1
|
Wise RD, de Vasconcellos K, Gopalan D, Ahmed N, Alli A, Joubert I, Kabambi KF, Mathiva LR, Mdladla N, Mer M, Miller M, Mrara B, Omar S, Paruk F, Richards GA, Skinner D, von Rahden R. Critical Care Society of Southern Africa adult patient blood management guidelines: 2019 Round-table meeting, CCSSA Congress, Durban, 2018. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE 2020; 36:10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1b.440. [PMID: 37415775 PMCID: PMC10321416 DOI: 10.7196/sajcc.2020.v36i1b.440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The CCSSA PBM Guidelines have been developed to improve patient blood management in critically ill patients in southern Africa. These consensus recommendations are based on a rigorous process by experts in the field of critical care who are also practicing in South Africa (SA). The process comprised a Delphi process, a round-table meeting (at the CCSSA National Congress, Durban, 2018), and a review of the best available evidence and international guidelines. The guidelines focus on the broader principles of patient blood management and incorporate transfusion medicine (transfusion guidelines), management of anaemia, optimisation of coagulopathy, and administrative and ethical considerations. There are a mix of low-middle and high-income healthcare structures within southern Africa. Blood products are, however, provided by the same not-for-profit non-governmental organisations to both private and public sectors. There are several challenges related to patient blood management in SA due most notably to a high incidence of anaemia, a frequent shortage of blood products, a small donor population, and a healthcare system under financial strain. The rational and equitable use of blood products is important to ensure best care for as many critically ill patients as possible. The summary of the recommendations provides key practice points for the day-to-day management of critically ill patients. A more detailed description of the evidence used to make these recommendations follows in the full clinical guidelines section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Wise
- Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - K de Vasconcellos
- Department of Critical Care, King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban; Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - D Gopalan
- Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - N Ahmed
- Surgical ICU, Tygerberg Academic Hospital; Department of Surgical Sciences and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - A Alli
- Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - I Joubert
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - K F Kabambi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, Mthatha; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
| | - L R Mathiva
- Intensive Care Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - N Mdladla
- Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital; Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - M Mer
- Department of Medicine, Divisions of Critical Care and Pulmonology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - M Miller
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Division of Critical Care, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - B Mrara
- Anaesthesia Department, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
| | - S Omar
- Department of Critical Care, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital and School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - F Paruk
- Department of Critical Care, Steve Biko Academic Hospital and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - G A Richards
- Department of Critical Care, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - D Skinner
- Department of Critical Care, King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban; Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - R von Rahden
- Private practice (Critical Care), Rodseth and Partners, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dupuis C, Sonneville R, Adrie C, Gros A, Darmon M, Bouadma L, Timsit JF. Impact of transfusion on patients with sepsis admitted in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7:5. [PMID: 28050898 PMCID: PMC5209327 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-016-0226-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) threshold in patients with sepsis remains a matter of controversy. A threshold of 7 g/dL for stabilized patients with sepsis is commonly proposed, although debated. The aim of the study was to compare the benefit and harm of restrictive versus liberal RBCT strategies in order to guide physicians on RBCT strategies in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Four outcomes were assessed: death, nosocomial infection (NI), acute lung injury (ALI) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Studies assessing RBCT strategies or RBCT impact on outcome and including intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis were assessed. Two systematic reviews were achieved: first for the randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and second for the observational studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials.gov were analyzed up to March 01, 2015. Der Simonian and Laird random-effects models were used to report pooled odds ratios (ORs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to explore studies heterogeneity. One RCT was finally included. The restrictive RBCT strategy was not associated with harm or benefit compared to liberal strategy. Twelve cohort studies were included, of which nine focused on mortality rate. RBCT was not associated with increased mortality rate (overall pooled OR was 1.10 [0.75, 1.60]; I 2 = 57%, p = 0.03), but was associated with the occurrence of NI (2 studies: pooled OR 1.25 [1.04-1.50]; I 2 = 0%, p = 0.97), the occurrence of ALI (1 study: OR 2.75 [1.22-6.37]; p = 0.016) and the occurrence of AKI (1 study: OR 5.22 [2.1-15.8]; p = 0.001). Because there was only one RCT, the final meta-analyses were only based on the cohort studies. As a result, the safety of a RBCT restrictive strategy was confirmed, although only one study specifically focused on ICU patients with sepsis. Then, RBCT was not associated with increased mortality rate, but was associated with increased in occurrence of NI, ALI and AKI. Nevertheless, the data on RBCT in patients with sepsis are sparse and the high heterogeneity between studies prevents from drawing any definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Dupuis
