Reevaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Over the Past 20 Years

Perioperative toripalimab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcomes in resectable esophageal cancer: an interim analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high-level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) + cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed.

RESULTS

Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1-3M0 to T2-3N0-3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1-year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1-year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future.

Economic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

In the absence of evidence on whether neoadjuvant (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is more beneficial for various tumor treatments, economic evaluation (EE) can assist medical decision making. There is limited evidence on their cost-effectiveness and their prospective evaluation is less likely in the future. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis about EE for NAC versus AC in solid tumor help compare these therapies from various perspectives.

METHODS

Various databases were searched for studies published from inception to 2021. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and economic-specific guidelines. The data were pooled using a random effects model when possible.

RESULTS

The retrieval identified 15 EE studies of NAC versus AC in 8 types of cancer. NAC is the dominant strategy for pancreatic, head and neck, rectal, prostate cancers and colorectal liver metastases. For ovarian cancer, NAC is cost-effective with a lower cost and higher or similar quality-adjusted life-year. There were no significant differences in cost and outcomes for lung cancer. For stage IV or high-risk patients with ovarian or prostate cancer, NAC was cost-effective but not for patients who were not high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEs results for NAC versus AC were inconsistent because of their different model structures, assumptions, cost inclusions, and a shortage of studies. There are multiple sources of heterogeneity across EEs evidence synthesis. More high-quality EE studies on NAC versus AC in initial cancer treatment are necessary.

Biofunctional study on chemoresistance in esophageal squamous carcinoma cells induced by missense mutation of NOTCH1 p.E450K

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) combined with surgery is one of the main strategies for the treatment of resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, nearly 40% of patients did not benefit from nCT, and the detection rate of NOTCH1 missense mutation was significantly increased in patients who did not respond to chemotherapy, suggesting that the missense mutation may be related to tumor chemoresistance. We aim to explore the effect of a NOTCH1 missense mutation on cell phenotype, to interpret the biofunctional changes in cell lines with a NOTCH1 missense mutation and to analyze the effect of a NOTCH1 missense mutation on drug resistance in ESCC cell lines.

Methods

Sanger sequencing was used to evaluate the exon mutations in the NOTCH1 ligand binding region of candidate ESCC cell lines. After screening, KYSE450 and KYSE140 cells were selected as the research objects, and point mutation cell lines [KYSE140-mutant-type (MT) and KYSE450-MT] were constructed by CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Then, functional experiments were performed with the four cell lines [KYSE450-MT/wild-type (WT) and KYSE140-MT/WT]. The drug resistance of ESCC cell lines was assessed with a drug sensitivity test, and the proliferation, invasion and migration of ESCC lines were evaluated by proliferation test, scratch test and Transwell test. The cell cycle status of ESCC cells was assessed using flow cytometry.

Results

Drug sensitivity tests showed that the NOTCH1 p.E450K point mutation caused chemotherapy resistance in KYSE140 and KYSE450 ESCC cell lines. Cell proliferation, Wound scratch and Transwell assays showed that the NOTCH1 p.E450K point mutation enhanced the proliferation, invasion and migration abilities of KYSE140 and KYSE450 cells. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the NOTCH1 p.E450K point mutation caused an increase in KYSE140 and KYSE450 cells in S phase.

Conclusions

The NOTCH1 p.E450K point mutation causes chemotherapy resistance in KYSE140 and KYSE450 ESCC cells. Cell functional experiments showed that the NOTCH1 p.E450K point mutation enhanced the proliferation, migration and invasion abilities of KYSE140 and KYSE450 cells and increased the number of cells in S phase.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial (CY-NICE)

Background

Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to the chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Sintilimab is one such ICI used for treatment. Herein, we designed a trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sintilimab combined with paclitaxel and platinum for locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced resectable (stage II-III) ESCC were enrolled and received at least two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with sintilimab (200 mg on day 1) plus platinum-based chemotherapy in each 3-week cycle followed by esophagectomy. The primary endpoint of the trial was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary endpoints were the major pathological response (MPR) rate, the objective response rate (ORR), the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and quality of life (QOL). Besides, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) were exploratory endpoints. Forty-three cases were needed to be enrolled in this trial. It was assumed the regimen of the neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy would achieve a pCR rate of 30.5%.

