A Retrospective Study of Survivors of Endovascular Coiling for Posterior and Anterior Aneurysms: Medical and Patient Perspectives

Quality of life scores in patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysm: Prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Living with the diagnosis of an unruptured cerebral aneurysm can understandably cause distress to a patient. The goal of preventive treatment is to increase the number of years with good quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the effect of unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment on change in QoL scores measured by the SF36 and EQ-5D-5L.

METHODS

We prospectively collected SF36 and EQ-5D-5L survey data for patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms at two time-points over 1 year between 2 treatment groups: observation and intervention (microsurgical and endovascular). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine treatment group differences in the mean change in scores from baseline to 1 year when adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

92 patients were included in the observation group and 68 patients were included in the intervention group, for a total of 160 patients. The intervention group had lower SF36 total scores at baseline (p = 0.001). With multivariate linear regression models, the effect of treatment on mean change in SF36 total score from baseline to 1 year was not statistically significant (p = 0.4); similarly, there was no difference in mean change in EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSION

In this large prospective study, preventive aneurysm treatment was not associated with a significant change in QoL score at 1 year compared to observation as measured by the SF36 and EQ-5D-5L. Further studies are needed to explore the lower QoL scores in patients seeking treatment and its impact on management decision making.

Do patient-reported outcome measures for SAH include patient, family, and caregiver priorities? A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically describe literature that identified patient/family/caregiver priorities for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), developed novel SAH PROMs by incorporating patient/family/caregiver perspectives, or involved patient/family/caregiver perspectives in evaluating existing SAH PROMs.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using Embase and Ovid MEDLINE from inception to February 6, 2018. Study eligibility and data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate. For each eligible citation, we abstracted information about study population, design, type of patient involvement, and outcome measures. We planned a descriptive summary of all included studies.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 4,961 citations, of which 15 met our eligibility criteria. Four of these included duplicate data, so our final sample consisted of 12 articles. There were 879 patients with SAH and 241 carers from the 11/12 articles that reported these data. One additional study involved 70 individuals but did not specify the number of carers or patients. We did not find any studies where SAH survivors or their families were directly involved in the full continuum of PROM outcome conceptualization from development to evaluation. We found 41 measures identified by patients with SAH. We identified only 2 PROMs developed with patients and only one that was a post hoc evaluation by patients. These 3 PROMs are subarachnoid hemorrhage outcome tool, Wessex Patient Carer Questionnaire, and Functional Status Examination, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We identified 3 PROMs that have involved patients in some way, but the extent to which they reflect patient priorities remains unclear. More work is needed to ensure SAH research is not overlooking outcomes that are important to patients.