoming a valid alternative to SLB, if performed in experienced centres, due to significantly lower morbidity and mortality.

SUMMARY

Lung biopsy plays an important role in diagnosis and identification of the progressive fibrotic phenotype. The introduction of less invasive procedures could potentially expand the role of lung sampling, including for example patients with a known diagnosis of ILD or at an earlier stage of the disease.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Molecular mechanisms and potential treatment approaches

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive disease with high mortality that commonly occurs in middle-aged and older adults. IPF, characterized by a decline in lung function, often manifests as exertional dyspnea and cough. Symptoms result from a fibrotic process driven by alveolar epithelial cells that leads to increased migration, proliferation, and differentiation of lung fibroblasts. Ultimately, the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, which synthesize excessive amounts of extracellular matrix proteins, destroys the lung architecture. However, the factors that induce the fibrotic process are unclear. Diagnosis can be a difficult process; the gold standard for diagnosis is the multidisciplinary conference. Practical biomarkers are needed to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. High-resolution computed tomography typically shows interstitial pneumonia with basal and peripheral honeycombing. Gas exchange and diffusion capacity are impaired. Treatments are limited, although the anti-fibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib can slow the progression of the disease. Lung transplantation is often contraindicated because of age and comorbidities, but it improves survival when successful. The incidence and prevalence of IPF has been increasing and there is an urgent need for improved therapies. This review covers the detailed cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying IPF progression as well as current treatments and cutting-edge research into new therapeutic targets.

Diagnostic approach of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases of unknown origin

Interstitial lung diseases encompass a broad range of numerous individual conditions, some of them characterized histologically by fibrosis, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia, interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases, and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. The diagnostic approach relies mainly on the clinical evaluation, especially assessment of the patient's demographics, history, smoking habits, occupational or domestic exposures, use of drugs, and on interpretation of high-quality HRCT of the chest. Imaging is key to the initial diagnostic approach, and often can confirm a definite diagnosis, particularly a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis when showing a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in the appropriate context. In other cases, chest HRCT may orientate toward an alternative diagnosis and appropriate investigations to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Autoimmune serology helps diagnosing connective disease. Indications for bronchoalveolar lavage and for lung biopsy progressively become more restrictive, with better considerations for their discriminate value, of the potential risk associated with the procedure, and of the anticipated impact on management. Innovative techniques and genetics are beginning to contribute to diagnosing interstitial lung disease and to be implemented routinely in the clinic. Multidisciplinary discussion, enabling interaction between pulmonologists, chest radiologists, pathologists and often other healthcare providers, allows integration of all information available. It increases the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction, proposes a first-choice diagnosis, may suggest additional investigations, and often informs the management. The concept of working diagnosis, which can be revised upon additional information being made available especially longitudinal disease behaviour, helps dealing with diagnostic uncertainty inherent to interstitial lung diseases and facilitates management decisions. Above all, the clinical approach and how thoroughly the patient's history and possible exposures are assessed determine the possibility of an accurate diagnosis.