Results

Between March 2021 and January 2023, a total of 43 patients (41 men and 2 women) were enrolled, including 11 cases (25.6%) of clinical stage II and 32 cases (74.4%) of clinical stage III at baseline. All the 43 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and 32 patients received McKeown radical resection for esophageal cancer. The pCR rate was 28.1% (9/32), which was below the 30.5% reference cutoff value, and the MPR rate was 37.5% (12/32). According to RECIST 1.1, four patients (4/43, 9.3%) had a complete response (CR), 21 patients (21/43, 48.8%) had a partial response (PR), ORR was 58.1% (25/43). The incidence of ≥ grade 3 TRAEs was 23.3% (10/43) and there were no ≥ grade 4 TRAEs.

Conclusions

Sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy is safe, feasible and effective in locally advanced resectable ESCC, suggesting a supportive rationale for its further evaluation in randomized clinical trials.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2200056558.

The role of surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy in management of localized squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus - What is the verdict?

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of esophagus has significantly changed over last decade with the development of newer surgical techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial esophageal cancer and refinement of existing surgical techniques (e.g., Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy) that has been associated with an improvement in patient outcomes. The data from the pivotal CROSS study has established neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as standard of care for patients with locally advanced disease progressing to esophagectomy Simultaneously, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has emerged as an effective therapeutic modality with an added advantage of organ preservation. The present review focuses on reviewing the management of localized esophageal SqCC and exploring the evidence regarding the efficacy and caveats of different therapeutic modalities. One of the key objectives is to identify any specific features which may influence choosing a particular modality (e.g. surgery cf. dCRT) and definition of an appropriate evidence-based algorithm for management of early (superficial) and locally advanced SqCC of esophagus.

Efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective observational study

This study was designed to observe the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel plus nedaplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). From April 2019 to Dec 2020, patients with ESCC who underwent Mckeown surgery at our center were analyzed retrospectively. All patient received 2 to 3 cycles of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin before surgery, tumor regression grade (TRG) and American National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 5.0 were used to evaluate its efficacy and safety. TRG grades from TRG 2 to TRG 5are considered effective in chemotherapy, TRG 1 stands for pathological complete response (pCR). A total of 41 patients were included in this study. All patients achieved R0 resection. According to the TRG classification, the number of patients assessed for TRG 1-TRG 5 were: 7 cases, 12 cases, 3 case, 12 cases and 7 cases. Its objective response rate and pCR were 82.9% (34/41) and 17.1% (7/41), respectively. We found that hematological toxicity is the most common adverse events of this regimen, with an incidence of 24.4%, followed by digestive tract reactions, with an incidence of 17.1%. Hair loss, neurotoxicity and hepatological disorder are the others, their incidence was 12.2%, 7.3%, and 2.4%; and chemotherapy related deaths were no found. Notably, 7 patients achieved pCR without recurrence or death. Survival analysis showed that patients with pCR may have longer disease-free survival (P = .085) and overall survival (P = .273), although the difference was not statistically significant. As neoadjuvant therapy for patients with ESCC, albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin has a higher pCR rate and less side effects. It is a reliable choice for ESCC patients as neoadjuvant therapy.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared with Surgery for Oesophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study and Missing Evidence

Background: Negative evidence for the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to treat oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported in Western countries in the past century. However, in China, most ESCC patients underwent paclitaxel and platinum-based NAC without evidence from local RCTs. Empiricism or a lack of evidence does not necessarily mean that the evidence is negative. However, there was no way to compensate for the missing evidence. The only way to obtain evidence is by conducting a retrospective study using propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the effects of NAC and primary surgery on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among ESCC patients in China, which is the country with the highest prevalence of ESCC patients. Methods: From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, a total of 5443 patients with oesophageal cancer/oesophagogastric junction carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy were retrospectively identified at Henan Cancer Hospital. After PSM, 826 patients were selected for the retrospective study and divided into the NAC and primary surgery groups. The median follow-up period was 54.08 months. Toxicity and tumour responses to NAC, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, recurrence, DFS and OS were analysed. Results: The postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The 5-year DFS rates were 57.48% (95% CI, 52.05% to 62.53%) for the NAC group and 49.93% (95% CI, 44.56% to 55.05%) for the primary surgery group (P=0.0129). The 5-year OS rates were 62.95% (95% CI, 57.63% to 67.79%) for the NAC group and 56.29% (95% CI, 50.99% to 61.25%) for the primary surgery group (P=0.0397). Conclusion: Compared with primary surgery, NAC with paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy and two-field extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy might be associated with long-term survival benefits among ESCC patients.

The safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with non-tube nofasting fast-track surgery for esophageal carcinoma

Our non-tube no fasting (early oral feeding and no nasogastric tube) fast-track surgery (FTS) was safe and effective to combine with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy. In addition, the two groups were similar in terms of the recovery time, hospital discharge day, and early resumption of oral feeding.

A Transcriptomic Liquid Biopsy Assay for Predicting Resistance to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish a liquid-biopsy assay to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pretreatment prediction of resistance to NAT is of great significance for the selection of treatment options in ESCC patients. In this study, we comprehensively translated tissue-based microRNA (miRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression biomarkers into a liquid biopsy assay.

METHODS

We analyzed 186 clinical ESCC samples, which included 128 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and a matched subset of 58 serum samples, from 2 independent institutions. We performed quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and developed a resistance-prediction model using the logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

We first evaluated the potential of 4-miRNAs and 3-mRNAs panel, which robustly predicted resistance to NAT [area under the curve (AUC): 0.85]. Moreover, addition of tumor size to this panel increased predictive potential to establish a combination signature (AUC: 0.92). We successfully validated this signature performance in independent cohort, and our model was more accurate when the signature was combined with clinical predictors (AUC: 0.81) to establish a NAT resistance risk (NATRR) model. Finally, we successfully translated our NATRR model into a liquid biopsy assay (AUC: 0.78), and a multivariate regression analysis revealed this model as an independent predictor for response to NAT (odds ratio: 6.10; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a liquid biopsy-based assay that allows robust prediction of response to NAT in ESCC patients, and our assay provides fundamentals of developing precision-medicine.

The Notch1 gene may control cell chemoresistance in esophageal squamous cell cancer

BACKGROUND

In our previous study, missense mutations in the Notch1 gene were found in chemotherapy-resistant esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients. In this study, we explored changes in the interaction between Notch1 and DLL4 resulting from missense mutations.

METHODS

Bioinformatics analysis was performed to assess and compare the different biological structures and functions of wild type (WT) and mutation type (MT) sequences of Notch1. A genetic information search was performed, and the results were analyzed using in silico modeling. Homology modeling of the Notch1 protein was carried out using Swiss-Model software, and modeling of site-directed mutations was carried out using PyMOL software to observe the protein structure. The Notch1-DLL4 ligand-receptor complex protein model was constructed, Wincoot software was used to determine site-directed mutations, and a protein-ligand interaction profiler (PLIP) was used to calculate the noncovalent interactions in the complex.

RESULTS

The mutation site was located in the region where Notch1 binds to DLL4. A careful examination of the in silico structural model revealed that the mutation caused an alteration in the surface charge, and the water-bridge bonds of the interaction between Notch1-DLL4 increased in number from 5 to 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Notch1 gene missense mutation leads to an increase in the number of water-bridge bonds, thus enhancing the Notch1-DLL4 interaction, which may lead to tighter Notch1-DLL4 binding, either making the pathway easier to activate or increasing the length of time it is active.

Influence of neoadjuvant therapy on outcomes in patients with resectable carcinoma of esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction from a tertiary cancer care center in India

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery to upfront surgery (surgery alone) in patients with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (esophageal cancer [EC]), and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in a limited resource setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2010 through December 2016) who underwent surgery for EC and GEJ cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 454 patients were included and categorized into the following groups: nCT (n = 65), nCRT (n = 152) and upfront surgery (n = 237). Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for two-thirds and one-third of the cases, respectively. nCRT group patients were also noted to have smaller tumors, lower margin positivity and a higher R0 resection rates. With a median follow up of 76 months (35-118 months) improved 5-year overall survival was noted in nCRT group in comparison to nCT and upfront surgery groups (56.5% vs. 34% and 35%, respectively, p = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrate the beneficial effect of nCRT for patients with EC and GEJ in a limited resource setting. Further studies are required to analyze and promote the benefits of nCRT in limited-resource settings.

