Stent thrombosis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed between six months and five years with sirolimus-eluting stents and other drug-eluting stents in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[The in vivo thrombosis evaluation for the biodegradable polymer stent]

New biodegradable intravascular stent can reduce risk of foreign bodies retained, thus, it is widely concerned and some of the products have been introduced into the clinic. However, the characteristic of biodegradable may lead to more safety concerns associated with thrombosis. To ensure the safety, the thrombus formation experiment in vivo needs to be carefully designed and evaluated based on GB/T 16886.4 standard, but current standard do not provide explicit testing and evaluating methods. Establishing animal model with experimental pigs, the study compares biodegradable coronary stents and metal stents by simulating clinical implantation in vivo on the thrombus formation in the implanting process, and after the short-term and long-term implantation. The evaluation methods include gross observation, digital subtraction angiography intraoperative analysis, optical coherence tomography analysis, scanning electron microscopy and so on. The results show that combining these methods could comprehensively evaluate the whole process of the thrombus formation from the beginning of implantation to the end of preclinical animal experiments, so that, it may better predict the clinical thrombosis risk, and the selection of the control was very important. The study tries to use the comparison examples of thrombosis on the new medical instrument to provide the clue for thrombosis evaluation in vivo on similar instruments and show the methodology on the preclinical evaluation.

Early and Late Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, drug-eluting stents (DES) are most commonly used compared with bare metal stents (BMS) since the former are associated with significantly lower rates of revascularization following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, unpredictable in-stent thrombosis is a major concern with DES, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare early and late stent thrombosis in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus following PCI with DES.

METHODS

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials or observational studies comparing patients with diabetes mellitus versus those without it following PCI with DES and they reported acute and sub-acute/early and late stent thrombosis among their clinical outcomes. Early stent thrombosis was defined as stent thrombosis that occurred before 30 days and late stent thrombosis was defined as stent thrombosis that occurred after 30 days following PCI. The statistical analysis was carried out by the new version of the RevMan software (version 5.3), and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were considered as the statistical parameters.

RESULTS

A total number of 18,910 patients were included in this analysis comparing early and late stent thrombosis in patients with diabetes mellitus (5123 patients) and in patients without diabetes mellitus (13,787 patients). Both groups of patients had similar rates of early stent thrombosis, with an OR of 1.30 (95% CI 0.89-1.91; P = 0.18, I² = 9%) (4962 patients with diabetes mellitus were compared with 13,392 patients without diabetes mellitus). However, late stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with diabetes mellitus, with an OR of 1.95 (95% CI 1.35- 2.81; P = 0.0004, I² = 0%) (5113 patients with diabetes mellitus and 13,775 patients without diabetes mellitus were compared).

CONCLUSIONS

Both patients with and without diabetes mellitus had a similar rate of early stent thrombosis following PCI with DES. However, diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly higher rate of late stent thrombosis.

Revascularization for patients with diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the management of patients with diabetes mellitus and requiring coronary revascularization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence continues to show that patients with diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease represent a very high-risk group of patients. Choice of stent appears important for minimizing target lesion and target vessel adverse events with everolimus eluting stents having the best performance, particularly in patients being treated with insulin. The higher risk of adverse angioplasty results in patients with diabetes appears most related to the disease state per se and not necessarily to anatomical complexities. Interestingly, physiologic documentation of nonischemia producing lesions with use of fractional flow reserve appears less reassuring in this setting of aggressive and rapid atherosclerosis progression, particularly if myocardial infarction has occurred previously, than in patients without diabetes. Coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with appropriate anatomy and diabetes continues to emerge in many analyzes as the optimal, long-term therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

The treatment of diabetes per se, advances in stent technology and optimization of coronary artery bypass techniques are all occurring in parallel making it very critical for the design of modern era trials that keep pace with these advances. Currently, in patients with appropriate anatomy who are willing candidates, bypass surgery remains the optimal, long-term therapeutic option.

Early (≤ 30 Days), Late (31-360 Days) and Very Late (> 360 Days) Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Insulin-Treated versus Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

At this time in 2018, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) still on the rise, the post-percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) outcomes observed in patients with diabetes mellitus who are on insulin therapy (ITDM) and those who do not require insulin (NITDM) are still controversial and require further investigation. Considering this idea to be of particular interest to the readers, as well as being an important issue in interventional cardiology, we aimed to systematically assess early (≤ 30 days), late (31-360 days) and very late (> 360 days) stent thrombosis in patients with ITDM and NITDM following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

METHODS

Well-known online databases (the Cochrane, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for relevant English publications based on ITDM and NITDM and stent thrombosis following PCI using specific terms. Early stent thrombosis, late stent thrombosis and very late stent thrombosis were the clinical outcomes. The main analysis was carried out using the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.3) whereby odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 8524 participants with T2DM (2273 participants were on insulin therapy and 6251 participants were not) were included. Results of this analysis showed early stent thrombosis to be significantly higher in patients with ITDM (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.04-3.15; P = 0.04), whereas late and very late stent thromboses were not significantly different following PCI with DES in diabetic patients with versus without insulin therapy (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.73-2.84, P = 0.30 and OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.33-1.92, P = 0.62, respectively). Late stent thromboses associated exclusively with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) were not significantly different in patients with ITDM and NITDM.

CONCLUSION

Following PCI with DES, early stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with ITDM. However, late and very late stent thromboses were not significantly different in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with or without insulin. Comparison with individual DES was not sufficiently powerful to reach a conclusion.