Differences Between the "Chinese AMS Score" and the Lake Louise Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Mountain Sickness

Gastrointestinal syndrome encountered during a train voyage to high altitudes: A 14-day survey of 69 passengers in China

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of acute mountain sickness (AMS) continue to be problematic due to a lack of consensus on the inclusion of symptoms in a scoring system. Recent investigations highlight the significance of gastrointestinal symptoms in identifying this condition. However, the specific gastrointestinal symptoms associated with AMS have not been thoroughly elucidated in previous studies, and the underlying risk factors remain inadequately comprehended.

METHODS

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, trends, and risk factors related to gastrointestinal symptoms encountered during train travel to high altitude. A total of 69 passengers, specifically all with medical backgrounds, were surveyed 6 times over a period of 14 days.

RESULTS

The daily incidence of abdominal discomfort was higher than non-gastrointestinal symptoms within 14 days. Gastrointestinal symptoms demonstrated a greater prevalence, longer duration, and increased risk compared to non-gastrointestinal symptoms, such as headaches. The symptoms of abdominal distension and bowel sound hyperaction were found to be prevalent and persistent among patients diagnosed with AMS, exhibiting a high incidence rate. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, and alcohol consumption were identified as risk factors associated with the occurrence and duration of gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that gastrointestinal symptoms are more common and persistent when traveling to the plateau by train. These symptoms should be taken into consideration in the further diagnosis and prevention of AMS. Therefore, this study provides a significant theoretical foundation for the prevention and treatment of AMS.

Metabolite and protein shifts in mature erythrocyte under hypoxia

As the only cell type responsible for oxygen delivery, erythrocytes play a crucial role in supplying oxygen to hypoxic tissues, ensuring their normal functions. Hypoxia commonly occurs under physiological or pathological conditions, and understanding how erythrocytes adapt to hypoxia is fundamental for exploring the mechanisms of hypoxic diseases. Additionally, investigating acute and chronic mountain sickness caused by plateaus, which are naturally hypoxic environments, will aid in the study of hypoxic diseases. In recent years, increasingly developed proteomics and metabolomics technologies have become powerful tools for studying mature enucleated erythrocytes, which has significantly contributed to clarifying how hypoxia affects erythrocytes. The aim of this article is to summarize the composition of the cytoskeleton and cytoplasmic proteins of hypoxia-altered erythrocytes and explore the impact of hypoxia on their essential functions. Furthermore, we discuss the role of microRNAs in the adaptation of erythrocytes to hypoxia, providing new perspectives on hypoxia-related diseases.

Assessment of Acute Mountain Sickness: Comparing the Chinese AMS Score to the Lake Louise Score

Wu, Yu, Wenqi Zhao, Bao Liu, Jianyang Zhang, Zhifeng Zhong, Simin Zhou, Jiaxin Xie, Yuqi Gao, Peng Li, and Jian Chen. Assessment of Acute Mountain Sickness: Comparing the Chinese Ams Score to the Lake Louise Score. High Alt Med Biol 00:000-000, 2024. Objective: To compare the ability of the Chinese AMS Score (CAS) to detect acute mountain sickness (AMS) using the 2018 version of the Lake Louise Score (LLS) as reference. Methods: After flying from Chengdu (altitude: 500 m) to Lhasa (3,658 m), 2,486 young men completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained LLS and CAS items. An LLS ≥3 and/or a CAS ≥cutoff were used as the criteria for AMS. Hierarchical cluster analysis and two-step cluster analysis were used to investigate relationships between the symptoms. Results: AMS incidence rates were 33.8% (n = 840) with the LLS and 59.3% (n = 1,473) with the CAS (χ2 = 872.5, p < 0.001). The LLS and CAS had a linear relationship (orthogonal regression, Pearson r = 0.91, p < 0.001). With the LLS as the standard, the CAS had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.96). However, with the CAS, 25.5% (n = 633) more participants were labeled as having AMS than with the LLS (false positives). Two clusters were identified: one with headache only (419 participants, 66.2%) and one without headache but with other symptoms (214 participants, 33.8%). Reducing the weight of headache in the CAS allowed to align CAS and LLS. Conclusion: In comparison to the LLS, the CAS has a sensitivity close to 100% but lacks specificity given the high rate of false positives. The different weight of headaches may be the main reason for the discrepancy.