A phase III study on neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Henan Cancer Hospital Thoracic Oncology Group 1909 (HCHTOG1909)

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) are the standard treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is still far from satisfactory. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in the treatment of ESCC. More than 20 phase II clinical trials have been launched to explore combinations of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. Based on our phase II clinical trial, a two-arm phase III trial was launched in Henan Cancer Hospital. ICIs combined with NAC may usher in a new era and may benefit locally advanced, resectable ESCC patients.

Methods

A two-arm phase III trial was launched in April 2020 in Henan Cancer Hospital. Patient recruitment will be completed within 18 months. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) rate, overall response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, major pathologic response (MPR), adverse events (AEs), complication rate and quality of life (QOL). A biobank of pretreatment, resected tumor tissue and paired blood samples will be built for translational research in the future.

Discussion

This RCT directly compares NAC with neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy in terms of EFS for locally advanced ESCC. The results may usher in a new era of resectable ESCC treatment.

Trial registration

NCT04280822 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04280822). Registered title: “A Phase III, Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-adjuvant Toripalimab (JS001) in Combination with Chemotherapy versus Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma”. Version 1.0/Nov. 21, 2019.

A phase II, single-centre trial of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a challenging malignancy with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic methods. However, recent clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in the treatment of lethal malignancies. The second-line treatment of late-stage ESCC was approved based on the results of KEYNOTE-180, KEYNOTE-181 and ATTRACTION-1, ATTRACTION-3. Combining ICIs with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy may benefit patients with locally advanced, resectable ESCC.

Methods

A two-arm phase II trial was launched in July 2019 in Henan Cancer Hospital. The primary outcome measure will be completed within 21 months. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate is the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), the toxicities of the neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy, the relationship between combined positivity score (CPS) of specimen and the treatment response, the relationship between lymphocyte infiltration and the treatment response, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and adverse events (AEs). It was assumed that the pCR rate of this trial might be 25%. Therefore, the 30 enrolled patients could reject the hypothesis at 75% (α=0.1).

Discussion

The study will determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for ESCC and provide enough evidence for phase III clinical trials.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03985670, Registered: October 24, 2019, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0008Z9D&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002MIY&ts=2&cx=-i71o4q. Registry name: “Teripalimab Plus Chemotherapy in Local Advanced Esophageal Cancer”.

Investigating the Survival Benefit of Combining Radiotherapy for Surgery Treated Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Aged 65 and Older

PURPOSE

To evaluate the survival benefit of combining radiotherapy with surgery in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients aged over 65.

METHODS

Using the SEER database, we selected patients age ≥ 65 years that were diagnosed as locally advanced ESCC during 2004-2013. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were established to identify possible prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 972 cases were included in the study. For surgical patients aged 65-79 years, 74 patients (32.9%) were treated by surgery alone and 122 patients (54.2%) had received additional neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT). NRT + surgery was associated with improved CSS comparing with surgery alone (HR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.39 to 0.85; P = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, NRT was associated with improved CSS for patients aged 65-74 years (2-year CSS 56.6% versus 39.6%, P = 0.026). No significant differences of progonosis was observed for different treatment groups in 75-79 years patients (P = 0.972).

CONCLUSIONS

In this SEER-based study, the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before surgery was associated with improved CSS for locally advanced ESCC patients aged 65 to 74 years.

Residual Cancer Volume Predicts Clinical Outcome in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of residual cancer volume (RCV) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. We measured RCV by using complete stepwise sections at 6- to 8-mm intervals obtained from 81 ESCC patients with clinical stages IB to III. RCV was defined as the summation of all products of residual cancer area and thickness, and its cutoff value was set by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis on 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS). The multivariate analyses were performed in comparison with histopathological factors including tumor regression grades according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (TRG-JPN) or reported by Becker et al (TRG-Becker). Results. The range of RCV was 0 to 49.3 cm³ (median = 1.4 cm³), and the cutoff value was set at 1.0 cm³ (sensitivity = 78%; specificity = 68%). In the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis with the log-rank test, RCV > 1.0 cm³ predicted poorer prognosis for relapse-free survival (RFS; 5-year RFS rate, 12% vs 47%; P < .001) and DSS (5-year DSS rate, 27% vs 61%; P < .001). The multivariate analyses by the Cox hazards model revealed that RCV > 1.0 cm³ was a factor predicting poor prognosis for RFS (P = .013; hazard ratios [HR] = 2.62) and DSS (P = .028; HR = 2.56) compared with histopathological factors including TRG-JPN; RFS (P = .014; HR = 3.03) and DSS (P = .045; HR = 2.71) compared with histopathological factors including TRG-Becker. Conclusions. The study suggested that determining RCV is a new method of predicting prognosis in ESCC patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Combined Modality Therapy for Management of Esophageal Cancer: Current Approach Based on Experiences from East and West

