Effect of dyad training on medical students' cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance

Near-peer teaching for learning clinical photography skills: Perceptions of students

AIM

This paper evaluates the perceptions and experience of students, in the role of both near-peer teacher and learner who participated in the clinical dental photography course, using a mixed-method analysis with focus group interviews of student tutors and a questionnaire of learner perceptions.

METHODS

A student-led course on Digital Clinical Photography took place with BDS 5 and 6 students as near-peer teachers (NPTs) and BDS 2 and 3 students as learners. Interviews were conducted with near-peer teachers, and a questionnaire was distributed to learners to evaluate students' perceptions of this novel teaching and learning experience.

RESULTS

Near-peer teaching has proven to be a beneficial alternative teaching pedagogy which was well-received by NPTs and student learners. The content creation and teaching experience deepened NPTs' understanding on the subject matter and were motivated given the autonomous nature of the project. NPTs enjoyed and benefited from the collaborative nature of the project and the relevance of the subject matter and improved their clinical skills. The student learners enjoyed the learning experience and benefits of learning from NPTs which is supported by social and cognitive congruence. The positive perception of teaching and learning in pairs were also described.

CONCLUSION

This project demonstrates the perceived benefits of near-peer teaching for clinical photography skills for student experiential learning and highlights key elements on how to structure such an activity to engage and support students to participate in such future activities.

Is two a crowd? A qualitative analysis of dyad learning in an OBGYN clinical clerkship

INTRODUCTION

Dyad learning occurs when two students work together to acquire new skills and knowledge. Several studies have provided evidence to support the educational rationale for dyad learning in the controlled simulated setting. However, the role of dyad learning in the clinical setting remains uncertain. Unlike the simulated setting, learning in the clinical setting depends on a complex interplay between medical students, doctors, nurses and patients potentially making dyad learning less valuable in clerkships. The objective of this study was to explore how key stakeholders perceive the value of implementing dyad learning during medical students' clinical clerkships.

METHODS

In a constructivist qualitative study, we conducted 51 semi-structured interviews with 36 key stakeholders involved in dyad learning, including 10 medical students, 12 doctors, five nurses and nine patients. Data were coded inductively using thematic analysis, then coded deductively using stakeholder theory as a theoretical framework.

RESULTS

We found that stakeholders generally perceived the educational impact of dyad learning in the clinical setting similarly but disagreed on its value. Students emphasised that dyad learning made them participate more actively during patient encounters and patients did not mind having two students present. Doctors and nurses considered dyad learning disruptive to the balance between service and training and reported that it did not resonate with their perception of good patient care.

CONCLUSION

Dyad learning enables students to be more active during their clinical clerkships, but it easily disrupts the balance between service and training. This disruption may be exacerbated by the shifted balance in priorities and values between different stakeholder groups, as well as by making implicit teaching obligations more explicit for supervising doctors and nurses. Consequently, implementing dyad learning may not be perceived as valuable by doctors and nurses in the clinical setting, regardless of its pedagogical rationale.