- UMR 1137 - IAME Team 5 – DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Control and Care Inserm/Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
- Medical and Infectious Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Romain Sonneville
- Medical and Infectious Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Adrie
- Medical-Surgical ICU, Delafontaine Hospital, 2 rue du docteur Delafontaine, BP 279, 93 205 Saint-Denis, France
| | - Antoine Gros
- Medical-Surgical ICU, Versailles Hospital, 177 Rue de Versailles, 78150 Le Chesnay, France
| | - Michael Darmon
- Medical ICU, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Avenue Albert Raymond, 42270 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Lila Bouadma
- UMR 1137 - IAME Team 5 – DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Control and Care Inserm/Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
- Medical and Infectious Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Jean-François Timsit
- UMR 1137 - IAME Team 5 – DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Control and Care Inserm/Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
- Medical and Infectious Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris Diderot University, 75018 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chan YL, Han ST, Li CH, Wu CC, Chen KF. Transfusion of Red Blood Cells to Patients with Sepsis. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18091946. [PMID: 28891973 PMCID: PMC5618595 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18091946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the major causes of death worldwide, and is the host response to infection which renders our organs malfunctioning. Insufficient tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery have been implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis-related organ dysfunction, making transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) a reasonable treatment modality. However, clinical trials have generated controversial results. Even the notion that transfused pRBCs increase the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood has been challenged. Meanwhile, during sepsis, the ability of our tissues to utilize oxygen may also be reduced, and the increased blood concentrations of lactate may be the results of strong inflammation and excessive catecholamine release, rather than impaired cell respiration. Leukodepleted pRBCs more consistently demonstrated improvement in microcirculation, and the increase in blood viscosity brought about by pRBC transfusion helps maintain functional capillary density. A restrictive strategy of pRBC transfusion is recommended in treating septic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ling Chan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan.
| | - Shih-Tsung Han
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan.
| | - Chih-Huang Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan.
| | - Chin-Chieh Wu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung, Keelung 204, Taiwan.
| | - Kuan-Fu Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung, Keelung 204, Taiwan.
- Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan.
- Community Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung, Keelung 204, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical outcomes and mortality before and after implementation of a pediatric sepsis protocol in a limited resource setting: A retrospective cohort study in Bangladesh. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0181160. [PMID: 28753618 PMCID: PMC5533322 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric sepsis has a high mortality rate in limited resource settings. Sepsis protocols have been shown to be a cost-effective strategy to improve morbidity and mortality in a variety of populations and settings. At Dhaka Hospital in Bangladesh, mortality from pediatric sepsis in high-risk children previously approached 60%, which prompted the implementation of an evidenced-based protocol in 2010. The clinical effectiveness of this protocol had not been measured. We hypothesized that implementation of a pediatric sepsis protocol improved clinical outcomes, including reducing mortality and length of hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of children 1-59 months old with a diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to Dhaka Hospital from 10/25/2009-10/25/2011. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality pre- and post-protocol implementation. Secondary outcomes included fluid overload, heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, length of hospital stay, and protocol compliance, as measured by antibiotic and fluid bolus administration within 60 minutes of hospital presentation. RESULTS 404 patients were identified by a key-word search of the electronic medical record; 328 patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock were included (143 pre- and185 post-protocol) in the analysis. Pre- and post-protocol mortality were similar and not statistically significant (32.17% vs. 34.59%, p = 0.72). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for post-protocol mortality was 1.55 (95% CI, 0.88-2.71). The odds for developing fluid overload were significantly higher post-protocol (AOR 3.45, 95% CI, 2.04-5.85), as were the odds of developing heart failure (AOR 4.52, 95% CI, 1.43-14.29) and having a longer median length of stay (AOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.10-2.96). There was no statistically significant difference in respiratory insufficiency (pre- 65.7% vs. post- 70.3%, p = 0.4) or antibiotic administration between the cohorts (pre- 16.08% vs. post- 12.43%, p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a pediatric sepsis protocol did not improve all-cause mortality or length of stay and may have been associated with increased fluid overload and heart failure during the study period in a large, non-governmental hospital in Bangladesh. Similar rates of early antibiotic administration may indicate poor protocol compliance. Though evidenced-based protocols are a potential cost-effective strategy to improve outcomes, future studies should focus on optimal implementation of context-relevant sepsis protocols in limited resource settings.
Collapse
|