Human evolutionary genetic divergence and distinctive environmental exposures have contributed to the development of clinicopathologic variations of esophageal cancer in Eastern and Western countries. Different treatment strategies have derived from the disparate regional experiences. Treatment strategy is more standardized in the West. Trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery is widely accepted as the standard treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Trimodality treatment has not been adopted in many Eastern countries, and standard treatment is neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several randomized trials are ongoing that may alter the standard management of esophageal cancer worldwide.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy versus primary surgery for management of esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective study

There is no consensus about the combined therapeutic strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. The quality control and standardization of surgery procedures were far from satisfactory in past neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials, which may underestimate the survival benefits. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the survival benefit of paclitaxel plus platinum followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy with total two-field lymphadenectomy patterns versus primary surgery. Between 06/2011 and 12/2014, there were 279 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy with total two-field lymphadenectomy; 83 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 196 primary surgery. Propensity score matching was used to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients and 76 matched primary surgery patients. Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adverse events, complications after the operation, and survival rates were evaluated. After propensity score matching, and compared with primary surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a better survival (P = 0.049). The overall clinical response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 77.1%. The pathological response rate was 20.5%. There was no significant difference in complication rates between two groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus platinum followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy and total two-field lymphadenectomy have better OS over the primary surgery without serious adverse events.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without neoadjuvant radiotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Background

Although it was controversial for treating locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) was more widely accepted rather than neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) worldwide. With the development of paclitaxel, a high response rate to NAC was reported in many studies. Our hypothesis is that lots of patients could get a response from NAC alone and avoid unnecessary NACR. Those who had no response from NAC could still response from the followed radiotherapy. We attempted to circumvent the controversy over the use of NAC, NACR and made a combined version, NAC ± neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NAR).

Methods

The retrospective study compared NAC ± NAR with NACR between June 30, 2015 and October 31, 2016. Sixty consecutive borderline resectable ESCC were included: thirty-one in NAC ± NAR group and 29 in NACR group. The toxicities, response rates, operative data, complications, length of stay, and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.

Results

The response rate to NAC ± NAR was 93.5%; to NACR was 86.2%. There was no grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events after NAC ± NAR, but three in the NACR group. Arrhythmias (6.5% vs. 37.9%, P=0.003), pneumonitis (25.8% vs. 51.7%, P=0.039) and anastomotic leakage (0% vs. 13.8%, P=0.049) were more likely in NACR group. Postoperative hospitalization stays were significantly prolonged in the NACR (9 vs. 16 d, P<0.001). A point estimate of the 2-year OS rate of the NAC ± NAR group was 84.0%, the NACR group 80.7% (P=0.410).

Conclusions

Compared with NACR, the NAC ± NACR provided the same survival benefits but low post operation complication rate. In the future, it might be a choice for locally advanced ESCC.

Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of T2N0 esophageal cancer treatment options

BACKGROUND

Esophageal carcinoma usually shows poor long-term survival rates, even when esophagectomy, the standard curative treatment is performed. As a result, there has been increasing interest in the neoadjuvant therapy, which could potentially downstage cancer, eliminate micrometastasis and ergo increase resectability and curative (R0) resection. Currently, for the earliest stage esophageal cancers, most guidelines point out to the role of endoscopic treatment, and for T1bN0 upfront surgery. For locally advanced cases, several studies have demonstrated the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy to increase resectability. For clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer, there is no consensus as to the optimal treatment strategy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare neoadjuvant therapy with surgery alone on clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer patients, concerning overall survival, recurrence, post-operative mortality, anastomotic leak, and R0 resection rate.

RESULTS

For overall survival at the mean follow-up point, the neoadjuvant therapy was not associated to a higher probability of survival than upfront surgery in cT2N0 patients (risk difference: 0.00; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.09). There was no difference between neoadjuvant therapy and primary surgery concerning recurrence (risk difference: 0.21; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.45); perioperative mortality (risk difference: 0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.01); and risk for anastomotic leak (risk difference: -0.08; 95% CI: -0.21, 0.05). Pooled data showed that neoadjuvant therapy was associated to a higher risk for positive margins after resection (risk difference: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that neoadjuvant therapy is not associated to better results than surgery alone, for the management of clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer patients, concerning overall survival, recurrence rate, perioperative mortality, anastomotic leak, and seems to be associated to a higher risk for resection with positive margins.

Prognosis of surgery combined with different adjuvant therapies in esophageal cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether the efficacy of surgery with adjuvant therapies, including radiotherapy (RT+S), chemotherapy (CT+S), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT+S) have better performance in esophageal cancer treatment and management. PubMed and EMBASE were used to search for relevant trials. Both conventional pair-wise and network meta-analyses were carried out. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank interventions based on the efficacy of the treatment method. As for 3-year overall survival (OS), CRT+S showed the highest efficacy (CRT+S vs.

SURGERY

HR=0.81, 95% CrI =0.73-0.90; CRT+S vs. CT+S: HR=0.82, 95% CrI =0.70-0.95; CRT+S vs. RT+S: HR=0.77, 95% CrI =0.62-0.95). For disease-free survival, CRT+S showed efficacy over CT+S ((HR =0.70, 95% CrI =0. 59-0.83). In conclusion, CRT+S showed a better performance for survival outcomes and ranks best among all therapies. The results of our study can provide guidance for medical decisions and treatment options that may help clinical practitioners improve the efficacy of EC treatment.

Is endoscopic ultrasound examination necessary in the management of esophageal cancer?

Despite substantial efforts at early diagnosis, accurate staging and advanced treatments, esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be an ominous disease worldwide. Risk factors for esophageal carcinomas include obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hard-alcohol use and tobacco smoking. Five-year survival rates have improved from 5% to 20% since the 1970s, the result of advances in diagnostic staging and treatment. As the most sensitive test for locoregional staging of EC, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) influences the development of an optimal oncologic treatment plan for a significant minority of patients with early cancers, which appropriately balances the risks and benefits of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. EUS is costly, and may not be available at all centers. Thus, the yield of EUS needs to be thoughtfully considered for each patient. Localized intramucosal cancers occasionally require endoscopic resection (ER) for histologic staging or treatment; EUS evaluation may detect suspicious lymph nodes prior to exposing the patient to the risks of ER. Although positron emission tomography (PET) has been increasingly utilized in staging EC, it may be unnecessary for clinical staging of early, localized EC and carries the risk of false-positive metastasis (over staging). In EC patients with evidence of advanced disease, EUS or PET may be used to define the radiotherapy field. Multimodality staging with EUS, cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic analysis of ER, remains the standard-of-care in the evaluation of early esophageal cancers. Herein, published data regarding use of EUS for intramucosal, local, regional and metastatic esophageal cancers are reviewed. An algorithm to illustrate the current use of EUS at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is presented.

A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus surgery alone for stage IIA-IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. The surgical procedure was not well defined in NAC strategy, in past trials. The different surgical procedure and different levels of lymphadenectomy may decrease the survival benefits from NAC. The new chemotherapy regimen with paclitaxel is promising. The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of paclitaxel, cisplatin and McKeown esophagectomy with total two-field lymphadenectomy compared with surgery alone for ESCC.

METHODS

A two-arm phase III trial was launched in June 2015. A total of 528 patients will be recruited from eight Chinese institutions within 2.5 years. The overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoints include disease-free survival (DFS), R0 resection rate, complication rate, perioperation mortality, days of hospitalization, quality of life (QOL), NAC response rate, pathologic response rate, toxicities of NAC, prognostic factors, predictive factors, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.

DISCUSSION

The study will provide the final conclusion of NAC for ESCC in China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02442440 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/).

Overexpression of glypican-1 implicates poor prognosis and their chemoresistance in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background:

Despite the recent improvements in multimodal therapies for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the prognosis remains poor. The identification of suitable biomarkers for predicting the prognosis and chemo-sensitivity is required to develop targeted treatments and improve treatment results.

Methods:

Proteins highly expressed in ESCC cell lines compared with normal oesophageal cell lines were screened by isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). We identified glypican-1 (GPC1) as a novel molecule. The clinicopathological characteristics of GPC1 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using ESCC specimens, and clinical parameters were assessed. The correlation between GPC1 expression levels and chemo-sensitivity were analysed in vitro.

Results:

In the immunohistochemical assessment of 175 ESCC patients, 98.8% expressed GPC1. These patients demonstrated significantly poorer prognosis compared with patients with low-GPC1 expression by survival assay (P<0.001). Higher chemoresistance was observed in the GPC1 high-expression group. GPC1 expression levels positively correlated with chemo-sensitivity against cis-Diammineplatinum (II) dichloride (CDDP), and are potentially associated with anti-apoptotic function based on alterations in the MAPK downstream signalling pathway and Bcl-2 family member proteins.

Conclusions:

GPC1 is an independent prognostic factor in ESCC and is a critical molecule for altering the threshold of chemoresistance to CDDP.

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma: a single center Phase II study

OBJECTIVE

The role of preoperative chemotherapy in squamous cell esophageal carcinoma remains controversial. A prospective trial was initiated to investigate whether preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery results in increased progression-free survival in patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IIb-IIIa/b resectable esophageal carcinoma were eligible for the study. They received two cycles of FLEP regimen chemotherapy (cisplatin, etoposide, leucovorine, 5-fluorouracil) followed by transthoracic extended 2- or 3-field esophagectomy. Two-year progression-free survival was the primary endpoint. To evaluate the potential benefit of the dual-modality approach we compared these results with the outcome of patients who were treated in our center in the same period of time and were non-randomly allocated to surgery alone.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2008, 63 patients were included in the study (bimodality group) and 58 patients into the surgery-alone group. Median follow-up was 68 (range, 4-123) months. Squamous cell carcinoma had 93% patients. Two-year progression-free survival for all patients was 45.3 and 30.7% (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.46-1.08) and median overall survival was 26.5 months and 18.0 months (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.41-1.01) in bimodality- and surgery-alone groups, respectively. Patients who underwent R0-resection after bimodality treatment had significantly better overall survival (40.9 months) than after surgery alone (19.0 months, hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy did not improve progression-free survival of patients with resectable thoracic esophageal carcinoma in intent-to-treat population. However, significantly better results of bimodality approach was seen in R0-resected patients which warrants further trials with more effective chemotherapy combinations.

MicroRNA-367 is a potential diagnostic biomarker for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this study, we investigated whether microRNA-367 (miR-367) may serve as a circulating biomarker and tumor oncogene in esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Circulating serum miR-367 was compared by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) between 35 ESCC patients and 35 normal control patients, as well paired ESCC tumor tissues and adjacent non-tumor esophageal epithelial tissues in 46 patients. The correlation between serum miR-367 and clinicopathological properties of ESCC patients was assessed. The overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test between patients with high serum miR-367 and low serum miR-367. The possibility of miR-367 being independent prognostic factor for ESCC was also assessed. Furthermore, lentivirus-mediated miR-367 downregulation was conducted in ESCC cell lines Kyse30 and TE-1 cells to assess the possible oncogenic effect of miR-367 on ESCC proliferation and cell cycle transition in vitro.

RESULTS

MiR-367 was aberrantly upregulated in sera and tumors of ESCC patients, whereas downregulated in ESCC patients after the treatments of esophagectomy and chemotherapy. Serum miR-367 was found to be closely correlated with the clinicopathological properties of differentiation grades, clinical stage and tumor metastasis in ESCC patients. Serum miR-367 was also confirmed to be associated with OS, as well as serving independent prognostic factor in ESCC patients. Moreover, lentivirus-induced miR-367 downregulation inhibited cancer growth and cell cycle transition in Kyse30 and TE-1 cells.

CONCLUSION

MiR-367 is a potential biomarker for ESCC and may act as an oncogene in regulating ESCC development.